|
National Implementation of Agenda 21
|
Information Provided by the Government of Republic of Armenia to
the United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development
United Nations Department for Policy Coordination and
Sustainable Development |
This country profile has been provided by:
Name of Ministry/Office: Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Date: 5 February 1997
Submitted by: Department of International Organizations, MFA
Mailing address: Government House 2, Republic Square, Yerevan, Armenia, 357010
Telephone: (3742) 526802
Telefax: AT & T 151042
E-mail:
Note from the Secretariat: Parts of the original Country Profiles were provided in the Russian language. This text is an official English translation. An effort has been made to present all country profiles within a common format, with an equal number of pages. However, where Governments have not provided information for the tables appended to Chapters 4 and 17, those tables have been omitted entirely in order to reduce the overall length of the profile and save paper. Consequently, there may be some minor inconsistencies among the formats of the different country profiles.
All statistics are rendered as provided by the respective Governments.
|
| APELL | Awareness and Preparedness for Emergencies at Local Level |
| CFC | chlorofluorocarbon |
| CGIAR | Consultative Group on International Agriculture Research |
| CILSS | Permanent Inter-State Committee on Drought Control in the Sahel |
| EEZ | exclusive economic zone |
| ECA | Economic Commission for Africa |
| ECE | Economic Commission for Europe |
| ECLAC | Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean |
| ELCI | Environmental Liaison Centre International |
| EMINWA | environmentally sound management of inland water |
| ESCAP | Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific |
| ESCWA | Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia |
| FAO | Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations |
| GATT | General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade |
| GAW | Global Atmosphere Watch (WMO) |
| GEF | Global Environment Facility |
| GEMS | Global Environmental Monitoring System (UNEP) |
| GEMS/WATER | Global Water Quality Monitoring Programme |
| GESAMP | Joint Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Pollution |
| GIPME | Global Investigation of Pollution in Marine Environment (UNESCO) |
| GIS | Geographical Information System |
| GLOBE | Global Legislators Organisation for a Balanced Environment |
| GOS | Global Observing System (WMO/WWW) |
| GRID | Global Resource Information Database |
| GSP | generalized system of preferences |
| HIV | human immunodeficiency virus |
| IAEA | International Atomic Energy Agency |
| IAP-WASAD | International Action Programme on Water and Sustainable Agricultural Development |
| IARC | International Agency for Research on Cancer |
| IBSRAM | International Board of Soil Resources and Management |
| ICCA | International Council of Chemical Associations |
| ICES | International Council for the Exploration of the Sea |
| ICPIC | International Cleaner Production Information Clearing House |
| ICSC | International Civil Service Commission |
| ICSU | International Council of Scientific Unions |
| IEEA | Integrated environmental and economic accounting |
| IFAD | International Fund for Agricultural Development |
| IGADD | Intergovernmental Authority for Drought and Development |
| IGBP | International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (ICSU) |
| IGBP/START | International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme/Global Change System for Analysis, Research and Training |
| ILO | International Labour Organisation |
| IMF | International Monetary Fund |
| IMO | International Maritime Organization |
| INFOTERRA | International Environment Information system (UNEP) |
| IOC | Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission |
| IPCC | Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change |
| IPCS | International Programme on Chemical Safety |
| IPM | integrated pest management |
| IRPTC | International Register of Potentially Toxic Chemicals |
| ITC | International Tin Council |
| ITTO | International Tropical Timber Organization |
| IUCN | International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources |
| MARPOL | International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships |
| OECD | Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development |
| PGRFA | plant genetic resources for agriculture |
| PIC | prior informed consent procedure |
| SADCC | South African Development Co-ordination Conference |
| SARD | sustainable agriculture and rural development |
| UNCTAD | United Nations Conference on Trade and Development |
| UNDP | United Nations Development Programme |
| UNDRO | Office of the United Nations Disaster Relief Coordinator |
| UNEP | United Nations Environment Programme |
| UNESCO | United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization |
| UNFPA | United Nations Population Fund |
| UNICEF | United Nations Children's Fund |
| UNIDO | United Nations Industrial Development Organization |
| UNU | United Nations University |
| WCP | World Climate Programme (WMO/UNEP/ICSU/UNESCO) |
| WFC | World Food Council |
| WHO | World Health Organization |
| WMO | World Meteorological Organization |
| WWF | World Wide Fund for Nature (also called World Wildlife Fund) |
| WWW | World Weather Watch (WMO) |
1. Key National Sustainable Development Coordination Mechanism(s)/Council(s). Ministry of the Environment and Underground
Contact point (Name, Title, Office): Mr. Boris Ghazaryan, Head, International Cooperation Division
Telephone: 7 3742 530741/533629 Fax: 7 3742 534902 e-mail:
Mailing address: 35 Moskovian Street, Yerevan 375002, Armenia
2. Membership/Composition/Chairperson 2a. List of ministries and agencies involved: An official agency is in the course of being set up. In addition to the Ministry of the Environment and Underground, the Ministry of Education and Science, and the Ministry of Information are involved in popularizing Agenda 21.
