UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The Tribunal found that the contested decision did not appear prima facie unlawful and dismissed the application.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant sought a suspension of action of the decision not to renew his appointment beyond 31 August 2011.

Legal Principle(s)

In cases of abolition of post, the Organization is obliged to act in good faith and try to find an alternative suitable position for staff members affected by an abolition of post.

Outcome

Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Ashraf

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement