UNDT/2016/034, Sako

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

Receivability: The Tribunal found that the Applicant’s subsequent correspondence with the ONUCI Human Resources Office after he was notified of the decision did not constitute a new or discrete decision. He failed to meet the 60 day deadline set out in staff rule 11.2(c) for management evaluation. Consequently, his Application is not receivable.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant challenged a decision concerning the calculation of his termination indemnity by the United Nations Operation in Côte d’Ivoire (ONUCI). The Tribunal concluded that the Application is not receivable ratione temporis.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome

Dismissed as not receivable

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Full judgment

Applicants/Appellants

Sako

Entity

UNOCI

Case Number(s)

UNDT/NBI/2015/66

Tribunal

UNDT

Registry

Nairobi

Date of Judgement

20 Apr 2016

Duty Judge

Judge Shaw

Language of Judgment

English

Issuance Type

Judgment

Categories/Subcategories

TEST -Rename- Benefits and entitlements-45

Jurisdiction / receivability (UNDT or first instance)

Temporal (ratione temporis)

Applicable Law

Staff Rules