2b. Names of para-statal bodies and institutions involved, as well as participation of academic and private sectors: Yerevan State University State Broadcasting and Television Committee
2c. Names of non-governmental organizations:
"For Human Sustainable Development" Association
3. Mandate role of above mechanism/council: Coordination of actions in the field of Human Sustainable Development; dissemination of information on the main principles of the ethics of universality and provisions of Agenda 21.
4. If available, attach a diagram (organization chart) showing national coordination structure and linkages between ministries: N/A
Submitted by (Name): Souren Avetissian Title: Minister Date: 3 April 1996
Ministry/Office: Ministry of Environment and Underground
Telephone: 7 3742 530741/533629 Fax: 7 3742 534902 e-mail:
|
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 2: INTERNATIONAL
COOPERATION TO ACCELERATE SUSTAINABLE
DEVELOPMENT
The Government strategy supposes the gradual decreasing of the
humanitarian assistance and targeting the financing on the
development programs. Armenia pursues a trade liberalization
strategy. Import tariffs at the rates of 0-10% are applied.
There are no export taxes. The EU Partnership and Cooperation
Agreement was signed in 1995. Armenia has free trade
agreements with CIS countries. Armenia is in the process of
accession to the World Trade Organization.
IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES AND RELATED
DOMESTIC POLICIES (with special
emphasis on TRADE)
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT: The progress in the
implementation of the economic reforms is considerably determined
by the
support provided by the international community, including the
World Bank, International Monetary Fund, United
Nations, European Bank, as well as other financial institutions and
foreign countries. The assistance provided by donor
countries and organizations to the Republic of Armenia is
implemented in five main directions:
1. provision of macroeconomic stabilization;
2. public investment programs;
3. private sector development;
4. techncial assistance for institutional building and
economic reforms;
5. humanitarian assistance.
1. Decision-Making Structure: Government of the Republic of
Armenia
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: Institution
Building, Structural Adjustment, Irrigation Rehabilitation
3. Major Groups: No information
4. Finance: Credits of the International Monetary Fund,
World Bank, EBRD, Bilateral assistance, as well as financing
from the Government budget
5. Regional/International Cooperation: Multilateral donors
including IMF, World Bank, EBRD, UN.
Bilateral donors including USA, France, etc.
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 3: COMBATING
POVERTY
Focus of national strategy
After the disintegration of the Soviet Union and the
attainment of independence in 1991, Armenia inherited an economy in
a state of collapse. Economic and social problems were further
aggravated following the 1988 earthquake and the
economic blockade which began as a consequence of the conflict in
Nagorny Karabakh. As a result of this, output
declined sharply - by more than 60 per cent during the period
1992-1994. The same period also saw a sharp rise in the
inflation of the dram (900 per cent during the last two months of
1993 and 1500 per cent in 1994). Subsidies for electric
power, produce and transport for the population were also reduced.
