014 (NBI/2025), Asya AEM
The Applicant failed to identify disputed facts for which the proposed testimony is relevant. Even assuming the facts as alleged by the Applicant regarding her future claims, it was clear that each decision would rise or fall on its own merits.
Directing the Applicant to file new claims in the case would cause undesirable delay in disposing of the case.
The Applicant contests the 29 February 2024 decision of the Director of Administration, Resource Management and Service Development Division/ESCWA denying her request for “remote work”. In this motion, the Applicant requests a hearing and a leave to tender a written statement from her witness to "assist the Tribunal in having a better understanding of her case." The Applicant further indicated her intent to file challenges to two additional administrative decisons and requested guidance on how to file the two new applications.
The Tribunal does not give advice to parties appearing before it on how best to litigate their cases. Doing so would imperil the Tribunal’s role as an impartial adjudicator.
The Tribunal will not issue rulings or directions with respect to cases that have yet to be filed.