UNDT/2014/111, Bello
UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements
The Tribunal decided, by way of summary judgment, that it was not competent to examine the application, since the Applicant did not contest an administrative decision taken by the Secretary-General as the Chief Administrative Officer of the United Nations and since the IMO is not one of the organizations or entities with which a special agreement has been concluded under the terms of art. 2.5 of the Tribunal’s Statute. C
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
The Applicant, employed by the International Maritime Organization (“IMO”), filed an application entitled “Service incurred injury” with the UNDT, contesting a series of decisions taken by IMO officials and relating to the injuries she suffered after an accident she had in the IMO premises.
Legal Principle(s)
ompetence: The Tribunal is not competent to examine applications directed against decisions emanating from Officials of the IMO, which is not one of the organizations or entities with which a special agreement has been concluded under the terms of art. 2.5 of the Tribunal’s Statute.