Skip to main content
Welcome to the United Nations
  • English
  • Français
UN logo
SYSTEM OF ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE
  • English
  • Français
  • English
  • Français
  • Search
  • Menu
  • News
  • Our work
  • Global
  • Health
  • Local
  • Human rights
  • Peace and security
Group Heading
  • Covid-19
  • Events and news
  • Get involved
  • Live now
  • Global
  • Health
  • Local
  • Human rights
  • Peace and security
  • Covid-19
  • Events and news
  • Get involved
  • Live now
      • Search
      • OAJ categories
      • CaseLaw Demo Video
      • Search
      • OAJ categories
      • CaseLaw Demo Video
    SYSTEM OF ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE
    1. Home
    2. applicable law
    3. Article 20

    Article 20

  • Article 1.2
  • Article 10
  • Article 10.1
  • Article 11.3
  • Article 13
  • Article 15
  • Article 16
  • Article 16.1
  • Article 17
  • Article 17.1
  • Article 18
  • Article 18.1
  • Article 18bis
  • Article 18bis.1
  • Article 19
  • Article 2
  • Article 20
  • Article 20.2
  • Article 22
  • Article 23
  • Article 24
  • Article 25
  • Article 26
  • Article 27
  • Article 29
  • Article 29(a)
  • Article 29(b)
  • Article 3.1
  • Article 30
  • Article 31
  • Article 31.1
  • Article 4.2
  • Article 7
  • Article 7.1
  • Article 7.1(a)
  • Article 7.2
  • Article 7.3
  • Article 8
  • Article 8.1
  • Article 8.2
  • Article 8.2(b)
  • Article 8.3
  • Article 8.4
  • Article 8.6
  • Article 9
  • Article 9.4
  • Showing 1 - 1 of 1

    2021-UNAT-1152, Ashraf Zaqqout

    29 Oct 2021
    Judgment-related matters Revision of Judgment Jurisdiction / receivability (UNDT or first instance) Subject matter (ratione materiae) Non-renewal No expectancy of renewal Separation from service Expiration of appointment (see also, Non-renewal)

    UNAT considered an application for revision of Judgment No. 2020-UNAT-1055. UNAT found that none of the three new facts sought to be relied on by the applicant could have changed the outcome in any decisions entered against him in the UNRWA DT, and this test being one of four, all of which must exist for a judgment to be revised, Mr. Zaqqout’s application was dismissed.

    Full judgment
    Case digest
    • A-Z Site Index
    • Contact
    • Copyright
    • FAQ
    • Fraud Alert
    • Privacy Notice
    • Terms of Use
    Donate