Rule 11.2(c)

  • 111.2(3)a
  • Appendix A
  • IPD 1/10
  • Rule 1
  • Rule 1.2
  • Rule 1.2(c)
  • Rule 1.2(f)
  • Rule 11.2
  • Rule 11.2(c)
  • Rule 111.2
    • Showing 1 - 1 of 1
    2021-UNAT-1176, Mohamed Haider Elhemshawy

    UNAT held that there were no errors in the decision of the UNRWA DT that the Appellant’s application was irreceivable. UNAT held the Appellant was notified of the decision not to shortlist him by e-mail of 14 November 2019. UNAT held that the Appellant’s allegations regarding the abolishment of his post had no legal relevance for the appeal, which dealt only with issues of receivability. UNAT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the UNRWA DT Judgment.