National Implementation of Agenda 21
|
Information Provided by the Government of Russian Federation to
the United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development
United Nations Department for Policy Coordination and
Sustainable Development |
This country profile has been provided by:
Name of Ministry/Office: State Environmental Protection Committee of the Russian Federation together with the other ministries and offices concerned (see list in appendix 1)
Date: December 1996
Submitted by: V. I. Danilov-Danilyan, Chairman of the State Environmental Protection Committee of the Russian Federation.
Mailing address: 123812 Moscow, GSP, ul. B. Gruzinskaya 4/6
Telephone: (095) 252 25 03
Telefax: (095) 254 82 83
E-mail:
Note from the Secretariat: The original of this Country Profile was provided in the Russian language. This text is an official English translation. An effort has been made to present all country profiles within a common format, with an equal number of pages. However, where Governments have not provided information for the tables appended to Chapters 4 and 17, those tables have been omitted entirely in order to reduce the overall length of the profile and save paper. Consequently, there may be some minor inconsistencies among the formats of the different country profiles.
All statistics are rendered as provided by the respective Governments.
|
1. Ministry of the Economy (ch. 4) 2. Ministry of Foreign Affairs (chs. 2, 38) 3. State Science and Technology Committee (chs. 16, 34, 35) 4. State Environmental Protection Committee (chs. 8, 12, 13, 15, 20-22) 5. Ministry of Natural Resources (ch. 18) 6. Ministry of Finance (ch. 33) 7. Ministry of Labour and Social Development (chs. 3, 5, 7) 8. Ministry of Health (chs. 6, 19) 9. Federal Hydrometeorology and Environmental Monitoring Service (chs. 9, 17) 10. State Committee for Land Resources and Land Use (ch. 10) 11. Federal Forestry Service (ch. 11) 12. Ministry of Agriculture (ch. 14) 13. State Fisheries Committee (ch. 17) 14. Ministry of General and Vocational Education (ch. 36) 15. The non-governmental organization "Ekosoglasiye" (chs. 23-32)
|
APELL | Awareness and Preparedness for Emergencies at Local Level |
CFC | chlorofluorocarbon |
CGIAR | Consultative Group on International Agriculture Research |
CILSS | Permanent Inter-State Committee on Drought Control in the Sahel |
EEZ | exclusive economic zone |
ECA | Economic Commission for Africa |
ECE | Economic Commission for Europe |
ECLAC | Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean |
ELCI | Environmental Liaison Centre International |
EMINWA | environmentally sound management of inland water |
ESCAP | Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific |
ESCWA | Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia |
FAO | Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations |
GATT | General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade |
GAW | Global Atmosphere Watch (WMO) |
GEF | Global Environment Facility |
GEMS | Global Environmental Monitoring System (UNEP) |
GEMS/WATER | Global Water Quality Monitoring Programme |
GESAMP | Joint Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Pollution |
GIPME | Global Investigation of Pollution in Marine Environment (UNESCO) |
GIS | Geographical Information System |
GLOBE | Global Legislators Organisation for a Balanced Environment |
GOS | Global Observing System (WMO/WWW) |
GRID | Global Resource Information Database |
GSP | generalized system of preferences |
HIV | human immunodeficiency virus |
IAEA | International Atomic Energy Agency |
IAP-WASAD | International Action Programme on Water and Sustainable Agricultural Development |
IARC | International Agency for Research on Cancer |
IBSRAM | International Board of Soil Resources and Management |
ICCA | International Council of Chemical Associations |
ICES | International Council for the Exploration of the Sea |
ICPIC | International Cleaner Production Information Clearing House |
ICSC | International Civil Service Commission |
ICSU | International Council of Scientific Unions |
IEEA | Integrated environmental and economic accounting |
IFAD | International Fund for Agricultural Development |
IGADD | Intergovernmental Authority for Drought and Development |
IGBP | International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (ICSU) |
IGBP/START | International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme/Global Change System for Analysis, Research and Training |
ILO | International Labour Organisation |
IMF | International Monetary Fund |
IMO | International Maritime Organization |
INFOTERRA | International Environment Information system (UNEP) |
IOC | Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission |
IPCC | Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change |
IPCS | International Programme on Chemical Safety |
IPM | integrated pest management |
IRPTC | International Register of Potentially Toxic Chemicals |
ITC | International Tin Council |
ITTO | International Tropical Timber Organization |
IUCN | International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources |
MARPOL | International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships |
OECD | Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development |
PGRFA | plant genetic resources for agriculture |
PIC | prior informed consent procedure |
SADCC | South African Development Co-ordination Conference |
SARD | sustainable agriculture and rural development |
UNCTAD | United Nations Conference on Trade and Development |
UNDP | United Nations Development Programme |
UNDRO | Office of the United Nations Disaster Relief Coordinator |
UNEP | United Nations Environment Programme |
UNESCO | United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization |
UNFPA | United Nations Population Fund |
UNICEF | United Nations Children's Fund |
UNIDO | United Nations Industrial Development Organization |
UNU | United Nations University |
WCP | World Climate Programme (WMO/UNEP/ICSU/UNESCO) |
WFC | World Food Council |
WHO | World Health Organization |
WMO | World Meteorological Organization |
WWF | World Wide Fund for Nature (also called World Wildlife Fund) |
WWW | World Weather Watch (WMO) |
In 1992 Russia, together with 178 other States at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development in Rio de Janeiro, signed a number of programme documents establishing the agreed policy of all the countries of the world for ensuring sustainable development and preserving the Earth's ecosystem.
The transition to sustainable development may be seen as a national idea which could unite all strata of society in the cause of Russia's rebirth.
A Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of 1 April 1996 asserted the Concept of the transition of the Russian Federation to sustainable development. This Concept posits the implementation in the Russian Federation of a transition to sustainable development which will ensure the balanced solution of socio-economic problems and the problems of maintaining a favourable environment and natural resource potential in order to meet the requirements of present and future generations.
The socio-economic development of society in the twentieth century, aimed primarily at rapid rates of economic growth, has caused unprecedented damage to the natural environment. Mankind has been confronted with contradictions between the growing demands of world society and the inability of the biosphere to satisfy these demands.
The riches of nature, its capacity to support the development of society, and the possibilities of self-sustainment have proved to have limits. Increasing economic power has become a destructive force for the biosphere and mankind. At the same time civilisation, while using an enormous volume of ecosystem-destructive technology, has not in fact proposed anything which could take the place of the regular mechanisms of the biosphere. A real threat to the vital interests of future generations has emerged.
These contradictions can be eliminated only within the framework of stable socio-economic development which does not destroy its basis in nature. The improvement of people's quality of life must be effected within the limits of the biosphere's economic capacity, for to exceed those limits will mean the destruction of the natural biotic mechanism for regulating the environment and its global changes. Only by satisfying these conditions will it be possible to maintain a normal environment and a viable existence for future generations.
A transition to sustainable development posits the gradual restoration of natural ecosystems to a state which ensures the stability of the environment; this can be achieved by the efforts of all mankind, but every country must make its own independent start towards this goal.
However, it is impossible to make the transition to sustainable development without abandoning current stereotyped thinking which pays no heed to the limits of the biosphere's capacities and engenders in individual citizens and bodies corporate an irresponsible attitude towards the environment and the need to ensure environmental security.
The ideas of sustainable development are very much in tune with the traditions, spirit and mentality of Russia. They can play an important role in the consolidation of Russian society and in determining the State's priorities and the directions of socio-economic transformation.
|
1. Key National Sustainable Development Coordination Mechanism(s)/Council(s). State Environmental Protection Committee of the Russian Federation
Contact point (Name, Title, Office):
Telephone: (095) 252-25-03
Fax: (095) 254-82-83
e-mail:
Mailing address: 123812 Moscow, GSP, ul. B. Gruzinskaya 4/6
2. Membership/Composition/Chairperson 2a. List of ministries and agencies involved: Ministries of: Economy; Foreign Affairs; Natural Resources; Finance; Labour and Social Development; Health; Agriculture; General and Vocational Education.
2b. Names of para-statal bodies and institutions involved, as well as participation of academic and private sectors: State Science and Technology Committee; State Environmental Protection Committee; Federal Hydrometeorology and Environmental Monitoring Service; State Committee for Land Resources and Land Use; Federal Forestry Service; State Fisheries Committee;
2c. Names of non-governmental organizations: "Ekosoglasiye".
3. Mandate role of above mechanism/council: Transition to sustainable development which will ensure the balanced solution of socio-economic problems and the problems of maintaining a favourable environment and natural resource potential in order to meet the requirements of present and future generations.
4. If available, attach a diagram (organization chart) showing national coordination structure and linkages between ministries: Submitted by (Name): V. I. Danilov-Danilyan
Title: Chairman of the State Environmental Protection Committee of the Russian Federation
Date: December 1996.
Ministry/Office: 123812 Moscow, GSP, ul. B. Gruzinskaya 4/6
Telephone: (095) 252-25-03
|
NATIONAL PRIORITY: | |
STATUS REPORT:
Russia is a party to multilateral agreements on the conservation of nature (conventions on climate change, biological diversity, protection of the ozone layer, etc.), which take into account the special situation of developing countries in carrying out the provisions of the agreements. Russia is also a fully fledged participant in the activities of international organizations such as UNEP, WHO, HABITAT, IUCN and UNCTAD (ecologically sound foreign trade) etc., whose programmes of work include tackling the environmental and sustainable development problems of the developing countries.
|
1. Decision-Making Structure: No information
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: No information
3. Major Groups: No information
4. Finance: No information
5. Regional/International Cooperation: No information
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 3: COMBATING POVERTY
Focus of national strategy
In accordance with the Presidential Decree of 2 March 1992 on
"System of minimum consumer budgets of the Russian
Federation", the poverty level in the Russian Federation is
measured by the level of the minimum income, which is
defined as the lowest possible volume of personal consumption of
essential goods and services.
In the period since 1992 the level of real monetary incomes
has fallen by about 40 per cent, the purchasing power of
wages has declined in comparison with the pre-reform period by a
factor of two, and pensions by a factor of 2.5. The
minimum levels of wages and pensions have lost their significance
as the most important social indicators.
A specific feature of the present situation in Russia is that,
in addition to the traditional socially vulnerable groups
(families with many children and single-parent families, the
chronically sick and pensioners), the poverty category now
includes large new groups - the unemployed, workers with children,
and workers in budget-financed branches of the
economy, i.e. categories of the economically active population who
are capable of ensuring and must independently ensure
their essential living standards by their labour.
The impoverishment of Russia's population manifests itself not
only in general terms in the increase in the number of
people with incomes below the minimum but also in the growth of
extremely poor (indigent) groups among the poor.
Highlight activities aimed at the poor and linkages to the
environment
On the instructions of the Government Council on Questions of
Social Development, the Ministry of Social Security,
together with the Ministry of Labour, the Ministry of the Economy
and the Ministry of Finance, prepared a report on
"Ways of overcoming poverty in the Russian Federation". By a
decision of the Council it was proposed that ministries
and offices and executive organs of subjects of the Russian
Federation should prepare measures for participation in the
International Year for the Eradication Poverty.
Matters connected with the preparation and implementation of
measures to solve this problem are under consideration in
all of Russia's regions.
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT:
1. Decision-Making Structure: On 24 October 1996 the State
Duma adopted in first reading a Federal Law on "The
minimum income in the Russian Federation", which establishes the
fundamental principles for determining the level of the
minimum income and social support of the poorest families.
The levels of minimum wages, pensions, allowances and benefits
are regularly adjusted to the cost-of-living index.
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: No information
3. Major Groups: Pensioners, children, the unemployed,
workers in establishments funded by the State budget.
4. Finance: The federal budget, local budgets, the Pension
Fund.
5. Regional/International Cooperation:
NB: Developed countries, where domestic poverty alleviation is not
a major concern may wish to briefly describe their
position regarding global poverty alleviation.
In conjunction with the World Bank, pilot programmes are to be
implemented in 1997 in three subjects of the Russian
Federation on the introduction of targeted social support for the
poorest families, with the aim of bringing per capita
incomes in such families up to a level not lower than 50 per cent
of the minimum income in the region of their permanent
residence.
This approach will later be extended to the whole of
Russia.
1985-1990 | 1992 | 1995 | 1996 | ||
Unemployment (%) | Not recorded | 0.6 | 3.3 | 3.4 | |
Population living in absolute poverty | 29.7 | 25 | 20 | ||
Public spending on social sector % | |||||
Other data
|
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 4: CHANGING CONSUMPTION
PATTERNS
National policy objectives/focus
Attainment of the long-term objectives of society: ensuring
national security, political sovereignty and sustainable
socio-economic development.
"At the present stage Russia's highest national interest,
which coincides with the supreme national value embodied in the
Constitution, is to ensure human development and the sustainable
growth of living standards and welfare on the basis of
observance of human rights and freedoms and encouragement of
responsibility: the democratic development of the
country." (Message on national security from the President of the
Russian Federation to the Federal Assembly.)
National targets
The prosperity of the people: the protection and redevelopment
of the land in which it lives; the preservation and
development of the national culture.
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT:
1. Decision-Making Structure: The national goals with
regard to the formation of rational consumption structures are to
be attained within the framework of specific decision-making
procedures, which include the education of public opinion,
enactment of legislation, preparation and adoption of decisions of
the President and Government of the Russian Federation
and decisions of other federal executive organs and executive and
legislative organs of subjects of the Russian Federation.
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: Consumption
capacity-building is predetermined by the need to solve, as the
first step, the acute economic and social problems, with strict
observance during this period of justified environmental
constraints on economic activity. At the same time action must be
taken to secure fundamental structural changes in the
economy, technological renewal, and the incorporation of
environmental considerations in the process of socio-economic
development.
3. Major Groups: No information.
4. Finance: No information.
5. Regional/International Cooperation: The following main
areas of activity are envisaged in the development of
international cooperation for the conservation, protection and
restoration of the Earth's ecosystem: preservation of
biodiversity and protection of the ozone layer; prevention of
anthropogenic climate change; protection of forests and
reforestation; development and improvement of the network of
specially protected natural areas; safe destruction of
chemical and nuclear weapons; solution of the problems of the
world's oceans; and solution of regional cross-boundary
environmental problems.
Latest 1995 | |||||
GDP per capita (current US$) | 4 221 | ||||
Real GDP growth (%) | 97 | 85.5 | 96 | ||
Annual energy consumption per capita | 7 245.6 | 6 704.1 | 5781.8 | ||
Motor vehicles in use per 1000 inhabitants | 89 | 116 | 133.1 | ||
Other data |
Government policies affecting consumption and production.
1. Goals and Agents (Stakeholders)
Indicate with a (X) those agents which your Governments policies are meant most to influence.
Agents Goals | |||||
Material efficiency | X | ||||
Energy efficiency: | |||||
Transport | |||||
Housing | |||||
Other | |||||
Waste: | |||||
Reduce | |||||
Reuse | |||||
Recycle |
Comments:
2. Means & Measures and Agents (Stakeholders)
Indicate with an (R) those agents who assume primary responsibility for any of the policy measures indicated; indicate with an (I) the agents for which the impact is expected to be especially significant.
Agents Means & Measures | |||||
Improving understanding and analysis | |||||
Information and education (e.g., radio/TV/press) | |||||
Research | |||||
Evaluating environmental claims | |||||
Form partnerships | |||||
Applying tools for modifying behaviour | |||||
Community based strategies | |||||
Social incentives/disincentives (e.g., ecolabelling) | |||||
Regulatory instruments | |||||
Economic incentives/disincentives | |||||
Voluntary agreements of producer responsibility
for aspects of product life cycle | |||||
Provision of enabling
facilities and
infrastructure (e.g., transportation alternatives, recycling) | |||||
Procurement policy | |||||
Monitoring, evaluating and reviewing performance | |||||
Action campaign | |||||
Other (specify) |
Comments:
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 5: DEMOGRAPHIC DYNAMICS AND SUSTAINABILITY
NATIONAL PRIORITY: Stabilization and improvement of the demographic situation | ||||
STATUS REPORT: In the early 1990s the
demographic development of the Russian Federation entered a period
of
very acute crisis reflected in all the demographic indicators. The
total annual death rate for the previous 15 years rose by
almost 50 per cent and the death rate among the economically active
population by a factor of 1.6, with the male rate
four times higher than the female.
The current situation has arisen against a background of long-standing unfavourable demographic trends over more than 30 years. At the same time, the evolving tendency for constant deterioration in demographic processes has been intensified by the impact on the population of the country's socio-economic crisis and the decline in the living standards of a significant part of the population, which has been reflected in the health and life-expectancy indicators. Over the period 1965-1994 life expectancy in Russia fell by five years before rising slightly in 1995 (0.68 years for men and 0.52 for women). At present Russia's life expectancy indicators lag behind the average European figures by 11 years for men and five for women.
In 1991 Russia's overall birth rate fell to its lowest level in the post-war period and it has continued to decline, reaching 1.34 in 1995. Russia is now among the European countries with the lowest birth rates.
This lower birth rate has been influenced by the ongoing reforms in Russia and the general dynamics of the socio-economic and political situation in the country, but it is consistent with trends established earlier.
Despite a generally favourable increase in migration, the natural loss of population in Russia, which began in 1992, means that numbers have continued to decline: in 1996 the population totalled 147.5 million, as against 148.1 million in 1995.
|
1. Decision-Making Structure: The Ministry of Labour and
Social Development, in accordance with the decisions of
the Parliament and Government and on the basis of research
conducted in Russia's largest centres of population, is
developing and implementing measures for the achievement of the
fundamental socio-demographic objectives, preparing
annual reports on the status and trends of demographic development
in the Russian Federation for the President and
Government, and making proposals for the solution of the most
pressing demographic problems.
An inter-departmental commission on socio-demographic
questions, established by Governmental Decree No. 697 of 23
July 1993, is working on the formulation of an overall strategy for
socio-demographic policy, the determination of
priorities in the development and implementation of federal
socio-demographic development programmes, and
coordination of the activities of central federal executive organs,
scientific organizations and regional inter-departmental
commissions on questions of socio-demographic development.
