UNDT/2009/059

View PDF

UNDT/2009/059, Mcneil

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

Since former Staff Rules were applicable to this case, the Tribunal pointed out that the application was time-barred under Staff Rule 111.2 (a).Outcome: Application was dismissed.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant’s contract with UNMIK was terminated prior to its expiration date. She requested administrative review and received the answer from the Secretary-General on 19 April 2009. She did not file an appeal with the Joint Appeals Board until 26 May 2009.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome
Dismissed as not receivable

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Full judgment
Applicants/Appellants
Mcneil
Entity
UNMIK
Case Number(s)
UNDT/GVA/2009/078
Tribunal
UNDT
Registry
Geneva
Date of Judgement
Duty Judge
Judge Laker
Language of Judgment
English
French
Issuance Type
Judgment
Categories/Subcategories
Jurisdiction / receivability (UNDT or first instance)
Temporal (ratione temporis)
Applicable Law
Former Staff Rules