The fall in State budget revenue led to a sharp decline
in vitally important social expenditures and services, and the
standard of living of the population declined and poverty
became significantly more widespread. The principal way to remedy
this situation in conditions where there is a slump in
production and an increase in poverty is to provide a stimulus to
the mechanisms which will lead to rapid economic
growth. This is a national priority for Armenia.
Highlight activities aimed at the poor and linkages to the
environment.
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT:
1. Decision-Making Structure: Government of the Republic
of Armenia, Ministry of the Economy and Social Security
of the Republic of Armenia.
2. Major Groups: The disabled, orphans, families of single
pensioners and single pensioners themselves,
persons who have been living in temporary shelters in the disaster
zone.
3. Finance: State budget, Pension and Employment Fund of
the Republic of Armenia, Social Security Fund of the
Republic of Armenia.
4. International coooperation: IMF, World Bank, USAID,
UNDP, World Food Programme and a number of other
public donor organizations.
NB: Developed countries, where domestic poverty alleviation is not
a major concern may wish to briefly describe their
position regarding global poverty alleviation.
| Unemployment - (9.8 per cent) | |
| Absolute poverty - Approximately 30 per cent of the population is living at or below the poverty line. | |
| Other data - Pensioners - 625,000; disabled - 110,000; unemployed - 158,000; orphans - 42,000; refugees - 300,000; persons living in temporary shelters in the disaster zone - 42,000; single mothers - 17,000. |
| Primary importance of investing in human resources capital | - People deprived of access to satisfactory education and medical services are in danger of long-term poverty. Human resources capital serves as a basis for long-term economic development | - To prepare and implement an
appropriate stragegy to strengthen
primary health care.
| - To increase State expenditure on
education and health. - To establish, manage and make mandatory basic norms and standards of universal education. |
| Assistance to neediest groups | The extent of benefits to be granted is very wide and the level of poverty prevention is very low | - To improve assessment of family
poverty by the "Paros" system. - To explore the possibility of minimum tariffs in the energy sector. - To place the periodic study of poverty on a structural basis. - To increase invest-ment in the improvement of water supply and sanitation, which are a major problem for the needy. - To preserve a certain level of investment in restoration work on housing in the disaster zone and other areas which are experiencing widespread poverty. | - To create private markets for housing construction and
develop a system to finance it; this would ensure a more
rational and effective distribution of economic resources for
housing construc-tion and urban development. - To apply a revised pension system for a transition to the payment of minimum pensions which would meet minimum subsistence needs, with a parallel transition to a programme of private pensions based on taxes. - To improve the procedure for tax collection and the declaration of income, to make it more reliable. - To retrain social workers and create a State organ for the actual allocation of benefits on the basis of income. |
| Ensuring access to employment and the means of production | While agriculture is still in
transition from
"subsistence" farming to a
modern system of
production there is a danger
that the situation of the
neediest will deteriorate still
further.
| - To complete the process of
designating and registering
agricultural land. - To preserve the minimum wage to encourage enterprises to hire workers. - To replace food assistance distributed to the able-bodied in need by food provided under work programmes. - To implement some State programmes with financing from foreign donors in areas where there is highly centralized unemployment. | - To provide assistance to the agricultural cooperative credit
system. - To redesign the agricultural transport system to make it accessible to small farmers. - To improve communications to markets and work places, particularly in rural areas. - To invest in road maintenance. - To reduce taxes on wages while increasing wages and redesigning the pension system. - To preserve the minimum wage to encourage enterprises to hire workers. - To encourage retraining in the private sector by non-governmental organizations and specialized agencies. - To redesign technical education and the retraining of the unemployed to improve new production needs. - To create a financial structure which would encourage official employment and the establishment of small enterprises. - To simplify the administrative procedures for registration of entrepreneurship, decentralizing the registration system. - To encourage programmes of privately administered technical support for small business. |
| The strengthening of enterprises engaged in poverty elimination policies and programmes | - Organizations in the public sector need more effective cooperation, with the encouragement and development of initiatives in the private sector and small groups | - To improve the structure of the Ministry of Social
Security to stimulate the formulation of its policies
and administrative functions. - To encourage local non-governmental organizations by supporting programmes they are carrying out for the needy and in border zones and by cooperating with the local and central authorities. - To publicize the distribution of humanitarian aid through reports and the dissemination of information. - To retrain and provide equipment to the local authorities with a view to the implementation of programmes of assistance to the neediest groups. These programmes may be financed within the limits of the regional budget. | - Non-governmental organizations and donor
agencies should expand retraining programmes
and provide technical support to local groups
and individuals by carrying out small-scale
programmes to assist the needy. - To establish a financial system which will promote the financing of poverty reduction programmes by non-governmental organizations and funds. |
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 4: CHANGING CONSUMPTION
PATTERNS
National policy objectives/focus
The main objectives of the Government's macroeconomic program
for the period 1996-1998 are to consolidate and deepen
the stabilization of the economy, and to further accelerate
structural reforms for the provision of the sustained and
significant growth. The systematic reforms in 1996-1998 will take
place in the financial sector, through the privatization
in the energy sector, and in the budgetary sphere.
