ESA home Search Parliamentary services Research and analysis National governments Regional cooperation Development issues

National Implementation of Agenda 21

REPUBLIC OF SURINAME

COUNTRY PROFILE

IMPLEMENTATION OF AGENDA 21:
REVIEW OF PROGRESS MADE SINCE THE
UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON
ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT, 1992

Information Provided by the Government of Suriname to the
United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development
Fifth Session
7-25 April 1997
New York

United Nations Department for Policy Coordination and Sustainable Development
Division for Sustainable Development
The Information contained in this Country Profile is also available on the World Wide Web, as follows:
http://www.un.org/dpcsd/earthsummit

SURINAME

This country profile has been provided by: The Republic of Suriname

Name of Ministry/Office: Permanent Mission of Suriname to the United Nations

Date: 23 April 1997

Submitted by: Natasha E.M. Halfhuid, Chargé d'Affaires a.i.

Mailing address: 866 United Nations Plaza, Suite 320, New York, N.Y. 10017

Telephone:(212) 826 0660

Telefax: (212) 980 7029

E-mail:

Note from the Secretariat: An effort has been made to present all country profiles within a common format, with an equal number of pages. However, where Governments have not provided information for the tables appended to Chapters 4 and 17, those tables have been omitted entirely in order to reduce the overall length of the profile and save paper. Consequently, there may be some minor inconsistencies among the formats of the different country profiles.

All statistics are rendered as provided by the respective Governments.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ACRONYMS
OVERVIEW
FACT SHEET
AGENDA 21 CHAPTERS
2. International cooperation to accelerate sustainable development in developing countries and related domestic policies
3. Combating poverty
4. Changing consumption patterns
5. Demographic dynamics and sustainability
6. Protecting and promoting human health
7. Promoting sustainable human settlement development
8. Integrating environment and development in decision-making
9. Protection of the atmosphere
10. Integrated approach to the planning and management of land resources
11. Combating deforestation
12. Managing fragile ecosystems: combating desertification and drought
13. Managing fragile ecosystems: sustainable mountain development
14. Promoting sustainable agriculture and rural development
15. Conservation of biological diversity
16. Environmentally sound management of biotechnology
17. Protection of the oceans, all kinds of seas, including enclosed and semi-enclosed seas, and coastal areas and the protection, rational use and development of their living resources
18. Protection of the quality and supply of freshwater resources: application of integrated approaches to the development, management and use of water resources
19. Environmentally sound management of toxic chemicals, including prevention of illegal international traffic in toxic and dangerous products
20. Environmentally sound management of hazardous wastes, including prevention of illegal international traffic in hazardous wastes
21. Environmentally sound management of solid wastes and sewage-related issues
22. Safe and environmentally sound management of radioactive wastes
23-32. Major groups
33. Financial resources and mechanisms
34. Transfer of environmentally sound technology, cooperation and capacity-building
35. Science for sustainable development
36. Promoting education, public awareness and training
37. National mechanisms and international cooperation for capacity-building in developing countries
38. International institutional arrangements
39. International legal instruments and mechanisms
40. Information for decision-making

ACRONYMS

APELL Awareness and Preparedness for Emergencies at Local Level
CFC chlorofluorocarbon
CGIAR Consultative Group on International Agriculture Research
CILSS Permanent Inter-State Committee on Drought Control in the Sahel
EEZ exclusive economic zone
ECA Economic Commission for Africa
ECE Economic Commission for Europe
ECLAC Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean
ELCI Environmental Liaison Centre International
EMINWA environmentally sound management of inland water
ESCAP Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific
ESCWA Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia
FAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
GATT General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
GAW Global Atmosphere Watch (WMO)
GEF Global Environment Facility
GEMS Global Environmental Monitoring System (UNEP)
GEMS/WATER Global Water Quality Monitoring Programme
GESAMP Joint Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Pollution
GIPME Global Investigation of Pollution in Marine Environment (UNESCO)
GIS Geographical Information System
GLOBE Global Legislators Organisation for a Balanced Environment
GOS Global Observing System (WMO/WWW)
GRID Global Resource Information Database
GSP generalized system of preferences
HIV human immunodeficiency virus
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency
IAP-WASAD International Action Programme on Water and Sustainable Agricultural Development
IARC International Agency for Research on Cancer
IBSRAM International Board of Soil Resources and Management
ICCA International Council of Chemical Associations
ICES International Council for the Exploration of the Sea
ICPIC International Cleaner Production Information Clearing House
ICSC International Civil Service Commission
ICSU International Council of Scientific Unions
IEEA Integrated environmental and economic accounting
IFAD International Fund for Agricultural Development
IGADD Intergovernmental Authority for Drought and Development
IGBP International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (ICSU)
IGBP/START International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme/Global Change System for Analysis, Research and Training
ILO International Labour Organisation
IMF International Monetary Fund
IMO International Maritime Organization
INFOTERRA International Environment Information system (UNEP)
IOC Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission
IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
IPCS International Programme on Chemical Safety
IPM integrated pest management
IRPTC International Register of Potentially Toxic Chemicals
ITC International Tin Council
ITTO International Tropical Timber Organization
IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources
MARPOL International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships
OECD Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development
PGRFA plant genetic resources for agriculture
PIC prior informed consent procedure
SADCC South African Development Co-ordination Conference
SARD sustainable agriculture and rural development
UNCTAD United Nations Conference on Trade and Development
UNDP United Nations Development Programme
UNDRO Office of the United Nations Disaster Relief Coordinator
UNEP United Nations Environment Programme
UNESCO United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
UNFPA United Nations Population Fund
UNICEF United Nations Children's Fund
UNIDO United Nations Industrial Development Organization
UNU United Nations University
WCP World Climate Programme (WMO/UNEP/ICSU/UNESCO)
WFC World Food Council
WHO World Health Organization
WMO World Meteorological Organization
WWF World Wide Fund for Nature (also called World Wildlife Fund)
WWW World Weather Watch (WMO)

FACT SHEET

NAME OF COUNTRY: SURINAME

1. Name of Key National Sustainable Development Coordination Mechanism(s)/Council(s).

Suriname is in the process of establishing a National Commission on Sustainable Development.

