![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() |
National Implementation of Agenda 21![]()
|
Information Provided by the Government of Suriname to the
United Nations Department for Policy Coordination and
Sustainable Development
|
This country profile has been provided by: The Republic of Suriname
Name of Ministry/Office: Permanent Mission of Suriname to the United Nations
Date: 23 April 1997
Submitted by: Natasha E.M. Halfhuid, Chargé d'Affaires a.i.
Mailing address: 866 United Nations Plaza, Suite 320, New York, N.Y. 10017
Telephone:(212) 826 0660
Telefax: (212) 980 7029
E-mail:
Note from the Secretariat: An effort has been made to present all country profiles within a common format, with an equal number of pages. However, where Governments have not provided information for the tables appended to Chapters 4 and 17, those tables have been omitted entirely in order to reduce the overall length of the profile and save paper. Consequently, there may be some minor inconsistencies among the formats of the different country profiles.
All statistics are rendered as provided by the respective Governments.
|
APELL | Awareness and Preparedness for Emergencies at Local Level |
CFC | chlorofluorocarbon |
CGIAR | Consultative Group on International Agriculture Research |
CILSS | Permanent Inter-State Committee on Drought Control in the Sahel |
EEZ | exclusive economic zone |
ECA | Economic Commission for Africa |
ECE | Economic Commission for Europe |
ECLAC | Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean |
ELCI | Environmental Liaison Centre International |
EMINWA | environmentally sound management of inland water |
ESCAP | Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific |
ESCWA | Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia |
FAO | Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations |
GATT | General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade |
GAW | Global Atmosphere Watch (WMO) |
GEF | Global Environment Facility |
GEMS | Global Environmental Monitoring System (UNEP) |
GEMS/WATER | Global Water Quality Monitoring Programme |
GESAMP | Joint Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Pollution |
GIPME | Global Investigation of Pollution in Marine Environment (UNESCO) |
GIS | Geographical Information System |
GLOBE | Global Legislators Organisation for a Balanced Environment |
GOS | Global Observing System (WMO/WWW) |
GRID | Global Resource Information Database |
GSP | generalized system of preferences |
HIV | human immunodeficiency virus |
IAEA | International Atomic Energy Agency |
IAP-WASAD | International Action Programme on Water and Sustainable Agricultural Development |
IARC | International Agency for Research on Cancer |
IBSRAM | International Board of Soil Resources and Management |
ICCA | International Council of Chemical Associations |
ICES | International Council for the Exploration of the Sea |
ICPIC | International Cleaner Production Information Clearing House |
ICSC | International Civil Service Commission |
ICSU | International Council of Scientific Unions |
IEEA | Integrated environmental and economic accounting |
IFAD | International Fund for Agricultural Development |
IGADD | Intergovernmental Authority for Drought and Development |
IGBP | International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (ICSU) |
IGBP/START | International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme/Global Change System for Analysis, Research and Training |
ILO | International Labour Organisation |
IMF | International Monetary Fund |
IMO | International Maritime Organization |
INFOTERRA | International Environment Information system (UNEP) |
IOC | Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission |
IPCC | Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change |
IPCS | International Programme on Chemical Safety |
IPM | integrated pest management |
IRPTC | International Register of Potentially Toxic Chemicals |
ITC | International Tin Council |
ITTO | International Tropical Timber Organization |
IUCN | International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources |
MARPOL | International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships |
OECD | Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development |
PGRFA | plant genetic resources for agriculture |
PIC | prior informed consent procedure |
SADCC | South African Development Co-ordination Conference |
SARD | sustainable agriculture and rural development |
UNCTAD | United Nations Conference on Trade and Development |
UNDP | United Nations Development Programme |
UNDRO | Office of the United Nations Disaster Relief Coordinator |
UNEP | United Nations Environment Programme |
UNESCO | United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization |
UNFPA | United Nations Population Fund |
UNICEF | United Nations Children's Fund |
UNIDO | United Nations Industrial Development Organization |
UNU | United Nations University |
WCP | World Climate Programme (WMO/UNEP/ICSU/UNESCO) |
WFC | World Food Council |
WHO | World Health Organization |
WMO | World Meteorological Organization |
WWF | World Wide Fund for Nature (also called World Wildlife Fund) |
WWW | World Weather Watch (WMO) |
1. Name of Key National Sustainable Development Coordination Mechanism(s)/Council(s). Suriname is in the process of establishing a National Commission on Sustainable Development.
Contact point (Name, Title, Office): Ms. Ellen Naarendorp, Environmental Policy Coordinator, Ministry of Natural Resources, Suriname Telephone: +597-0-473 428 Fax: +597-0-472 911 e-mail: bollie@sr.net Mailing address: Mr. Dr. J.C. de Mirandastraat 13, Paramaribo-Suriname (S-A)
2. Membership/Composition/Chairperson:
2a. List of ministries and agencies involved:
2b. Names of para-statal bodies and institutions involved, as well as participating of academic and private sector bodies:
2c. Names of non-governmental organizations involved:
3. Mandate role of above mechanism/council:
4. If available, attach a diagram (organization chart) showing national coordination structure and linkages between ministries:
|
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 2: INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION
TO ACCELERATE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN DEVELOPING
COUNTRIES AND RELATED DOMESTIC POLICIES (with special emphasis on
TRADE)
Because of its economic policy to intensively stimulate
export-oriented prodution economy, this issue has a very high
priority in Suriname's external policy.
NATIONAL PRIORITY: Very high.
STATUS REPORT: Suriname subscribes fully to the
aims and principles of UNCTAD. The Government also intensively
follows the developments within other organizations such as GATT,
and subscribes fully to the principles and the Plans of
Action of both the Summit of the Americas held in Miami in 1994 and
in Santa Cruz de la Sierra in Bolivia in 1996
respectively, which also included very clearly stated conclusions
and recommendations with regard to sustainable
development and trade. Within this framework, Suriname participates
in the activities of OAS, IDB and ECLAC.
1. Decision-Making Structure: Trade is one of the very
important characteristics of the Surinamese Sustainable Human
Development Model which will be operational as soon as possible.
The Sustainable Human Development Model of the
UNDP is considered a more sophisticated development of Agenda 21.
Trade will be integrated into the optimized
economic, social, environmental and human development aspects of
this model.
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: Support provided by
the UNDP, IDB and European Union is being mobilized
for capacity-building and to provide technology for securing the
integration of trade into other policies.
3. Major Groups: All possible stakeholders will be
mobilized.