National targets
The targets for 1997 social-economic development program
include:
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT:
1. further GDP growth;
2. reduction of average monthly inflation;
3. increasing the real average wages;
4. reduction of the consolidated deficit of state budget
against GDP;
5. improving the system of target social protection;
6. export growth.
1. Decision-Making Structure: Government of the Republic of Armenia
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: ESAF, SAC, Health and Education Sectors Development, Social Investment Fund, etc.
3. Major Groups: No information
4. Finance: ESAF (Enhanced Structural Adjustment Facility), credits, budget financing
5. Regional/International Cooperation: International Monetary Fund, World Bank, UN
|
GDP per capita in 1995 - 117,355 drams or 288.77 (currency
$1=406.40 drams)
GDP growth in January-September 1996 has made up 4.5%
Latest 1995 GDP per capita (current US$)
-
-
19,242 r.
$288.77
Real GDP growth (%)
-
-7.4
-52.6
6.9
Annual energy consumption per capita (Kg. of oil
equivalent per
capita)
1980 - 246: 1993 - 57
Motor vehicles in use per 1,000 inhabitants
Other data
Government policies affecting consumption and production.
1. Goals and Agents (Stakeholders)
Indicate with a (X) those agents which your Governments policies are meant most to influence.
| Agents Goals | |||||
| Material efficiency | X | ||||
| Energy efficiency: | X | X | X | X | |
| Transport | X | ||||
| Housing | X | ||||
| Other | |||||
| Waste: | |||||
| Reduce | |||||
| Reuse | |||||
| Recycle |
Comments:
2. Means & Measures and Agents (Stakeholders)
Indicate with an (R) those agents who assume primary responsibility for any of the policy measures indicated; indicate with an (I) the agents for which the impact is expected to be especially significant.
| Agents Means & Measures | |||||
| Improving understanding and analysis | |||||
| Information and education (e.g., radio/TV/press) | R | ||||
| Research | |||||
| Evaluating environmental claims | R | ||||
| Form partnerships | R | ||||
| Applying tools for modifying behaviour | |||||
| Community based strategies | R | R | |||
| Social incentives/disincentives (e.g., ecolabelling) | R | ||||
| Regulatory instruments | R | ||||
| Economic incentives/disincentives | R | ||||
| Voluntary agreements of producer responsibility
for aspects of product life cycle | R | ||||
| Provision of enabling facilities and
infrastructure (e.g., transportation alternatives, recycling) | R | R | |||
| Procurement policy | R | ||||
| Monitoring, evaluating and reviewing performance | |||||
| Action campaign | R | ||||
| Other (specify) |
Comments:
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 5: DEMOGRAPHIC DYNAMICS AND
SUSTAINABILITY
| NATIONAL PRIORITY: | ||||
| STATUS REPORT: As of December 1996 the
population of RA was 3,780,800. It is important to note that this
number may not
accurately reflect the 700,000 citizens who have emigrated over the
last 5 years due to adverse socio-economic conditions. The urban
population consists of 2,539,600 people, and the rural population
is 1,241,100. The number of births for 1996 has consisted of
47,200
and the number of deaths: 26,200
Annual rate of increase of population in absolute number has made 21,000.
