Skip to main content
Welcome to the United Nations
  • English
  • Français
UN logo
SYSTEM OF ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE
  • English
  • Français
  • English
  • Français
  • Search
  • Menu
    • Global
    • Health
    • Local
    • Human rights
    • Peace and security
  • Covid-19
  • Events and news
  • Get involved
  • Live now
    • Search
    • OAJ categories
    • CaseLaw Demo Video
    • Search
    • OAJ categories
    • CaseLaw Demo Video
SYSTEM OF ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE
  1. Home
  2. applicable law
  3. Article 8.1(d)(i)(b)
  • Article 1.2(c)
  • Article 10.1
  • Article 10.2
  • Article 10.5
  • Article 10.5(a)
  • Article 10.5(b)
  • Article 10.6
  • Article 10.8
  • Article 10.9
  • Article 11
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.2
  • Article 11.3
  • Article 11.4
  • Article 18
  • Article 18.1
  • Article 2
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(b)
  • Article 2.1(c)
  • Article 2.1(d)
  • Article 2.1(e)
  • Article 2.10
  • Article 2.2
  • Article 2.2(a)
  • Article 2.3
  • Article 2.4(b)
  • Article 2.5
  • Article 2.6
  • Article 2.7
  • Article 2.8
  • Article 2.9
  • Article 2.9(a)
  • Article 2(b)
  • Article 2(c)
  • Article 2(e)
  • Article 24
  • Article 3.2
  • Article 4
  • Article 5
  • Article 6
  • Article 6.2
  • Article 7
  • Article 7.1
  • Article 7.1(c)
  • Article 7.2
  • Article 7.3
  • Article 7.4
  • Article 7.5
  • Article 8
  • Article 8.1
  • Article 8.1(c)
  • Article 8.1(d)(i)(b)
  • Article 8.2
  • Article 8.3
  • Article 9
  • Article 9.1
  • Article 9.1(a)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.3
  • Article 9.4
  • Article 9.5
  • Article 9(b)
  • Showing 1 - 1 of 1
    Download

    2015-UNAT-552, Gallo

    2 Jul 2015
    Jurisdiction / receivability (UNDT or first instance) Temporal (ratione temporis)

    UNAT held that it could discern no error in UNDT’s computation of the applicable time limits. UNAT considered that the UNDT decision that it had no jurisdiction to consider the merits of the Appellant’s claim was reasonable and there were no grounds for overturning it. UNAT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the UNDT judgment.

    Full judgment
    Case digest
    • A-Z Site Index
    • Contact
    • Copyright
    • FAQ
    • Fraud Alert
    • Privacy Notice
    • Terms of Use
    Donate