UNDT/2015/046

UNDT/2015/046, Belkhabbaz

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The Tribunal found that the Applicant had missed the deadline to request management evaluation of the refusal to provide her with a badge; hence, her application was irreceivable ratione materiae in that respect. As for the denial of legal assistance, the Tribunal considered that in view of the exceptional circumstances of the case, which lies in the fact that the relationship between the Applicant and her former supervisors in the Office of the Administration of Justice, including the Chief, OSLA, had completely broken down, the refusal to grant assistance to the Applicant through OSLA could not be considered illegal. The Tribunal was of the view that in these circumstances no constructive and unbiased exchange between the Applicant—as a potential client—and OSLA—as potential counsel—is possible. The application was therefore rejected in its entirety.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant, a former Legal Officer at the Office of Staff Legal Assistance (OSLA) based in Geneva, challenged the refusal to provide her with an entry badge to the UN premises in New York, and the refusal to grant her legal assistance by OSLA.

Legal Principle(s)

Irreceivability ratione materiae: The challenge before the Tribunal of a decision for which a request for management has been filed untimely is not receivable ratione materiae. Res judicata: The principle of res judicata does not apply to applications concerning new decisions, made in a different factual setting.OSLA assistance to UN staff members: There is no unconditional right for a UN staff member to be represented by OSLA, as OSLA has a certain discretionary power, although not unfettered, in choosing to represent or not staff members seeking its assistance.

Outcome
Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Belkhabbaz
Entity
OAJ
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry
Date of Judgement
Duty Judge
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type
Applicable Law