4. Finance: Financing is provided by donors.
5. Regional/International Cooperation: In accordance with
the principles of UNCTAD and the Summits of the
Americas.
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 3: COMBATING POVERTY
Focus of national strategy
No information.
Highlight activities aimed at the poor and linkages to the
environment
No information.
NATIONAL PRIORITY: No information.
STATUS REPORT:
1. Decision-Making Structure: No information.
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: No information.
3. Major Groups: No information.
4. Finance: No information.
5. Regional/International Cooperation: No information.
NB: Developed countries, where domestic poverty alleviation is not
a major concern may wish to briefly describe their
position regarding global poverty alleviation.
Latest 199_ | |||||
Unemployment (%) | |||||
Population living in absolute poverty | |||||
Public spending on social sector % | |||||
Other data
|
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 4: CHANGING CONSUMPTION
PATTERNS
National policy objectives/focus
No information.
National targets
No information.
NATIONAL PRIORITY: No information.
STATUS REPORT:
1. Decision-Making Structure: No information.
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: No information.
3. Major Groups: No information.
4. Finance: No information.
5. Regional/International Cooperation: No information.
Latest 199_ | |||||
GDP per capita (current US$) | |||||
Real GDP growth (%) | |||||
Annual energy consumption per capita (Kg. of oil equivalent per capita) | |||||
Motor vehicles in use per 1000 inhabitants | |||||
Other data
|
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 5: DEMOGRAPHIC DYNAMICS AND
SUSTAINABILITY
NATIONAL PRIORITY: Not a national priority. | ||||
STATUS REPORT: In Suriname, there is
no national policy on demographic dynamics and sustainability,
although the
topic has been discussed occasionally at different levels. The last
population census was conducted in 1980. In 1993, Suriname participated in the International Conference on Population and Development. A National Preparatory Commission was established for the Conference consisting of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the Ministry of Health and Environment, the Ministry for Foreign Affairs, the Ministry of Planning and Development (including the National Planning Office and the General Statistics Office) and the Lobi Foundation (a NGO which works in the area of Family Planning). Suriname's population has hardly grown since its independence in 1975, which is mainly due to emigration. Subsequent Governments have expressed the view that population growth is too low, but no formal policies have been implemented to stimulate growth. Some official policies which have been in place for some time have in fact signaled the opposite. The Ministry of Social Affairs only provides Child Support for up to four children and even though the amount of the support is insignificant, it could be interpreted as an indication by the Government in favor of smaller families. Largely due to the work of the Lobi Foundation and general medical practitioners, birth control devices are readily available to the general public, which has resulted in a reduction in the size of the families.
The Government of Suriname considers the population growth and the fertility level of the country satisfactory and wants to maintain it status quo.
|
1. Decision-Making Structure: The policies of the Ministry
of Health and Environment have had most impact on actual
demographic trends.
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: Health conditions
and institutional capacity suffered as a result of the high
inflation and brain-drain. In the interior, the infastructure was
severely damaged during the internal strike in 1986-87.
After the signing of the Peace Treaty in 1992, the health
infrastructure in the interior was reconstructed, but it is not yet
at
the pre-war level. With the stabilization of the economy,
facilities in the city and rural areas have also been improved,
although the brain-drain has not permitted a full recovery as yet.
3. Major Groups: The main distinction in population issues
has been the contrast between the coastal areas (city and
rural areas) and the hinterland (interior). The interior is
inhabited mainly by tribal peoples: Amerindians and Maroons.
Demographic statistics of the coastal areas have always been much
more reliable than those of the interior. Fertility levels
and population growth in the interior seem higher than in the
coastal areas.
4. Finance: No information.
5. Regional/International Cooperation: Suriname is a member
of the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) and has
cooperated accordingly in the health sector and regional
programmes. The same goes for the Pan American Health
Organization (PAHO), which has a permanent office in Suriname. With
the neighbouring countries, there has been
cooperaton in the field of malaria eradication. Most of these
programmes have dealt mainly with the treatment and
prevention of diseases and only indirectly with demographic
dynamics and sustainability. The Lobi Foundation is the main
organization that deals with family planning policies and has
received much international funding. The Medical Mission
(the Moravian Brothers) is the main organization responsible for
health care in the interior, and it has also received
international funding in addition to Government subsidies.
Latest 1995 | ||||
Population (Thousands) mid-year estimates | ||||
Annual rate of increase (1990-1993) | ||||
Surface area (Km2) | ||||
Population density (people/Km2) | ||||
Crude birth rate (per 1000) | ||||
Crude death rate (per 1000) | ||||
Infant mortality rate (per 1000 live birth) |
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 6: PROTECTING AND PROMOTING
HUMAN HEALTH
NATIONAL PRIORITY: No information.
STATUS REPORT: No information.
1. Decision-Making Structure: No information.
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: No information.
3. Major Groups: No information.
4. Finance: No information.
5. Regional/International Cooperation: No information.
Latest 1995 | ||||
Life expectancy at birth Male Female | ||||
Infant mortality (per 1000 live births) | ||||
Maternal mortality rate (per 100000 live births) | ||||
Access to safe drinking water (% of population) | ||||
Access to sanitation services (% of population) | ||||
Other data
|
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 7: PROMOTING SUSTAINABLE HUMAN
SETTLEMENT DEVELOPMENT
NATIONAL PRIORITY: No information.
STATUS REPORT: No information.
1. Decision-Making Structure: No information.
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: No information.
3. Major Groups: No information.
4. Finance: No information.
5. Regional/International Cooperation: No information.
Urban population in % of total population | |||
Annual rate of growth of urban population (%) | |||
Largest city population (in % of total population) | |||
Other data |
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 8: INTEGRATING ENVIRONMENT AND
DEVELOPMENT IN DECISION-MAKING
Within the process of participatory democracy, in which
district and regional councils participate, decentralization
issues, will become operational through the consensus-building
technique of the holistic people-centered approach.
Communities will get involved in the planning and decision-making
processes with regard to the optimized integration of
environmental development into the other three main aspects of the
Surinamese Sustainable Human Development Model.
The Government of Suriname has already availed itself of the
UNDP support. A National Strategy on Biodiversity is
under preparation as well as a National Environmental Action Plan,
and a Methodology for Ecological Economic Zoning.
A Council for the Environment will soon be established in the
Cabinet of the President. It will be responsible for the
development of an overall environmental policy and its integration
in the national development policy.
For monitoring and control of environmental parameters, an
Environmental Management Agency will be established,
and relevant legislation will be developed or adopted.
