The context of the case in O’Brien is not similar. Essentially, in O’Brien, the applicant was the subject of an investigation, whereas in the present case, the Applicant was the complainant. Accordingly, In O’Brien, the applicant opposed a disciplinary investigation launched against himself based on a misconduct complaint made by others, and he then contested a decision to reject his request for an independent review of the investigation. The Appeals Tribunal, however, dismissed the applicant’s challenge because the decision-maker eventually held in his favour as, contrary to the preliminary...