The migration of population for 1996 made up 6,560 people.
Average life expectancy for 1996 is 72.5 years.
| ||||
1. Decision-Making Structure: Government of Armenia,
Ministry of Social Security
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: Institution
Building Loan Social Component, financed by WB Paros System
3. Major Groups: No information
4. Finance: Social Investment Fund, financed by the WB,
USAID and the Government of Netherlands
5. Regional/International Cooperation: TACIS, WB, USAID and
other international organizations
| Latest 1996 | ||||
| Population (Thousands) mid-year estimates | 3,575 | 3,740 | 3,780 | |
| Annual rate of increase (1990-1993) | - | 2.0% | - | |
| Surface area (Km2) | 29.0 | 29.0 | 29.0 | |
| Population density (people/Km2) | 123.3 | 129.0 | 130.4 | |
| Other data
| ||||
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 6: PROTECTING AND PROMOTING
HUMAN HEALTH
The Government is introducing a comprehensive reform program,
intended to secure stable financing of health care
system more efficient and cost effective, and to protect access to
basic services for all the population. Key elements of the
reform program include:
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT:
- Diversification of health financing by formalizing some user
cost-sharing and rationalising subsidization, combined with
the introduction of performance based, comprehensive
provider-payment mechanisms and the decentralization of
management.
- Reorientation of the health system away from hospital based
curative care towards preventive, primary heatlh-care
through consolidation of hospital capacity and integration of
internationally supported programs into national health
programs.
- Ensuring equity by introduction of a basic benefits package and
protecting vulnerable groups.
- Redefinition of medical education to reflect primary care
orientation and to correct imbalances in human resource
supply.
- Ensuring minimum standards through introduction of a licensing
and accreditation process.
- Promoting private sector activity in the health sector through
appropriate legislation and privatization of some facilities.
1. Decision-Making Structure: Government of Armenia,
Ministry of Health
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: Health Development
Program to be financed by the World Bank (preparation
is financed by the Government of Japan).
3. Major Groups: No information
4. Finance: Health Care is predominantly financed by the
state budget and credits of the WB Japanese Grant.
5. Regional/International Cooperation: TACIS Health Reform
Program, WB Health and Education Development
Program
| Latest 1995 | ||||
| Life expectancy at birth
(years) Male Female | as of 1985 69.8 75.7 | 67.9 74.8 | 67.9 74.4 | |
| Infant mortality (per 1000 live births) | 26.2 | 18.5 | 14.4 | |
| Maternal mortality rate (per 100,000 live births) | - | 52.6 | 38.5 | |
| Access to safe drinking water (% of urban and rural housing fund) | - | - | 96.4 | |
| Access to sanitation services (% of urban and rural housing fund) | - | - | 79.2 | |
| Other data Main causes of death | Cardiovascular diseases, disorder of respiratory system, cancer | |||
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 7: PROMOTING SUSTAINABLE HUMAN
SETTLEMENT DEVELOPMENT
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT: No information
1. Decision-Making Structure: No information
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: No information
3. Major Groups: No information
4. Finance: No information
5. Regional/International Cooperation: No information
| Urban population in % of total population | |||
| Annual rate of growth of urban population (%) | |||
| Largest city population (in % of total population) | |||
| Other data
| |||
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 8: INTEGRATING ENVIRONMENT AND
DEVELOPMENT IN DECISION-MAKING
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT: The Armenian National Commission
on Sustainable Development is in the process of formation and
after being established will coordinate the implementation of
sustainable development in accordance with the decisions in
Rio.