Contact point (Name, Title, Office): Ms. Ellen Naarendorp, Environmental Policy Coordinator, Ministry of Natural Resources, Suriname

Telephone: +597-0-473 428

Fax: +597-0-472 911

e-mail: bollie@sr.net

Mailing address: Mr. Dr. J.C. de Mirandastraat 13, Paramaribo-Suriname (S-A)

2. Membership/Composition/Chairperson:

2a. List of ministries and agencies involved:

2b. Names of para-statal bodies and institutions involved, as well as participating of academic and private sector bodies:

2c. Names of non-governmental organizations involved:

3. Mandate role of above mechanism/council:

4. If available, attach a diagram (organization chart) showing national coordination structure and linkages between ministries:

AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 2: INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION TO ACCELERATE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES AND RELATED DOMESTIC POLICIES (with special emphasis on TRADE)

NATIONAL PRIORITY: Very high.
STATUS REPORT: Suriname subscribes fully to the aims and principles of UNCTAD. The Government also intensively follows the developments within other organizations such as GATT, and subscribes fully to the principles and the Plans of Action of both the Summit of the Americas held in Miami in 1994 and in Santa Cruz de la Sierra in Bolivia in 1996 respectively, which also included very clearly stated conclusions and recommendations with regard to sustainable development and trade. Within this framework, Suriname participates in the activities of OAS, IDB and ECLAC.

Because of its economic policy to intensively stimulate export-oriented prodution economy, this issue has a very high priority in Suriname's external policy.

Cross-Sectoral Issues

1. Decision-Making Structure: Trade is one of the very important characteristics of the Surinamese Sustainable Human Development Model which will be operational as soon as possible. The Sustainable Human Development Model of the UNDP is considered a more sophisticated development of Agenda 21. Trade will be integrated into the optimized economic, social, environmental and human development aspects of this model.

2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: Support provided by the UNDP, IDB and European Union is being mobilized for capacity-building and to provide technology for securing the integration of trade into other policies.

3. Major Groups: All possible stakeholders will be mobilized.

4. Finance: Financing is provided by donors.

5. Regional/International Cooperation: In accordance with the principles of UNCTAD and the Summits of the Americas.

AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 3: COMBATING POVERTY

NATIONAL PRIORITY: No information.
STATUS REPORT:

Focus of national strategy

No information.

Highlight activities aimed at the poor and linkages to the environment

No information.

Cross-Sectoral Issues

1. Decision-Making Structure: No information.

2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: No information.

3. Major Groups: No information.

4. Finance: No information.

5. Regional/International Cooperation: No information.

NB: Developed countries, where domestic poverty alleviation is not a major concern may wish to briefly describe their position regarding global poverty alleviation.

STATISTICAL DATA/INDICATORS
1985
1990
1992
Latest 199_
Unemployment (%)
Population living in absolute poverty
Public spending on social sector %
Other data

AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 4: CHANGING CONSUMPTION PATTERNS

NATIONAL PRIORITY: No information.
STATUS REPORT:

National policy objectives/focus

No information.

National targets

No information.

Cross-Sectoral Issues

1. Decision-Making Structure: No information.

2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: No information.

3. Major Groups: No information.

4. Finance: No information.

5. Regional/International Cooperation: No information.

STATISTICAL DATA/INDICATORS
1985
1990
1992
Latest 199_
GDP per capita (current US$)
Real GDP growth (%)
Annual energy consumption per capita (Kg. of oil equivalent per capita)
Motor vehicles in use per 1000 inhabitants
Other data

AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 5: DEMOGRAPHIC DYNAMICS AND SUSTAINABILITY

NATIONAL PRIORITY: Not a national priority.
STATUS REPORT: In Suriname, there is no national policy on demographic dynamics and sustainability, although the topic has been discussed occasionally at different levels. The last population census was conducted in 1980.

In 1993, Suriname participated in the International Conference on Population and Development. A National Preparatory Commission was established for the Conference consisting of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the Ministry of Health and Environment, the Ministry for Foreign Affairs, the Ministry of Planning and Development (including the National Planning Office and the General Statistics Office) and the Lobi Foundation (a NGO which works in the area of Family Planning).

Suriname's population has hardly grown since its independence in 1975, which is mainly due to emigration. Subsequent Governments have expressed the view that population growth is too low, but no formal policies have been implemented to stimulate growth. Some official policies which have been in place for some time have in fact signaled the opposite. The Ministry of Social Affairs only provides Child Support for up to four children and even though the amount of the support is insignificant, it could be interpreted as an indication by the Government in favor of smaller families. Largely due to the work of the Lobi Foundation and general medical practitioners, birth control devices are readily available to the general public, which has resulted in a reduction in the size of the families.

The Government of Suriname considers the population growth and the fertility level of the country satisfactory and wants to maintain it status quo.

Cross-Sectoral Issues

1. Decision-Making Structure: The policies of the Ministry of Health and Environment have had most impact on actual demographic trends.

2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: Health conditions and institutional capacity suffered as a result of the high inflation and brain-drain. In the interior, the infastructure was severely damaged during the internal strike in 1986-87. After the signing of the Peace Treaty in 1992, the health infrastructure in the interior was reconstructed, but it is not yet at the pre-war level. With the stabilization of the economy, facilities in the city and rural areas have also been improved, although the brain-drain has not permitted a full recovery as yet.

3. Major Groups: The main distinction in population issues has been the contrast between the coastal areas (city and rural areas) and the hinterland (interior). The interior is inhabited mainly by tribal peoples: Amerindians and Maroons. Demographic statistics of the coastal areas have always been much more reliable than those of the interior. Fertility levels and population growth in the interior seem higher than in the coastal areas.

4. Finance: No information.

5. Regional/International Cooperation: Suriname is a member of the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) and has cooperated accordingly in the health sector and regional programmes. The same goes for the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO), which has a permanent office in Suriname. With the neighbouring countries, there has been cooperaton in the field of malaria eradication. Most of these programmes have dealt mainly with the treatment and prevention of diseases and only indirectly with demographic dynamics and sustainability. The Lobi Foundation is the main organization that deals with family planning policies and has received much international funding. The Medical Mission (the Moravian Brothers) is the main organization responsible for health care in the interior, and it has also received international funding in addition to Government subsidies.

STATISTICAL DATA/INDICATORS
1990
1993
Latest 1995
Population (Thousands) mid-year estimates
401.7
403.8
409.0
Annual rate of increase (1990-1993)
0.6
0.1
1.0
Surface area (Km2)
163,820
Population density (people/Km2)
2.5 (1994)
Crude birth rate (per 1000)
23.8
23.3
21.3
Crude death rate (per 1000)
2.6
2.5
NA
Infant mortality rate (per 1000 live birth)
7.0
7.4
6.6

AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 6: PROTECTING AND PROMOTING HUMAN HEALTH

NATIONAL PRIORITY: No information.
STATUS REPORT: No information.

Cross-Sectoral Issues

1. Decision-Making Structure: No information.

2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: No information.

3. Major Groups: No information.

4. Finance: No information.

5. Regional/International Cooperation: No information.

STATISTICAL DATA/INDICATORS
1980
1990
Latest 1995
Life expectancy at birth

Male

Female

Infant mortality (per 1000 live births)
Maternal mortality rate (per 100000 live births)
7.0
6.6
Access to safe drinking water (% of population)
Access to sanitation services (% of population)
Other data

AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 7: PROMOTING SUSTAINABLE HUMAN SETTLEMENT DEVELOPMENT

NATIONAL PRIORITY: No information.
STATUS REPORT: No information.

