UNDT/2017/016

UNDT/2017/016, Zeb

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

Request for management evaluation: A request for management evaluation has a precise and specific meaning in the framework of the Organization’s internal justice system. It is the first step in formal contestation of an administrative decision and, as such, a mere communication conveying discontent to “management” does not amount to a formal management evaluation request. Management evaluation is a formal process involving a request to the body specifically vested with the authority to look into a contested decision, to consider whether it conformed with the applicable rules of the Organization.Rejection of an irreceivable application: The fact that an application is rejected as irreceivable for want of a management evaluation request in no manner precludes the applicant from undertaking the formal management evaluation step to the MEU, nor from filing a new application against the same decision once he/she has gone through the management evaluation process, subject to the applicable mandatory time limits.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant appealed the decision not to consider his application for a post in UNODC in Afghanistan. Although the Tribunal doubted the Applicant’s standing to institute legal proceedings—because he appeared to no longer be a staff member since the end of 2015, and his grievance did not concern his former conditions of service but a candidacy to a post advertised after the end of his service—it lacked reliable information to make a firm finding on this point. The UNDT, nonetheless, declared the application irreceivable ratione materiae since the Applicant had not previously submitted a request for management evaluation. Indeed, he had merely addressed an email to management showing discontent with the decision. Such a communication did not amount to a formal management evaluation request.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome

Dismissed as not receivable

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.