1. Decision-Making Structure (please also refer to the fact
sheet): No information
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: No information
3. Major Groups: No information
4. Finance: No information
5. Regional/International Cooperation: No information
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 9: PROTECTION OF THE
ATMOSPHERE
The Montreal Protocol and its Amendments
1. In accordance with the rules of procedure, Armenia may raise
the question of its inclusion among the countries
defined in article 5 of the Montreal Protocol on Substances that
Deplete the Ozone Layer (1987), whereby it would
receive the appropriate benefits; however, it can be included in
the list of such countries only after it has acceded to the
Protocol. This means that the Republic of Armenia would be
burdened with excessive financial obligations under the
Multilateral Fund of the Montreal Protocol. Until it receives the
status of a country covered by article 5, it cannot
receive financial aid to meet its obligations.
2. In accordance with the provisions of the Protocol (and the
amendments thereto), a party acceding to the Protocol,
even if it is covered by article 5, cannot increase its consumption
of substances that deplete the ozone layer above its
annual level of consumption at the time of its accession. At the
present time, because of the serious economic crisis,
Armenia's consumption of such substances is almost nil and
naturally, in the event of ratification, the industry and
economy of the Republic of Armenia as a whole would be placed in an
unfavourable position (an almost total ban on the
use of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and other substances that deplete
the ozone layer).
The above comments are the reason why Armenia has not so far
acceded to the Montreal Protocol.
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT:
Montreal Protocol (1987) signed in 19--
London Amendment (1990) signed in 19--
Copenhagen Amendment (1992) signed in 19--
The latest report(s) to the Montreal Protocol Secretariat were
prepared in 19--
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
UNFCCC was signed in 199-.
The latest report to the UNFCCC Secretariat was submitted in 199-.
Additional comments relevant to this chapter
1. Decision-Making Structure:
2. Capacity-building/technology issues: As part of the
GEF programme "Armenia: Study of climate change in the
country", it is proposed that the following work should be carried
out: 3. Major Groups: No information
4. Finance: So that the Republic of Armenia could meet
the obligations it had undertaken under FCCC, in January
1995 the Government of Armenia requested UNDP to obtain funding
from GEF.
5. Regional/international cooperation: In May 1996, the Republic of Armenia also ratified the Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution.
|
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 10: INTEGRATED APPROACH TO THE
PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT OF LAND
RESOURCES
| NATIONAL PRIORITY: | |
| STATUS REPORT: The Ministry of the Environment
and Natural Resources, the Ministry of Agriculture and
Production and the Ministry of Construction, with input from other
parties interested in the planning and management of
land resources, are preparing appropriate decisions and submitting
them to the Government for adoption. In the adoption
of decisions, the provisions of the Act on assessing environmental
exposure (1995) and the Land Code, as well as public
opinion and the views of non-governmental organizations are taken
into account.
The Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources is responsible for general State monitoring of the utilization of land by all land users irrespective of the form of ownership of the land.
In addition, the Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources is responsible for preparing Government decisions relating to geological and other natural processes (landslides, subsidence, avalanches, mudslides, etc.) leading to loss, erosion and irrational use of land and the recultivation of degraded land.
Some top urgent measures should be initiated in 1997 in view of ensuring planning and management of land resources. The priority measures drafted for this purpose are set below:
|
1. Decision-Making Structure: The Department for the Protection of Land Resources of the Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources bears the main responsibility for an integrated approach to the planning and management of land resources.
2. Capacity-building/technology issues: International experience is being studied, primarily in the area of the processing of municipal waste, "tailings" resulting from enrichment in non-ferrous metallurgy and the utilization of waste from the construction materials industry, the establishment of toxic waste sites, the use of biological and other environmentally safe fertilizers and the means of controlling plant and animal diseases.
3. Major groups: The Department for the Protection of Land Resources, regional inspections and the monitoring service of the Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources.
4. Finance: The extremely limited State budget, payments for the use of land, investment by international funds, public organizations and sponsors.
5. Regional/international cooperation: Armenia has introduced a number of proposals to combat soil erosion and to deal with desertification problems and, in this connection is cooperating with Turkey, Iran, Georgia and Azerbaijan (tentatively).
World experience will be used to the maximum in the field of mapping and cartography on the basis of the only existing atlas (for countries of the former Soviet Union) atlas of Armenia's land resources.