Cross-Sectoral Issues

1. Decision-Making Structure: No information.

2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: No information.

3. Major Groups: No information.

4. Finance: No information.

5. Regional/International Cooperation: No information.

STATISTICAL DATA/INDICATORS
1990
1995
Urban population in % of total population
Annual rate of growth of urban population (%)
Largest city population (in % of total population)
Other data

AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 8: INTEGRATING ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT IN DECISION-MAKING

(See pages vii and viii at the beginning of the profile)

NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT: As a result of the UNCED and the Summits of the Americas, Suriname is embarking on its own Sustainable Human Development Planning processes through a bottom-up and top-down approach characterized, among others, by good governance, participatory democracy, a stable economic and political environment, dynamic private and public sectors, investment in population as the most important natural resource, belief in a free market economy and trade forces and belief in safeguarding and/or improving the environment.

Within the process of participatory democracy, in which district and regional councils participate, decentralization issues, will become operational through the consensus-building technique of the holistic people-centered approach. Communities will get involved in the planning and decision-making processes with regard to the optimized integration of environmental development into the other three main aspects of the Surinamese Sustainable Human Development Model.

The Government of Suriname has already availed itself of the UNDP support. A National Strategy on Biodiversity is under preparation as well as a National Environmental Action Plan, and a Methodology for Ecological Economic Zoning. A Council for the Environment will soon be established in the Cabinet of the President. It will be responsible for the development of an overall environmental policy and its integration in the national development policy.

For monitoring and control of environmental parameters, an Environmental Management Agency will be established, and relevant legislation will be developed or adopted.

Cross-Sectoral Issues

1. Decision-Making Structure (please also refer to the fact sheet): Referring to the Status Report, participatory democracy and decentralization issues are already policies in operation adopted by the Surinamese Government.

2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: Suriname has availed itself of support from the UNDP in this respect.

3. Major Groups: District- and regional councils under the guidance of the Ministry of Regional Development will play a crucial role.

4. Finance: Provided by donors.

5. Regional/International Cooperation: Through UNDP support and their experience in Thailand and Trinidad & Tobago, Suriname will develop its own approach.

AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 9: PROTECTION OF THE ATMOSPHERE

NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT:

The Montreal Protocol and its Amendments were signed in 1988.

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change was signed in 1992.

Additional comments relevant to this chapter

Within the limits of the possibilities, Suriname has been promoting activities related to the National Action on Sustainable Development. Various missions have been carried out to formulate country programmes. The ratification of the Montreal Protocol and related amendments is in process, as is the ratification of the UNFCCC, too. The National Council on Sustainable Development of Suriname will be established very soon.

Cross-Sectoral Issues

1. Decision-Making Structure: The Ministry of Public Works, especially the Meteorological Service.

2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: Very poorly developed.

3. Major Groups: No information.

4. Finance: No information.

5. Regional/International Cooperation: With the support of the Netherlands, a national inventory programme on emissions and Coastal Zone Management will be carried out between April 1997 and June 1998.

STATISTICAL DATA/INDICATORS
1980
1990
Latest 199-
CO2 emissions (eq. million tons)
SOx "
NOx "
CH4 "
Consumption of ozone depleting substances (Tons)
Expenditure on air pollution abatement in US$ equivalents (million)
Other data

AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 10: INTEGRATED APPROACH TO THE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT OF LAND RESOURCES

NATIONAL PRIORITY: High.
STATUS REPORT: So far, land use planning has not been done in a coordinated way. The Ministry of Natural Resources is responsible for all land issues, and can provide various land titles and user rights to private and public entities. The decisions about the granting of land are based on the information available on prevailing soils, forests and geology. An Ecological Economic Zoning project will soon be taken up for an integrated planning of the use of land resources. An Environmental Management Agency will be responsible for monitoring the control and management of land use.

Cross-Sectoral Issues

1. Decision-Making Structure: The Land Service of the Ministry of Natural Resources is responsible for the granting of land titles and rights for the use of public land. The National Planning Bureau of the Ministry of Planning and Development Cooperation is responsible for regional and physical planning. The Bureau is the coordinating body with regard to zoning and land use planning. The different Ministries are represented in an inter-departmental advisory council. The Planning Act of Suriname, which should guide these activities, originates from 1973, but has never been fully implemented.

2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: Suriname is in the process of introducing new technology for land use planning, zoning and monitoring of land use, but will need substantial institutional support.

3. Major Groups: The Ministry of Natural Resources, the National Planning Bureau, districts and regional bodies.

4. Finance: Financing comes mainly from the European Union, IDB and the Netherlands.

5. Regional/International Cooperation: Mainly within the framework of the Amazonian Cooperation Treaty with regard to strategy and technology and with financial assistance from bilateral and multilateral funds.

AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 11: COMBATING DEFORESTATION

NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT: Forests are one of Suriname's most abundant natural resources with a high economic potential. In 1995, the value of the forest industry exports totalled about US$ 3,2 million. The value of the forest industry exports increased by more than 400% compared to the 1994 figure. Focusing on the total forest land of 14,855,800 ha (more than 80% of the total land area of Suriname) and the present area utilized for timber production (2,414,800 ha), the largest part of the forests are still preserved. The principles of sustainable development shall guide the decisions with regard to the expansion of the forest land area for production.

Almost the entire forest land in Suriname is state-owned. The responsibility and authority regarding the state of forests is with the Government. Deforestation in Suriname is negligible; during the last 10 years, less than one percent of the forest land of Suriname has been converted into other uses, primarly for mining purposes.

The forests are a substantial carbon dioxide sink and contribute to combating the intensification of the global greenhouse effect.

The latest national forest inventories were carried out by the Forest Service with the assistance of FAO, with a total inventory area of 400,000 ha from 1070 to 1974 and an additional 80,000 ha from 1979-1982.

Several plans and/or projects have been prepared or are under preparation to improve Suriname's capacity for the sustainable management of forests. Assistance for institutional strengthening, capacity-building and policy formulation is given by the main partners with regard to forest development, namely the UNDP, European Union, FAO and the Netherlands. Within the framework of the Amazonian Cooperation Treaty, several projects directed to sustainable use of natural environment are being undertaken.

Cross-Sectoral Issues

1. Decision-Making Structure: The Ministry of Natural Resources is responsible for the forestry sector and gives policy guidance. The Forest Service is in charge of the management and control of the public forests. Other Ministries and institutions involved in forestry matters are, e.g. the Ministry of Trade and Industries with regard to the wood processing industry, the Jan Starke Training Center of the Forest Service for the training of lower level staff, and the Center for Agricultural Research of the University of Suriname for forestry research. In 1992, Suriname enacted a new Forest Management Act which is directed to sustainable management of forest resources. The Multi-annual Plan of the Government gives guidelines for forest policy and for the forestry programme. Initiatives for updating the forest policy have been undertaken by the FAO and the European Union. The Forest industry is organized in several associations. There are different associations for loggers, saw millers, wood producers and wood exporters.

