2025-UNAT-1565, Esraa Samih Aljuju & Eman Saqer Abualainain
The UNAT noted that the Agency’s job classification tool had been used to reclassify the staff members’ posts. The UNAT found that the UNRWA DT had not erred when it had decided the case in the absence of the full document of the International Civil Service Commission’s “Master Standard for Classification”. The UNAT agreed with the Commissioner-General that the Classification Reports were relevant and sufficient for the UNRWA DT’s determinations.
The UNAT held that notwithstanding the various anomalies in the reclassification process, the staff members had failed to show anything specific that...