2016-UNAT-670, Adundo
UNAT affirmed the findings of UNDT that Mr Adundo’s application was receivable. UNAT then considered the merits of the Secretary-General’s appeal. UNAT noted that, contrary to the findings by UNDT that the guidelines were violated as the duration of the weapons restriction was not mentioned within the communications between the Chief of the Security and Safety Service and Mr Adundo, it was clear that the restriction would remain in force until Mr Adundo was “ready to obey lawful commands”, which was for him to attend weapons training for a security breach. UNAT upheld the Secretary-General’s...