UNDT/2017/002

UNDT/2017/002, Kuai

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The Applicant failed to file a request for management evaluation of the nonrenewal decision within the applicable deadline. This claim was not receivable. The Applicant had in his management evaluation request of 12 July 2015 already accomplished the requirements set out in CF/EXD/2012-007 in relation to his complaints of bullying, harassment, intimidation and abuse of authority against his supervisor and the UNICEF Country Representative. As held in Kadri, the Applicant was entitled to a fair hearing and a fully reasoned judgment of his application. The Applicant’s claims in relation to the allegations of bullying, harassment, intimidation and abuse of authority against his supervisor and the UNICEF Country Representative were properly before the Tribunal and were receivable.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant was challenging what he described as the termination of his fixedterm appointment. In his application, the Applicant made several allegations of bullying, harassment, intimidation and abuse of authority against his supervisor and the UNICEF Country Representative.

Legal Principle(s)

Staff rule 11.2(a) provides that a staff member wishing to formally contest an administrative decision alleging non-compliance with his or her contract of employment or terms of appointment shall, as a first step, submit to the Secretary-General in writing a request for a management evaluation of the administrative decision. In accordance with staff rule 11.2(c), a request for a management evaluation shall not be receivable unless it is sent within 60 calendar days from the date on which the staff member received notification of the administrative decision to be contested. Staff rule 11.4(a) stipulates that a staff member may file an application against a contested administrative decision, whether or not it has been amended by any management evaluation, with the UNDT within 90 calendar days from the date on which the staff member received the outcome of the management evaluation or from the date of expiration of the deadline specified under staff rule 11.2 (d), whichever is earlier. The Applicant’s case was one of non-renewal of contract and not a termination which has different legal ramifications.

Outcome

Dismissed as not receivable

Outcome Extra Text

The Applicant failed to file a request for management evaluation of the nonrenewal decision within the applicable deadline. This claim was not receivable. The Applicant’s claims in relation to the allegations of bullying, harassment, intimidation and abuse of authority against his supervisor and the UNICEF Country Representative were properly before the Tribunal and were receivable.

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Kuai
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry
Date of Judgement
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type