2020-UNAT-1046, Ashhab
UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements
UNAT held that, although no performance evaluation process was legally required for termination, an appropriate procedure should have been followed. UNAT held that UNRWA failed to indicate that the contract would be terminated before its expiration date if the staff member did not improve his performance, and the lack of fair warning rendered the decision to terminate unlawfully. UNAT granted the appeal in part, rescinded the termination decision, and ordered reinstatement, with an in-lieu compensation of two months’ net base salary.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
The Applicant contested the decision to terminate his limited-duration contract for poor performance. UNRWA DT decided that UNRWA had acted in accordance with the regulatory framework and had established an adequate basis for the termination decision.
Legal Principle(s)
The UNRWA Commissioner-General has broad discretion to terminate a limited-duration contract in the interest of UNRWA before its expiration date. UNRWA must act in good faith and its decision must not be arbitrary or motivated by factors inconsistent with proper administration.
Outcome
Outcome Extra Text
Reinstatement or financial compensation; Reinstatement or financial compensation