007 (NBI/2024), Jean-Joseph Henry
UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements
1. The Tribunal noted that in sec. VI of his application form, the Applicant declared that he did not request management evaluation. Indeed, he did not file a copy of his management evaluation request with his application. The record showed that the Applicant was yet to request management evaluation of the decision he sought to have suspended. 2. The Tribunal recalled that applications filed pursuant to arts. 2.2 of the UNDT Statute and 13.1 of the Rules of Procedure must be predicated on a pending management evaluation. Consequently, since the Applicant had not requested management evaluation, his application for suspension of action pending management evaluation was dismissed as not receivable.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
The Applicant sought to suspend a decision which he described as “retroactive modification of his contractual status (duty station)”
Legal Principle(s)
Pursuant to the settled jurisprudence, an application for suspension of action, filed under art. 2.2 of the Tribunal's Statute, can only be considered when it is subject to an ongoing management evaluation.
Outcome
Suspension of action denied
Individual Party
Jean-Joseph Henry
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry
Date of Order
Duty Judge
Language of Order
Appeal Status
Appealed
Issuance Type
Categories/Subcategories
Applicable Law