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: In accordance with
the recommendations of the International Conference on
Population and Development (Cairo, 1994), the Ministry of Labour
and Social Development produced in 1995 a Concept
of the demographic development of the Russian Federation,
subsequently approved by the Government, which addresses
the need for strategic programmes to counteract the crisis
affecting the health of the population, with a view to increasing
life expectancy and reducing the death rate and solving the
problems of the birth rate and migration as the fundamental
determinants of sustainable demographic development.
In 1997 a programme of action to resolve the demographic
crisis in the Russian Federation is being elaborated for
confirmation by the President or Government.
3. Major Groups: The inter-departmental commission on
socio-demographic questions is establishing working groups
on the basic problems of the demographic development of the Russian
Federation: human health, the death rate, migration
from northern regions, refugees and forcibly displaced persons,
etc.
4. Finance: The federal budget and the budgets of subjects
of the Russian Federation, as well as the United Nations
Population Fund (UNFPA) and the United Nations Children's Fund
(UNICEF).
5. Regional/International Cooperation: The Ministry of
Labour and Social Development is acting as lead agency for
the participation of the Russian Federation in UNFPA, UNICEF and
the European Centre for Social Welfare Policy and
Research; it coordinates and plays its part in scientific research
in the regions connected with their demographic
development.
Latest 1995 | ||||
Population (Thousands) mid-year estimates | 148 292 | 148 519 | 147 773 | |
Annual % rate of increase (1990-1993) | 100.5 | 99.75 | ||
Surface area (Km2) | 17 075.4 | |||
Population density (people/Km2) | 8.7 | |||
Life expectancy (years) Men Women | 63.8 74.3 | 58.9 71.9 | 58.8 71.7 |
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 6: PROTECTING AND PROMOTING
HUMAN HEALTH
Over the past year the total death rate fell in the Russian
Federation and the birth rate continued to decline. The death rate
among the population of working age is high in a number of regions
of the country, and this is an important factor in the
decline in life expectancy. The number of elderly persons is
increasing, while the number of children and adolescents is
decreasing. There is growth in the overall morbidity rate both
among adults (psychological disturbances, tuberculosis,
syphilis) and among children (diseases of respiratory organs). At
the same time the indicators for controllable infections
have declined.
In these circumstances the fundamental task of the Ministry of
Health is to ensure the sustainable functioning of the health
system and maintenance of the volume and standards of medical
care.
Despite the objective difficulties of the transitional period
in Russia, it has proved possible to maintain the capacity of the
health system with respect to personnel, materials and equipment,
and scientific and industrial requirements.
The organizational structure of institutions of curative and
preventive medicine in urban and rural areas guarantees free
access of all citizens to primary health care. Hospital facilities
at the municipal, regional and federal levels provide every
kind of specialized medical services. As in the past, great
attention is given to prevention. The public health and
epidemiological services continue to perform their functions.
One task of State-wide importance is the protection of workers
and of the whole population by means of comprehensive
programmes of environmental safety.
In the past year work continued on reform of the health
system, including administrative decentralization and adaptation of
health institutions and enterprises to the new economic conditions.
To this end measures have been carried out to effect a
transition to compulsory personal medical insurance and to ensure
the regulation of activities of institutions of curative and
preventive medicine in the new circumstances, the use of general
practitioners, and the introduction of modern methods of
prevention, diagnosis and treatment.
NATIONAL PRIORITY: Formulation of State policy for
protection of human health and adoption of comprehensive
measures to improve the performance of the branches of the health
system
STATUS REPORT: A people's health always subtly
and clearly reacts to and reflects the socio-economic and
socio-political conditions in which it lives. Accordingly, on the
basis of analysis of the country's medical and demographic
situation, a State policy is being constructed for the protection
of human health.
1. Decision-Making Structure: The scientific-industrial
combine "Medical-Social Problems, the Economy and
Information Technology" and a number of public health scientific
research institutes are providing the Ministry of Health
with expert scientific assessments of problems of protecting human
health.
A law on "Medical insurance of citizens of the Russian
Federation" was adopted in 1991, and in 1993 a law on
"Fundamental legislation of the Russian Federation on the
protection of human health".
In accordance with the health care priorities, eight
special-purpose State programmes have been drawn up, with
subprogrammes, including: "Children of Russia", "Safe maternity",
"Prevention by vaccination", "Anti-AIDS",
"Development and improvement of the all-Russian disaster-response
medical service", "Elimination of the consequences
of the accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power station", and
"Development of the medical industry and improvement of
the supply of medicines and medical equipment".
A number of bills on improvement of the protection of human
health have been submitted to the State Duma.
In 1996 the Federal Assembly adopted a law of the Russian
Federation on "Framework of State regulation of socio-economic
development in the North of the Russian Federation".
By 1998 the preparation of the following practical scientific
federal programmes will be completed:
3. Major Groups: The period since 1992 has seen the
adoption in Russia of key documents on the protection of mothers
and children, documents which form the basis for State social
policy on the protection, survival and development of
mothers and children. The measures include:
- Urgent measures to ensure high standards of public health,
prevention of infectious and non-infectious diseases, and
reduction of the number of premature deaths;
- Family medicine;
- Support for Russian medical science.
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues:
- The Presidential Decree on "Priority measures for carrying
out the World Declaration on the Survival,
Protection and Development of Children in the 1990s" (1992);
- Since January 1993 Russia has introduced the childbirth
criteria recommended by WHO;
- The Presidential Decree on "Priority tasks of State policy
for women" (1993);
- The national plan of action for children, confirmed by a
Presidential Decree in implementation of the United
Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (1995);
- The Concept of the improvement of the status of women in the
Russian Federation (1996) and the national plan
of action to improve the status of women and enhance their role in
society up to the year 2000 (1996), confirmed by the
Government of the Russian Federation with a view to the
implementation of the Convention on Elimination of all Forms
of Discrimination against Women.
4. Finance: The proportion of GDP
spent on health remains small at 2.5 per cent.
5. Regional/International Cooperation: Cooperation
has begun in the Russian-American commission on science and
technology (the Gore-Chernomyrdin commission) on programmes to
combat infectious diseases, health education, and
improvement of human health.
Latest 1995 | ||||
Birthrate per 1,000 | 15.9 | 13.4 | 9.3 | |
Infant mortality (per 1000 live births) | 22.1 | 17.4 | 18.1 | |
Maternal mortality rate (per 100,000 live births) | 68.0 | 47.4 | 53.3 | |
Access to safe drinking water (% of population) | ||||
Access to sanitation services (% of population) | ||||
Other data |
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 7: PROMOTING SUSTAINABLE
HUMAN SETTLEMENT
DEVELOPMENT
At present the development of a sustainable human settlement
system in Russia is proceeding on the basis of the
preservation of the existing basic settlement framework but with a
reduction in the proportion of urban population due to a
decline in the number of urban settlements. The inefficient
employment system, especially in towns with a variety of
industries, obstructs the establishment of a sustainable settlement
system.
The proportion of urban population in Russia stands roughly at
the average European level and is only slightly lower than
in such countries as the United States and Japan. However the
concentration of population in very large towns is
noticeably lower, especially in comparison with the United States.
In Russia there are 12 towns with populations of more
than one million, two times fewer than in the United States, and
the population of 10 of these towns is below two million.
The process of dispersal of population from large towns is
proceeding in Russia, despite the obstacles, with the
introduction of the registration system and attempts to carry out
a policy of limiting large-town growth.
There are plans for the further development of densely
populated large and very large conurbations, with due attention
given to considerations of human environmental safety and the
priority development of transcontinental settlement along
the St. Petersburg-Vladivostok axis.
Currently the most urgent problems of sustainable human
settlement are connected with the establishment of an efficient
employment system; in addition the small towns have problems of
social infrastructure and ensuring maximum satisfaction
of social requirements.
In view of the need to improve the environmental situation in
Russia, the existing settlements in areas of exceptional
environmental conditions will be reorganized, and this will mean
the relocation of population.
Measures to improve the urban environment by means of new
construction projects on the cleanest suburban sites envisage
low-rise instead of high-rise building, the rehabilitation of land
in industrial zones and centres, and the implementation of
programmes to upgrade the environment. This will include the
development of suburban zones for the construction of
individual and collective housing, the use of local recreational
possibilities, the establishment of a sustainable network of
settlements, and the creation of model sustainable landscapes in
the buffer zones of specially protected natural areas.
Special attention will be given to the environmental
rehabilitation of urban land, suburban and recreational areas,
rural
settlements and open spaces between settlements, and to the
creation on this basis of a congenial living environment;
attention will also be given to the preservation of the historical
traditions and authentic living environment of various
ethnic and ethnic-cultural population groups, especially minority
indigenous peoples, and to the establishment of federal or
regional systems for the regulated use of nature (national parks
and reserves).
NATIONAL PRIORITY: Establishment of a sustainable
human settlement system
STATUS REPORT:
1. Decision-Making Structure: In accordance with the
Presidential Decree on "A comprehensive programme of
measures on job creation and preservation for 1996-2000", a general
plan has been prepared for the creation of jobs in the
light of the restructuring of the economy and social and regional
policies.
The Government has confirmed this general plan for changes in
the settlement pattern (Protocol No. 31 of 15 December
1994).
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: The indicators of
this general settlement plan are reviewed and adjusted
annually.
Principles for the establishment of an efficient employment
system have been proposed by the Ministry of Labour and
Social Development and the relevant federal executive organs and
executive organs of subjects of the Russian Federation.
3. Major Groups: Towns, regions, conurbations, and federal
executive organs.
4. Finance: Federal and local budgets and investments,
including direct foreign investments, the Small Business
Development Fund, and regional development funds.
5. Regional/International Cooperation: With the support of
the International Labour Organization the Ministry of
Labour and Social Development held a conference on improvement of
the employment system in the Russian Federation.
Urban population in % of total population | 74 | 73 | |
Annual rate of growth of urban population (%) | -0.7 | -0.2 | |
Largest city population (in % of total population) | 23.9 | 22.6 | |
Other data | 3 221 | 3 108 |
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 8: INTEGRATING ENVIRONMENT
AND DEVELOPMENT IN
DECISION-MAKING
Following the United Nations Conference in Rio de Janeiro in
June 1992 the Russian Federation adopted a series of very
important documents on environmental protection and use of natural
resources, including:
The Government's plan of action for environmental protection
for 1994-1995, which includes some 100 very important
environmental measures (Governmental Decree No. 496 of 18 May
1994).
Governmental Decree No. 155 of 19 February 1996 confirming the
Government's plan of action for environmental
protection and use of natural resources for 1996-1997.
This plan contains 56 very important measures, including: four
bills, 41 special-purpose federal programmes, 25 of which
are for implementation, six regulatory instruments, and five other
documents. This plan represents the second stage of the
implementation of the fundamental provisions of the State strategy
confirmed by Presidential Decree No. 236 of 4
February 1994 on "State strategy of the Russian Federation for
environmental protection and sustainable development".
By Order No. 217 of 24 February 1994 the Government instructed
the Ministry of the Economy, the Ministry of the
Environment, other relevant ministries and offices, with the
participation of the Russian Academy of Sciences, and the
executive organs of subjects of the Russian Federation to develop
a draft Concept of the transition of the Russian
Federation to sustainable development. In compliance with this
instruction the Ministry of the Economy created a
working group to prepare the document and a commission to
coordinate the work. The Ministry of the Environment and
the Federal Environment Fund announced a competition, for which 30
different concepts were submitted by various
collectives and individual scientists. Eight of these concepts
were selected by the competition commission for use in the
preparation of the summary document. The draft Concept was
considered at the first all-Russian congress on the
conservation of nature, during the preparations for which in
January-May 1995 the draft Concept was discussed at local
conferences in 87 subjects of the Russian Federation. The final
version of the Concept for the transition of the Russian
Federation to sustainable development was confirmed by a
Presidential Decree of 1 April 1996.
This Decree ordered the production of a draft State strategy
for the sustainable development of the Russian Federation.
In May 1996 the Government adopted an Order on the production
of a draft State strategy for the sustainable development
of the Russian Federation. The Ministry of the Economy, the
Ministry of the Environment and the Ministry of Science
were nominated as the lead agencies in this undertaking.
An all-Russian conference on combating violations of
environmental law was held in May 1996. It adopted a very
important resolution, the implementation of which will lead to a
considerable reduction in such offences. This resolution
requires the Ministry of the Environment to prepare and submit to
the Government a draft federal coordination plan for
combatting violations of environmental law for the period
1997-2001.
On 10-11 April 1996 the Ministry held an international
seminar, at Golitsino, Moscow region, on the
consideration and introduction of a programme of action on
environmental protection for the countries of Central and
Eastern Europe. A package of documents, including the decisions of
the seminar, was sent to 115 agencies for use in
their work.
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT:
1. Decision-Making Structure (please also refer to the fact sheet):
- The Government's plan of action for environmental protection
and use of natural resources for 1996-1997 confirmed by
Governmental Decree No. 155 of 19 February. This plan represents
the second stage in the implementation of the
fundamental provisions of the State strategy for environmental
protection and sustainable development confirmed by
Presidential Decree No. 236 of 4 February 1994. The plan contains
56 very important measures, including four bills, 41
special-purpose federal programmes, of which 25 are for
implementation, six regulatory instruments, and five other
documents.
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues:
- The drafting of regulatory instruments in the field of
environmental protection and the use of natural resources with a
view to the consistent implementation of the transition of the
Russian Federation to sustainable development;
3. Major Groups: Improvement of the legal and regulatory basis for environmental protection and the use of natural resources with a view to the consistent implementation of the transition of the Russian Federation to sustainable development.
4. Finance: The federal budget, budgets of subjects of the Russian Federation, resources of enterprises and extra-budgetary sources.
5. Regional/International Cooperation: Bilateral and multilateral agreements on environmental protection and the use of natural resources.
|
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 9: PROTECTION OF THE
ATMOSPHERE
The Montreal Protocol and its Amendments
The State Environmental Protection Committee is the lead
agency in the Russian Federation for matters connected with the
Montreal Protocol. The main centres dealing with questions of the
gradual reduction of the production and use of ozone
depleting substances (ODS) within the organizational structure were
the special unit on the ODS problem, established in
1993, the inter-departmental commission on protection of the ozone
layer, established in 1992, and its subcommissions,
set up in 1993.
Questions of ozone layer research and monitoring are the
responsibility of the Federal Hydrometeorlogical and
Environmental Monitoring Service (Rosgidromet). The programme of
work includes the basic areas of research
envisaged in the Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone
Layer. Special attention is given to the development
and support of a system for monitoring the condition of the ozone
layer and a system for monitoring ultraviolet radiation
over the Russian Federation and adjoining territories.
In the monitoring of the ozone layer use is made of both
land-based and satellite observation facilities. The work which is
being done represents a significant contribution by the Russian
Federation to the development and support of the Global
Atmosphere Watch of the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) and
to the fulfilment of commitments under the
Vienna Convention.
Rosgidromet has a network of stations for measuring the total
ozone content at 30 points in the territory of the Russian
Federation. The incoming operational information is processed at
a single centre (Rosgidromet's Central Aerological
Observatory) and is presented in the form of daily maps showing
deviations of the volumes of total ozone content from
norms established over many years, together with block bulletins.
Analyses are also made of monthly and seasonal
anomalies in the fields of total ozone content above the
territories of the Russian Federation in the Antarctic.
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate
Change
UNFCCC was signed in 1994.
Additional comments relevant to this chapter
In the Russian Federation agriculture, forestry and water
resources are extremely vulnerable to climate change. This is
due mainly to shifts in the distribution of precipitation and an
increase in the frequency and severity of droughts. In the
zone of permanent frost, covering some 10 million km (about 58 per
cent of the country's total area), thawing caused by
warming of the climate will destroy the economic infrastructure,
owing largely to the vulnerability of mining installations,
energy and transport systems and the communal economy. A rise in
the level of the world's oceans will lead to flooding
and destruction of coastal areas and low-lying land in river deltas
together with the towns and other settlements located
there. Climate change may have a harmful effect on human health
both through intensification of heat stress in southern
regions and through the spread of many kinds of disease.
The Russian Federation therefore has an interest in conducting
national activities in various economic spheres and in broad
international cooperation on problems of climate change with the
States parties to the Convention.
In 1994, with a view to coordinating the activities of
ministries, offices and organizations of the Russian Federation
designed to prevent dangerous climate changes and ensure the timely
adaptation of the economy and the environment to
such changes, the Government established an inter-departmental
commission on problems of climate change. Its
membership includes senior officials of 24 ministries and offices
and distinguished Russian scientists.
Among the most important results of the work of the
inter-departmental commission over the recent period in accordance
with the obligations of the Russian Federation under the Convention
attention must be drawn to the preparation of the first
national statement of the Russian Federation on activities under
the Convention, submitted to the Convention Secretariat in
November 1995, with the agreement of the Government, as well as to
activities under the special-purpose federal
programme on prevention of dangerous climate changes and their
harmful consequences, confirmed by a Governmental
Order of 19 October 1996.
The evaluations contained in the first national statement on
activities under the Convention justify a confident assertion
that by 2000 the Russian Federation will no longer be exceeding the
level of anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases
established on base 1990. This will make it possible to carry out,
within the framework of the special-purpose federal
programme, measures for the limitation of anthropogenic emissions
of greenhouse gases which take into account the
levels of economic growth expected in our country.
The Russian Federation takes an active part in the work of the
Convention's highest organ - the Conference of the Parties
- and its subsidiary bodies.
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT:
Montreal Protocol (1987) signed in 1987
London Amendment (1990) signed in 1991
The latest report(s) to the Montreal Protocol Secretariat were
prepared in 1994.
The latest report to the UNFCCC Secretariat was submitted in 1995.
1. Decision-Making Structure: In the Russian Federation the coordination of activities connected with UNFCCC is entrusted to the inter-departmental commission on problems of climate change, established by Governmental Decree No. 34 of 22 January 1994. The provisions concerning the inter-departmental commission and its membership were confirmed by Governmental Order No. 346 of 19 April 1994. These are the commission's basic functions:
- Coordination of the work of ministries and offices on the
reduction of the harmful impact of economic activities on the
climate, and prevention of the adverse consequences of climate
change for the country's economy and natural
environment;
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: For the purposes
of fulfilment of the Russian Federation's obligations with
respect to implementation of UNFCCC and with a view to prevention
of the harmful consequences of climate change for
human health and the national economy, the special-purpose federal
programme on prevention of dangerous climate
changes and their harmful consequences for the period 1997-2000 was
confirmed by Governmental Decree No. 1242 of 19
October 1996; this programme provides for:
Considerable attention has been given to the development of bilateral scientific and technological links with other countries on problems of climate change. These matters are reflected in the topics of common interest in the draft agreements with France, Australia and South Korea.
