A/RES/69/251

  • 10th - 1955
  • 11th - 1956
  • 13th - 1958
  • A/RES/1/13
  • A/RES/13(I)
  • A/RES/217 (III)
  • A/RES/22(I)A
  • A/RES/258/III
  • A/RES/2688(XXV)
  • A/RES/3042(XXVII)
  • A/RES/31/126
  • A/RES/31/240
  • A/RES/32/253
  • A/RES/33/142
  • A/RES/33/143
  • A/RES/3357(XXIX)
  • A/RES/35/210
  • A/RES/37/126
  • A/RES/39/246
  • A/RES/39/27
  • A/RES/43/226
  • A/RES/44/198
  • A/RES/45/259
  • A/RES/470-V
  • A/RES/48/218
  • A/RES/48/218B
  • A/RES/49/241
  • A/RES/50/11
  • A/RES/51/217
  • A/RES/51/226
  • A/RES/51/241
  • A/RES/51/243
  • A/RES/52/234
  • A/RES/53/221
  • A/RES/53/253
  • A/RES/54/244
  • A/RES/55/159
  • A/RES/55/232
  • A/RES/55/258
  • A/RES/57/226
  • A/RES/57/305
  • A/RES/58/254
  • A/RES/59/272
  • A/RES/59/283
  • A/RES/59/287
  • A/RES/59/289
  • A/RES/59/296
  • A/RES/594(VI)
  • A/RES/61/240
  • A/RES/61/244
  • A/RES/61/251
  • A/RES/61/261
  • A/RES/61/262
  • A/RES/61/822
  • A/RES/62/228
  • A/RES/62/253
  • A/RES/62/63
  • A/RES/63/228
  • A/RES/63/250
  • A/RES/63/250/Paragraph 23
  • A/RES/63/252
  • A/RES/63/253
  • A/RES/63/259
  • A/RES/64/110
  • A/RES/64/233
  • A/RES/64/269
  • A/RES/64/289
  • A/RES/65/247
  • A/RES/65/247/Paragraph 50
  • A/RES/65/248
  • A/Res/66/106
  • A/RES/66/237
  • A/RES/66/264
  • A/RES/67/241
  • A/RES/67/257
  • A/RES/68/253
  • A/RES/68/254
  • A/RES/68/268
  • A/RES/68/291
  • A/RES/69/203
  • A/RES/69/204
  • A/RES/69/251
  • A/RES/69/302
  • A/RES/70/112
  • A/RES/70/170
  • A/RES/70/244
  • A/RES/71/263
  • A/RES/71/266
  • A/RES/72/254
  • A/RES/72/255
  • A/RES/72/290
  • A/RES/73/236
  • A/RES/73/276
  • A/RES/73/278
  • A/RES/73/315
  • A/RES/74/255
  • A/RES/74/255A-B
  • A/RES/74/263
  • A/RES/75/248
  • A/RES/76(I)
  • A/RES/76/242
  • A/RES/77/114
  • A/RES/77/260
  • A/RES/973(X)
    • Showing 1 - 3 of 3
    UNDT/2017/099, Mirella, Ben Said, Santini, Keating

    Receivability Contested decisions Considering the Applicants’ submissions as a whole, the contested decisions are to be identified as Secretary-General’s decisions, in implementing the Unified Salary Scale, to convert a portion of the Applicants’ salaries into a separate allowance. The Applicants do not challenge the General Assembly’s resolution adopting the Unified Salary Scale as a measure of general application. Whether the contested decisions constitute administrative decisions In interpreting its jurisdiction, the Tribunal must take into account the Organization’s duty to provide access...

    UNDT/2017/098, Quijano-Evans, Dedeyne-Amann

    Receivability Contested decisions Considering the Applicants’ submissions as a whole, the contested decisions are to be identified as Secretary-General’s decisions, in implementing the Unified Salary Scale, to convert a portion of the Applicants’ salaries into a separate allowance. The Applicants do not challenge the General Assembly’s resolution adopting the Unified Salary Scale as a measure of general application. Whether the contested decisions constitute administrative decisions In interpreting its jurisdiction, the Tribunal must take into account the Organization’s duty to provide access...

    UNDT/2017/097, Lloret Alcaniz, Zhao, Xie, Kutner, And Krings

    Receivability Contested decisions Considering the Applicants’ submissions as a whole, the contested decisions are to be identified as Secretary-General’s decisions, in implementing the Unified Salary Scale, to convert a portion of the Applicants’ salaries into a separate allowance. The Applicants do not challenge the General Assembly’s resolution adopting the Unified Salary Scale as a measure of general application. Whether the contested decisions constitute administrative decisions In interpreting its jurisdiction, the Tribunal must take into account the Organization’s duty to provide access...