2016-UNAT-641, Chemingui
UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements
UNAT considered an interlocutory appeal by the Secretary-General. UNAT held that UNDT did not “clearly exceed its competence or jurisdiction” when it temporarily suspended the administrative decision to laterally reassign the staff member as that decision did not constitute a case of “appointment, promotion, or termination” excluded from interim relief under Article 10. 2 of the UNDT Statute. Accordingly, UNAT dismissed the interlocutory appeal as not receivable.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
The staff member contested the decision to laterally reassign him and requested a suspension of action. UNDT issued an order granting the staff member’s request for suspension of action pending resolution of the matter.
Legal Principle(s)
A lateral reassignment decision does not constitute a case of appointment, promotion, or termination. Therefore, it is subject to interim relief under Article 10. 2 of the UNDT Statute.