2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: No information.

3. Major Groups: Stakeholders in Suriname are the Government, the private sector, the indigenous (tribal) people, and NGOs working in the field of environment and rural development.

4. Finance: Financing for forestry related projects comes from development funds and multilateral funding agencies. Government fundung is, due to the economic situation, limited.

5. Regional/International Cooperation: Suriname is part of the Amazone basin and belongs to the Carribean. Suriname tries to harmonize its standing and activities in the field of the environment and development with those of these regions.

STATISTICAL DATA/INDICATORS
1985
1990
Latest 1995
Forest Area (ha)
14,855,800
14,855,800
14,855,800
Protected forest area (% of total land area)
5
5
5
Roundwood production (in m3)
227,000
116,000
109,000
Deforestation rate (Km2/annum)
Reforestation rate (Km2/annum)
Other data

AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 12: MANAGING FRAGILE ECOSYSTEMS: COMBATING DESERTIFICATION AND DROUGHT

NATIONAL PRIORITY: Not applicable.
STATUS REPORT:

International Convention to Combat Desertification in Countries Experiencing Drought and/or Desertification

Particularly in Africa

Additional comments relevant to this chapter

There are no deserts or areas in danger of becoming deserts in Suriname.

Cross-Sectoral Issues

1. Decision-Making Structure: Not applicable.

2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: Not applicable.

3. Major Groups: Not applicable.

4. Finance: Not applicable.

5. Regional/International Cooperation: Not applicable.

STATISTICAL DATA/INDICATORS
1980
1990
Latest 1997
Land affected by desertification (Km2)
NA
NA
NA
Other data

AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 13: MANAGING FRAGILE ECOSYSTEMS: SUSTAINABLE MOUNTAIN DEVELOPMENT

NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT: The mountain areas in Suriname are almost completely uninhabited and unexploited. The highest mountain top is only 1,280 m. Foreign investors have shown interest in these areas for forestry and gold mining purposes. Developments in these sectors could cause environmental problems mostly related to increased erosion.

Cross-Sectoral Issues

1. Decision-Making Structure: No information.

2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: No information.

3. Major Groups: No information.

4. Finance: No information.

5. Regional/International Cooperation: No information.

STATISTICAL DATA/INDICATORS

AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 14: PROMOTING SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

NATIONAL PRIORITY: No information.
STATUS REPORT: No information.

Cross-Sectoral Issues

1. Decision-Making Structure: No information.

2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: No information.

3. Major Groups: No information.

4. Finance: No information.

5. Regional/International Cooperation: No information.

STATISTICAL DATA/INDICATORS
1985
1990
Latest 199_
Agricultural land (Km2)
Agricultural land as % of total land area
Agricultural land per capita
1989/90
1992/93
Latest 199_
Consumption of fertilizers per Km2 of agricultural land as of 1990
Other data

AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 15: CONSERVATION OF BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY

NATIONAL PRIORITY: High.
STATUS REPORT:

Convention on Biological Diversity was signed in 1992 and ratified in 1996.

Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora was signed in 1981 and ratified in 1995.

Additional comments relevant to this chapter

Over 80% of the land surface (165,940 km2) of Suriname is covered by tropical rainforests, while the very small human population (approx. 400,000) is concentrated in and around the capital, Paramaribo, and along the coast. The biological diversity is high: 185 mammal species (spp.), 668 bird spp., 152 reptile spp., 95 amphibian spp., 452 fish spp., 6,135 plant spp., (of which 5,075 Spermatophyte spp.) and 1,750 Invertebrate spp., while large areas of the interior (the Guyana Shield) still remain unknown for their flora, fauna, ecosystems and ecological relations. Many inventories were conducted between 1900 and 1980 by foreign institutions, and most specimens collected were taken out of Suriname.

The Nature Preservation Law of 1954 provides a possibility to establish nature reserves (now 13), and other laws for other categories of protected areas; altogether 804,000 ha or approx. 5% of the land surface. Inventories of ecosystems of the interior will enlarge these figures for protected areas. The Game Law fully protects all mammals, birds, sea turtles and other species mentioned, except those that are designated as game spp., cage spp. and predominantly harmful spp.

The Fish Protection Law for inland waters protects eight fish spp. by setting limits on the size to be captured. It also determines non-fishing seasons for certain species.

The Sea Fisheries Law (for the territorial sea and the economic zone) contains the framework for sea fisheries, e.g. the possibility for establishing quota for certain species in certain fishing areas.

The Law on Forest Management regulates the exploration and exploitation of timber in forest areas (which will be categorized as permanent production forests, especially protected forests, conversion forests, reserved forests and communal forests). The law also regulates the collection and export of non-timber products (including medicinal plants). Amerindians and Maroons use many plants and animals for their subsistence as food and medicine for ritual purposes.

A project on bioprospecting of medicinal plants started in 1994 and the second phase in 1995. Within the framework of a GEF project, preliminary regulations will be formulated for the contents of contracts, and the sharing of results and benefits gained from the research, development and utilization of biological resources.

The extent of mercury pollution from small-scale gold mining and its influence on the biodiversity are unknown.

A National Strategy on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Biological Diversity and a National Environmental Action Plan are being drafted with the financial support of the Amazon Cooperation Treaty/UNDP respectively of the Organization of American States.

Export of wildlife is regulated by the CITES provisions and a voluntary quota system.

Cross-Sectoral Issues

1. Decision-Making Structure: CITES is regulated in the Game Law (animals) and the Law on Forest Management (plants) and it is executed by the Forest Service, Nature Conservation Division (CITES Management Authority) and the Nature Protection Commission (CITES Scientific Authority). Parts of the Convention on Biological Diversity are covered by provisions in the Nature Preservation Law (under the Forest Service), the Game Law and the Law on Forest Management (both under the Ministry of Natural Resources, Forest Service), the Fish Protection Law and the Sea Fisheries Law (both under the Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Husbandry and Fisheries, Fishery Service). Other agencies related to biodiversity are the Ministry of Planning and Development Cooperation, National Planning Bureau (e.g. coordination of the ACT/UNDP Biodiversity Project), Institute of Development Planning and Management (coordination of a draft National Environmental Action Plan, NEAP), and Environmental Working Groups in several Ministries. The intention is to include a National Environmental Policy Board and an Environmental Management Agency in NEAP.