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT: As a result of the UNCED and the
Summits of the Americas, Suriname is embarking on its own
Sustainable Human Development Planning processes through a
bottom-up and top-down approach characterized, among
others, by good governance, participatory democracy, a stable
economic and political environment, dynamic private and
public sectors, investment in population as the most important
natural resource, belief in a free market economy and trade
forces and belief in safeguarding and/or improving the
environment.
1. Decision-Making Structure (please also refer to the fact
sheet): Referring to the Status Report, participatory
democracy and decentralization issues are already policies in
operation adopted by the Surinamese Government.
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: Suriname has
availed itself of support from the UNDP in this respect.
3. Major Groups: District- and regional councils under the
guidance of the Ministry of Regional Development will play
a crucial role.
4. Finance: Provided by donors.
5. Regional/International Cooperation: Through UNDP support
and their experience in Thailand and Trinidad &
Tobago, Suriname will develop its own approach.
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 9: PROTECTION OF THE
ATMOSPHERE
The Montreal Protocol and its Amendments were signed in 1988.
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change was signed
in 1992.
Additional comments relevant to this chapter
Within the limits of the possibilities, Suriname has been promoting
activities related to the National Action on Sustainable
Development. Various missions have been carried out to formulate
country programmes. The ratification of the Montreal
Protocol and related amendments is in process, as is the
ratification of the UNFCCC, too. The National Council on
Sustainable Development of Suriname will be established very
soon.
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT:
1. Decision-Making Structure: The Ministry of Public Works,
especially the Meteorological Service.
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: Very poorly
developed.
3. Major Groups: No information.
4. Finance: No information.
5. Regional/International Cooperation: With the support of
the Netherlands, a national inventory programme on
emissions and Coastal Zone Management will be carried out between
April 1997 and June 1998.
Latest 199- | ||||
CO2 emissions (eq. million tons) | ||||
SOx " | ||||
NOx " | ||||
CH4 " | ||||
Consumption of ozone depleting substances (Tons) | ||||
Expenditure on air pollution abatement in US$ equivalents (million) | ||||
Other data
|
NATIONAL PRIORITY: High. | |
STATUS REPORT: So far, land use planning has not
been done in a coordinated way. The Ministry of Natural
Resources is responsible for all land issues, and can provide
various land titles and user rights to private and public
entities. The decisions about the granting of land are based on the
information available on prevailing soils, forests and
geology. An Ecological Economic Zoning project will soon be taken
up for an integrated planning of the use of land
resources. An Environmental Management Agency will be responsible
for monitoring the control and management of land
use.
|
1. Decision-Making Structure: The Land Service of the
Ministry of Natural Resources is responsible for the granting of
land titles and rights for the use of public land. The National
Planning Bureau of the Ministry of Planning and
Development Cooperation is responsible for regional and physical
planning. The Bureau is the coordinating body with
regard to zoning and land use planning. The different Ministries
are represented in an inter-departmental advisory council.
The Planning Act of Suriname, which should guide these activities,
originates from 1973, but has never been fully
implemented.
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: Suriname is in the
process of introducing new technology for land use
planning, zoning and monitoring of land use, but will need
substantial institutional support.
3. Major Groups: The Ministry of Natural Resources, the
National Planning Bureau, districts and regional bodies.
4. Finance: Financing comes mainly from the European Union,
IDB and the Netherlands.
5. Regional/International Cooperation: Mainly within the
framework of the Amazonian Cooperation Treaty with regard
to strategy and technology and with financial assistance from
bilateral and multilateral funds.
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 11: COMBATING
DEFORESTATION
Almost the entire forest land in Suriname is state-owned. The
responsibility and authority regarding the state of forests
is with the Government. Deforestation in Suriname is negligible;
during the last 10 years, less than one percent of the
forest land of Suriname has been converted into other uses,
primarly for mining purposes.
The forests are a substantial carbon dioxide sink and
contribute to combating the intensification of the global
greenhouse effect.
The latest national forest inventories were carried out by the
Forest Service with the assistance of FAO, with a total
inventory area of 400,000 ha from 1070 to 1974 and an additional
80,000 ha from 1979-1982.
Several plans and/or projects have been prepared or are under
preparation to improve Suriname's capacity for the
sustainable management of forests. Assistance for institutional
strengthening, capacity-building and policy formulation is
given by the main partners with regard to forest development,
namely the UNDP, European Union, FAO and the
Netherlands. Within the framework of the Amazonian Cooperation
Treaty, several projects directed to sustainable use of
natural environment are being undertaken.
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT: Forests are one of Suriname's
most abundant natural resources with a high economic potential. In
1995, the value of the forest industry exports totalled about US$
3,2 million. The value of the forest industry exports
increased by more than 400% compared to the 1994 figure. Focusing
on the total forest land of 14,855,800 ha (more than
80% of the total land area of Suriname) and the present area
utilized for timber production (2,414,800 ha), the largest part
of the forests are still preserved. The principles of sustainable
development shall guide the decisions with regard to the
expansion of the forest land area for production.
1. Decision-Making Structure: The Ministry of Natural
Resources is responsible for the forestry sector and gives policy
guidance. The Forest Service is in charge of the management and
control of the public forests. Other Ministries and
institutions involved in forestry matters are, e.g. the Ministry of
Trade and Industries with regard to the wood processing
industry, the Jan Starke Training Center of the Forest Service for
the training of lower level staff, and the Center for
Agricultural Research of the University of Suriname for forestry
research. In 1992, Suriname enacted a new Forest
Management Act which is directed to sustainable management of
forest resources. The Multi-annual Plan of the
Government gives guidelines for forest policy and for the forestry
programme. Initiatives for updating the forest policy
have been undertaken by the FAO and the European Union. The Forest
industry is organized in several associations.
There are different associations for loggers, saw millers, wood
producers and wood exporters.
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: No information.
3. Major Groups: Stakeholders in Suriname are the
Government, the private sector, the indigenous (tribal) people, and
NGOs working in the field of environment and rural development.
4. Finance: Financing for forestry related projects comes
from development funds and multilateral funding agencies.
Government fundung is, due to the economic situation, limited.
5. Regional/International Cooperation: Suriname is part of
the Amazone basin and belongs to the Carribean. Suriname
tries to harmonize its standing and activities in the field of the
environment and development with those of these regions.
