The Respondent withdrew from the impugned decision to change the Applicant’s functional title from Team Assistant to Language Assistant. Accordingly, the claim was moot at the time of the filing of the application and therefore not receivable. With respect to the decision to remove the Applicant’s responsibility for the Litani magazine the Tribunal found that this claim was not the subject of management evaluation and therefore not receivability. With respect to the Applicant’s reassignment, the Tribunal noted that the impugned decision entailed a change in the Applicant’s place, her supervisor and the nature of her duties. Further, the Applicant had alleged there was harassment and retaliation. Thus, there was a decision capable of being reviewed for compliance with the terms of her appointment. The Applicant’s claim for reversal of this decision was irreceivable because she had separated form service. The Tribunal found that the only receivable claim in the application was the Applicant’s claim for compensation for the alleged harm caused by the decision to re-assign her from the J1 Branch to the LSU Office. The Tribunal concluded however that the Applicant’s claim for compensation could not succeed because the Administration had not exceeded its discretion. The impugned decision did not violate the terms of the Applicant’s appointment and she had not met her burden of proving her allegations of harassment.