2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: Professionals in biodiversity have been trained in foreign universities. The recently established Department of Environmental Sciences at the Faculty of Technology (University of Suriname) will hopefully enhance ecological studies carried out by the Environmental Research Center of the University of Suriname. Mid-level staff may be trained at the Natural Technical Institute (NATIN), while technicians (forest guards, game wardens, and reserve managers) may be trained at the Jan Starke Training Center of the Forest Service. Biodiversity studies and inventories are carried out by several agencies, e.g. the Forest Service, Foundation for Nature Preservation in Suriname, University of Suriname, Center for Agriculture Research, National Drugs Company (BGVS), foreign universities, institutes and NGOs.

3. Major Groups: Governmental and non-governmental agencies (see 2), Timber concessionaires, wildlife exporters, and tribal communities.

4. Finance: Funds are received from, e.g. the Government budget, the Amazonian Cooperation Treaty, UNEP, FAO, UNDP/GEF, and OAS, European Union, Canadian Wildlife Servcie, WHSRN, the French Ministry of the Environment, and in the near future, from the Dutch Environmental Fund and IDB.

5. Regional/International Cooperation: Suriname participates in the Special Environment Commission of the Amazonian Cooperation Treaty, the Caribbean Environmental Program (including activities of the Cartagena Convention), Conference of CITES, Wetlands Convention and the Convention on Biological Diversity, and has relations with several international agencies (e.g. UNEP, WWF, and IUCN).

STATISTICAL DATA/INDICATORS
1992
Latest 1996
Protected area as % of total land area
5%
5%
1990
Latest 199_
Number of threatened species
Other data

AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 16: ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANAGEMENT OF BIOTECHNOLOGY

NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT: Biotechnology in Suriname is limited to the tissue culture of bananas. Experiments have been made with the tissue culture of pineapple, mushrooms and some other crops. However, only bananas are cultured on a commercial basis by using this technique.

Cross-Sectoral Issues

1. Decision-Making Structure: No information.

2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: No information.

3. Major Groups: No information.

4. Finance: No information.

5. Regional/International Cooperation: No information.

STATISTICAL DATA/INDICATORS

AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 17: PROTECTION OF THE OCEANS, ALL KINDS OF SEAS, INCLUDING ENCLOSED AND SEMI-ENCLOSED SEAS, AND COASTAL AREAS AND THE PROTECTION, RATIONAL USE AND DEVELOPMENT OF THEIR LIVING RESOURCES

NATIONAL PRIORITY: Very high.
STATUS REPORT:

The UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) was signed on 10 December 1982.

See also the attached tables on the next pages.

The legal base for the protection of the sea is provided by the Sea Fisheries Law (with the possibility for fishing quotas) and the MARPOL Convention. Suriname has signed the UNCLOS and participates in the Caribbean Environment Program, although the Republic is not a Party to the Cartagena Convention or its Protocols. Control of the ocean is poorly executed.

In the coastal areas, there are four nature reserves and one Multiples Management Area (MUMA). The policy is to cover the whole estuarine zone by MUMAs and to formulate and implement management plans for these MUMAs. The latter is now being done for each part of this zone according to an order of priority which is related to the possible impact by agriculture (rice cultivation), crude oil exploitation, and aquaculture projects.

Although Suriname has not yet ratified the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, it has initiated - with the assistance of the Dutch Government - a project on sea-level rise.

Cross-Sectoral Issues

1. Decision-Making Structure: The Forest Service under the Ministry of Natural Resources will be responsible for the coordination of the management by the relevant agencies of the coastal MUMAs. The Nature Conservation Division of the Forest Service is already the Suriname Administrative Authority for the Wetlands Convention. The Ministry will get advice on this subject from the National Wetlands Commission, which will be established in the near future.

2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: Qualified staff must be trained or hired.

3. Major Groups: The Government (e.g. Ministries of Natural Resources, of Agriculture, Animal Husbandry and Fisheries, of Regional Development, and of Public Works), users (farmers, fishermen, aquaculture companies) and NGOs.

4. Finance: Funds for project formulation and for management come from, e.g. UNEP, the French Ministry of Environment, the Dutch Government and the Canadian Wildlife Service.

5. Regional/International Cooperation: The Amazon Cooperation Treaty, the Caribbean Environment Program (including the Cartagena Convention), MARPOL and the United Nations Framework Convention for Climate Change. Suriname and French Guyana will enlarge their cooperation with regard to nature conservation and the environment (especially in the coastal areas).

STATISTICAL DATA/INDICATORS
1980
1990
Latest 1994
Catches of marine species (metric tons)
16,525
Population in coastal areas
Population served by waste water treatment (% of country's

total population)

Discharges of oil into coastal waters (metric tons)
Releases of phosphate into coastal waters (metric tons)
Releases of nitrate into coastal waters (metric tons)
Other data:

There are no further national indicators specifically for this chapter and no work is being done to develop new indicators.

AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 18: PROTECTION OF THE QUALITY AND SUPPLY OF FRESHWATER RESOURCES: APPLICATION OF INTEGRATED APPROACHES TO THE DEVELOPMENT, MANAGEMENT AND USE OF WATER RESOURCES

NATIONAL PRIORITY: High.
STATUS REPORT: Ninety percent of the population in Suriname is served by public waterworks, but the service level is not adequate. About 60% of the population is served by public sewerage, which is also inadequate. The waste water treatment in urban areas consists mainly of septic tanks and latrines.

The annual rain fall is on average 2,200 mm, and the evaporation rate is about 30% (750 mm).

Cross-Sectoral Issues

1. Decision-Making Structure: There are plans to establish a National Board of Water Management in addition to the (Water) Management Authority for the Multipurpose Corantijn Project in the north-western part of Suriname. For research and monitoring see 3.

2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: On-the-job training is being carried out by the Suriname Waterleiding Maatschappij (Suriname Water Company) with the assistance of the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO). At the University of Suriname, water is included as a subject in the curricula. There are some fellowships for studies abroad in this field.

3. Major Groups: The Government (the Hydraulic Research Division of the Ministry of Public Works, Public Health Bureau, Drainage Division of the Ministry of Public Works); para-statal organizations (University of Suriname); Suriname Water Company; (Water) Management Authority for the Multipurpose Corantijn Project; the Pan American Health Organization.

4. Finance: Financing for activities under Chapter 18 is provided from the Government budget, payments for (pipe) water, and from development projects (e.g. from the Dutch development aid).

5. Regional/International Cooperation: Regional/international cooperation is undertaken under the Pan American Health Organization.

STATISTICAL DATA/INDICATORS
1980
1990
Latest 1996
Fresh water availability (total domestic/external in million m3)
abundant
Annual withdrawal of freshwater as % of available water
less than 10%
Other data

AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 19: ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANAGEMENT OF TOXIC CHEMICALS, INCLUDING PREVENTION OF ILLEGAL INTERNATIONAL TRAFFIC IN TOXIC AND DANGEROUS PRODUCTS

NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT: Suriname recognizes its responsibility with respect to sustainable development and is aware of its obligations to take the necessary precautions in time to prevent coming generations from disasters. Therefore, Suriname has, for instance, ratified MARPOL 73/78 with all its five Annexes in 1988, in order to prevent and fight pollution from ship-generated waste and other hazardous disposal. However, due to circumstances, only now Suriname has the opportunity to prepare the necessary legislation to implement MARPOL. This will be done in cooperation with the Dutch Ministry of Public Works under a programme which has already started. The existing legislation on water transport will also be updated during this work. The legal focal point in Suriname (an IMO project) is involved.

