The investigation panel properly investigated 13 of the Applicant’s allegations (see para. 113 of the Judgment). It did not however properly investigate six of the Applicant’s allegations (see para. 115 of the Judgment).
Consequently, the responsible official acted on a partially defective report and the decision to close the case with managerial action cannot stand with respect to the complaints that were not properly investigated.
In view of the time lapse since the events in support of the Applicant’s allegations that were not properly investigated occurred, the Tribunal does not find it...