Particular attention must be drawn to the development of bilateral cooperation on problems of climate change between the Russian Federation and the United States within the framework of the Gore-Chernomyrdin commission.
Since 1994 work has been carried out under a Russian-American project as part of the United States programme for the support of national research in the field of climate change; in addition to Russia, 53 other countries are participating in this programme.
The problems of climate change occupy an important place on the agenda of the Inter-State Hydrometeorology Council, which coordinates the activities of the hydrometeorlogical services of the States members of CIS. Under the auspices of this Council work has been done on the preparation of the national statements on activities under the Convention of the States members of CIS, and coordinated proposals have been worked out for the establishment of a greenhouse gases monitoring network in the territory of the CIS countries. |
Greenhouse gases (eq. million tons) | Latest 1995 | |||
CO2 emissions | 651 | |||
N2O | 0.82 | |||
CH4 | 27 | |||
CO | 8.1 | |||
NOx | 3.0 | |||
Non-methoane hydrocarbons | 4.1 |
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 10: INTEGRATED APPROACH TO
THE PLANNING AND
MANAGEMENT OF LAND RESOURCES
The condition of Russia's land, especially in recent years,
has been unsatisfactory and in some regions critical. Data on
the condition and use of the land of the Russian Federation testify
to the continuing development of harmful processes
(decline of humus content to an unacceptably low level, water and
wind erosion, desertification and flooding, subsidiary
salination and nitrification, and pollution of soil with pesticide
residues, heavy metals, radionuclides, etc.). Accordingly,
there is an urgent and immediate need to create a unified system
for obtaining information about the condition and use of
land, to apply the principle of economical land use, and to devise
and introduce regulatory and economic mechanisms
which will eliminate the consumerist attitude towards the land.
Questions of an integrated approach to the planning and
management of land resources and information about the state of
affairs are reflected in the annual "National State report on the
condition and use of the land of the Russian Federation".
NATIONAL PRIORITY: Management of land resources with
a view to their maximum preservation as a means of
providing for the essential needs of Russia's population.
STATUS REPORT:
1. Decision-Making Structure: The Government of the
Russian Federation has adopted a number of Orders: on
confirmation of the special federal programme on the establishment
of an automated system for conducting the State land
survey; on land monitoring; on the State programme for monitoring
the land of the Russian Federation for the period
1993-1995; on the establishment of a unified State system of
environmental monitoring; and on confirmation of the Order
on the procedure for exercise of State control over land use and
conservation in the Russian Federation.
The problems reflected in these documents must be solved by
taking practical action in the sphere of land resources and
development.
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues:
3. Major Groups:
4. Finance: Expenditure for 1996-2000 on the establishment
of an automated system for conducting the State land survey
(in accordance with Governmental Order No. 932 of 3 August 1996)
amounts to 8,718.4 billion roubles at 1995 prices.
Land monitoring, surveying and development in the territory of
the Russian Federation requires expenditure of 1,000
billion roubles a year.
Financing for the establishment of an automated system for
conducting the land survey is being provided by the
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (LARIS
project), the European Bank for Reconstruction and
Development (TASIS project) and other international financial
institutions. The Russian-German HERMES project will
equip 400 land survey offices in 1996-1997.
5. Regional/International Cooperation:
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 11: COMBATING
DEFORESTATION
The need to preserve forests as a fundamental Russian
landscape and as component parts of land use based on scientific
knowledge, experience and comprehensive assessment of possible
impacts on forest ecosystems has been established in the
relevant legislative and regulatory instruments, guidelines,
handbooks and recommendations on forestry in the Russian
Federation.
The following are some of the elements of Russia's national
priority in the fight against deforestation:
Russia's participation in international agreements on forest
resources
The vast extent of Russia's forest resources pre-ordains their
global significance and the special role of its Federal
Forestry Service (Rosleskhoz).
Rosleskhoz represents the Russian Federation at global
meetings on forests. Following the United Nations Conference on
Environment and Development in 1992, Rosleskhoz has taken part in
the Helsinki process, the Montreal process, meetings
of the intergovernmental working group on the world's forests
convened by Canada and Malaysia in 1994, the dialogue on
criteria and indicators of conservation and management of temperate
and boreal forests, held at Olympia, United States, in
1994 and Santiago, Chile, in February 1995 (Santiago Declaration),
and the ministerial conference on forests organized by
FAO in Rome in March 1995.
At the international meeting on tropical timber in January
1994 the Russian Federation was one of the 24 countries which
made statements about the achievement of the sustainable management
of their forests by 2000. Russia has signed and
ratified the Framework Convention on Climate Change and the
Convention on Biological Diversity.
Concrete action to fulfil international obligations is being
taken against the background of the reform of the country's
economy. The radical economic changes in Russia have caused a
crisis in the forestry sector. The sharp cut in budgetary
allocations for forest management, including expenditure on
protection and conservation and reforestation, as well as on
scientific research, has already led to a worsening of the forestry
situation and may possibly have further serious
consequences for sustainable management of the forestry sector.
Despite all the difficulties of the transitional period, the
Russian Government is adopting real measures for reform of the
forestry sector and implementation of international agreements.
The continuing reforms have substantially
transformed the attitude of society to forestry in Russia. The
emphasis has
shifted from the output of forestry products, including their
processing, to a management methodology aimed at
sustainable development. The basic function of the central forest
management organ - Rosleskhoz - has become the
establishment of the regulatory framework and the organizational
and economic conditions for sustainable forest
management. This means that the main task of Rosleskhoz is now the
formulation and consistent implementation of
effective forestry policy.
The "Bases of forestry legislation" and the "Law on
environmental protection" have been in force in Russia since 1993.
A
new forestry law of direct application - the Forestry Code of the
Russian Federation - is about to be enacted.
The establishment of the legal framework for State management
of Russia's stock of forests is nearing completion. The
production of this new forestry legislation has required the
drafting of a considerable volume of new regulatory and
standard-setting instruments.
In order to establish the Concept of the transition of the
Russian Federation to sustainable development in the forestry
sector, to fulfil Russia's international forestry obligations
stemming from ratification of the two conventions mentioned
above, and to implement the decisions of the United Nations
Conference on Environment and Development with a view to
sustainable forest management (principles of forestry, Agenda 21),
Rosleskhoz has drafted and confirmed the criteria and
indicators of the sustainable management of the forests of the
Russian Federation.
These "criteria and indicators" are a working document at the
federal and regional levels. Their fundamental purpose is to
establish the framework conditions for the functioning of State
forest management agencies in such a way as to satisfy the
requirements of present and future generations of Russians and to
coordinate the efforts for the sustainable development of
the forestry sector as a whole.
Rosleskhoz is creating a national system of certification of
forest products as a tool for the practical improvement of the
forest management and forest use systems, primarily at the local
level.
Reforestation
The Government drafted and adopted a State programme of
reforestation in Russia for 1993-1995 with a view to reducing
the areas of unforested land, reproducing forestry resources,
preventing the build-up of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere,
and combating undesirable climate changes on the planet.
This programme is designed to give the maximum possible
concrete effect to the organizational, technical and economic
measures necessary for the attainment of the main goal - timely
reforestation with economically valuable species.
The implementation of the programme in 1993-1995 succeeded in
checking the decline in the volume of reforestation
work, improving its quality, and increasing the responsibility of
executive organs for reforestation. In comparison with
1992, in 1993-1994 the volume of reforestation work and the
inclusion of saplings in the category of plantings with an
economic value as timber were increased, and the loss of forest
crops was reduced.
Now the priority for the development of the output of forest
products is the transition to intensive industrial technology
which will mechanize the work and ensure the high quality of the
products.
Under this programme work has been stepped up on the
identification and reproduction of a genetic stock of valuable
species, and on the organization of new forestry seed selection and
growing centres in areas of intensive production, and
plans have been made for increasing the production of grown-on
planting stock and for the construction of additional
nurseries with watering systems and heating. Owing to the shortage
of funding the planned projects have not been fully
implemented. Nevertheless, a significant volume of work is being
done every year, making it possible to support the
introduction of forest management techniques in order to guarantee
the uninterrupted use of forest resources and
continuation of other forest activities.
For the period 1993-1995 the State reforestation
programme envisaged for the whole of Russia reforestation measures
covering an area of 4,950 thousand hectares, including 1,650
thousand hectares in 1994 and 1,700 thousand in 1995.
According to the inventory of the stock of forests as of 1
January 1993, there was a total of 115.5 million hectares of
unforested land. Owing to the shortage of funding, the volume of
reforestation work declined every year. In 1990
reforestation work was carried out on 1,765.4 thousand hectares, in
1991 on 1,562.3 thousand hectares and in 1992 on
1,402 thousand.
According to the evaluation of the implementation of the State
programme, in 1993-1995 actual reforestation work was
carried out on an area of 4,476.9 thousand hectares. Over the
three-year period a total of 1,186 thousand hectares was
planted or sown with forest crops, including 391 thousand hectares
in 1994 and 366.9 thousand in 1995. For this period
the planted area resulting from the encouragement of natural
renewal totalled 3,290.9 thousand hectares or 73.5 per cent
of the total volume of reforestation.
In 1994 the quota for the planting of cedar was met by 120 per
cent, a figure significantly higher than in the previous
year.
In comparison with 1994, 1995 saw some decline in the actual
volume of reforestation work (by 107.6 thousand hectares),
including the production of forest crops on 24.1 thousand hectares
and the encouragement of natural renewal on 83.6
thousand. At the same time the loss of forest crops not
transferred to forested land has continued to decline. In 1995 3.8
thousand fewer hectares were lost than in 1994, and there was some
decline in the damage of crops by fires and a sharp
increase, almost by a factor of two, in the volume of crops lost
owing to unfavourable weather conditions.
It should be noted that, in general terms, Russia's
reforestation work has proceeded at a fairly high level over the
recent
period in both qualitative and quantitative terms.
In view of the need for urgent action to implement
international agreements and ensure sustainable development, the
Government instructed Rosleskhoz to draw up a federal programme on
reforestation in Russia for 1996-2000, which will
stipulate scientifically based volumes of reforestation work and
the ways and means of carrying it out, and secure an
improvement in the condition of the stock of forests and the
country's environmental situation.
Protection of forests against fires, pests
and diseases, and pollution
In order to improve the protection of forests against fires
and in implementation of a Governmental Order, Rosleskhoz
together with other relevant ministries and offices drew up a State
programme on the protection of forests against fires for
1993-1997. It was adopted in 1993 and provides for:
- Strengthening of the existing aerial and land-based forest
fire services;
Roslezkhoz is carrying a number of further measures in order
to apply the principles embodied in the Concept of Russia's
environmental security.
In order to comply with the principle of acceptable levels of
impact on the environment, standards for the maximum
permissible concentrations of pollutants in the atmosphere for the
main coniferous species have been drawn up and
recommended for approval in a number of regions of the country.
There are also plans to step up the work on a schedule
of pollutants, primarily ozone, and the establishment of critical
levels (loads), taking into account the effect of the
accumulation and fall-out of phytotoxic substances, in order to set
standards for environmental impact as a whole and
introduce procedures for applying these standards.
The development of a system of tree disease monitoring will be
continued in order to identify and rehabilitate
damaged areas and ensure systematic maintenance. Disease
monitoring, which is an integral part of forest monitoring,
provides an operational and constant check on tree diseases in
forests affected by various factors and facilitates timely
decisions on carrying out forest management work to rehabilitate
the damaged areas.
The implementation of this programme requires the drafting of
a number of standard-setting documents:
methodology for the selection and location of facilities, criteria
for the evaluation of the condition of forests, and
improved methods of evaluation and forecasting of developments so
that decisions can be taken for the necessary action.
The special-purpose reforestation programme provides for the
further development of biological methods of protecting
forests against pests. To this end, work is being conducted under
the auspices of the Scientific Research Institute on a
number of topics with a view to the improvement of aerial fire
fighting techniques and production of bacterial and viral
preparations which will make it possible to reduce the use of
chemical insecticides to protect forests.
The radioactive pollution of forest land has brought
about significant changes and constraints in the social sphere, in
the
system of forest use, in reforestation and in forest protection.
For the total area of forest land affected by the Chernobyl
accident, the direct losses alone from unrealised profits owing
to the reduction of the volume of principal and intermittent use
and to unused economically accessible resources for by-products
total at least 7-10 billion roubles a year (at August 1993
prices).
The area of forests polluted by radionuclides, determined by
a quarterly land-based radiation survey during 1991-1994, as
a result of the accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power station
totals 1,230.2 thousand hectares, as a result of the many
years of operation of the Mayak industrial combine - 647 thousand
hectares, and as a result of the testing of nuclear
weapons before the introduction of the ban on surface and air
nuclear explosions - 271.5 thousand hectares.
In accordance with the concept of introducing forest
management in polluted areas, the basic task is to enhance the
ecological role of the forests as a biochemical barrier to the
passage of radioactive materials out of the polluted areas.
The total area of destroyed forest totalled 171.2 thousand
hectares in 1993 and 225.3 thousand in 1994. The increase in
the area of destroyed forest was due primarily to fires. In 1995
the area of forest lost was 162.1 thousand hectares, 5.3
per cent less than in 1993 and 28 per cent less than in 1994.
The period 1993-1995 saw an increase in the area of forest in
which action is being taken to protect the trees against pests
and diseases, and the substantial growth in the volume of such
measures is due to the need to suppress population
explosions of the Siberian silk-spinning moth.
However, in 1993-1995 there was no increase and even a small
decrease in the area covered by aerial fire-protection
services - for familiar reasons.
Modernization of production technology
Owing to the crisis in the timber production and processing
industry and the continuing economic recession, production
equipment is not being renewed and new technology and equipment are
not being introduced. Only five per cent of
existing equipment is up to modern standards and more than half
requires modification, while a part requires total
replacement. As a result of the decline in the output of forestry
industry products the take-up of production capacity has
fallen to an extremely low level.
As a result of the introduction of machine methods in the
forestry enterprises accounting for 65 per cent of the timber
exports of the former USSR, the level of mechanization of basic
timber operations in 1990 was:
1. Felling - 38.4 per cent of all work;
However, the numerous private logging and timber processing
enterprises, supported by the local authorities,
are endeavouring to speed up the turnover of scarce capital, i.e.
to achieve greater independence from the central
authorities and federal management.
Here there is a need for new forms of balanced development of
the numerous private enterprises in the forestry
industry, which are moreover extremely unevenly distributed over
the territory of the European-Urals part of Russia.
The system of forest use is currently at the formative stage.
It is based on the numerous (more than 2,000 in
the European-Urals part of Russia) forestry organizations and
enterprises and joint-stock companies. The overwhelming
majority of them are private bodies.
December 1992 saw the creation of the Association of Forestry
Enterprises of Russia, an organization with a
membership of more than 800 companies, partnerships, firms and
enterprises in the forestry industry, which represents
forestry interests in the various federal legislative and executive
bodies. The Russian State Forestry Corporation
"Roslesprom" was established in January 1993.
Some of the forestry enterprises have joined the
Roslesprom joint-stock corporation, some the Russian Forestry
Industrialists joint-stock corporation, some the Karellesprom
joint-stock company, and some the Komilesprom joint-stock
company, etc.
At present Russia has 3,500 specialized State logging, saw
mill and timber processing enterprises and about 33,000
different logging, processing and marketing firms.
All these organizations have been created on the basis of the
organizational structure of the forestry industry complex of
the former USSR.
Non-timber forestry resources and their processing
According to the forestry legislation of the Russian
Federation, in addition to roundwood production the following forms
of forest use are allowed in Russia's forests:
Secondary forest materials, subsidiary forestry activities and
hunting are of special importance in the daily lives of the
local population, which is heavily dependent on the forest.
Secondary forest materials have traditionally included
industrial materials, fodder and materials for decorative and
applied art.
The industrial materials basically of tannins and natural
dyes.
The commonest animal feed is the vitamin meal obtained from
the branches of coniferous species and fed to
cattle.
Decorative and applied art products - willow and birch
baskets, wooden spoons, carved wooden animals, etc. -
have been in strong demand, especially in recent years. Many of
the products of our local craftsmen are destined for
export.
Secondary forest materials are collected by the people both
for their own use and for procurement
organizations.
The supply of secondary forest materials is sufficient to meet
the needs of the local population and their
handicraft activities. The industrial shortage of such raw
materials is due solely to a shortage of labour to collect them.
An analysis of the use of plants growing wild in the forest
says much about the economic and social situation of
the country but little about the capacity of its natural resources,
which are clearly underused. A comparison of the
average use of secondary forest materials over many years with the
average harvest of food products from the forest
which could be gathered for industrial uses shows that the average
exploitation of this resource for the whole country is
no more than 30-40 per cent.
Following the country's transition to a
new economic course, there are plans for a more rational approach
to the solution
of the problem of the use of forest food products to meet the needs
of the national economy, and for the issue of the
desirability of the production of any specific type of product in
any given region to be decided in the light of strict
economic accounting.
These issues must be resolved on the basis of the value of the
timber itself and taking into account the economic and
environmental consequences of the decisions. A land-survey
evaluation of forest land is currently being made, and the
values are expressed in roubles per unit of forest area for each
type of forest and in each specific region.
Recreation
The fundamental provisions of the forestry legislation of the
Russian Federation provide for the designation of categories
of forest for health and recuperation purposes. These include
urban forests, health-resort forests, and forests in green
belts around towns and other settlements and industrial
enterprises.
For the purposes of organized leisure and tourism, in addition
to the categories of forest mentioned above, in 1983 a start
was made on the creation of national parks. In 1988 Russia had
nine such parks with a total area of 1,300 thousand
hectares. In 1994 there were 26 of them, with a total area of
6,410.2 thousand hectares, and in 1996 33 parks with a total
area of 97,360.8 thousand hectares. Additional national parks will
be established. The number of areas of the country's
forests designated for recreational use will also be increased.
