2021-UNAT-1153

2021-UNAT-1153, Ali Abdel Mon’em Aref Al Khatib

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

It was a reasonable exercise of the Commissioner-General’s discretion to determine that intentionally abusing a position of power and trust against a beneficiary of UNRWA in a vulnerable situation rendered Mr. Al Khatib unfit for further service with the Agency, and separation from service without termination indemnity was neither unfair nor disproportionate to the seriousness of the offence.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

UNRWA/DT/2020/063

Legal Principle(s)

In determining whether these evidential standards have been established in any case, the UNDT must consider and weigh not only the evidence put forward by witnesses produced for the Secretary-General, but also any countervailing evidence adduced for the staff member, and any relevant and probative documentary evidence which may either corroborate or case doubt on the recollection of witnesses. Such an analysis has to be applied by the UNDT not only to each individual piece of disputed evidence, but it must then be applied likewise to the totality of the evidence in support of the allegation of misconduct.

The matter of the degree of the sanction is usually reserved for the Administration, which has discretion to impose a measure that it considers adequate in the circumstances of the case and for the actions and conduct of the staff member involved.

Outcome
Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Ali Abdel Mon’em Aref Al Khatib
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry
Date of Judgement
President Judge
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type