2020-UNAT-1050, Hamdan
UNAT considered an appeal by Mr Hamdan and a cross-appeal by the Secretary-General. UNAT held that UNDT was correct to hold that Mr Hamdan’s appointment was not terminated. UNAT held that UNDT should not have rescinded the decision placing him on SLWFP. UNAT held that UNDT had correctly held that the SLWFP decision had been rendered moot because the employment relationship had ceased and the special leave had been consumed. UNAT held that UNDT was correct to reject Hamdan’s claim for compensation as there was no direct link between the SLWFP decision and the termination indemnity. UNAT held that Mr Hamdan did not receive termination indemnity because he was not terminated and the SLWFP decision itself did not cause any material harm to him. UNAT held that, as UNDT dismissed the application, the Secretary-General was not adversely affected by the judgment and therefore the cross-appeal was not receivable. UNAT dismissed the appeal, dismissed the cross-appeal and affirmed the UNDT judgment.
The Applicant contested the decision to place him on Special Leave with Full Pay (SLWFP) for two months and, in addition, requested termination indemnity. The context of this decision was the drawdown and phased closure of UNAMID. UNDT found that the applicable framework for abolition of post did not confer upon a staff member a right to have a termination as the modality of separation and that accordingly, there was no basis for payment of a termination indemnity. As for placing the Appellant on SLWFP until the expiry of his fixed-term appointment, UNDT found no support in the jurisprudence to use SLWFP as a generic cost-saving alternative to termination or a default modality for downsizing and therefore found the decision to be unlawful. UNDT found no basis for rescinding the contested decision despite it being unlawful, given that the SLWFP had been consumed and the employment relationship had ceased, rendering the question moot. UNDT dismissed the application.
Termination is a separation from service which marks the end of all employment relations between a staff member and the UN. A staff member cannot request termination indemnity while at the same time keeping the advantages and benefits of remaining a staff member. UNDT may only award compensation if the harm in question was caused by the administrative decision challenged by the staff member.