The increase in the number of private automobiles has brought
with it an increase in the number of people spending their
holidays and rest days in the countryside and the forest. It has
become increasingly common for people to take activity
holidays canoeing on mountain rivers and streams in the taiga, for
every opportunity exists for this type of holiday.
During the summer holidays the recreational demands on the forest
sharply increase, resulting in some regions in the
trampling of plantations, damage to the topsoil (due especially to
the gathering of berries and mushrooms) and even its
outright destruction.
Russia's protected areas are divided into four categories:
reserves, national parks, wildlife sanctuaries and natural
monuments. The reserves are of greatest importance for protection
of the biodiversity of the forest landscape. By 1994
Russia had 85 reserves, some of them established 75 years earlier.
The number and huge extent of the reserves testify to
an understanding of their significance for the conservation of
nature in the wild.
The national nature parks which are being created have many
different functions, one of which is the conservation of the
biodiversity of the forest, including the diversity of ecosystems
and species and genetic diversity.
Under the amended project to establish a coherent network of
national parks by 2005, the plan is to create an additional 46
parks with a total area of 11 million hectares. Under the existing
legislation national parks are foundations for the
conservation of nature, including natural systems and sites of
special ecological, historical and aesthetic value designated
for use for nature-conservation, recreational, educational,
scientific and cultural purposes.
Russia's national parks and reserves have a great diversity of
animals and plants. They contain about 1.5 thousand species
of taller plants, of which 120 are classified as rare and
endangered plants, while 47 species are included in Russia's Red
Book. The national parks contain a large number of exotics (more
than 70 species) and 103 species of relict.
Conservation of biological diversity is one of the fundamental
functions of the reserves and national parks. There are
many species of rare fauna: animals (64 species), birds (210),
fish (28), and amphibians and reptiles (20).
Seven species of bird are registered in Russia's Red Book.
As well as plants and animals the national parks also contain
many valuable historical and cultural sites.
NATIONAL PRIORITY: Deforestation can be combatted only
by means of balanced land use based on the sustainable
management of forests seen as a specific, long-term and
economically beneficial process of interaction with forest
ecosystems.
- Improvement of the machinery for taking decisions on forest
use, including clear-felling, with a view to maintaining the
biodiversity and sustainable development of forest ecosystems;
- Discouragement of environmentally unsound forestry practices
and use of industrial forestry equipment which can
destroy the environment and biodiversity, and their replacement
with more environmentally sound approaches to forest
use;
- Application of the established criteria and indicators of
sustainable management of Russia's forests at the sub-national
and national levels;
- Encouragement of the activities of all branches of the
national economy to involve them in the introduction of new
environmentally sound technology in the exploitation of forest
resources.
STATUS REPORT:
- Establishment of new units for the operational detection and
fighting of forest fires and provision of the material and
technical resources for these units in accordance with
scientifically based standards;
- Organization in densely forested regions of special mobile
units to fight major forest fires and provision of extremely
mobile fire-fighting equipment and the means of delivering it;
- Acceleration of the construction and commissioning of a
fleet of aircraft to fight forest fires;
- Production and commissioning of satellite information
systems to protect forests against fires and monitor the forest
fire
situation, and of a system for detection and operational
notification of incipient forest fires and for operational
communications;
- Establishment of integrated control centres for the
management of the prevention and fighting of forest fires.
According to forest monitoring data, in 1993-1995, against a
background of a higher number of recorded fires, the area of
forest land crossed by fires declined by a factor of more than two
from 748.5 thousand hectares in 1993 to 360.1 thousand
in 1995. Brush fires were more widespread. Human activity remains
the main cause of fires (about 88 per cent of all
outbreaks).
2. Chokerless skidding - 41.9 per cent;
3. Dressing of trunks - 58.8 per cent;
4. Stump removal - 42.6 per cent.
The level of mechanization of labour employed in timber
enterprises increased over the past five years from 44 to 49.7
per cent, including an increase in basic logging work from 50.1 to
57.3 per cent.
However, at present the total timber technology in use does
not meet the industry's existing requirements, which envisage
limiting the specific pressure of machinery on the ground to
0.4-0.5 kg/cm and protection of 60 to 70 per cent of the new
growth at felling sites.
Despite the existing objective difficulties, one of the
priorities for forestry production remains the transition to
advanced
technology guaranteeing a high standard of mechanized operations
while complying with the environmental requirements.
Free enterprise
The "Bases of forestry legislation" adopted in March 1993
replaced the former system of timber resource bases with a
leasing system and transferred all roundwood production to a
commercial footing. This led to a restructuring of the first
link - forest cultivation (forestry as such) and the felling of
forests (forestry industry) - in the chain of the utilization of
forestry resources to deliver forest products. Forestry
production, in the broad sense, includes the results
of all possible means of utilization of forest resources and
production of goods and services connected with forestry.
1. Resin production;
2. Production of secondary forestry products (stumps, bast,
bark including birch bark, and fir, spruce and pine branches);
3. Subsidiary forest uses (haymaking, cattle grazing, bee
keeping, sap collection, gathering of wild fruits, mushrooms,
berries, nuts, medicinal plants and raw materials, and gathering of
moss, litter, fallen leaves, reeds, etc.);
4. Use of forests for hunting and game management.
In 1994, in accordance with the requirements of the forestry
legislation of the Russian Federation, the "Fundamental
regulations on the conduct of subsidiary activities in the forests
of the Russian Federation" were drafted and adopted; they
deal with the legal, economic, environmental and social aspects of
this question.
Protection of the genetic stock, and specially
protected areas
1. Decision-Making Structure: In accordance
with the existing forestry legislation, State management of the
utilization,
reproduction, protection and conservation of forests in the
territory of the Russian Federation is the responsibility of the
President of the Russian Federation, the Government, and the
executive organs of subjects of the Federation, and of
specially designated State forest management organs.
The system of specially designated State forest management
organs includes: the State organ for the management of the
forests of the Russian Federation (the Federal Forestry Service),
its subsidiary units in subjects of the Federation and the
local forestry bodies. The national nature parks on forest land
and teaching and experimental forestry establishments also
supervise forestry activities and form part of the Federal Forestry
Service system.
The head of the Federal Forestry Service is appointed by the
President of the Russian Federation.
The activities of the Federal Forestry Service are regulated
by Orders confirmed by the Government, which also
establishes the procedures for exercise of State control over the
condition, utilization, reproduction, protection and
conservation of the forests. The latest Order on the Federal
Forestry Service was confirmed on 5 July 1994.
The management of Russia's forests is based on the established
principles of forestry and specific forest management
projects developed on a regular basis for each management unit.
The management of Russia's entire stock of forests is the
responsibility of specialized forest management organizations
operating in a unified system throughout the Federation and in
accordance with procedures established by the Federal
Forestry Service. The management activities include the
maintenance of an inventory of the stock of forests in order to
monitor the species- and age-composition of plantations and their
condition and the qualitative and quantitative status of
other forest resources.
Measures for the reproduction, management and protection of
forests in the European-Urals part of Russia are carried out
by the forest management organs of the 57 subjects of the Russian
Federation, which form part of the Federal Forestry
Service system.
As of 1 January 1993 there were 57 regional forest management
units in the European-Urals territory of the Federation,
including 1,237 forestry enterprises. In accordance with the
existing forestry legislation, the forestry enterprises are the
basic owners of Russia's forests, and they account for 94 per cent
of the area of forested land suitable for forestry
management, i.e. under the direct control of the Federal Forestry
Service. They constitute the structural basis of the
Federal Forestry Service, for they are the local forest management
units. They are directly responsible to the regional
forest management departments in each of the 89 subjects (members)
of the Russian Federation, which are in turn
subordinate to the central apparatus of the Federal Forestry
Service in Moscow.
The borders of the forestry enterprises coincide with the
borders of the administrative regions of Russia. This
arrangement, together with a number of other regional and local
arrangements, facilitates the designation of new forestry
enterprises under the Federal Forestry Service.
The main features of the existing structure of the management
of Russia's forests were determined by the
change of function of forestry enterprises and the ban on roundwood
production (industrial logging). This ban was
imposed by article 8 of the "Bases of forestry legislation" in the
following terms: "The State forest management organ
of the Russian Federation and its subordinate units shall not
engage in the cutting of primary-use timber or its
processing".
The basic functions of the forest management
apparatus include:
Following the adoption of the new forestry legislation in
1993, several dozen instruments regulating forest management
were drafted and adopted: "Functions and tasks of forestry
enterprises of the Federal Forestry Service" (adopted on 10
September 1993); "Fundamental provisions on the designation of
specially protected sections of forest" (adopted on 30
December 1993); and "Regulations on fire prevention in the forests
of the Russian Federation" (adopted on 9 September
1993), etc.
Management of forest use
The "Bases of forestry legislation" is the principal law
regulating forest use.
In accordance with the changed functions of forest management,
industrial logging by governmental forestry organizations
is prohibited.
In addition to the "Bases of forestry legislation", there are
several other standard-setting instruments regulating questions
of forest use and protection. Thus, the legislation governing
forest use is established by the Federal Forestry Service and
the Government of the Russian Federation as a whole. The use of
forest resources has become an exclusively commercial
activity carried on for the purpose of extracting profits from
cutting and processing.
At virtually all stages of the output of forest products there
exists a reserve capacity for their optimal exploitation.
Particular attention must be drawn here to the reduction of losses
during the felling of timber - losses of up to 20-30 per
cent - as a result of the introduction of modern logging
technology. Additional resources can be obtained from
maintenance cutting. In order to secure the full utilization of
timber raw materials it is essential to develop the capacity for
intensive chemical and mechanized processing, especially of
softwood.
However, all of this is achievable with the transition to a
sustainable model of forest management based on the concept of
sustainable forest use.
3. Major Groups: The "Bases of forestry
legislation" adopted in 1993 radically altered the distribution of
the rights of
State ownership among the levels and subjects of management. This
consolidated the presence in the country of three
main groups of people having an influence on the drafting and
implementation of Russia's forestry policy. These groups
are: forestry professionals operating through the specially
designated State forest management organs, to which was
transferred the right to manage and own the forest stock; local
people in the shape of local authorities, in which the law
invests the right to control forests; and owners of industrial
forestry enterprises invested with the right to utilize the stock
of forests. To these groups should be added Russia's minority
peoples, by virtue of their role in forestry policy, for their
traditional economic activities are inseparably connected with the
forest.
The role of each of these groups is manifested primarily in
their involvement in the drafting and implementation of plans
for economic activities in the forests and is determined by their
differing interests.
Given this situation, the Federal Forestry Service adopted a
new concept of the planning and funding of expenditure on the
conservation of forest resources, which includes the following
sources:
5. Regional/International Cooperation: One of the main
functions of the Federal Forestry Service as the central forest
management organ is the representation of the Russian Federation in
its relations with other States and international
organizations in connection with the drafting of agreed decisions
on questions of forest management and conservation,
scientific support services and improvement of technical standards
in the utilization of forest resources.
As the holder of a fifth of the world's forest resources,
Russia takes an active part in the international negotiating
process
on forests, which has been proceeding vigorously since the United
Nations Conference on Environment and Development
in 1992. Russia follows the development of this process closely
and during the period 1993-1996 took part in almost all
the international forestry initiatives.
Participation in the activities of international organizations
has become an important area of international cooperation.
The Federal Service maintains the closest contacts with the
following international organizations: UNEP, UNCSD, FAO,
IUFRO, WWF, etc.
One of the most effective forms of international
cooperation is the conduct of joint research and the implementation
of
bilateral and multilateral projects under the auspices of working
groups. The following bilateral working groups on
scientific and technological cooperation in forestry matters have
been established: Russian-Swedish, Russian-Chinese and
Russian-American. The international agreements included detailed
thematic plans for cooperation on the whole spectrum
of forestry problems for 1994 and for the future. In November 1993
a protocol on mutual cooperation at the level of
forestry ministries and offices was signed by the CIS countries,
the Baltic countries, Georgia and Moldova.
Local management organs maintain direct contacts with overseas
partners. For example, the Krasnoyarsk and Khabarovsk
forest management authorities established direct contact with
United States local forest management bodies on the
region-with-region principle.
The "Gassinsky" model forest has been established in the
Khabarovsk region under the Canadian programme
"International model forests network".
An agreement has been signed with the United States forestry
service on the monitoring of the numbers of the Asiatic
form of the unmated silk-spinning moth found on the forested land
adjacent to the ports of Vladivostok, Nakhodka and
Vostochny. The Yaroslavl, Kostroma and Smolensk forestry
authorities, together with the Funduk NGO, are successfully
carrying out work under a contract between the Russian Federation
and Finland on the establishment of experimental
seedling plantations.
The Saratov forestry authorities have concluded an agreement
with the University of Oregon, United States, on the
establishment of plantations in the Saratov region to absorb
greenhouse gases from the atmosphere.
The management and representatives of the forestry authorities
of the Republics of Karelia and Mariy El and of the
Archangelsk, Vladimir, Leningrad, Moscow, Penza and Chelyabinsk
regions have been studying the forest management
system and forestry practices in Sweden.
- State regulation and control of the utilization,
reproduction, protection and conservation of forests and
development of
the main lines of State policy in this field;
- Observance of federal interests in the regulation of the
utilization, reproduction, protection and conservation of
forests;
- Uninterrupted but sustainable utilization of forests,
maintenance and increase of forest resources, and preservation and
consolidation of the protective, water storage, recreational and
other useful natural functions of forests;
- Management of the stock of forests, establishment and
maintenance of the State forest survey, management of the State
stock inventory, and establishment and conduct of forest monitoring
under the unified State system of environmental
monitoring.
At the local level the practical performance of the functions
of the Federal Forestry Service is the responsibility of the
forestry enterprises and management units. In addition, the
national nature parks on forest land and teaching and
experimental forestry bodies also engage in forest management and
form part of the Federal Forestry Service system.
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: Given
the current very low economic indicators of the forestry sector in
the
circumstances of its transition to a market economy, it can be
unambiguously asserted that the possibility exists for
overcoming the present crisis. The main basis for enhancing the
importance of the forestry complex in the economy is the
high resource capacity of the country's forests.
4. Finance: Total expenditure on measures for
the conservation of nature amounted, in 1994 for example, to
approximately eight trillion roubles at current prices.
Expenditure on forestry accounted for 10 per cent of this sum (825
billion roubles). In 1995 expenditure on forest resources under
the federal budget, taking into account the changes
(federal law adopted by the State Duma on 6 December 1995),
totalled approximately 969.4 billion roubles and
represented 0.34 per cent of total federal budget expenditure (not
counting expenditure on forest resources from local
budgets). Expenditure totalling 1,672.3 billion roubles (0.58 per
cent of the total budget) was planned under the item
"Protection of the environment and natural resources,
hydrometeorology, geodesy and cartography", including only 37.7
billion roubles on environmental protection as such. This thus
represents a continuation of the tendency to allocate
insufficient financing (especially in comparison with other densely
forested countries) for the reproduction of forest
resources.
- Federal budget;
- Local budgets;
- Other legally authorized sources: mobilization of own
resources, deductions from forestry taxes, leasing fees, auction of
forests, services to outside organizations, and profits from timber
processing and timber resulting from maintenance
cutting.
1993 | ||||
Forest Area (Km2) | 11 870 000 | 11 820 000 | 11 810 000 | |
Protected forest area (Km2), including reserves and national parks | 1 069 000 | 1 079 000 | 1 310 000 | |
Roundwood production (mill m3) | 299 | 325 | 174 | |
Deforestation rate (Km2/annum) | 33 000 | 28 000 | 26 000 | |
Reforestation rate (Km2/annum) | 6 000 | 7 000 | 4 000 |
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 12: MANAGING FRAGILE
ECOSYSTEMS: COMBATING
DESERTIFICATION AND DROUGHT
International Convention to Combat Desertification in Countries
Experiencing Drought and/or Desertification
Particularly in Africa
Convention: not signed or ratified by Russia.
In accordance with an instruction of the Government of the
Russian Federation dated 17 October 1995, the Russian
Federation is participating in preparatory meetings for the
Convention and after its entry into force it will participate in
conferences of the parties as an observer. At the same time the
relevant ministries and offices and subjects of the
Federation experiencing serious problems of drought and
desertification are proceeding with their detailed study of the
possibility of Russia's becoming a fully fledged party to the
Convention.
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT:
The latest report to the Secretariat of the Convention was
prepared in 19--.
*A latest report has not been submitted to the Secretariat of the
Convention.
Additional comments relevant to this chapter
1. Decision-Making Structure: No information
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: No information
3. Major Groups: No information
4. Finance: No information
5. Regional/International Cooperation: A UNEP project on
the drafting of a national plan of action to combat
desertification in the Kalmyk Republic is being implemented.
Latest 1995 | ||||
Land affected by desertification (Km2) | over 100 million hectares | |||
Other data |
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 13: MANAGING FRAGILE
ECOSYSTEMS: SUSTAINABLE
MOUNTAIN DEVELOPMENT
At no time in its history has Russia had a special State
policy for the socio-economic development of its mountain regions.
By virtue of the geographical location of 70 per cent of its
territory, Russia is a northern country and it has such policies
only for the northern indigenous peoples and territories.
Some of the republics of the North Caucasus (Dagestan, North
Osetiya-Alaniya) carry out their own programmes to
support the development of mountain regions, which are generally
poor and almost totally dependent on the federal and
republic budgets.
The specific features of mountain territories are taken into
account in some indicators in the State sectors of the economy.
With regard to the state of the environment and resources and
the problems of socio-economic development Russia's
mountain regions differ substantially from each other, depending on
their geographical location and history of
assimilation.
The North Caucasus has a "fuller spectrum of problems",
typical of many mountain regions in the world. The war in
Chechnya and the territorial conflict between the Republics of
North Osetiya-Alaniya and Ingushetiya are without doubt
the dominating problem of the current socio-economic development of
the North Caucasus. This is one of Russia's most
acute and complex political problems, deeply rooted in history, and
so far found no solution has been found for it.
However, the Government of the Russian Federation and the
authorities of the Chechen Republic are even now working
on plans for the postwar development of Chechnya.
