UNDT/2014/032

UNDT/2014/032, Nielsen

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The Tribunal considered that the Applicant as a party cannot file a motion for intervention in her own case, and that her request for intervention by the Tribunal in the rebuttal process is not receivable ratione materiae, thus leaving no legal ground for an interim measure.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant filed a “motion for intervention”, requesting the Tribunal to intervene in the rebuttal process of her performance appraisal, followed by a motion for interim measures.

Legal Principle(s)

Receivability: It is not for the Tribunal to intervene in ongoing administrative procedures such as a rebuttal that is still pending. Summary judgment: A matter of law may be adjudicated even without serving the application to the Respondent for reply and even if it was not raised by the parties.

Outcome
Dismissed as not receivable

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Nielsen
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry
Date of Judgement
Duty Judge
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type