010 (NBI/2024), Nelson Mutsoli
The Court held that the application was not admissible because none of the elements that justified a stay of action were present.
The Court held that the administrative measure was moot and inadmissible because the contested administrative measure had been explained and an additional step had been taken to eliminate any possibility of prejudice to the appeal.
The applicant requested that the execution of the decision of the Entebbe Regional Service Centre to recover his scholarship advance for the 2022-2023 academic year in the amount of USD 31,890.40 and to overpay his salary be suspended pending management's assessment.
For a suspension order to be issued, it must be found that the administrative decision appears unlawful, is particularly urgent and that the execution of the contested decision would cause irreparable harm. These three findings must be met.
The Court held that the administrative measure was moot because the contested administrative measure had been explained and an additional step had been taken to eliminate any possibility of prejudice to the appeal.