Situation of and assistance to Palestinian women – ECOSOC debate, vote – Provisional summary record (excerpts)

 

 

Substantive session of 2010 

General segment 

Provisional summary record of the 42nd meeting 

Held at Headquarters, New York, on Tuesday, 20 July 2010, at 3 p.m. 

  

 President:  Mr. Soborun (Vice-President) ……………………………………………………  (Mauritius) 

  

  

  

Contents 

  

/…

(a)  Advancement of women 
 

  


 In the absence of Mr. Ali (Malaysia), Mr. Soborun (Mauritius), Vice-President, took the Chair. 
The meeting was called to order at 3.15 p.m. 

  

/…

  

Draft resolution entitled “Situation of and assistance to Palestinian women”

  

67.  The President drew attention to chapter I, section B, of the report, which contained a draft resolution entitled “Situation of assistance to Palestinian women”. The draft resolution had been adopted by the Commission by a recorded vote of 31 to 2, with 9 abstentions. 

68.  Ms. Phipps (United States of America) said that, as the draft resolution had been adopted by a recorded vote in the Commission, her delegation wished to request a recorded vote at the current meeting. 

69.  The President asked if any delegation wished to make a general statement. 

70.  Ms. Davidovich (Observer for Israel) said her delegation was dismayed that the Council was being forced to consider the draft resolution, an annual politically motivated initiative which, by focusing on only one group of women, ignored the needs of countless others who did not have powerful political blocs to lobby on their behalf. Moreover, it was misleading and one-sided, as it ignored a number of challenges that Palestinian women faced, such as the imposition by Hamas of restrictions on women’s freedoms. It also failed to note that Palestinian women had widely benefited from economic growth and from the fact that Israel allowed all goods that were not weapons or other war materiel into the Gaza Strip. 

71.  The draft resolution scapegoated Israel instead of addressing the situation on the ground, thus diminishing the Council’s credibility and reinforcing the sad reality that certain countries cared about the plight of women only if it could be used as a political weapon. Her Government continued to call for direct negotiations with the Palestinians in pursuit of a solution that would involve two States living side-by-side in peace and security, so as to improve the condition of Israeli and Palestinian women alike. She called on all countries to vote against the draft resolution. 

72.  Mr. Zeidan (Observer for Palestine) said that the Council, in its yearly resolution on the situation of Palestinian women, had consistently highlighted the repression, humiliation and lack of development suffered by Palestinian women under foreign Israeli occupation, which was now in its forty-third year. It also reaffirmed the rights of all women living under such occupation. Palestinian women were in a special situation in that their rights were violated every day by a State Member of the United Nations. Since the text of the draft resolution had been agreed upon by the Group of 77 and China, he urged all delegations to vote in favour of it. 

73.  A recorded vote was taken. 

In favour: 
 Argentina, Bangladesh, Brazil, Chile, China, Congo, Egypt, Guatemala, India, Iraq, Malaysia, Mauritius, Mongolia, Morocco, Namibia, Niger, Pakistan, Peru, Philippines, Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Uruguay, Zambia. 

Against: 
 Australia, Canada, United States of America. 

Abstaining: 
 Belgium, Côte d’Ivoire, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Malta, Norway, Poland, Republic of Korea, Republic of Moldova, Slovakia, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. 

74.  The draft resolution was adopted by 24 votes to 3, with 15 abstentions. 

75.  Mr. Windsor (Australia) said that his Government had consistently expressed its deep concern at the humanitarian situation in the Palestinian territories, including with regard to women. However, it had decided to oppose the draft resolution because it introduced political issues into the Council unnecessarily, did not reflect the responsibilities of all parties to address the situation and did not contribute constructively to the goal of a negotiated solution to the conflict or to improving the situation on the ground. 

76.  His Government had made clear its strong support for efforts to achieve a comprehensive and enduring peace based on a two-State solution. It welcomed the proximity talks mediated by the United States of America and urged the parties to use them as a step towards direct negotiations and to refrain from any action that undermined trust. All countries had a responsibility to support those efforts. 

77.  In support of the peace process, Australia was contributing to the development of Palestinian institutions and had also provided humanitarian assistance, including to women, worth more than $125 million since 2007. Those contributions were being used to build the capacity of schools and health clinics, assist the Palestinian Authority with recovery and reconstruction efforts, and build the institutions necessary for Palestinian statehood. 

  

/…

The meeting rose at 5.10 p.m. 

  

Corrections to this record should be submitted in one of the working languages. They should be set forth in a memorandum and also incorporated in a copy of the record. They should be sent within one week of the date of this document to the Chief, Official Records Editing Section, room DC2-750, 2 United Nations Plaza. 


Document symbol: E/2010/SR.42
Document Type: Summary record, Voting record
Document Sources: Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC)
Subject: Assistance, Human rights and international humanitarian law, Social issues, Women
Publication Date: 20/07/2010
2019-03-11T21:07:48-04:00

Share This Page, Choose Your Platform!

Go to Top