UNDT/2018/131

UNDT/2018/131, Applicant

View this page as PDF
Full judgment

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The Tribunal accepts the motion to withdraw the application on the terms requested. The parties are to be praised for the approach taken in this matter. The Tribunal, on its own motion, decided to anonymize this judgment considering that since the matter was amicably resolved, it was not appropriate for the Applicant’s name to be disclosed in a public document. The Applicant’s motion to withdraw the application is granted and this case is hereby closed, with, as requested, no right of reinstatement.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision of the Administration not to take action on his harassment complaint.

Legal Principle(s)

The amicable settlement of disputes is encouraged and is important, especially in circumstances where there is an ongoing employment relationship.

Outcome

Closed on withdrawal

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Applicant
Entity
UNMIK
Case Number(s)
UNDT/GVA/2018/039
Tribunal
UNDT
Registry
Geneva
Date of Judgement
Duty Judge
Judge Downing
Language of Judgment
English
Issuance Type
Judgment
Categories/Subcategories
Investigation