For the uninhabited mountains of the high plains (Khibiny
range, Novaya Zemlya) and the thinly settled Urals social
problems do not have any priority. The main priorities are the
problems of environmental protection and rational use of
natural resources:
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT: In the European part of Russia
the mountains occupy peripheral positions in relation to the
Russian
plain, which is the historical and economic centre of the country.
The Caucasus mountains (to the south), the Urals (to
the east), the Khibiny range (to the north-west), and the polar
islands of Novaya Zemlya and Franz Joseph Land frame the
plain with a huge semicircle.
- Pollution of the atmosphere and surface waters by emissions
from industrial enterprises (central Urals, Khibiny);
- Monitoring of the radioactive pollution of groundwater and
the countryside as a result of underground nuclear tests (at
the Novaya Zemlya nuclear test site and also in the Perm region in
the southern Urals, where nuclear tests were carried
out from 1969 to 1987);
- The felling of mountain forests is leading to changes in
their structure and species diversity (northern Urals), which is
reducing the average annual drainage by up to 10 per cent. As a
result of atmospheric pollution by mining and iron and
steel industries areas of phytopathogenic damage are becoming
established in the mountain ecosystems of the
Khibiny range;
- Emplacement of mining wastes (tips, tailing dumps,
etc.);
- Recultivation of land and rehabilitation of the
countryside;
- Improvement of the network of specially protected areas.
1. Decision-Making Structure: There is a plan to draw up
a special-purpose federal programme on the sustainable
development of Russia's mountain regions, with the following
possible key components: improvements in the
emplacement of environmentally hazardous substances; a policy of
State support for agricultural production in mountain
regions; environmental rehabilitation of mountain regions;
establishment of a framework of environmental protection in
the mountains to support the sustainable development of the region,
etc.
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: No information
3. Major Groups: No information
4. Finance: No information
5. Regional/International Cooperation: The Government of
the Russian Federation and the regional governments and
local government authorities in mountain areas are interested in
studying the European experience of the development of
mountain regions - the Alpine Convention, the Charter of the
Mountain Regions of Europe, and mountain policy (Council
of Europe).
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 14: PROMOTING SUSTAINABLE
AGRICULTURE AND
RURAL DEVELOPMENT
The years of reform in Russia have seen radical changes in the
structure of agriculture. Virtually all agricultural
enterprises have been reformed, about 300,000 peasant farms have
been established, and the processing and marketing of
agricultural products have undergone significant changes as a
result of widespread privatization.
However, unfavourable developments in general economic
conditions at certain stages and the serious financial
difficulties, together with the problems of the transitional period
in agriculture itself, could not fail to have an impact on
the sector. This impact has manifested itself in particular in a
decline in State allocations, the emergence of price
disparities for the means of production and for farm output, and a
significant decrease in the supply of the means of
production.
In addition to all this there is the openness of the external
market, which has created serious competition for the Russian
producer. Today Russia imports more than a quarter of its consumer
meat products and a seventh of its dairy products.
At the same time Russia generally manages to avoid importing
grain and a number of other basic agricultural products.
Generally speaking, the situation of Russia's agriculture and
food supply market must be described as problematic. A
whole range of measures is required, together with a consistent
macroeconomic, agrarian and foreign trade policy for the
development of domestic production as a key factor in the
sustainable development of agriculture.
This was the reason for the drafting the "Programme of
stabilization and development of agro-industrial production for
1996-2000", which has been confirmed by the President of the
Russian Federation. This programme gives priority to the
creation of the economic preconditions and infrastructure for
increased production and market activity on the part of
agricultural producers.
What is envisaged is a system of measures of State regulation
and solid support for the country's agro-industrial complex.
The implementation of this programme is designed to ensure the
sustainable development of Russia's agriculture and
secure a substantial improvement in the supply of consumer
foodstuffs.
NATIONAL PRIORITY: Increase of agricultural production
and improvement of consumer supplies of environmentally
sound food products
STATUS REPORT:
1. Decision-Making Structure:
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: The re-equipment of agriculture with a new generation of high-output technology which can meet contemporary environmental requirements.
3. Major Groups: Changes in the social and economic structure of agriculture.
Development of domestic production as a key factor in the sustainable development of agriculture.
A programmatic approach to problem solving.
Improvement of the legislative framework and economic
machinery of the interrelationship between agriculture and the
environment.
4. Finance: The federal budget, budgets of subjects of the Russian Federation, resources of enterprises and extra-budgetary sources.
5. Regional/International Cooperation: Bilateral and multilateral agricultural agreements (in the CIS framework).
|
Latest 1995 | ||||
Agricultural land (Km2) | 2 289.6 | 2221.3 | 2209.6 | |
Agricultural land as % of total land area | 13 | 13 | 13 | |
Agricultural land per capita | 0.015 | 0.015 | 0.015 | |
Latest 1995 | ||||
Consumption of fertilizers per Km2 of agricultural land as of 1990 | 0.55 | 0.46 | 0.07 | |
Other data
|
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 15: CONSERVATION OF
BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Convention on Biological Diversity
At its meetings this commission has considered a number of
questions connected with the drafting of a national strategy on
biodiversity, the inclusion of specific measures for the
conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity in sectoral plans,
and the
establishment of a data base.
Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild
Fauna and Flora
In 1994 the Government of the Russian Federation adopted a
special Order stating that the functions of administrative organ
for
CITES would be performed by the former Ministry of Environmental
Protection and Natural Resources, now the State
Environmental Protection Committee, and specifying the priority
measures for fulfilment of obligations under the Convention,
taking into account the new situation resulting from the break-up
of the USSR.
With a view to the introduction of measures to strengthen
control of the procurement, trading and passage across customs
frontiers of CITES specimens, a plan has been approved for
collaboration between the federal executive organs (environmental
protection, law enforcement, quarantine and postal
communications).
Similar plans have been drawn up in 28 subjects of the Russian
Federation. In 1995 Russia reviewed the reservations
concerning the CITES annexes, which had been entered earlier by the
USSR. Action is being taken to improve the
effectiveness of the standard-setting legal framework with respect
to species of animals and plants registered in the Red Book of
the Russian Federation. With the financial support of Switzerland,
Germany, IUCN and a number of other organizations, two
teaching seminars have been held for the CIS countries, a handbook
on the animals included in the CITES annex has been
published in Russian, and a popular coloured booklet entitled
"Import and export of endangered species of fauna and flora" has
been produced and published. Effective cooperation is being
established with the customs authorities. Between November 1994
and March 1995, 300 parrots and 28 monkeys were confiscated at
Sheremetev-2 international airport alone.
Additional comments relevant to this chapter
The national legislation is being improved. In recent years
bills have been submitted on "The animal world",
"Regulation of genetic engineering", and "The continental shelf of
the Russian Federation". In 1995 the President confirmed
a special-purpose federal programme of support for State nature
reserves and national parks for the period up to 2000. This
programme provides for the creation of 36 new reserves and 28
national parks. In 1995-1996 the Government strengthened
the measures for conservation and sustainable use of sites where
especially rare and threatened animals are found. Russia is
carrying out a special State programme on biological diversity. A
project on the conservation of biological diversity is being
carried out with the support of the World Bank and the Global
Environment Facility.
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT:
Convention: Signed in 1992; Ratified in 1995.
Latest report submitted in 19--.
By Order No. 669 of 1 July 1995 the Government entrusted the
organization of the fulfilment of the obligations of the Russian
Federation under this Convention to the former Ministry of
Environmental Protection and Natural Resources, now the State
Environmental Protection Committee. In order to coordinate the
fulfilment of these obligations, an inter-departmental
commission on problems of biological diversity has been created by
a Governmental Order.
Convention signed in 1974.
Latest report submitted in 1995.
1. Decision-Making Structure: Fundamental decisions are
taken by the Government of the Russian Federation. On the
basis of such decisions, sectoral decisions are taken by the
relevant federal executive organs: Ministry of Agricultural
Production, State Fisheries Commission, Rosleskhoz, Ministry of
Science, Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Foreign
Affairs, Ministry of the Economy, Ministry of Health, etc. An
inter-departmental commission on problems of
biodiversity has been created in order to coordinate activities and
prepare governmental decisions on biodiversity. The
coordinator is the Ministry of the Environment (now the State
Environmental Protection Committee).
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: These issues will
now be considered by the inter-departmental commission on
problems of biodiversity. A biodiversity scientific-coordination
centre is being established under the auspices of the All-Russian
Scientific Research Institute for Environmental Protection in
accordance with a decision of the inter-departmental
commission.
3. Major Groups: Groups are established, as required, by
the inter-departmental commission.
4. Finance: The State budget is the main source of
financing. Some expenditure is also covered by overseas investors,
including the Global Environment Facility.
5. Regional/International Cooperation: Many different
activities are being carried out under bilateral and multilateral
cooperation agreements.
Latest 1995 | |||
Protected area as % of total land area | 1.47 | 1.9 | |
Latest 1995* | |||
Number of threatened species | |||
animals | 247 | ||
plants | 533 | ||
Other data |
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 16: ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND
MANAGEMENT OF
BIOTECHNOLOGY
The problem of the environmentally sound use of biotechnology
is becoming all the more urgent for Russia in view of the
fairly intensive development of biotechnology in the country's
scientific institutions, the extension of the range of
recombined products used for various purposes, and the need to
ensure the safety of transboundary technology transfers
and of genetically modified organisms and/or their products.
In this connection the creation of a legal and regulatory
framework for biodiversity has become an urgent national
priority.
In June 1996 Russia adopted a law on "State regulation of
genetic engineering activities", which had been drafted by the
State Committee on Science and Technology, the Russian Academy of
Sciences and the Ministry of the Environment.
Experts from OECD, UNIDO and UNESCO took part in the preliminary
amendment of the law.
This federal law is based on:
NATIONAL PRIORITY: Life sciences and biotechnology
STATUS REPORT:
- The general principles of biological safety set out in OECD
and UNEP documents (international principles of safety
techniques in biotechnology) and in the voluntary codes of UNIDO,
FAO, etc.;
- The concept of risk assessment and management focused on the
"biotechnology product" and the corresponding
authorization and notification system for genetic engineering
activities;
- A system of technical protocols: the security rules
governing work with organisms modified by genetic engineering
(micro-organisms, transgenetic plants and animals) and their
handling or release into the environment.
Machinery for implementation of this federal law is currently
being established, including:
- The creation of a biological security infrastructure,
primarily for genetic engineering and biotechnology;
- The establishment of a national commission on biological
security and working commissions on biological security in
organizations engaging in genetic engineering;
- Drafting of sector-specific technical safety rules and
protocols;
- Creation of an authorization and notification system for
genetic engineering and biotechnology on the basis of
a system of risk assessment and management;
- Development of a system of notification and standardization
to set standards of liability and compensation;
- Creation of an information network with centralized and
decentralized data banks.
Further work on Russia's legal and regulatory framework for
biotechnology will seek to harmonize it with the
existing regulations (at the national and world levels) and with
international agreements.
1. Decision-Making Structure: No information
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: No information
3. Major Groups: No information
4. Finance: No information
5. Regional/International Cooperation: No information
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 17: PROTECTION OF THE OCEANS,
ALL KINDS OF
SEAS, INCLUDING ENCLOSED AND SEMI-ENCLOSED SEAS,
AND COASTAL AREAS AND THE PROTECTION, RATIONAL USE AND DEVELOPMENT
OF THEIR LIVING
RESOURCES
1. Protection of oceans, all kinds of seas, including enclosed
and semi-enclosed seas, and coastal areas.
These questions are very important to the Russian Federation
because it possesses very large coastal areas. Russia's
maritime part (shelf) alone constitutes one-third of the whole of
its territory. The total length of the shores of the world's
oceans is 777,000 kilometres, and Russia has 60,000 kilometres of
shoreline. Russia's seas have a severe climate, and
maritime activities require well organized and sophisticated
hydrometeorlogical services.
Under its marine research programme, new methods of marine
forecasting have been devised and are being brought into
operational use; the foundations have been laid for a modern
national system for processing marine data, including the use
of super-computers; and marine information systems are being
developed in the Arctic and Antarctic.
Regular Antarctic research activities are continuing, together
with work at an extensive network of Antarctic stations
located on the ice continent.
A water quality monitoring programme has been in operation for
some time now in the territorial waters of the former
USSR. In spite of the economic difficulties, this programme will
be continued in the territorial waters of the Russian
Federation (at a level determined by available resources). A
decision has been taken to establish a national reporting
centre under the MARPOLMON programme.
Russia has a standing programme of data collection, analysis,
evaluation and application with a view to rational resource
use, including evaluation of the environmental impact of activities
affecting coastal and marine regions. Data bases are
being created for evaluation and rational use of coastal regions
and all seas and their resources, and measures are being
carried out to support the regular monitoring of the state of the
environment of coastal and marine regions.
Efforts are being made to combat the effects of the rise in
the level of the Caspian Sea. A system is being developed for
forecasting the level of the Caspian over various time spans, and
it will be capable of predicting erratic changes. For
example, the latest forecast of a change in the average level of
the Caspian Sea for one year ahead, produced at Russia's
hydrometeorlogical centre in 1996, predicts a slight drop.
In developing the system of forecasting and other services
considerable attention is given to improving the components on
the forecasting and detection of dangerous natural phenomena, such
as high water levels, storm waves and tidal waves,
and to an early-warning and response system for such phenomena.
In connection with its marine activities and use of marine
resources Russia is extensively engaged in international work
under the auspices of the United Nations and other international
governmental and non-governmental organizations, and in
bilateral and multilateral cooperation. In this connection the
Russian Federation:
- Participates in scientific research on and observation of
the marine environment;
- Conducts an active exchange of data and
information resulting from scientific research and systematic
observation
through a network of world, regional and national centres.
At present the Russian Federation has several data
banks of direct relevance to the international programmes of WMO,
including the World Weather Watch (WWW), and of the
Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (IOC), as well as
to other global observation systems, and takes an active part in
international cooperation in the exchange of data and
information and their storage and in the creation of archives
through world and regional data centres.
In cooperation with IOC, WHO, UNEP, ICSU and other
international organizations, the Russian Federation is taking an
active part in planning and preparing to implement the Global Ocean
Observing System (GOOS).
Together with countries bordering on the Sea of Japan (China,
Republic of Korea, Japan) Russia is participating in the
NEARGOOS project under the GOOS programme. Similar activities are
being developed with the Black Sea countries.
Russia has in operation an extensive system for the training of
experts in marine hydrometeorology and oceanography and
it is working under the programme of training, education and mutual
assistance (TEMA).
The Russian Federation is helping to strengthen international
cooperation for the protection and rational use of seas and
oceans. It is active in the following programmes:
The results obtained will be used to develop activities for
the protection of oceans and different kinds of seas, and for the
conservation, rational use and development of marine
bioresources.
The further expansion of these activities requires a
scientifically balanced approach. Accordingly, the special-purpose
federal
programme "World Ocean" which is under preparation envisages
coordination of regional programmes for monitoring
phenomena occurring in coastal areas and coastal waters and
connected with climate change, as well as monitoring of the
parameters of research of key significance for the rational use of
marine and coastal areas in all regions. Individual sections of
this federal programme are concerned with improvement of the
forecasting of the marine environment to ensure the safety and
efficient conduct of marine activities, as well as with questions
of the rational use
of marine resources and protection of the marine environment.
The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea: signed in
1982.
In July 1996 the Government of the Russian Federation approved
the Convention and submitted it to the President for
transmission to the State Duma for ratification.
2. Protection, rational use and development of living
resources
The world fishing industry is constantly developing in both
positive and negative directions. On the one hand, there are the
increased catches in certain parts of the world's oceans, vigorous
development of fish farming, expansion of world trade in fish
products, and improvement of consumer supplies of fish and seafoods
in many countries. On the other hand, the development
of sea fishing is accompanied by over-exploitation of many of the
most valuable stocks and over-capitalization in the industry
due partly to uncontrolled access to bioresources and partly to the
State protection of the industry in many countries.
In order for Russia's problems to be understood, especially in
the light of the decisions of UNCED, it is necessary to give a
brief description of the situation in the country's fishing
industry.
Russia's fishing industry has entered a period of acute
crisis, with a decline in catches and output of food products and,
most of
important of all, a decrease in the availability of fish products
in Russia, something which is unjustified given the shortage of
foodstuffs in general and of animal protein in particular.
Together with the domestic economic difficulties of Russia's
fishing industry, serious new problems have arisen in the
international situation. This is primarily a matter of water-
resource and fisheries relations with the former republics of the
Soviet Union which are now sovereign States - Estonia, Lithuania,
Latvia, Ukraine, Georgia, Azerbaijan, Khazakstan and
Turkmenistan. Russia has to solve these extremely complicated and
entirely new problems of an international legal and
economic nature for the regions of the Caspian, Black and Baltic
Seas.
Some of the difficulties which Russia's fishing industry is
experiencing are specific to our country, but there are many global
reasons for the worsening of the situation:
- Decline of basic stocks for valuable traditional products of
the industry, together with a drop in catches per unit;
See also the tables set out below.
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT:
- The marine aspects of WWW;
- The marine programmes of IOC, WMO, UNEP, ICSU, IMO, ICES and
other international organizations;
- The marine components of global systems for monitoring
climate and droughts and of the Global Ocean Observing
System;
- Marine pollution monitoring programmes.
Great importance is attached to expanding regional cooperation
in the Black and Azov Seas and in the Caspian, Baltic,
Japan and Bering Seas.
Other matters of fundamental importance for the Russian
Federation are the forthcoming use of the northern sea route by
international shipping and international cooperation in the Russian
sector of the Arctic.