Furthermore, the Surinamese Government and the Parliament are studying a proposal for the privatization of waste management in order to simplify and ensure the processing of waste.

Preparations for the Maritime Authority are very advanced. The necessary facilities, and other technical provisions resulting from the MARPOL Convention, are to be provided by this authority.

Cross-Sectoral Issues

1. Decision-Making Structure: No information.

2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: No information.

3. Major Groups: No information.

4. Finance: No information.

5. Regional/International Cooperation: No information.

STATISTICAL DATA/INDICATORS

AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 20: ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANAGEMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTES, INCLUDING PREVENTION OF ILLEGAL INTERNATIONAL TRAFFIC IN HAZARDOUS WASTES

NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT:

The Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and their Disposal

The importance of the Basel Convention for the states in the Caribbean region is increasing due to the fact that the region is one of the most frequently chosen routes for the transboundary movement of hazardous wastes. Relevant institutions in Suriname are engaged in the exchange of views on the Basel Convention which should ultimately lead to the ratification of the Convention.

Additional comments relevant to this chapter

Cross-Sectoral Issues

1. Decision-Making Structure: No information.

2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: No information.

3. Major Groups: No information.

4. Finance: No information.

5. Regional/International Cooperation: No information.

STATISTICAL DATA/INDICATORS
1980
1990
Latest 199-
Generation of hazardous waste (t)
Import of hazardous wastes (t)
Export of hazardous wastes (t)
Area of land contaminated by hazardous waste (km2)
Expenditure on hazardous waste treatment (US$)
Other data

AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 21: ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANAGEMENT OF SOLID WASTES AND SEWAGE-RELATED ISSUES

NATIONAL PRIORITY: No information.
STATUS REPORT: No information.

Cross-Sectoral Issues

1. Decision-Making Structure: No information.

2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: No information.

3. Major Groups: No information.

4. Finance: No information.

5. Regional/International Cooperation: No information.

STATISTICAL DATA/INDICATORS
1980
1990
Latest 199-
Generation of industrial and municipal waste (t)
Waste disposed(Kg/capita)
Expenditure on waste collection and treatment (US$)
Waste recycling rates (%)
Municipal waste disposal (Kg/capita)
Waste reduction rates per unit of GDP (t/year)
Other data

AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 22: SAFE AND ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE WASTES

NATIONAL PRIORITY: No information.
STATUS REPORT: No information.

Cross-Sectoral Issues

1. Decision-Making Structure: No information.

2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: No information.

3. Major Groups: No information.

4. Finance: No information.

5. Regional/International Cooperation: No information.

AGENDA 21 CHAPTERS 23-32: MAJOR GROUPS

The role of major groups are also covered under the various chapters of Agenda 21. The following is a summary of main objectives outlined in Agenda 21. Please check the appropriate boxes and describe briefly any important steps or obstacles.

STATUS REPORT ON PARTICIPATION BY MAJOR GROUPS AT THE

NATIONAL AND LOCAL LEVELS
Ch. 24: GLOBAL ACTION FOR WOMEN TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE AND EQUITABLE DEVELOPMENT.

The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women was signed and ratified in 1993.

24.a Increasing the proportion of women decision makers.

In 1992, the proportion of women in the Parliament was 6%. In 1996, it was 14%.

24.b assessing, reviewing, revising and implementing curricula and other educational material with a view to promoting dissemination of gender-relevant knowledge.

Curricula and educational material does not yet promote gender relevant knowledge.

24.c and 24.d formulating and implementing policies, guidelines, strategies and plans for achievement of equality in all aspects of society including issuing a strategy by year 2000 to eliminate obstacles to full participation of women in sustainable development. No information.

24.e establishing mechanisms by 1995 to assess implementation and impact of development and environment policies and programmes on women No information.

Brief comments on this chapter (maximum 100 words) (please, do not exceed this page):

Various initiatives have been taken by the Government in cooperation with NGOs, but incidentally. Those are, for example (i) the institution of the "Monitoring Group for Women's Policy" for the development of a policy plan, which has already been approved by the Government, but not yet implemented, (ii) the establishment of the Women's Bureau at the Ministry of Internal Affairs, and (iii) the writing of the National Report for Beijing.

STATUS REPORT ON PARTICIPATION BY MAJOR GROUPS AT THE

NATIONAL AND LOCAL LEVELS
Ch. 25: CHILDREN AND YOUTH IN SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT.

25.a establishing processes that promote dialogue between the youth and government at all levels and mechanisms that permit youth access to information and opportunity to present their viewn implementing A21.

The four most relevant youth forums in Suriname are the Jaycees, the Youth Assemble, Nayuga and the Leo's/Rotaracts.

Describe their role in the national process: At the moment, the youth are not really involved in national development processes and mechanisms.

25.b reducing youth unemployment Statistics on youth unemployement do not give national percentages but numbers for some districts, and the last ones are from 1994.

25.c ensuring that by year 2000 more than 50% of youth -- gender balanced -- have access to appropriate secondary education or vocational training.

No goal has been set yet nationally.

Brief comments on this chapter (maximum 100 words) (please, do not exceed this page):

There could be more cooperation between the Government and the youth organizations. Youth organizations should also initiate more activities, like the Jaycees did last year by organizing a national seminar called "Development Starts with a Clean Environment".

Youth organizations are active in "Clean Up the World" campaigns, and Earth Day activities are promoted by NGOs in Suriname.

STATUS REPORT ON PARTICIPATION BY MAJOR GROUPS AT THE

NATIONAL AND LOCAL LEVELS
Ch. 26: RECOGNIZING AND STRENGTHENING THE ROLE OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLE AND THEIR COMMUNITIES.

26.a establishing a process to empower indigenous people and their communities -- through policies and legal instruments: Not in place.

26.b strengthening arrangements for active participation in national policies:

Indigenous people participate on an ad hoc basis.

26.c involving indigenous people in resource management strategies and programmes at the national and local level. No action yet.

Brief comments on this chapter (maximum 100 words) (please, do not exceed this page):

Ch. 27: STRENGTHENING THE ROLE OF NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS: PARTNERS FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT.

27.a developing mechanisms that allow NGOs to play their partnership role responsibly and effectively.

27.b reviewing formal procedures and mechanisms to involve NGOs in decision making and implementation.

27.c promoting and allowing NGOs to participate in the conception, establishment and evaluation of official mechanisms to review Agenda 21 implementation.

