SecCo list of items – SecGen summary statement – Addendum (excerpts)

Summary statement by the Secretary-General on matters of

which the Security Council is seized and on the stage reached

in their consideration

   Addendum

  Pursuant to rule 11 of the provisional rules of procedure of the Security Council, the Secretary-General is submitting the following summary statement.

  The list of items of which the Security Council is seized is contained in documents S/2006/10 of 1 March 2006, S/2006/10/Add.12 of 7 April 2006, S/2006/10/Add.15 of 28 April 2006 , S/2006/10/Add.16 of 5 May 2006 and S/2006/10/Add.21 of 9 June 2006.

  During the week ending 10 June 2006, the Security Council took action on the following items:

    Meeting of the Security Council with the troop-contributing countries to the United Nations Disengagement Observer Force pursuant to resolution 1353 (2001), annex II, sections A and B (see S/2001/15/Add.47; S/2002/30/Add.20 and 50; S/2003/40/Add.25 and 49; S/2004/20/Add.25 and 49; and S/2005/15/Add.23 and 49)

  The Security Council resumed its consideration of the item at its 5452nd (private) meeting, held on 6 June 2006 in accordance with the understanding reached in its prior consultations.

  At the close of the meeting, in accordance with rule 55 of the provisional rules of procedure of the Security Council, the following communiqué was issued through the Secretary-General in place of a verbatim record:

    On 6 June 2006, the Security Council, pursuant to annex II, sections A and B, of resolution 1353 (2001), held its 5452nd meeting in private with the troop-contributing countries to the United Nations Disengagement Observer Force (UNDOF).

    The Security Council and the troop-contributing countries heard a briefing under rule 39 of its provisional rules of procedure by Lisa Buttenheim, Director of the Asia and Middle East Division of the Department of Peacekeeping Operations.

    Members of the Council, Ms. Buttenheim and representatives of participating troop-contributing countries had an exchange of views.

    International Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the Former Yugoslavia since 1991;

…

___________