The Russian Federation has concluded the latest cycle of
research under the federal programme "Comprehensive research
in oceans and seas and in the Arctic and Antarctic", which included
the following components:
- The physical fields of Russia's seas and the oceans, their
interaction with the atmosphere, and the forecasting of short-range
changes in the ocean climate;
- The chemical regime of Russia's seas and the oceans, mineral
and raw material resources, hydrochemical bases of
bioproductivity, and anthropogenic changes in the state of the
waters;
- Ecosystem dynamics, and biological structure and resources
of Russia's seas and the oceans;
- The geosphere of oceans and seas; composition, structure,
development, forecasting and evaluation of mineral resources;
- Arctic. Natural environment and its sustainability, mineral
and biological resources, hydrometeorlogical forecasting,
and climate;
- Antarctic. Natural environment and global change
trends;
- Technical ways and means of measurement, collection and
processing of environmental data; computer technology;
- Russia's seas. Natural resources and
environmental situation; drafting of recommendations on rational
use of natural
resources;
- Economic, political and legal problems of scientific
research on and use of the space and resources of the world's
oceans
(especially Russia's sea space), the Arctic and Antarctic, and
measures to maintain their environmental security.
- Overall decline in the economic indicators of the activities
of the fleet and shore enterprises;
- Intensification of uncontrolled international fishing on the
high seas and, in particular, in the northern Pacific
Ocean and Barents Sea;
- Use of unselective equipment and fishing techniques,
etc.
Accordingly, Russia has a serious interest in broad
international cooperation in the rational exploitation of the
bioresources of the world's oceans as a means of checking these
negative trends.
1. Decision-Making Structure: The management, conservation and optimal use of basic resources must become a new strategic principle of Russia's fisheries policy in order to ensure the sustainable development of its fishing industry and equal opportunities for use of these resources under all forms of ownership.
To this end, the recently drafted federal programme for the development of the fishing industry of the Russian Federation up to 2000 ("Ryba") sets out what are basically stabilization measures. This approach is essentially based on genuine State support (budget allocations, grants to meet additional expenditures connected with higher prices of energy, fishing equipment and feedstuffs; organization of preferential tax and credit terms; reduction of customs duties) and on expanded foreign investment to secure an increase in marine catches of 4-4.5 million tons by 2000.
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: No information
3. Major Groups: No information
4. Finance: No information
5. Regional/International Cooperation: The practice of managing marine stocks and introducing national measures on the basis of the adoption of internationally agreed decisions has a long history and it has generally proved its viability, and in view of the international nature of the fishing industry and the distribution of stocks throughout the waters of the world's oceans there is no alternative. Such decisions are usually taken on a bilateral, subregional, regional or global level depending on the seriousness of the problems. These activities are conducted on a constant daily basis in the various international organizations.
However, when emerging problems reach a level requiring the adoption of fundamentally new decisions affecting the interests of the majority of countries in the world community, the need arises to convene such forums the United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea, the World Conference on Fisheries Management and Development, and the United Nations Conference on Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks.
Fisheries cooperation with neighbouring countries with which Russia is linked by long-term common interests, primarily the optimal use and conservation of common or interlinked fish stocks (Norway, Finland, Sweden, Denmark, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Republic of Korea, China, Japan, United States and the countries of the Black Sea and Caspian Sea basins), must of course be conducted under strict State control regardless of the form of ownership of the vessels authorized to fish or conduct research operations. This approach is consistent with the responsibility of a State for conservation of natural resources in the interests of present and future generations and its responsibility for the activities of vessels flying its flag.
Another State responsibility is the very important aspect of international activity represented by Russia's active participation in the work of existing and international fisheries organizations and others which are coming into being.
Russia welcomes in particular the adoption of two new complementary instruments - the Agreement for the Implementation of the Provisions of the United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea relating to the Conservation and Management of Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks, and the International Code of Conduct for Responsible Fishing, in the drafting of which it took an active part. This represents a contribution by the world's fishing community to the implementation of Agenda 21.
|
Latest 1995 | ||||
Catches of marine species (metric tons) | 6 800.0 | 7 820.0 | 4 253.0 | |
Including sea fishing | 6 200.0 | 7 313.0 | 3 800.0 | |
Population in coastal areas | ||||
Population served by waste water treatment (% of
country's total population) | ||||
Discharges of oil into coastal waters (metric tons) | ||||
Releases of phosphate into coastal waters (metric tons) | ||||
Releases of nitrate into coastal waters (metric tons) | ||||
Other data |
Chapter 17 (Oceans) Continued:
Check the boxes in the column below left: | Check the boxes in the column below right: |
For level of importance use: | For level of implementation use: |
*** = very important | *** = fully covered |
** = important | ** = well covered- gaps being addressed |
* = not important | * = poorly covered |
N = not relevant | O = not covered; N = not relevant |
TABLE I. THE FOLLOWING ACTIVITIES HAVE BEEN CONSIDERED BY THE APPROPRIATE COORDINATING MECHANISM FOR INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF COASTAL AND MARINE AREAS AND THEIR RESOURCES.
a. Preparation and implementation of land and water use and siting policies. | ||
b. Implementation of integrated coastal and marine management and sustainable development plans and programmes at appropriate levels. | ||
c. Preparation of coastal profiles identifying critical areas including eroded zones, physical processes, development patterns, user conflicts and specific priorities for management. | ||
d. Prior environmental impact assessment, systematic observation and follow-up of major projects, including systematic incorporation of results in decision-making. | ||
e. Contingency plans for human induced and natural disasters. | ||
f. Improvement of coastal human settlements, especially in housing, drinking water and treatment and disposal of sewage, solid wastes and industrial effluents. | ||
g. Periodic assessment of the impacts of external factors and phenomena to ensure that the objectives of integrated management and sustainable development of coastal areas and marine environment are met. | ||
h. Conservation and restoration of altered critical habitats. | ||
I. Integration of sectoral programmes on sustainable development for settlements, agriculture, tourism, fishing, ports and industries affecting the coastal areas. | ||
J. Infrastructure adaptation and alternative employment. | ||
K. Human resource development and training. | ||
L. Public education, awareness and information programmes. | ||
M. Promoting environmentally sound technology and sustainable practices. | ||
N. Development and simultaneous implementation of environmental quality criteria. |
TABLE II. TECHNOLOGY (MARINE ENVIRONMENT)
A. Apply preventive, precautionary and anticipatory approaches so as to avoid degradation of the marine environment, as well as to reduce the risk of long-term or irreversible adverse effects upon it. | ||
B. Ensure prior assessment of activities that may have significant adverse impacts upon the marine environment. | ||
C. Integrate protection of the marine environment into relevant general environmental, social and economic development policies. | ||
D. Develop economic incentives, where appropriate, to apply clean technologies and other means consistent with the internalization of environmental costs, such as the polluter pays principle, so as to avoid degradation of the marine environment. | ||
E. Improve the living standards of coastal populations, particularly in developing countries, so as to contribute to reducing the degradation of the coastal and marine environment. | ||
F. Effective monitoring and surveillance within the exclusive economic zone (EEZ) of fish harvesting and transportation of toxic and other hazardous materials. |
TABLE III. SEWAGE RELATED ISSUES
A. Sewage related problems are considered when formulating or reviewing coastal development plans, including human development plans. | ||
B. Sewage treatment facilities are built in accordance with national policies. | ||
C. Coastal outfalls are located so as to maintain acceptable level of environmental quality and to avoid exposing shell fisheries, water intakes and bathing areas to pathogens. | ||
D. The Government promotes primary treatment of municipal sewage discharged to rivers, estuaries and the sea, or other solutions appropriate to specific sites. | ||
E. The Government supports the establishment and improvement of local, national, subregional and regional, as necessary, regulatory and monitoring programmes to control effluent discharge. Minimum sewage effluent guidelines and water quality criteria are in use. |
TABLE IV. OTHER SOURCES OF MARINE POLLUTION, THE GOVERNMENT HAS:
A. Established or improved upon, as necessary, regulatory and monitoring programmes to control emissions, including recycling technologies. | ||
B. Promoted risk and environmental impact assessments to help ensure an acceptable level of environmental quality. | ||
C. Promoted assessment and cooperation at the regional level, where appropriate, with respect to the input of point source pollutants from the marine environment. | ||
D. Taken steps to eliminate emissions or discharges of organohalogen compounds from the marine environment. | ||
E. Taken steps to eliminate/reduce emissions or discharges or other synthetic organic compounds from the marine environment. | ||
F. Promoted controls over anthropogenic inputs of nitrogen and phosphorous that enter coastal waters where such problems as eutrophication threaten the marine environment or its resources. | ||
G. Taken steps to develop and implement environmentally sound land-use techniques and practices to reduce run-off to water courses and estuaries which would cause pollution or degradation of the marine environment. | ||
H. Promoted the use of environmentally less harmful pesticides and fertilizers and alternative methods for pest control, and considered the prohibition of those found to be environmentally unsound. | ||
I. Adopted new initiatives at national, subregional and regional levels for controlling the input of non-point source pollutants which require broad changes in sewage and waste management, agricultural practices, mining, construction and transportation. | ||
J. Taken steps to control and prevent coastal erosion and siltation due to anthropogenic factors related to, inter alia, land-use and construction techniques and practices. |
TABLE V. ADDRESSING CRITICAL UNCERTAINTIES FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF THE MARINE ENVIRONMENT AND CLIMATE CHANGE. IN ORDER TO IMPLEMENT THIS PROGRAMME AREA THE GOVERNMENT IS CARRYING OUT THE FOLLOWING ACTIVITIES:
A. Coordinating national and regional observation programmes for coastal and near-shore phenomena related to climate change and for research parameters essential for marine and coastal management in all regions. | ||
B. Providing improved forecasts of marine conditions for the safety of inhabitants of coastal areas and for the efficiency of marine operations. | ||
C. Adopting special measures to cope with and adapt to potential climate change and sea-level rise. | ||
D. Participating in coastal vulnerability assessment, modelling and response strategies particularly for priority areas, such as small islands and low-lying and critical coastal areas. | ||
E. Identifying ongoing and planned programmes of systematic observation of the marine environment, with a view to integrating activities and establishing priorities to address critical uncertainties for oceans and all seas. | ||
F. Research to determine the marine biological effects of increased levels of ultraviolet rays due to the depletion of the stratospheric ozone layer. | ||
G. Carrying out analysis, assessments and systematic observation of the role of oceans as a carbon sink. |
TABLE VI. RATING OF ACTIVITIES IN THE AIR AND MARITIME TRANSPORT SECTORS IN THE SMALL ISLANDS DEVELOPING STATES (SIDS)
1. Frequency (external flights) | 1. Frequency (external shipping) | ||
2. Frequency (in-country flights) | 2. Frequency (in-country shipping) | ||
3. Cooperation at regional level in air transport and civil aviation | 3. Cooperation at regional level in shipping | ||
4. Cooperation at international level | 4. Cooperation at international level | ||
5. Economic viability of national air line | 5. Economic viability of national shipping line(s) | ||
6. Economic viability of regional air line | 6. Economic viability of regional shipping line (s) | ||
7. national level training in skills for air transport sector | 7. National level training in skills for maritime transport sector | ||
8. Access to training in skills for air transport sector within the region | 8. Regional level training in skills for maritime transport sector | ||
9. Access to international training for air transport sector | 9. Access to international training for maritime transport sector | ||
10. Supportive of ICAO |
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 18: PROTECTION OF THE QUALITY
AND SUPPLY OF
FRESHWATER RESOURCES: APPLICATION OF INTEGRATED
APPROACHES TO THE DEVELOPMENT, MANAGEMENT AND USE OF WATER
RESOURCES
According to the figures of the State Water Survey, in 1995
the total withdrawal of water from natural sources in the
Russian Federation amounted to 96.8 km3, practically unchanged from
the 1994 volume of 96.2 km3.
Owing to the poor quality of water from these sources and a
number of other reasons, the country's existing system of
drinking water supply is in a critical situation. More than 40 per
cent of the pipelines carrying water from surface sources
and supplying 68 per cent of urban and about 10 per cent of rural
consumers do not have the necessary purification
equipment and cannot guarantee totally decontaminated and purified
water; many withdrawal facilities (one in four) are
not surrounded by protection zones, and where such zones do exist,
they mostly violate the existing regulations.
The pollution of natural sources and the drinking water supply
owing to inadequate filtration and purification equipment
means that the drinking water delivered to the consumer is of poor
quality and constitutes a serious threat to human health
in many regions of Russia, contributing to a high level of
intestinal infections and hepatitis and to an increased risk of
carcinogenic and mutagenic factors affecting the human organism.
According to official figures, half the inhabitants of the
Russian Federation have to use drinking water which does not
meet a number of hygiene standards, almost a third of the country's
population uses local sources of supply without
appropriate treatment, and a number of regions suffer from a
shortage of drinking water and from associated hygiene and
sanitation problems.
The acute problem of the quality of the drinking water supply
is being vigorously addressed in many regions.
Work to improve the technical and technological standards of
the water industry is proceeding in several areas:
In order to attain the established goals, the
following policies are to be carried out for the benefit of the
basic users:
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT:
- Development of energy- and resource-saving technology to
prevent the pollution of natural water sources and rehabilitate
their ecosystems;
- Development of new installations, equipment, instruments and
computer systems to ensure a safe, reliable and controlled
water supply;
- Improvement of methods of monitoring natural water
sources;
- Creation of the scientific framework and provision of the
technological and technical means for protecting water
facilities against pollution from surface run-off;
- Creation of an economic machinery for the water industry
adapted to market conditions and facilitating
adequate financing of water management activities.
Russia's fundamental water management policy consists of the
rehabilitation and maintenance of natural water
sources in a stable state in order to guarantee a sustainable
supply. This is the aim of the special-purpose federal
programmes "Rebirth of the Volga", "The Caspian", "Drinking water
supply for Russia's people", "Flood-prevention
measures", "Fundamental improvement of water management and the
environmental situation in the River Tom basin",
"Improvement of the quality of Moscow's drinking water supply",
etc.
- Industry: improvement of the local purification of waste
waters and introduction of closed water supply systems in order
to reduce the volume of pollution, especially by heavy-metal
penetration of purification installations and water sources;
- Consumers: measures to ensure the commissioning of every
planned purification plant, construction of installations for
the repurification of waste waters and limitation of the
penetration of waste waters from industrial enterprises;
- Agriculture: in view of the pollution of water facilities by
dispersed drainage from farm land and livestock complexes,
implementation of a set of agro-technology measures to reduce the
flow of pollutants;
- Water transport: measures to clear submerged timber and
fully eliminate the unrafted floating of logs on rivers.
The water resources management system is organized according
to basins and administrative subdivisions.
The management of Russia's water resources and water industry
has the following main functions:
Expenditure on the maintenance, repair and operation of fresh
water distribution and protection systems and installations
amounted in 1995 to $US 19.5 million and covered one cubic
kilometre of water withdrawal.
5. Regional/International Cooperation: The
Russian Federation has borders with 14 other States and it has
arrangements with all of them for the joint use of transboundary
water. Water management relations with neighbouring
States are regulated by means of international agreements on
cooperation in the use and protection of transboundary water.
Such agreements have been concluded with Finland, Ukraine,
Khazakstan and Mongolia.
These agreements regulate the joint use of water resources for
the benefit of the populations and environments of the
parties, the joint monitoring of the state of transboundary waters,
and the implementation of agreed water protection
measures.
Similar agreements are being prepared with Estonia, Azerbaijan
and China.
The conclusion and implementation of international agreements
facilitates the sustainable development of border regions.
1. Decision-Making Structure: The State
management of water resources and the water industry is the
responsibility of
the relevant federal executive organ - the Ministry of Natural
Resources.
- Drafting of special-purpose State programmes for the supply
of water to household and business consumers and for the
rehabilitation of water sources;
- Implementation of flood-control and water-damage
measures;
- Imposition of limits on water consumption and withdrawal
from river basins and regions;
- Issue of licenses for the use of natural water sources and
authorization of works at such sources; drafting of plans for the
comprehensive use and protection of the water resources of river
basins;
- Distribution and redistribution of water resources among
regions;
- Exercise of State control over the use and protection of
water resources and natural water sources;
- Regulation of water management systems (flood and high water
control, reduction of damage resulting from low water
levels);
- Prevention and elimination of the consequences of accidental
water pollution;
- Collection of payments for use of water resources;
- Construction of combined-use reservoirs;
- Preparation of specific basin water management agreements
and monitoring of the effectiveness of the measures carried
out;
- Monitoring of transboundary water agreements.
The information basis for carrying out this work is provided
by State monitoring of natural water sources and
the State Water Survey of the Russian Federation.
This monitoring system envisages the performance of the
following basic functions:
- Monitoring of the state of natural sources;
- Collection, storage and processing of the monitoring
data;
- Creation and management of data banks;
- Evaluation of the current state of natural sources and
monitoring of changes;
- Provision of information to users;
- Drafting of recommendations on water resource management.
The Ministry of Natural Resources, in collaboration
with the executive organs of subjects of the Russian Federation, is
preparing draft special-purpose State programmes on the supply of
water to household and business consumers and on the
rational use, protection and rehabilitation of water resources and
natural sources; it is also supervising the design and
implementation of measures to prevent and eliminate the
consequences of water damage and accidental water pollution.
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: The
Ministry of Natural Resources acts as the State commissioning
agency
for design and construction work connected with water management,
organizes the operation of large combined-use
reservoirs, water management systems and water protection
installations, provides for the collection, analysis, processing
and distribution of information on questions of water management
and the use, protection and rehabilitation of water
resources and natural sources, and collaborates on such matters
with public organizations and the mass information media.
3. Major Groups: No information.
4. Finance: Financing of measures concerning
the use and protection of fresh water sources is provided by:
- The federal budget - 18 per cent;
- The budgets of subjects of the Federation - 16 per cent;
- Local budgets - 18 per cent;
- Resources of enterprises - 60 per cent;
- Environmental funds and other sources - 5 per cent.
In 1995 the funding of capital projects on water use and
protection covering the withdrawal one cubic kilometre of fresh
water amounted to $US 7.8 million.
Latest 1995 | ||||
Fresh water availability (total domestic km2) | 4 580.0 | 4 580.0 | 4 580.0 | |
Annual withdrawal of freshwater as % of available water | 2.4 | 2.35 | 1.9 | |
Other data |
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 19: ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND
MANAGEMENT OF TOXIC
CHEMICALS, INCLUDING PREVENTION OF ILLEGAL
INTERNATIONAL TRAFFIC IN TOXIC AND DANGEROUS PRODUCTS
Activities connected with the environmental monitoring of the
handling of waste products encompass everything connected
with the generation, collection, storage, processing, transport and
disposal of industrial and consumer wastes.