Latest 1995 | ||||
Forest Area (ha) | ||||
Protected forest area (% of total land area) | ||||
Roundwood production (in m3) | ||||
Deforestation rate (Km2/annum) | ||||
Reforestation rate (Km2/annum) | ||||
Other data
|
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 12: MANAGING FRAGILE
ECOSYSTEMS: COMBATING DESERTIFICATION AND
DROUGHT
International Convention to Combat Desertification in Countries
Experiencing Drought and/or Desertification
Particularly in Africa
Additional comments relevant to this chapter
There are no deserts or areas in danger of becoming deserts in
Suriname.
NATIONAL PRIORITY: Not applicable.
STATUS REPORT:
1. Decision-Making Structure: Not applicable.
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: Not applicable.
3. Major Groups: Not applicable.
4. Finance: Not applicable.
5. Regional/International Cooperation: Not applicable.
Latest 1997 | ||||
Land affected by desertification (Km2) | ||||
Other data
|
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 13: MANAGING FRAGILE
ECOSYSTEMS: SUSTAINABLE MOUNTAIN DEVELOPMENT
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT: The mountain areas in Suriname
are almost completely uninhabited and unexploited. The highest
mountain top is only 1,280 m. Foreign investors have shown interest
in these areas for forestry and gold mining purposes.
Developments in these sectors could cause environmental problems
mostly related to increased erosion.
1. Decision-Making Structure: No information.
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: No information.
3. Major Groups: No information.
4. Finance: No information.
5. Regional/International Cooperation: No information.
|
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 14: PROMOTING SUSTAINABLE
AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT
NATIONAL PRIORITY: No information.
STATUS REPORT: No information.
1. Decision-Making Structure: No information.
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: No information.
3. Major Groups: No information.
4. Finance: No information.
5. Regional/International Cooperation: No information.
Latest 199_ | ||||
Agricultural land (Km2) | ||||
Agricultural land as % of total land area | ||||
Agricultural land per capita | ||||
Latest 199_ | ||||
Consumption of fertilizers per Km2 of agricultural land as of 1990 | ||||
Other data
|
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 15: CONSERVATION OF
BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Convention on Biological Diversity was signed in 1992 and
ratified in 1996.
Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild
Fauna and Flora was signed in 1981 and ratified
in 1995.
Additional comments relevant to this chapter
Over 80% of the land surface (165,940 km2) of Suriname is
covered by tropical rainforests, while the very small
human population (approx. 400,000) is concentrated in and around
the capital, Paramaribo, and along the coast. The
biological diversity is high: 185 mammal species (spp.), 668 bird
spp., 152 reptile spp., 95 amphibian spp., 452 fish spp.,
6,135 plant spp., (of which 5,075 Spermatophyte spp.) and 1,750
Invertebrate spp., while large areas of the interior (the
Guyana Shield) still remain unknown for their flora, fauna,
ecosystems and ecological relations. Many inventories were
conducted between 1900 and 1980 by foreign institutions, and most
specimens collected were taken out of Suriname.
The Nature Preservation Law of 1954 provides a possibility to
establish nature reserves (now 13), and other laws for
other categories of protected areas; altogether 804,000 ha or
approx. 5% of the land surface. Inventories of ecosystems of
the interior will enlarge these figures for protected areas. The
Game Law fully protects all mammals, birds, sea turtles
and other species mentioned, except those that are designated as
game spp., cage spp. and predominantly harmful spp.
The Fish Protection Law for inland waters protects eight fish
spp. by setting limits on the size to be captured. It also
determines non-fishing seasons for certain species.
The Sea Fisheries Law (for the territorial sea and the
economic zone) contains the framework for sea fisheries, e.g.
the possibility for establishing quota for certain species in
certain fishing areas.
The Law on Forest Management regulates the exploration and
exploitation of timber in forest areas (which will be
categorized as permanent production forests, especially protected
forests, conversion forests, reserved forests and
communal forests). The law also regulates the collection and export
of non-timber products (including medicinal plants).
Amerindians and Maroons use many plants and animals for their
subsistence as food and medicine for ritual purposes.
A project on bioprospecting of medicinal plants started in
1994 and the second phase in 1995. Within the framework of
a GEF project, preliminary regulations will be formulated for the
contents of contracts, and the sharing of results and
benefits gained from the research, development and utilization of
biological resources.
The extent of mercury pollution from small-scale gold mining
and its influence on the biodiversity are unknown.
A National Strategy on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of
Biological Diversity and a National Environmental
Action Plan are being drafted with the financial support of the
Amazon Cooperation Treaty/UNDP respectively of the
Organization of American States.
Export of wildlife is regulated by the CITES provisions and a
voluntary quota system.
NATIONAL PRIORITY: High.
STATUS REPORT:
1. Decision-Making Structure: CITES is regulated in the
Game Law (animals) and the Law on Forest Management
(plants) and it is executed by the Forest Service, Nature
Conservation Division (CITES Management Authority) and the
Nature Protection Commission (CITES Scientific Authority). Parts of
the Convention on Biological Diversity are covered
by provisions in the Nature Preservation Law (under the Forest
Service), the Game Law and the Law on Forest
Management (both under the Ministry of Natural Resources, Forest
Service), the Fish Protection Law and the Sea
Fisheries Law (both under the Ministry of Agriculture, Animal
Husbandry and Fisheries, Fishery Service). Other agencies
related to biodiversity are the Ministry of Planning and
Development Cooperation, National Planning Bureau (e.g.
coordination of the ACT/UNDP Biodiversity Project), Institute of
Development Planning and Management (coordination
of a draft National Environmental Action Plan, NEAP), and
Environmental Working Groups in several Ministries. The
intention is to include a National Environmental Policy Board and
an Environmental Management Agency in NEAP.
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: Professionals in
biodiversity have been trained in foreign universities. The
recently established Department of Environmental Sciences at the
Faculty of Technology (University of Suriname) will
hopefully enhance ecological studies carried out by the
Environmental Research Center of the University of Suriname.
Mid-level staff may be trained at the Natural Technical Institute
(NATIN), while technicians (forest guards, game
wardens, and reserve managers) may be trained at the Jan Starke
Training Center of the Forest Service. Biodiversity
studies and inventories are carried out by several agencies, e.g.
the Forest Service, Foundation for Nature Preservation in
Suriname, University of Suriname, Center for Agriculture Research,
National Drugs Company (BGVS), foreign
universities, institutes and NGOs.
3. Major Groups: Governmental and non-governmental agencies
(see 2), Timber concessionaires, wildlife exporters,
and tribal communities.
4. Finance: Funds are received from, e.g. the Government
budget, the Amazonian Cooperation Treaty, UNEP, FAO,
UNDP/GEF, and OAS, European Union, Canadian Wildlife Servcie,
WHSRN, the French Ministry of the Environment,
and in the near future, from the Dutch Environmental Fund and
IDB.
