UNDT/2014/032, Nielsen
The Tribunal considered that the Applicant as a party cannot file a motion for intervention in her own case, and that her request for intervention by the Tribunal in the rebuttal process is not receivable ratione materiae, thus leaving no legal ground for an interim measure.
The Applicant filed a “motion for intervention”, requesting the Tribunal to intervene in the rebuttal process of her performance appraisal, followed by a motion for interim measures.
Receivability: It is not for the Tribunal to intervene in ongoing administrative procedures such as a rebuttal that is still pending. Summary judgment: A matter of law may be adjudicated even without serving the application to the Respondent for reply and even if it was not raised by the parties.