NGO inputs are ad hoc.

27.d establishing a mutually productive dialogue by 1995 at the national level between NGOs and governments.

Brief comments on this chapter (maximum 100 words) (please, do not exceed this page):

The environmental NGOs have formed various forums such as the Platform Amazone Rainforest Suriname (PARS) and the Sustainable farming Environmental Alliance (Milieubond).

STATUS REPORT ON PARTICIPATION BY MAJOR GROUPS AT THE

NATIONAL AND LOCAL LEVELS
Ch. 28: LOCAL AUTHORITIES' INITIATIVES IN SUPPORT OF AGENDA 21.

28.a encouraging local authorities to implement and monitor programmes that aim to ensure participation of women and youth in local decision making.

There are no local Agendas 21 in Suriname.

Brief comments on this chapter (maximum 100 words) (please, do not exceed this page):

Within the National Assembly, Agenda 21 may be known by title, but not by its content. However, the Government supports various national activities in line with Agenda 21 policies without their being part of a national policy on sustainable development.

Ch. 29: STRENGTHENING THE ROLE OF WORKERS AND THEIR TRADE UNIONS.

29.a full participation of workers in implementation and evaluation of A21.

29.b (By year 2000, (a) promoting ratification of ILO conventions; (b) establishing bipartite and tripartite mechanism on safety, health and sustainable development; (c) increasing number of environmental collective agreements; (d) reducing occupational accidents and injuries; (e) increasing workers' education and training efforts.

Suriname does not have full information of the ILO Conventions.

Brief comments on this chapter (maximum 100 words) (please, do not exceed this page):

Within the Tripartite Council consisting of the representatives of the Government and employers' and employees' organizations, subjects such as safety, health, and reducing occupational accidents and injuries, etc. are broadly discussed, but not as part of an integral environmental policy network.

30: STRENGTHENING THE ROLE OF BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY.

30.a increasing the efficiency of resource use, including reuse, recycling, and reduction of waste per unit of economic output.

30.b encouraging the concept of stewardship in management and use of natural resources by entrepreneurs.

List any actions taken in this area:

The new Standard Mineral Act (1997) is the first known governmental initiative on these issues.

30.c increasing number of enterprises that subscribe to and implement sustainable development policies.

Two big enterprises have adopted sustainable development policies.

Brief comments on this chapter (maximum 100 words) (please, do not exceed this page):

STATUS REPORT ON PARTICIPATION BY MAJOR GROUPS AT THE

NATIONAL AND LOCAL LEVELS
Ch. 31: SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL COMMUNITY.

31.a improving exchange of knowledge and concerns between s&t community and the general public.

Scientific community has already established ways in which to address the general public and deal with

sustainable development.

Some efforts have been taken towards this direction; there is a public environmental exhibition space at the University of Suriname, and the Environmental Department has been established for education, research and international cooperation purposes.

31.b developing, improving and promoting international acceptance of codes of practice and guidelines related to science and technology and its role in reconciling environment and development.

Brief comments on this chapter not already described in chapter 35 (maximum 100 words) (please, do not exceed this page):

The Faculty of Technology of the University of Suriname is sometimes asked to contract research with environmental specialists involved. The various departments of the Faculty show great enthusiasm concerning environmental education and research subjects.

Ch. 32: STRENGTHENING THE ROLE OF FARMERS.

32.a promoting and encouraging sustainable farming practices and technologies.

No.

32.b developing a policy framework that provides incentives and motivation among farmers for sustainable and efficient farming practices.

No.

32.c enhancing participation of organizations of farmers in design and implementation of sustainable development policies.

No.

Brief comments on this chapter (maximum 100 words) (please, do not exceed this page):

Suriname does not yet have a tradition to promote and encourage sustainable farming practices and technologies. However, there are some encouraging initiatives such as the promotion of mixed farming systems in order to minimize the use of artificial fertilizers, and the import of organic fertilizers to which the farmers have reacted enthusiastically.

AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 33: FINANCIAL RESOURCES AND MECHANISMS

Financial resources and mechanisms are also covered under each sectoral chapter of Agenda 21 where relevant. This summary highlights broader national financial policies, domestic and external (including ODA)

NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT: Suriname is endowed with a very good natural resource base, comprising substantial bauxite reserves, extensive tropical forests, fertile soils in the coastal areas, large and mostly unexploited resources of gold, kaolin and dimension stones, and very good water and air quality.

The revenues generated by Suriname are very low, at the moment, and for the greater part, still generated by bauxite operations. Agricultural and other production-oriented activities are at a very low level. This, together with the so far heavily import-oriented economy, has limited Suriname's capacity to finance its economic, social, human and environmental development. Therefore, donor-oriented assistance is very much appreciated at the moment when Suriname is on the verge of embarking on its own Sustainable Human Development Model. In addition, development of legislation and efficient law enforcement mechanisms together with participatory democracy and a good and dynamic governance are necessary.

The Government of Suriname has availed itself of the support of several donors to achieve these goals. The Government is also pursuing the policy of extending and diversifying the number of donors and of providing the country with the best possible technologies available. Although financing for sustainable development is mainly provided by donors, Suriname tries to finance as much as possible through the efforts of its own population.

Donor coordination is necessary for the most efficient use of financial assistance. Funnelling financing through a proper development planning based on the Surinamese Sustainable Human Development processes is the main task of the Ministry of Planning and Development Cooperation. An appropriate and stable political environment is necessary for an efficient and effective fulfillment of this task. Only in such circumstances, a suitable sustainable resources management and resource use can be achieved.

CHANGES IN NATIONAL BUDGET TO ADDRESS SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: No information.

NEW ECONOMIC INSTRUMENTS: No information.

ELIMINATION OF ENVIRONMENTALLY UNFRIENDLY SUBSIDIES: No information.

STATISTICAL DATA/INDICATORS
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
ODA funding provided or received (Total US$million)
Average for 92-93
Average for 94-96
Net flow of external capital from all sources as % of GDP
Other data

AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 34: TRANSFER OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND TECHNOLOGY, COOPERATION AND CAPACITY-BUILDING

Transfer of environmentally sound technology, cooperation and capacity-building is also covered under each sectoral chapter of Agenda 21 where relevant. This summary highlights broader national policies and actions relating to chapter 34.

NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT ON LINKS BETWEEN NATIONAL, REGIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL INFORMATION NETWORKS/SYSTEMS: While developing the Surinamese Human Development Model, the best available sustainable resources management and resource use techniques have to be introduced in order to optimize economic, social, human and environmental development.

Already within the bauxite industry, environmentally sound adaptations have been deployed, although without governmental control mechanisms.