5. Regional/International Cooperation: Suriname
participates in the Special Environment Commission of the
Amazonian Cooperation Treaty, the Caribbean Environmental Program
(including activities of the Cartagena Convention),
Conference of CITES, Wetlands Convention and the Convention on
Biological Diversity, and has relations with several
international agencies (e.g. UNEP, WWF, and IUCN).
Latest 1996 | |||
Protected area as % of total land area | |||
Latest 199_ | |||
Number of threatened species | |||
Other data
|
NATIONAL PRIORITY: | |
STATUS REPORT: Biotechnology in Suriname is
limited to the tissue culture of bananas. Experiments have been
made
with the tissue culture of pineapple, mushrooms and some other
crops. However, only bananas are cultured on a
commercial basis by using this technique.
|
1. Decision-Making Structure: No information.
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: No information.
3. Major Groups: No information.
4. Finance: No information.
5. Regional/International Cooperation: No information.
|
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 17: PROTECTION OF THE
OCEANS, ALL KINDS OF SEAS, INCLUDING ENCLOSED
AND SEMI-ENCLOSED SEAS, AND COASTAL AREAS AND THE PROTECTION,
RATIONAL USE AND DEVELOPMENT OF THEIR LIVING RESOURCES
The UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) was signed on
10 December 1982.
See also the attached tables on the next pages.
The legal base for the protection of the sea is provided by
the Sea Fisheries Law (with the possibility for fishing
quotas) and the MARPOL Convention. Suriname has signed the UNCLOS
and participates in the Caribbean Environment
Program, although the Republic is not a Party to the Cartagena
Convention or its Protocols. Control of the ocean is poorly
executed.
In the coastal areas, there are four nature reserves and one
Multiples Management Area (MUMA). The policy is to
cover the whole estuarine zone by MUMAs and to formulate and
implement management plans for these MUMAs. The
latter is now being done for each part of this zone according to an
order of priority which is related to the possible impact
by agriculture (rice cultivation), crude oil exploitation, and
aquaculture projects.
Although Suriname has not yet ratified the United Nations
Framework Convention on Climate Change, it has initiated
- with the assistance of the Dutch Government - a project on
sea-level rise.
NATIONAL PRIORITY: Very high.
STATUS REPORT:
1. Decision-Making Structure: The Forest Service under the
Ministry of Natural Resources will be responsible for the
coordination of the management by the relevant agencies of the
coastal MUMAs. The Nature Conservation Division of the
Forest Service is already the Suriname Administrative Authority for
the Wetlands Convention. The Ministry will get
advice on this subject from the National Wetlands Commission, which
will be established in the near future.
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: Qualified staff
must be trained or hired.
3. Major Groups: The Government (e.g. Ministries of Natural
Resources, of Agriculture, Animal Husbandry and
Fisheries, of Regional Development, and of Public Works), users
(farmers, fishermen, aquaculture companies) and
NGOs.
4. Finance: Funds for project formulation and for
management come from, e.g. UNEP, the French Ministry of
Environment, the Dutch Government and the Canadian Wildlife
Service.
5. Regional/International Cooperation: The Amazon
Cooperation Treaty, the Caribbean Environment Program
(including the Cartagena Convention), MARPOL and the United Nations
Framework Convention for Climate Change.
Suriname and French Guyana will enlarge their cooperation with
regard to nature conservation and the environment
(especially in the coastal areas).
Latest 1994 | ||||
Catches of marine species (metric tons) | ||||
Population in coastal areas | ||||
Population served by waste water treatment (% of
country's total population) | ||||
Discharges of oil into coastal waters (metric tons) | ||||
Releases of phosphate into coastal waters (metric tons) | ||||
Releases of nitrate into coastal waters (metric tons) | ||||
Other data: There are no further national indicators specifically for this chapter and no work is being done to develop new indicators.
|
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 18: PROTECTION OF THE
QUALITY AND SUPPLY OF FRESHWATER RESOURCES:
APPLICATION OF INTEGRATED APPROACHES TO THE DEVELOPMENT,
MANAGEMENT AND USE OF WATER RESOURCES
The annual rain fall is on average 2,200 mm, and the
evaporation rate is about 30% (750 mm).
NATIONAL PRIORITY: High.
STATUS REPORT: Ninety percent of the population
in Suriname is served by public waterworks, but the service level
is
not adequate. About 60% of the population is served by public
sewerage, which is also inadequate. The waste water
treatment in urban areas consists mainly of septic tanks and
latrines.
1. Decision-Making Structure: There are plans to establish
a National Board of Water Management in addition to the
(Water) Management Authority for the Multipurpose Corantijn Project
in the north-western part of Suriname. For
research and monitoring see 3.
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: On-the-job training
is being carried out by the Suriname Waterleiding
Maatschappij (Suriname Water Company) with the assistance of the
Pan American Health Organization (PAHO). At the
University of Suriname, water is included as a subject in the
curricula. There are some fellowships for studies abroad in
this field.
3. Major Groups: The Government (the Hydraulic Research
Division of the Ministry of Public Works, Public Health
Bureau, Drainage Division of the Ministry of Public Works);
para-statal organizations (University of Suriname); Suriname
Water Company; (Water) Management Authority for the Multipurpose
Corantijn Project; the Pan American Health
Organization.
4. Finance: Financing for activities under Chapter 18 is
provided from the Government budget, payments for (pipe)
water, and from development projects (e.g. from the Dutch
development aid).
5. Regional/International Cooperation:
Regional/international cooperation is undertaken under the Pan
American
Health Organization.
Latest 1996 | ||||
Fresh water availability (total domestic/external in million m3) | ||||
Annual withdrawal of freshwater as % of available water | ||||
Other data
|
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 19: ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND
MANAGEMENT OF TOXIC CHEMICALS,
INCLUDING PREVENTION OF ILLEGAL INTERNATIONAL TRAFFIC IN TOXIC
AND DANGEROUS PRODUCTS
Furthermore, the Surinamese Government and the Parliament are
studying a proposal for the privatization of waste
management in order to simplify and ensure the processing of
waste.
Preparations for the Maritime Authority are very advanced. The
necessary facilities, and other technical provisions
resulting from the MARPOL Convention, are to be provided by this
authority.