Inventories have been made or are being made of sites for the
storage or disposal of industrial and consumer wastes in the
Republic of Mordovia and in the Kaliningrad, Kostroma, Ivanovsk,
Volgograd, Novosibirsk and Astrakhan regions and
the Altai area, as well as in a number of other parts of Russia.
These inventories will facilitate the systematic treatment of
information on sites for storage or disposal of wastes,
determination of the types of wastes accumulated at these sites,
including by category of risk, and evaluation of the conditions and
situation at the sites and the degree of their impact on
the environment.
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT:
1. Decision-Making Structure: No information
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: No information
3. Major Groups: No information
4. Finance: No information
5. Regional/International Cooperation: No information
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 20: ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND
MANAGEMENT OF
HAZARDOUS WASTES, INCLUDING PREVENTION OF ILLEGAL
INTERNATIONAL TRAFFIC IN HAZARDOUS WASTES
The Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements
of Hazardous Wastes and their Disposal
The situation in Russia with regard to the generation, use,
treatment, storage and disposal of wastes is leading to
dangerous pollution of the environment, irrational use of natural
resources and considerable economic damage, and
represents a real threat to human health.
The accumulation of toxic wastes at dumps and tips is causing
particular alarm (see statistical data).
The drafting of an effective State policy for waste management
has not been completed. The transition to a market
economy has not led to any increase in the reprocessing of
wastes.
The Government of the Russian Federation has confirmed a
special-purpose federal programme ("Wastes") and has
produced a draft federal law on industrial and consumer wastes.
A number of federal and regional programmes provide for the
implementation of pilot projects to solve the problem of
wastes in the Russian Federation.
NATIONAL PRIORITY: Development of the legal and
regulatory framework, and investment measures for treatment
and use of wastes.
STATUS REPORT:
Basel Convention : Signed in 1989; Ratified in 1994.
The latest information was provided to the Basel Convention
Secretariat in 1996.
Additional comments relevant to this chapter
1. Decision-Making Structure: Questions of the
transboundary movement of wastes in the Russian Federation are
regulated by the following legislation:
The federal law on ratification of the Basel Convention on
Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes
and their Disposal.
Governmental Order No. 670 of 1 July 1995 on "Priority
measures for implementation of the federal law on the
ratification of the Basel Convention".
Governmental Order No. 766 of 1 July 1996 on "State regulation
and monitoring of transboundary movements of wastes
and their disposal".
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: No information
3. Major Groups: No information
4. Finance: The "Wastes" programme provides for the
funding of measures costing a total of about 1,000 billion roubles
for the disposal of hazardous wastes.
5. Regional/International Cooperation: The CIS countries
have signed an agreement on the control of transboundary
movements of hazardous wastes and their disposal.
Under this agreement the parties will implement agreed
measures to regulate the import of wastes into each of their
territories and the transit through their territories of hazardous
or other wastes.
A regional centre for study and transfer of technology has
been established.
Latest 1995 | ||||
Generation of hazardous waste (t) | 1 405 226 373.620 | |||
Import of hazardous wastes (t) | 9 196.872 | |||
Export of hazardous wastes (t) | 33 117.193 | |||
Area of land contaminated by hazardous waste (km2) | 1 474.64 | |||
Expenditure on hazardous waste treatment | 3 050 322.5 million roubles | |||
Other data |
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 21: ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND
MANAGEMENT OF SOLID
WASTES AND SEWAGE-RELATED ISSUES
The Government of the Russian Federation has confirmed a
special-purpose federal programme ("Wastes") and produced
a draft federal law on industrial and consumer wastes.
A number of federal and regional programmes provide for the
implementation of pilot projects to solve the problem of
wastes in the Russian Federation.
One aim is to establish a standardized regional system for the
management of the handling of industrial and consumer
wastes and the improvement, development and application of
regulatory and methodological instruments in this area in
1995-1996. The Ministry of the Environment is carrying out an
experiment in the handling of hazardous industrial and
consumer wastes. The Republics of Bashkortostan, Komi and North
Osetiya are taking part in this experiment, together
with the Bryansk, Vladimir, Volgograd, Ivanovsk, Kalush, Kirov,
Moscow, Rostov, Smolensk, Tomsk, Chelyabinsk,
Yaroslavl and Astrakhan regions. One aspect of the experiment is
the development of a system of regulatory instruments
on the handling of wastes.
As well as creating a standardized system of waste management
at the regional level, the intention is to prepare proposals
for the establishment of the computerized information and data base
necessary for the taking of decisions on improvement
of the environmental situation with respect to the handling of
wastes, develop a standardized organizational structure, and
expand cooperation in waste management at the federal and regional
levels.
NATIONAL PRIORITY: Development of the legal and
regulatory framework, and investment measures for the
treatment and use of wastes.
STATUS REPORT:
1. Decision-Making Structure: Governmental Order No. 1098
of 13 September 1996 on the special-purpose federal
programme "Wastes".
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: No information
3. Major Groups: No information
4. Finance: The "Wastes" programme provides for the
funding of measures costing about 2,000 billion roubles for the
disposal of solid wastes.
5. Regional/International Cooperation: The CIS countries
have signed an agreement on control of transboundary
movements of hazardous wastes and their disposal.
Latest 1995 | ||||
Generation of industrial and municipal waste (t) | 1 405 | |||
Waste disposed(Kg/capita) | 350 | |||
Expenditure on waste collection and treatment (US$) | ||||
Waste recycling rates (%) | ||||
Municipal waste disposal (Kg/capita) | ||||
Waste reduction rates per unit of GDP (t/year) | ||||
Other data
|
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 22: SAFE AND ENVIRONMENTALLY
SOUND MANAGEMENT
OF RADIOACTIVE WASTES
Over recent years the Ministry of the Environment and other
relevant ministries and offices have been continuing their
work on the amendment and completion of the State register of
places and sites of generation, movement, reprocessing,
use, storage and disposal of radioactive materials and wastes which
are sources of ionizing radiation.
The summary data on the volume of radioactive wastes and spent
nuclear fuel located at enterprises of the various offices
is given in tables 1, 2 and 3.
Enterprises of Minatom (the atomic energy ministry), where
most of Russia's radiochemical production is concentrated
(Mayak industrial combine, Siberian chemical combine,
mining-chemical combine) remain potential sources of radioactive
pollution of adjoining land. In the course of their activities
they have accumulated a large volume of liquid and solid
wastes, with a total radioactivity of 1.5 billion Ci.
One source of particular concern is the concentration of
medium- and low-level liquid wastes in open radioactive waste
storage reservoirs at these enterprises.
Lake Karachai, which until recently was a disposal site for
medium-level wastes, has a radioactivity of about 120 million
Ci, mainly from strontium-90 and cesium-137. Following the
termination of the release into the lake of wastes from the
radiochemical industry, the cascade of the industrial reservoirs
created in the flood plains of the upper reaches of the
River Techa had an accumulation of 350 million cubic metres of
polluted water, mainly low-level wastes with a total
activity of about 200,000 Ci.
The presence of surface storage reservoirs for liquid wastes
results in the penetration of radioactive substances into the
groundwater. A lens of polluted groundwater has formed under Lake
Karachai with a volume of about four million cubic
metres and an area of 10 square kilometres. The rate of movement
of the polluted groundwater is up to 80 metres a year.
It is possible that these waters will penetrate into other
water-bearing structures and deliver radionuclides into the
hydrographic system.
At present the country's 29 nuclear power stations are storing
140,000 cubic metres of liquid wastes with a total
radioactivity of 29,000 Ci, eight thousand cubic metres of
solidified wastes with an activity of 2,000 Ci, and 120,000
cubic metres of solid wastes (equipment, construction debris).
At present none of Russia's nuclear power stations has a full
complement of equipment for the preparation of solid and
liquid radioactive wastes for disposal, and at some stations the
liquid wastes are reprocessed at bitumenization plants
(Leningrad and Kalinin stations) or evaporation plants (Balakov,
Kalinin and Novoronezh stations).
Radioactive wastes are also generated by the operation of
nuclear research reactors and the use of radionuclides in
medicine, industry, agriculture and scientific research. The
producers of wastes in this category are Russia's
numerous scientific research organizations, industrial enterprises,
medical and teaching institutions, which operate more
than 400,000 different sources of ionizing radiation and which are
mostly located in regions of high population density.
For the disposal of such wastes Russia has 16 radioactive waste
disposal facilities (excluding the Grosny special
combine, which is located in an area of military conflict).
At present these sites are holding an accumulation of about
200,000 cubic metres of wastes with a total
radioactivity of about two million Ci.
With the exception of the Moscow facility, which has
a developed infrastructure including a scientific research and
experimental complex working on the development and introduction of
new technologies for the reprocessing of
radioactive wastes and on environmental techniques and systems, the
equipment and technology in use at these sites is not
up to modern standards, and their storage capacity is either
exhausted or extremely limited. A number of the facilities
require new sites for the disposal of wastes. Questions of the
funding of these facilities and their activities have not yet
been resolved.
The radioactive waste disposal facilities are also responsible
for the reception and isolation of wastes resulting not from
the nuclear fuel cycle but from accidents in operations involving
sources of ionizing radiation or radioactive materials.
Their technical management is the responsibility of the Moscow
scientific production combine "Radon". The system for
control of the whole process of radio-isotope production in the
country is not perfect, so that not all spent sources of
ionizing radiation reach the disposal facilities, and instances of
their uncontrolled release into the environment occur.
Since 1963 84 low-yield underground nuclear explosions have
been carried out in various regions of the country at the
request of the Ministry of Geology of the USSR, the Ministry of
Petroleum of the USSR and the Ministry of Gas of the
USSR in order to create underground storage capacity, extinguish
fires at gas wells, increase oil production, and conduct
soundings of the earth's crust for the purpose of large-scale
mineral prospecting. The majority of these sites have fulfilled
their purpose and can now be regarded as closed, but some sites are
still being operated or are only temporarily closed.
The radioactivity of the materials generated by the explosions has
been estimated at several million Ci. Most of these
materials are found in cooled molten rock at depths from 600 to
2,800 metres. The land in these areas requires careful
investigation and, if necessary, rehabilitation. This work is not
being carried out either, owing to the lack of financing.
One of the most serious shortcomings remains the failure to
solve problems connected with the operation of nuclear
submarines, the management of radioactive wastes and spent nuclear
fuel at Russia's naval stations, and the operation of
the nuclear ice-breaking fleet.
At present 121 nuclear submarines (70 from the Northern Fleet
and 51 from the Pacific Fleet) have been decommissioned,
and the nuclear cores have been unloaded from 42 vessels (Northern
Fleet -18, Pacific Fleet - 24). Temporary
mothballing stations are being built for the decommissioned
submarines. Eight have been scrapped after removal of their
nuclear compartments, nine have been prepared for long-term
mothballing afloat, and 13 are at naval bases and shipyards
being scrapped or prepared for mothballing afloat. Ninety-one
decommissioned nuclear submarines are permanently
moored in an unsatisfactory technical condition; with an overall
service life of 32-35 years, up to 40 per cent of them have
undergone no maintenance or repairs for more than 10 years, and it
is extremely difficult to keep them afloat. In most
cases the spent fuel remains in the reactors for 15 or more years.
Four of the decommissioned vessels have damaged
reactors, and means of disposing of them have not yet been
devised.
The storage facilities for the spent fuel of the joint-stock
company "Murmansk Merchant Shipping" (Lotta, Lepse and
Imandra merchant shipping bases) are completely full. The same is
true of the shore-based and floating storage facilities
for the spent nuclear fuel of the Russian Navy (four shore-based
and nine floating facilities). All but three of the floating
facilities were built in the 1960s; they are in theory and in
practice obsolete and owing to their poor operational order they
are unable fully to perform the functions required of them.
Murmansk Merchant Shipping has experimental industrial plant
for the treatment of liquid radioactive wastes
(Filter-4, Filter-5), which can reprocess not only the liquid
wastes generated by the ice-breaking fleet but also the
wastes produced by the Navy. In 1994 840 cubic metres of such
wastes were reprocessed.
However, the most serious radioactive waste situation is found
in the Pacific Fleet. Following the banning of
the dumping of radioactive wastes at sea in 1993, the volume of
wastes has steadily increased. Owing to its
unsatisfactory condition, TNT-5 (a storage vessel) was transferred
from Kamen Bay to Pavlovsk Bay and grounded in
the shallows in order to avoid its capsizing or sinking at the
jetty. This cannot be regarded as a solution of the
problem, for owing to the absorption of radionuclides from wastes
into the metal of its tanks the hull of TNT-5 itself constitutes
solid radioactive waste.
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT:
1. Decision-Making Structure: No information
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: No information
3. Major Groups: No information
4. Finance: No information
5. Regional/International Cooperation: No information
|
Ch. 24: GLOBAL ACTION FOR WOMEN TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE AND
EQUITABLE DEVELOPMENT. The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women was Signed on 17 July 1980
Ratified on 19 December 1980 by the Supreme Soviet of the USSR (in force for Russia as the successor State of the USSR).
24.b Increasing the proportion of women decision makers. Percentage of women: in government % 0.3(1992) 2.9(1996) in parliament % 9 (1992) 7.3(1996) at local government level % ____(1992) ____(1996)
24.2.e assessing, reviewing, revising and implementing curricula and other educational material with a view to promoting dissemination of gender-relevant knowledge. Curricula and educational material are being revised.
24.2.f and 24.2.c formulating and implementing policies, guidelines, strategies and plans for achievement of equality in all aspects of society including issuing a strategy by year 2000 to eliminate obstacles to full participation of women in sustainable development. Policies/strategies are being drawn up. 24.2.d establishing mechanisms by 1995 to assess implementation and impact of development and environment policies and programmes on women Mechanisms are being developed.
Brief comments on this chapter (maximum 100 words) (please, do not exceed this page):
The Government has recently drawn up a number of State programmes and drafted laws to improve the status of women and expand the involvement of public organizations, including women's organizations, in the decision-making process. However, the shortage of funds for the implementation of State programmes often obstructs measures designed to improve the status of women, with a resulting increase of unemployment amongst women, deterioration of the health system, etc.
Although the representation of women in Government, Parliament and managerial posts is still insufficient, there has been a considerable increase in the activity of women's organizations. Machinery is being developed to accord greater attention to the interests of women in State sustainable development policy. |
Ch. 25: CHILDREN AND YOUTH IN SUSTAINABLE
DEVELOPMENT. 25.4 establishing processes that promote dialogue between the youth and government at all levels and mechanisms that permit youth access to information and opportunity to present their views on implementing A21. Name relevant youth fora (3-4 most important):
1. "Young people for the environment and sustainable development" ("Raduga", October 1992, November 1993, October 1995);
2. "Youth Inter-Week" (Siberian youth initiative, May 1993, May 1994, May 1995, May 1996).
Describe their role in the national process: No information 25.6 reducing youth unemployment
Young people accounted for 42 per cent of total unemployed in 1992 and 34 per cent in 1996.
25.5 ensuring that by year 2000 more than 50% of youth -- gender balanced -- have access to appropriate secondary education or vocational training. The goal set in Agenda 21 has been reached.
Brief comments on this chapter (maximum 100 words) (please, do not exceed this page):
Over the past five years activities have been carried out to improve the situation of young people and develop a dialogue between youth organizations and the Government. The Government adopted the "Youth of Russia" and "Children of Russia" programmes. A State committee on youth affairs has been created and it is making some efforts to increase the involvement of young people in the State decision-making process. However, there was hardly any representation of youth in the State Commission of the Russian Federation to develop the Concept of sustainable development, and there has been little involvement of young people in the discussion of many State documents relating to the environment and sustainable development. At the same time there is a desire for cooperation on the part both of the State and of youth organizations, so that there is some justification for thinking that such cooperation will be developed in the future.
|
Ch. 26: RECOGNIZING AND STRENGTHENING THE ROLE OF
INDIGENOUS PEOPLE AND THEIR
COMMUNITIES.
26.3.a establishing a process to empower indigenous people and their communities -- through policies and legal instruments: in place.
26.3.b strengthening arrangements for active participation in national policies indigenous people participate as advisors.
26.3.c involving indigenous people in resource management strategies and programmes at the national and local level. indigenous people are involved but not yet sufficiently
Brief comments on this chapter (maximum 100 words) (please, do not exceed this page):
The post-Rio period has seen the development of State programmes to improve the lives of indigenous peoples, for example the programme "Economic and social development of the indigenous peoples of the North up to 2000". The indigenous peoples inhabiting this territory were actively involved in the programme's development. The Association of Indigenous and Minority Peoples of the North was given consultative status in the State Committee on Questions of the North. With the support of the Russian Government this Association has become a permanent participant in the Arctic Council.
In recent years a legislative framework has been created for more active participation of indigenous peoples in the taking of decisions affecting the development of their lands. However, only time will tell how this legislation will be implemented in practice. | |
Ch. 27: STRENGTHENING THE ROLE OF NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS: PARTNERS FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT. 27.5 developing mechanisms that allow NGOs to play their partnership role responsibly and effectively. Mechanisms do not exist, although some efforts are being made to grant NGOs consultative status.
27.6 reviewing formal procedures and mechanisms to involve NGOs in decision making and implementation. Some work is being done in this area.
27.8 promoting and allowing NGOs to participate in the conception, establishment and evaluation of official mechanisms to review Agenda 21 implementation. NGOs inputs are adhoc.
27.7 establishing a mutually productive dialogue by 1995 at the national level between NGOs and governments.
Brief comments on this chapter (maximum 100 words) (please, do not exceed this page):
There is no permanent machinery for dialogue, although some efforts are being made: a consultative council of NGO leaders has been set up under the Ministry of the Environment, and NGO representatives are sometimes included in official delegations to major international negotiations and in State commissions drafting important documents connected with sustainable development.
General comments:
Recent years have seen the adoption of a number of laws which will enable NGOs to play a more active role in the decision-making process. However, no mechanisms for implementing these laws have been established. The lack of supplementary legislation and the lack of democratic traditions in society, as well as the defects of the system for dissemination of information, impede the more active involvement of NGOs in the decision-making process. However, NGO activity has increased noticeably since Rio, and in society at large and in State organs there is a steadily growing realization of the importance of the NGO role in achieving sustainable development. The development of a dialogue and cooperation between State organs and NGOs is proceeding, but not yet on a systematic basis.
|
Ch. 28: LOCAL AUTHORITIES' INITIATIVES IN SUPPORT OF
AGENDA 21.