Suriname will soon embark on its own National Environmental Action Plan in which recommendations for the introduction of environmentally sound technologies will be given for all relevant sectors. In addition, recommendations will be given on the organizational framework needed in order to coordinate all the activities and on the financial, technological and human resources implications. For example, a number of legal entities (now called Institutes) will be developed as soon as possible for the implementation of environmentally sound technologies, the acquisition of these technologies, the enforcement of laws etc.

With regard to the development of gold mining, detailed technological approaches are being scrutinized at the moment.

MEANS OF IMPLEMENTATION: In the first instance, financing will be provided by donors. Later on, as much as possible, financing will be provided by activities within the sectors in question.

Describe any work being undertaken at the national or local level regarding efforts to promote clean production processes and/or the concepts of eco-efficiency. These processes may include training, preferential financial arrangements, information dissemination and changes in legal or regulatory frameworks.

No information.

Provide information on the adoption of environmental management systems. National reaction to environmental management system standards such as the ISO 14000 Series and others. Please note efforts made at the national level to promote their adoption and the creation of certification infrastructure in order to facilitate access to these standards to local industry.

No information.

List and describe programs or work under way to facilitate the transfer of ESTs to small and medium sized enterprises. Please note efforts to facilitate access to financial resources and other transfer strategies.

No information.

AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 35: SCIENCE FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT ON NATIONAL SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE, RESEARCH NEEDS AND PRIORITIES:

The Surinamese Sustainable Human Development Model (SSHDM) places the Surinamese people in the center. Investing in our own population and participatory democracy as well as in dynamic and active private and public sectors are important aspects of this approach. However, these goals can only be achieved when educational capabilities of the population as a whole are continuosly being raised to an even higher level, especially development-oriented educational capabilities which consider technology the key to development. Educational and environmental development is expensive. Therefore, the optimization of economic, social, human and environmental development is important.

The still untouched vast natural resource base of Suriname constitutes a very high potential for financing the components of the SSHDM. However, the use of natural resources has to be done in accordance with the sustainable resource management and resource use systems, which call for proper policies and research.

A comprehensive educational framework is being prepared. The Ministry of Planning and Development Cooperation and the University of Suriname together with the Ministry of Education and Human Development are the key bodies responsible for decision-making,

With regard to capacity-building and technological development in this field, Suriname has established contacts with different universities in Europe, USA and the Caribbean Region. Within the more comprehensive educational framework currently under preparation, a more effective and efficient capacity-building and tecnology transfer can be effectuated. Suriname is also a member of the Caribbean Council for Science and Technology.

Financing for these issues comes mainly from donors.

STEPS TAKEN TO ENHANCE SCIENTIFIC UNDERSTANDING, IMPROVE LONG TERM SCIENTIFIC ASSESSMENT, BUILDING OF CAPACITY AND CAPABILITY: See above.

STATISTICAL DATA/INDICATORS
Year
Number of scientists, engineers and technicians engaged in research and experimental development # 19--
Total expenditure for research and experimental development (US$eq.) $ 19--
Other data

AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 36: PROMOTING EDUCATION, PUBLIC AWARENESS AND TRAINING

NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT: No information.

a) Reorientation of education towards sustainable development: No information.

b) Increasing public awareness: No information.

c) Promoting training: No information.

ROLE OF MAJOR GROUPS: No information.

FINANCING AND COST EVALUATION OF THE LABOUR ACTIVITIES: No information.

STATISTICAL DATA/INDICATORS
1980
1990
Latest 199-
Adult literacy rate (%) Male
Adult literacy rate (%) Female
% of primary school children reaching grade 5 (1986-97)
Mean number of years of schooling
% of GNP spent on education
Females per 100 males in secondary school
Women per 100 men in the labour force
Other data

AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 37: NATIONAL MECHANISMS AND INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION FOR CAPACITY-BUILDING IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES

National capacity building is also covered under sectoral chapters.

Donors: You may wish to describe here how Agenda 21 has influenced your ODA policies in this area.

Developing countries: You may wish to describe any new national mechanisms for capacity building - and any changes in technical cooperation.

NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT ON NATIONAL ENDOGENOUS CAPACITY BUILDING:

The Council for the Environment to be established and the Environment Management Agency as well as relevant legislation will provide mechanisms and tools for capacity-building. In addition, international cooperation will be a very important part of the Surinamese Sustainable Human Development Model and the sustainable resources management and resource use systems to be developed within the human and social development framework.

(See also Chapters 8, 33, 34 and 35.)

AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 38: INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS

Ch. 38: Brief summary of any particular UN System response affecting this country/state:

No information.

AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 39: INTERNATIONAL LEGAL INSTRUMENTS AND MECHANISMS

Ch. 39: International Legal Instruments are covered under the relevant sectoral chapters. This is a listing of major agreements/conventions (not already covered) entered into and relevant to Agenda 21:

International legal instruments are covered under the relevant sectoral chapters. The following are major agreements not covered by other chapters and relevant to sustainable development:

1) The Amazon Cooperation Treaty for the management, preservation and development of the Amazon region on a cooperative basis; and

2) Treaty between Suriname and Brazil concerning friendship, cooperation and commerce. Parties will closely cooperate to create a rational strategy for the conservation of flora and fauna in the border areas.

AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 40: INFORMATION FOR DECISION-MAKING

This chapter is also covered under sectoral and other chapters of this profile. The matrix below gives an overview of how national authorities rate the available information for decision making.

Rating of available data and information suitable for decision-making

Agenda 21 Chapters
Very
good
Good
Some good
data but
many gaps
Poor
Remarks
2. International cooperation and trade
3. Combating poverty
4. Changing consumption patterns
5. Demographic dynamics and sustainability
6. Human health
7. Human settlements
8. Integrating E & D in decision-making
9. Protection of the atmosphere
10. Integrated planning and management of land resources
11. Combating deforestation
12. Combating desertification and drought
13. Sustainable mountain development
14. Sustainable agriculture and rural development
15. Conservation of biological diversity
16. Biotechnology
17. Oceans, seas, coastal areas and their living resources
18. Freshwater resources
19. Toxic chemicals
20. Hazardous wastes
21. Solid wastes
22. Radioactive wastes
24. Women in sustainable development
25. Children and youth
26. Indigenous people
27. Non-governmental organizations
28. Local authorities
29. Workers and trade unions
30. Business and industry
31. Scientific and technological community
32. Farmers
33. Financial resources and mechanisms
34. Technology, cooperation and capacity-building
35. Science for sustainable development
36. Education, public awareness and training
37. International cooperation for capacity-building
38. International institutional arrangements
39. International legal instruments
40. Information for decision-making
Additional Comments

No information.

STATISTICAL DATA/INDICATORS
1980
1993
Latest 199-
Number of telephones in use per 100 inhabitants
Other data

Home | Search | Parliament | Research | Governments | Regions | Issues


Copyright © United Nations
Department of Economic and Social Affairs
Comments and suggestions: esa@un.org
1 November 1997