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT: Suriname recognizes its
responsibility with respect to sustainable development and is aware
of its
obligations to take the necessary precautions in time to prevent
coming generations from disasters. Therefore, Suriname
has, for instance, ratified MARPOL 73/78 with all its five Annexes
in 1988, in order to prevent and fight pollution from
ship-generated waste and other hazardous disposal. However, due to
circumstances, only now Suriname has the
opportunity to prepare the necessary legislation to implement
MARPOL. This will be done in cooperation with the Dutch
Ministry of Public Works under a programme which has already
started. The existing legislation on water transport will
also be updated during this work. The legal focal point in Suriname
(an IMO project) is involved.
1. Decision-Making Structure: No information.
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: No information.
3. Major Groups: No information.
4. Finance: No information.
5. Regional/International Cooperation: No information.
|
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 20: ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND
MANAGEMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTES,
INCLUDING PREVENTION OF ILLEGAL INTERNATIONAL TRAFFIC IN
HAZARDOUS WASTES
The Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements
of Hazardous Wastes and their Disposal
The importance of the Basel Convention for the states in the
Caribbean region is increasing due to the fact that the region
is one of the most frequently chosen routes for the transboundary
movement of hazardous wastes. Relevant institutions in
Suriname are engaged in the exchange of views on the Basel
Convention which should ultimately lead to the ratification of
the Convention.
Additional comments relevant to this chapter
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT:
1. Decision-Making Structure: No information.
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: No information.
3. Major Groups: No information.
4. Finance: No information.
5. Regional/International Cooperation: No information.
Latest 199- | ||||
Generation of hazardous waste (t) | ||||
Import of hazardous wastes (t) | ||||
Export of hazardous wastes (t) | ||||
Area of land contaminated by hazardous waste (km2) | ||||
Expenditure on hazardous waste treatment (US$) | ||||
Other data
|
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 21: ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND
MANAGEMENT OF SOLID WASTES AND SEWAGE-RELATED ISSUES
NATIONAL PRIORITY: No information.
STATUS REPORT: No information.
1. Decision-Making Structure: No information.
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: No information.
3. Major Groups: No information.
4. Finance: No information.
5. Regional/International Cooperation: No information.
Latest 199- | ||||
Generation of industrial and municipal waste (t) | ||||
Waste disposed(Kg/capita) | ||||
Expenditure on waste collection and treatment (US$) | ||||
Waste recycling rates (%) | ||||
Municipal waste disposal (Kg/capita) | ||||
Waste reduction rates per unit of GDP (t/year) | ||||
Other data |
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 22: SAFE AND
ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE
WASTES
NATIONAL PRIORITY: No information.
STATUS REPORT: No information.
1. Decision-Making Structure: No information.
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: No information.
3. Major Groups: No information.
4. Finance: No information.
5. Regional/International Cooperation: No information.
| |
Ch. 24: GLOBAL ACTION FOR WOMEN TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE AND
EQUITABLE DEVELOPMENT. The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women was signed and ratified in 1993.
24.a Increasing the proportion of women decision makers. In 1992, the proportion of women in the Parliament was 6%. In 1996, it was 14%.
24.b assessing, reviewing, revising and implementing curricula and other educational material with a view to promoting dissemination of gender-relevant knowledge. Curricula and educational material does not yet promote gender relevant knowledge.
24.c and 24.d formulating and implementing policies, guidelines, strategies and plans for achievement of equality in all aspects of society including issuing a strategy by year 2000 to eliminate obstacles to full participation of women in sustainable development. No information.
24.e establishing mechanisms by 1995 to assess implementation and impact of development and environment policies and programmes on women No information.
Brief comments on this chapter (maximum 100 words) (please, do not exceed this page):
Various initiatives have been taken by the Government in cooperation with NGOs, but incidentally. Those are, for example (i) the institution of the "Monitoring Group for Women's Policy" for the development of a policy plan, which has already been approved by the Government, but not yet implemented, (ii) the establishment of the Women's Bureau at the Ministry of Internal Affairs, and (iii) the writing of the National Report for Beijing.
|
| |
Ch. 25: CHILDREN AND YOUTH IN SUSTAINABLE
DEVELOPMENT. 25.a establishing processes that promote dialogue between the youth and government at all levels and mechanisms that permit youth access to information and opportunity to present their viewn implementing A21. The four most relevant youth forums in Suriname are the Jaycees, the Youth Assemble, Nayuga and the Leo's/Rotaracts.
Describe their role in the national process: At the moment, the youth are not really involved in national development processes and mechanisms.
25.b reducing youth unemployment Statistics on youth unemployement do not give national percentages but numbers for some districts, and the last ones are from 1994.
25.c ensuring that by year 2000 more than 50% of youth -- gender balanced -- have access to appropriate secondary education or vocational training. No goal has been set yet nationally.
Brief comments on this chapter (maximum 100 words) (please, do not exceed this page): There could be more cooperation between the Government and the youth organizations. Youth organizations should also initiate more activities, like the Jaycees did last year by organizing a national seminar called "Development Starts with a Clean Environment". Youth organizations are active in "Clean Up the World" campaigns, and Earth Day activities are promoted by NGOs in Suriname.
|
| |
Ch. 26: RECOGNIZING AND STRENGTHENING THE ROLE OF
INDIGENOUS PEOPLE AND THEIR
COMMUNITIES.
26.a establishing a process to empower indigenous people and their communities -- through policies and legal instruments: Not in place.
26.b strengthening arrangements for active participation in national policies: Indigenous people participate on an ad hoc basis.
26.c involving indigenous people in resource management strategies and programmes at the national and local level. No action yet.
Brief comments on this chapter (maximum 100 words) (please, do not exceed this page):
| |
Ch. 27: STRENGTHENING THE ROLE OF NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS: PARTNERS FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT. 27.a developing mechanisms that allow NGOs to play their partnership role responsibly and effectively. 27.b reviewing formal procedures and mechanisms to involve NGOs in decision making and implementation. 27.c promoting and allowing NGOs to participate in the conception, establishment and evaluation of official mechanisms to review Agenda 21 implementation. NGO inputs are ad hoc.
27.d establishing a mutually productive dialogue by 1995 at the national level between NGOs and governments.
Brief comments on this chapter (maximum 100 words) (please, do not exceed this page): The environmental NGOs have formed various forums such as the Platform Amazone Rainforest Suriname (PARS) and the Sustainable farming Environmental Alliance (Milieubond).
|
| |
Ch. 28: LOCAL AUTHORITIES' INITIATIVES IN SUPPORT OF
AGENDA 21.
28.a encouraging local authorities to implement and monitor programmes that aim to ensure participation of women and youth in local decision making. There are no local Agendas 21 in Suriname.
