UNDT/2013/018

UNDT/2013/018, Sicat

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The UNDT found that the decision of ESCAP to employ the external candidate on the maternity leave post, prior to advertising the vacancy, for the initial period of 1 February to 31 March 2011 and for one more month subsequently, while the selection process for the maternity leave post was ongoing, was lawful. The application was dismissed.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested the decisions of the Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (“ESCAP”) not to select her for two temporary vacancies, one of which became available when one staff member went on special leave without pay (“SLWOP post”) and the other when another staff member went on maternity leave (“maternity leave post”). The Applicant also contested the decision to temporarily place an external candidate on the maternity leave post for a total period of three months until the post was filled through a selection process. The UNDT found that the selection processes for the SLWOP post and the maternity leave post were conducted properly and the decisions not to select the Applicant were lawful.

Legal Principle(s)

Judicial review of non-selection: The Secretary-General has broad discretion in matters of selection, promotion, and appointment and it is not the role of the Tribunal to substitute its own decision for that of the Secretary-General. However, the exercise of managerial prerogative is not absolute and the Tribunal may examine whether the selection procedures were properly followed or were carried out in an improper, irregular or otherwise flawed manner, as well as assess whether the resulting decision was tainted by undue considerations or was manifestly unreasonable.

Outcome

Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Sicat
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry
Date of Judgement
Duty Judge
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type