28.2.d encouraging local authorities to implement and monitor programmes that aim to ensure participation of women and youth in local decision making.
Government support of local agenda 21 initiatives: Supports very weakly
Brief comments on this chapter (maximum 100 words) (please, do not exceed this page):
At present virtually all regions are developing local plans for sustainable development, and some of them are receiving assistance from international or overseas organizations (World Bank, USAID).
The State provides methodological support, developing the strategy for Russia's transition to sustainable development.
General comments:
In the post-Rio period there has been much discussion in Russia of questions of sustainable development, and the Concept of Russia's transition to sustainable development has been established. The content of this Concept is taken into account in the development of national, local and regional plans for socio-economic development and in the adoption of economic and other decisions at all levels.
Individual sustainable development plans are being drawn up in a number of regions.
| |
Ch. 29: STRENGTHENING THE ROLE OF WORKERS AND
THEIR TRADE UNIONS. 29.2 partial participation of workers in implementation and evaluation of A21. 29.3 a to e (By year 2000, (a) promoting ratification of ILO conventions; (b) establishing bipartite and tripartite mechanism on safety, health and sustainable development; (c) increasing number of environmental collective agreements; (d) reducing occupational accidents and injuries; (e) increasing workers' education and training efforts. ILO Conventions have been ratified. Workers take some part in National Agenda 21 discussions/implementation. Brief comments on this chapter (maximum 100 words) (please, do not exceed this page):
In the post-UNCED period workers' trade unions have begun to take a more active part in Agenda 21 discussions. However, the country's serious economic problems (unemployment, inflation, late payment of wages, decline of workers' living standards) mean that the problems of sustainable development are relegated to the background.
|
30: STRENGTHENING THE ROLE OF BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY. 30.6 increasing the efficiency of resource use, including reuse, recycling, and reduction of waste per unit of economic output.
State policies are in the development stage
30.18.a encouraging the concept of stewardship in management and use of natural resources by entrepreneurs.
List any actions taken in this area:
Publicity is given to positive examples in this area (Schmidheiny's book Changing course: a global business perspective on development and the environment has been translated into Russian) and a number of other publications have been issued, including "Russian Green Pages" containing information about companies which are actually taking environmental considerations into account in their production processes or are facilitating the solution of environmental problems by other means.
A number of conferences have been held, including a special section on business and the environment at the All-Union Congress on Environmental Protection.
30.18.b increasing number of enterprises that subscribe to and implement sustainable development policies.
A few big enterprises have adopted sustainable development policies. A few Small and Medium sized enterprises have adopted sustainable development policies.
Brief comments on this chapter (maximum 100 words) (please, do not exceed this page):
UNCED brought about some increase in the interest of business in problems of the environment and sustainable development. In spite of a number of positive examples in this area, the economic crisis and the decline in industrial activity have confronted most enterprises with the problem of survival, so that the problems of the environment and sustainable development are not yet priorities for them.
However, since Rio leading businessmen have begun to take a greater interest in the development of State sustainable development policy and have themselves begun to take initiatives to air the principles of sustainable development in business circles. |
Ch. 31: SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL
COMMUNITY. 31.3.b improving exchange of knowledge and concerns between s&t community and the general public. there is some effort in this direction. brief description: A number of popular publications have been produced, articles have been published in the mass information media, and conferences and seminars have been held, in particular for young people.
31.9 developing, improving and promoting international acceptance of codes of practice and guidelines related to science and technology and its role in reconciling environment and development. Some efforts are being made (in particular, a number of conferences have been held).
Brief comments on this chapter not already described in chapter 35 (maximum 100 words) (please, do not exceed this page):
Although on the whole society's awareness of the importance of the problems of protecting the environment and achieving sustainable development is still not sufficient, by means of the kinds of activity mentioned above scientific and technical circles have been promoting the dissemination of these ideas among the general public and decision-makers, and this activity has facilitated Russia's transition to sustainable development.
| |
Ch. 32: STRENGTHENING THE ROLE OF
FARMERS. 32.5.c promoting and encouraging sustainable farming practices and technologies. Some attempts have been made to disseminate knowledge in this area.
32.5.e developing a policy framework that provides incentives and motivation among farmers for sustainable and efficient farming practices. These questions have been discussed at a number of meetings and conferences, but no policies have yet been developed.
32.5.f enhancing participation of organizations of farmers in design and implementation of sustainable development policies. They are very little involved.
Brief comments on this chapter (maximum 100 words) (please, do not exceed this page):
Farmers take little part in the development of sustainable development policies. Despite the fact that farmers' associations and State organs have done some work on the dissemination of information about the sustainable development of agriculture, this has not been enough to motivate farmers to make rational use of natural resources and introduce efficient farming practices.
|
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 33: FINANCIAL RESOURCES AND
MECHANISMS
Financial resources and mechanisms are also covered under each
sectoral chapter of Agenda 21 where relevant. This summary
highlights broader national financial policies, domestic and
external (including ODA)
At present in the Russian Federation State monitoring of the
condition of the environment, use of natural resources, and
atmospheric pollution, as well as environmental monitoring in
general and the solution of other environmental protection
problems are the responsibility of the State Environmental
Protection Committee, the Federal Forestry Service, the
Ministry of Natural Resources, and the federal hydrometeorology and
cartography services; the relevant expenditures are
identified in a separate section of the federal budget entitled
"Protection of the environment and natural resources,
hydrometeorology, cartography and geodesy".
These resources are intended for the conduct of State
environmental monitoring activities, the organization and
maintenance of reserves and national parks under the
special-purpose federal programme of support for State nature
reserves and national parks up to 2000, and the implementation of
the special-purpose programmes on Russia's forests and
protection of forests against fires.
Allocations are also made for coastal-protection and
flood-prevention works, repair of dams, dredging of river deltas,
cleaning of reservoirs, and maintenance of pumping stations and
hydrological installations, and for other measures
connected with the sustainment, protection and rehabilitation of
natural water sources and for the maintenance by these
means of a good-quality water supply for household and business
consumers.
The federal budget makes allocations for the implementation of
the special-purpose programme on the development of the
hydrometeorlogical services of the national economy in 1994, 1995
and up to 2000, which covers the provision of
hydrometeorlogical services for the national economy and the
public, the defence of the Russian Federation,
hydrometeorlogical monitoring and the provision of information to
the national economy about the emergence of
dangerous natural hydrometeorlogical phenomena.
The federal budget allocates resources for
topographical-geodesic and cartographic work, remote sounding of
the earth,
the demarcation of the frontiers of the Russian Federation and the
correct use of geographical names, and also for the
implementation of the special-purpose federal programmes on
development of seismological observations and forecasting
of earthquakes for 1995-2000 and for the introduction of advanced
technology in the cartographic and geodesic services of
the Russian Federation.
At present expenditures under the federal budget are presented
in accordance with the budget classification by ministries
and offices, and expenditures on environmental protection measures
are also indicated, as part of their total expenditures,
for the ministries and offices whose activities may pollute the
environment or involve use of natural resources.
In addition, the federal budget provides resources for the
implementation of special-purpose federal programmes for
improvement of the environment in specific regions and cities of
the Russian Federation ("Programme for improvement of
the environmental situation and protection of human health in the
Tula region for 1993-1998", "Special-purpose federal
programme of urgent measures to improve the state of the
environment, the public health situation and human health in
Bratsk, Irkutsk region", "Comprehensive federal programme on the
protection of Lake Baikal and rational use of the
natural resources of its basin", etc.).
Provision is made for use of the resources of the Federal
Environment Fund, which have been incorporated in
the federal budget since 1995, to finance additional measures for
the construction and re-equipment of environmental
protection facilities, the conduct of scientific research and
design work connected with the environment, and the
preservation of natural monuments.
It is proposed that a total of 1,973.6 billion roubles (taking
into account reciprocal write-offs), or 90 per cent of the plan,
will be earmarked from the federal budget.
The draft federal budget for 1997, which has been confirmed in
second reading by the State Duma, contains expenditures
totalling 2,710.5 billion roubles for protection of the environment
and natural resources, hydrometeorology, cartography
and geodesy.
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT: The law on the federal budget for 1996 confirmed
resources totalling 2,131.5 billion roubles for protection of the
environment and natural resources, hydrometeorology, cartography
and geodesy. In 1996, in view of the strained
situation of federal budget revenues, financing was provided
basically under the protected sections of the budget (wages
and extra charges, transfers, etc.), which were expected to be
fully funded in 1996. CHANGES IN NATIONAL BUDGET TO ADDRESS SUSTAINABLE
DEVELOPMENT:
NEW ECONOMIC INSTRUMENTS:
ELIMINATION OF ENVIRONMENTALLY UNFRIENDLY
SUBSIDIES:
ODA policy issues No information |
ODA funding provided or received (Total US$million) | ||||||
Net flow of external capital from all sources as % of GDP | ||||||
Other data
|
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 34: TRANSFER OF
ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND
TECHNOLOGY, COOPERATION AND CAPACITY-BUILDING
Transfer of environmentally sound technology, cooperation and
capacity-building is also covered under each sectoral chapter
of Agenda 21 where relevant. This summary highlights broader
national policies and actions relating to chapter 34.
The development of computer telecommunications in Russia using
modern equipment and technology with a view to
integration in the world information community began in the late
1980s.
In the past decade the world has in fact seen an information
revolution as a result of the widespread introduction of data
transfer systems, which has led to in entirely new and extremely
efficient methods of organizing scientific and academic
activities.
The creation of an efficient system for reciprocal access by
the leading national scientific research and academic centres to
the information technology resources built up in Russia and abroad
(data banks and bases, information systems, super-computers) is a
very important component of the measures taken to maintain the
capacity of Russia's science and
education system and to create favourable conditions for entry into
the international scientific community.
This problem will be resolved as part of the
inter-departmental programme on the creation of a national network
of
computer telecommunications for science and higher education, which
is to be implemented in 1995-1998.
The national computer network is being built as a local
distribution branched system which includes an inter-urban
network linking the regional user networks and facilitating the
exchange of information among Russian users as well as
access to international communications networks.
At present Russia has two complementary data transfer systems
using various technologies - X.25 and TSR/IR. Both
these systems have their own areas of application, but for a number
of reasons the most popular in the international
scientific community is the Internet technology.
The programme is designed to establish in Russia on the basis
of overseas experience the nucleus (cluster) of a future
Russian network of the Internet type.
The national network of computer telecommunications for
science and higher education is a logical virtual network
composed in most cases of "real" standard computer networks.
The national computer network will be created with the help of
broad international scientific and technological
cooperation.
MEANS OF IMPLEMENTATION:
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT ON LINKS BETWEEN NATIONAL, REGIONAL
AND INTERNATIONAL INFORMATION
NETWORKS/SYSTEMS:
Describe any work being undertaken at the national or
local level regarding efforts to promote clean production
processes and/or the concepts of eco-efficiency. These processes
may include training, preferential financial
arrangements, information dissemination and changes in legal or
regulatory frameworks.
Provide information on the adoption of environmental management systems. National reaction to environmental management system standards such as the ISO 14000 Series and others. Please note efforts made at the national level to promote their adoption and the creation of certification infrastructure in order to facilitate access to these standards to local industry.
List and describe programs or work under way to facilitate the transfer of ESTs to small and medium sized enterprises. Please note efforts to facilitate access to financial resources and other transfer strategies.
|
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 35: SCIENCE FOR
SUSTAINABLE
DEVELOPMENT
In accordance with Governmental Order No. 360 of 17 April 1995
on "State support for the development of science and
scientific and technological activities", a decision of the
Governmental Commission on Scientific and Technological
Policy, and Presidential Decree No. 884 of 13 June 1996 on
"Doctrine of development of Russian science", the priorities
for the development of science and technology were drawn up and
confirmed, together with a list of the critical
technologies at the federal level, taking into account the problems
of Russia's sustainable development.
STEPS TAKEN TO ENHANCE SCIENTIFIC UNDERSTANDING, IMPROVE LONG
TERM SCIENTIFIC
ASSESSMENT, BUILDING OF CAPACITY AND CAPABILITY:
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT ON NATIONAL SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE,
RESEARCH NEEDS AND PRIORITIES:
Year | |||
Number of scientists, engineers and technicians engaged in research and experimental development (thousands) | 1 532.6 1 315.0 | 1992 1993 | |
1 106.3 | 1994 | ||
1 061.0 | 1995 | ||
980* | 1996 | ||
Total expenditure for research and experimental development (billions of roubles) | 103.16 848.9 | 1992 1993 | |
2 791.5 | 1994 | ||
5 470.0 | 1995 | ||
11 560.0* | 1996 | ||
Other data
|
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 36: PROMOTING EDUCATION,
PUBLIC AWARENESS AND
TRAINING
a) Reorientation of education towards sustainable
development
In the context of the emerging Concept of Russia's sustainable
development, the system for promoting public awareness of
matters of sustainable development is undergoing change. Teaching
programmes have been created, textbooks are being
produced, and arrangements are being made for the training of
teachers in this subject.
b) Increasing public awareness
Public information on matters of sustainable development is
provided under the leadership and coordination of the State
Environmental Protection Committee.
The problems of sustainable development are now regularly
aired by the mass information media and are being
extensively incorporated in further-education curricula.
c) Promoting training
The Ministry of General and Vocational Education has drawn up
recommendations for the redesign of teaching courses
relating to questions of environmental protection to take into
account the problems of Russia's sustainable development.
Schools of general and further education are creating
sustainable development centres to promote education and public
awareness on a regional basis. This work is coordinated by an
inter-departmental council on public environmental
education, which has been approved by the President.
ROLE OF MAJOR GROUPS:
FINANCING AND COST EVALUATION OF THE LABOUR ACTIVITIES:
Funding for the work of re-educating the public in the
problems of sustainable development is provided from the resources
of the State budget and international programmes.
NATIONAL PRIORITY: Protection of the environment and
gradual re-education of the public to make it aware of the
problems of sustainable development.
STATUS REPORT:
Latest 1995 | ||||
Adult literacy rate (%) Male | 99.5* | 99.5* | ||
Adult literacy rate (%) Female | 96.8* | 97.4* | ||
% of primary school children reaching grade 5 (1986-97) | ||||
Mean number of years of schooling | 9 | |||
% of GNP spent on education | 3.5 | 3.5 | ||
Females per 100 males in secondary school | 102 | 104 | 105 | |
Women per 100 men in the labour force | 87 | |||
Other data |
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 37: NATIONAL MECHANISMS AND
INTERNATIONAL
COOPERATION FOR CAPACITY-BUILDING IN DEVELOPING
COUNTRIES
National capacity building is also covered under sectoral
chapters.
Donors: You may wish to describe here how Agenda 21 has
influenced your ODA policies in this area.
Developing countries: You may wish to describe any new
national mechanisms for capacity building - and any changes in
technical cooperation.
No information.
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT ON NATIONAL ENDOGENOUS CAPACITY
BUILDING:
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 38: INTERNATIONAL
INSTITUTIONAL
ARRANGEMENTS
Ch. 38: Brief summary of any particular UN System
response affecting this country/state:
In order to finance special-purpose projects in accordance with the priorities of the Global Environment Facility, agreements have been signed with the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development concerning grants to Russia for:
1. Preserving biodiversity - $US 20.1 million.
2. Reducing emissions of greenhouse gases during the production and consumption of methane - $US 3.2 billion.
3. Phased reduction of the consumption of ozone depleting substances - $US 60 million.
|
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 39: INTERNATIONAL LEGAL
INSTRUMENTS AND
MECHANISMS
Ch. 39: International Legal Instruments are covered
under the relevant sectoral chapters. This is a listing of major
agreements/conventions (not already covered) entered into and
relevant to Agenda 21:
Under the auspices of international legal instruments the
Russian Federation is working on the implementation of more
than 20 agreements. |
2. | International cooperation and trade | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3. | Combating poverty | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4. | Changing consumption patterns |
|
| 5.
| Demographic dynamics and sustainability
|
|
|
| 6.
| Human health
|
|
|
| 7.
| Human settlements
|
|
|
| 8.
| Integrating E & D in decision-making
|
|
|
| 9.
| Protection of the atmosphere
|
|
|
| 10.
| Integrated planning and management of land resources
|
|
|
| 11.
| Combating deforestation
|
|
|
| 12.
| Combating desertification and drought
|
|
|
| 13.
| Sustainable mountain development
|
|
|
| 14.
| Sustainable agriculture and rural development
|
|
|
| 15.
| Conservation of biological diversity
|
|
|
| 16.
| Biotechnology
|
|
|
| 17.
| Oceans, seas, coastal areas and their living resources
|
|
|
| 18.
| Freshwater resources
|
|
|
| 19.
| Toxic chemicals
|
|
|
| 20.
| Hazardous wastes
|
|
|
| 21.
| Solid wastes
|
|
|
| 22.
| Radioactive wastes
|
|
|
| 24.
| Women in sustainable development
|
|
|
| 25.
| Children and youth
|
|
|
| 26.
| Indigenous people
|
|
|
| 27.
| Non-governmental organizations
|
|
|
| 28.
| Local authorities
|
|
|
| 29.
| Workers and trade unions
|
|
|
| 30.
| Business and industry
|
|
|
| 31.
| Scientific and technological community
|
|
|
| 32.
| Farmers
|
|
|
| 33.
| Financial resources and mechanisms
|
|
|
| 34.
| Technology, cooperation and capacity-building
|
|
|
| 35.
| Science for sustainable development
|
|
|
| 36.
| Education, public awareness and training
|
|
|
| 37.
| International cooperation for capacity-building
|
|
|
| 38.
| International institutional arrangements
|
|
|
| 39.
| International legal instruments
|
|
|
| 40.
| Information for decision-making
|
|
|
| |
No information
Latest 199- | ||||
Number of telephones in use per 100 inhabitants | ||||
Other data
|
Copyright © United Nations
Department of Economic and Social Affairs
Comments and suggestions: esa@un.org
1 November 1997