Brief comments on this chapter (maximum 100 words) (please, do not exceed this page): Within the National Assembly, Agenda 21 may be known by title, but not by its content. However, the Government supports various national activities in line with Agenda 21 policies without their being part of a national policy on sustainable development.
| |
Ch. 29: STRENGTHENING THE ROLE OF WORKERS AND
THEIR TRADE UNIONS. 29.a full participation of workers in implementation and evaluation of A21. 29.b (By year 2000, (a) promoting ratification of ILO conventions; (b) establishing bipartite and tripartite mechanism on safety, health and sustainable development; (c) increasing number of environmental collective agreements; (d) reducing occupational accidents and injuries; (e) increasing workers' education and training efforts. Suriname does not have full information of the ILO Conventions.
Brief comments on this chapter (maximum 100 words) (please, do not exceed this page): Within the Tripartite Council consisting of the representatives of the Government and employers' and employees' organizations, subjects such as safety, health, and reducing occupational accidents and injuries, etc. are broadly discussed, but not as part of an integral environmental policy network.
|
30: STRENGTHENING THE ROLE OF BUSINESS
AND INDUSTRY. | 30.a increasing the efficiency of resource use, including reuse, recycling, and reduction of waste per unit of economic output.
30.b encouraging the concept of stewardship in management and use of natural resources by entrepreneurs. List any actions taken in this area: The new Standard Mineral Act (1997) is the first known governmental initiative on these issues.
30.c increasing number of enterprises that subscribe to and implement sustainable development policies. Two big enterprises have adopted sustainable development policies.
Brief comments on this chapter (maximum 100 words) (please, do not exceed this page):
|
| |
Ch. 31: SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL
COMMUNITY. 31.a improving exchange of knowledge and concerns between s&t community and the general public. Scientific community has already established ways in which to address the general public and deal with sustainable development. Some efforts have been taken towards this direction; there is a public environmental exhibition space at the University of Suriname, and the Environmental Department has been established for education, research and international cooperation purposes.
31.b developing, improving and promoting international acceptance of codes of practice and guidelines related to science and technology and its role in reconciling environment and development.
Brief comments on this chapter not already described in chapter 35 (maximum 100 words) (please, do not exceed this page): The Faculty of Technology of the University of Suriname is sometimes asked to contract research with environmental specialists involved. The various departments of the Faculty show great enthusiasm concerning environmental education and research subjects.
| |
Ch. 32: STRENGTHENING THE ROLE OF
FARMERS. 32.a promoting and encouraging sustainable farming practices and technologies. No. 32.b developing a policy framework that provides incentives and motivation among farmers for sustainable and efficient farming practices. No. 32.c enhancing participation of organizations of farmers in design and implementation of sustainable development policies. No.
Brief comments on this chapter (maximum 100 words) (please, do not exceed this page): Suriname does not yet have a tradition to promote and encourage sustainable farming practices and technologies. However, there are some encouraging initiatives such as the promotion of mixed farming systems in order to minimize the use of artificial fertilizers, and the import of organic fertilizers to which the farmers have reacted enthusiastically.
|
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 33: FINANCIAL RESOURCES
AND MECHANISMS
Financial resources and mechanisms are also covered under each
sectoral chapter of Agenda 21 where
relevant. This summary highlights broader national financial
policies, domestic and external
(including ODA)
The revenues generated by Suriname are very low, at the
moment, and for the greater part, still generated by bauxite
operations. Agricultural and other production-oriented activities
are at a very low level. This, together with the so far
heavily import-oriented economy, has limited Suriname's capacity to
finance its economic, social, human and
environmental development. Therefore, donor-oriented assistance is
very much appreciated at the moment when Suriname
is on the verge of embarking on its own Sustainable Human
Development Model. In addition, development of legislation
and efficient law enforcement mechanisms together with
participatory democracy and a good and dynamic governance are
necessary.
The Government of Suriname has availed itself of the support
of several donors to achieve these goals. The
Government is also pursuing the policy of extending and
diversifying the number of donors and of providing the country
with the best possible technologies available. Although financing
for sustainable development is mainly provided by
donors, Suriname tries to finance as much as possible through the
efforts of its own population.
Donor coordination is necessary for the most efficient use of
financial assistance. Funnelling financing through a
proper development planning based on the Surinamese Sustainable
Human Development processes is the main task of the
Ministry of Planning and Development Cooperation. An appropriate
and stable political environment is necessary for an
efficient and effective fulfillment of this task. Only in such
circumstances, a suitable sustainable resources management
and resource use can be achieved.
CHANGES IN NATIONAL BUDGET TO ADDRESS SUSTAINABLE
DEVELOPMENT: No information.
NEW ECONOMIC INSTRUMENTS: No information.
ELIMINATION OF ENVIRONMENTALLY UNFRIENDLY SUBSIDIES: No
information.
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT: Suriname is endowed with a very
good natural resource base, comprising substantial bauxite
reserves, extensive tropical forests, fertile soils in the coastal
areas, large and mostly unexploited resources of gold, kaolin
and dimension stones, and very good water and air quality.
ODA funding provided or received (Total US$million) | ||||||
Net flow of external capital from all sources as % of GDP | ||||||
Other data |
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 34: TRANSFER OF
ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND TECHNOLOGY, COOPERATION
AND CAPACITY-BUILDING
Transfer of environmentally sound technology, cooperation and
capacity-building is also covered under each sectoral
chapter of Agenda 21 where relevant. This summary highlights
broader national policies and actions relating to
chapter 34.
Already within the bauxite industry, environmentally sound
adaptations have been deployed, although without
governmental control mechanisms.
Suriname will soon embark on its own National Environmental
Action Plan in which recommendations for the
introduction of environmentally sound technologies will be given
for all relevant sectors. In addition, recommendations
will be given on the organizational framework needed in order to
coordinate all the activities and on the financial,
technological and human resources implications. For example, a
number of legal entities (now called Institutes) will be
developed as soon as possible for the implementation of
environmentally sound technologies, the acquisition of these
technologies, the enforcement of laws etc.
With regard to the development of gold mining, detailed
technological approaches are being scrutinized at the moment.
MEANS OF IMPLEMENTATION: In the first instance, financing
will be provided by donors. Later on, as much as
possible, financing will be provided by activities within the
sectors in question.
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT ON LINKS BETWEEN NATIONAL, REGIONAL
AND INTERNATIONAL INFORMATION
NETWORKS/SYSTEMS: While developing the Surinamese Human
Development Model, the best available sustainable
resources management and resource use techniques have to be
introduced in order to optimize economic, social, human
and environmental development.
Describe any work being undertaken at the national or
local level regarding efforts to promote clean production
processes and/or the concepts of eco-efficiency. These processes
may include training, preferential financial
arrangements, information dissemination and changes in legal or
regulatory frameworks.
No information.
Provide information on the adoption of environmental management systems. National reaction to environmental management system standards such as the ISO 14000 Series and others. Please note efforts made at the national level to promote their adoption and the creation of certification infrastructure in order to facilitate access to these standards to local industry.
No information.
List and describe programs or work under way to facilitate the transfer of ESTs to small and medium sized enterprises. Please note efforts to facilitate access to financial resources and other transfer strategies.
No information.
|
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 35: SCIENCE FOR
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
The Surinamese Sustainable Human Development Model (SSHDM)
places the Surinamese people in the center.
Investing in our own population and participatory democracy as well
as in dynamic and active private and public sectors
are important aspects of this approach. However, these goals can
only be achieved when educational capabilities of the
population as a whole are continuosly being raised to an even
higher level, especially development-oriented educational
capabilities which consider technology the key to development.
Educational and environmental development is expensive.
Therefore, the optimization of economic, social, human and
environmental development is important.
The still untouched vast natural resource base of Suriname
constitutes a very high potential for financing the
components of the SSHDM. However, the use of natural resources has
to be done in accordance with the sustainable
resource management and resource use systems, which call for proper
policies and research.
A comprehensive educational framework is being prepared. The
Ministry of Planning and Development Cooperation
and the University of Suriname together with the Ministry of
Education and Human Development are the key bodies
responsible for decision-making,
With regard to capacity-building and technological development
in this field, Suriname has established contacts with
different universities in Europe, USA and the Caribbean Region.
Within the more comprehensive educational framework
currently under preparation, a more effective and efficient
capacity-building and tecnology transfer can be effectuated.
Suriname is also a member of the Caribbean Council for Science and
Technology.
Financing for these issues comes mainly from donors.
STEPS TAKEN TO ENHANCE SCIENTIFIC UNDERSTANDING, IMPROVE LONG
TERM SCIENTIFIC
ASSESSMENT, BUILDING OF CAPACITY AND CAPABILITY: See above.
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT ON NATIONAL SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE,
RESEARCH NEEDS AND PRIORITIES:
Year | |||
Number of scientists, engineers and technicians engaged in research and experimental development | # | 19-- | |
Total expenditure for research and experimental development (US$eq.) | $ | 19-- | |
Other data |
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 36: PROMOTING EDUCATION,
PUBLIC AWARENESS AND TRAINING
a) Reorientation of education towards sustainable
development: No information.
b) Increasing public awareness: No information.
c) Promoting training: No information.
ROLE OF MAJOR GROUPS: No information.
FINANCING AND COST EVALUATION OF THE LABOUR ACTIVITIES: No
information.
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT: No information.
Latest 199- | ||||
Adult literacy rate (%) Male | ||||
Adult literacy rate (%) Female | ||||
% of primary school children reaching grade 5 (1986-97) | ||||
Mean number of years of schooling | ||||
% of GNP spent on education | ||||
Females per 100 males in secondary school | ||||
Women per 100 men in the labour force | ||||
Other data |
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 37: NATIONAL MECHANISMS
AND INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION FOR
CAPACITY-BUILDING IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
National capacity building is also covered under sectoral
chapters.
Donors: You may wish to describe here how Agenda 21 has
influenced your ODA policies in this area.
Developing countries: You may wish to describe any new
national mechanisms for capacity building - and any
changes in technical cooperation.
The Council for the Environment to be established and the
Environment Management Agency as well as relevant
legislation will provide mechanisms and tools for
capacity-building. In addition, international cooperation will be
a very
important part of the Surinamese Sustainable Human Development
Model and the sustainable resources management and
resource use systems to be developed within the human and social
development framework.
(See also Chapters 8, 33, 34 and 35.)
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT ON NATIONAL ENDOGENOUS CAPACITY
BUILDING:
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 38: INTERNATIONAL
INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS
Ch. 38: Brief summary of any particular UN System
response affecting this country/state:
No information.
|
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 39: INTERNATIONAL LEGAL
INSTRUMENTS AND MECHANISMS
Ch. 39: International Legal Instruments are covered
under the relevant sectoral chapters. This is a listing of major
agreements/conventions (not already covered) entered into and
relevant to Agenda 21:
International legal instruments are covered under the relevant sectoral chapters. The following are major agreements not covered by other chapters and relevant to sustainable development:
1) The Amazon Cooperation Treaty for the management, preservation and development of the Amazon region on a cooperative basis; and 2) Treaty between Suriname and Brazil concerning friendship, cooperation and commerce. Parties will closely cooperate to create a rational strategy for the conservation of flora and fauna in the border areas.
|
2. | International cooperation and trade | |||||
3. | Combating poverty | |||||
4. | Changing consumption patterns | |||||
5. | Demographic dynamics and sustainability | |||||
6. | Human health | |||||
7. | Human settlements | |||||
8. | Integrating E & D in decision-making | |||||
9. | Protection of the atmosphere | |||||
10. | Integrated planning and management of land resources | |||||
11. | Combating deforestation | |||||
12. | Combating desertification and drought | |||||
13. | Sustainable mountain development | |||||
14. | Sustainable agriculture and rural development | |||||
15. | Conservation of biological diversity | |||||
16. | Biotechnology | |||||
17. | Oceans, seas, coastal areas and their living resources | |||||
18. | Freshwater resources | |||||
19. | Toxic chemicals | |||||
20. | Hazardous wastes | |||||
21. | Solid wastes | |||||
22. | Radioactive wastes | |||||
24. | Women in sustainable development | |||||
25. | Children and youth | |||||
26. | Indigenous people | |||||
27. | Non-governmental organizations | |||||
28. | Local authorities | |||||
29. | Workers and trade unions | |||||
30. | Business and industry | |||||
31. | Scientific and technological community | |||||
32. | Farmers | |||||
33. | Financial resources and mechanisms | |||||
34. | Technology, cooperation and capacity-building | |||||
35. | Science for sustainable development | |||||
36. | Education, public awareness and training | |||||
37. | International cooperation for capacity-building | |||||
38. | International institutional arrangements | |||||
39. | International legal instruments | |||||
40. | Information for decision-making |
No information.
|
Latest 199- | ||||
Number of telephones in use per 100 inhabitants | ||||
Other data
|
Copyright © United Nations
Department of Economic and Social Affairs
Comments and suggestions: esa@un.org
1 November 1997