As a member of the Inter-State Environmental Council (of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS)) and in cooperation with UNEP, UNDP, the Economic Commission for Europe, OECD and others, Armenia is participating both in the utilization of the experience already gained and in the development of new programmes and projects.
|
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 11: COMBATING
DEFORESTATION
All forests are owned by the Republic and managed by an
agency called Hayantar, on the basis of ten year plans with
annual tasking breakdowns. Hayantar retains income from its
operations and is provided with an operational budget
allcoation from the national government. It manages 26 vertically
integrated regional forestry enterprises, two protected
reservations, a nursery, a machine factory, an amelioration
station, a forest protection station, a research station and a
maintenance shop.
Before the blockade, approximately 60,000 m3 of timber were
harvested in Armenia each year, of which about 8,000
were considered commercial cuttings, as harvest which satisfies
only 10-14% of Armenian internal needs. Since the
country produces a very high quality of beech and oak hardwood,
foreign exchange could be earned through forest related
products - in spite of the low self sufficiency rate - if internal
needs were satisfied with lower quality lumber leaving the
possibility to use higher quality wood for production of export
goods.
Hayantar has undertaken major forestation in several areas,
mostly with the objetive of increasing erosion control."
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
High
STATUS REPORT: "Armenia underwent intense
deforestation overtime: historical records show that at the
beginning
of the 9th century 25% of Armenian land was covered with forests.
The percentage had reached 7% in the fifties,
although since then the forest cover has been increased to 11.2%.
The primary forested areas are in the north-east (which
contains about 80% of the forest industry), the north, and the
south, whilst the cental part of the country is almost
woodless.
1. Decision-Making Structure: The Armenian State Forest Service "Hayantar" within the Ministry of Environmnent and Underground Resources.
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: "Hayantar" is affected by problems of both inappropriate structure and weak capacity. In the Soviet era, various core functions of a national forest service were carried out centrally in Moscow through subsidiary branch offices in each of the Caucasian republics.
With the advent of independence, the same system is now carried out on a national basis in Armenia. "Hayantar" does not yet have its own capacity to carry out all these fuctions; for example, policy development, coordination, planning and budgeting, forest management and forest resource assessment.
In regard to the structure of "Hayantar", it remains vertically integrated with the forest enterprises according to the soviet model. Proposals for institutional capacity building need to be made in the context of institutional weaknesses and possible reforms. |
3. Major Groups: High level training in forestry is the
responsibility of the Forestry Chair of the Faculty of Agriculture
of the Armenian Agricultural Academy which was founded in the year
1992. There is no institution where the forest
technicians can be trained. Research in forestry is carried out
in the Forest Department of the Institute of Botany of the
Academy of Sciences and in the Forestry Research Station of
"Hayantar". The Research Station lacks the minimum
technical equipment, financing and transport to implement its work
programme.
4. Finance: Many aspects of "Hayantar" operations involve
uncosted internal transfers which the present accounting
system fails to record. For example, seedlings are supplied from
nursery to forest free of charge, and workers receive the
major part of their income in kind, as fuelwood and grazing rights,
etc. The extremely low levels of official wages
provide insufficient incentives to motivate performance, and the
use of uncosted internal transfers subverts the role of
prices as efficiency signals.
The lack of any transparent system of financial management
obscures those parts of "Hayantar" operations which are
relatively profitable and may justify investments. If "Hayantar"
is to become self-reliant financially, it must charge full
economic prices for its products and ensure efficient revenue
collection. There is, therefore, an urgent need to increase its
capacity to provide a more modern management information and
control system, capable of providing cost analysis at a
decentralized level, and also supporting a monitoring and
evaluation function.
5. Regional/International Cooperation: FAO jointly with
the Ministries of Agriculture and of Nature Protection and
Subsoil Wealth is currently implementing Technical Cooperation
Project (TCP) in Armenia that has already yielded results
in terms of providing, inter alia, an overall framework for
programme development and indicating specific areas where
donor assistance is required.
In May 1995, Armenian Forest Sector Development Issues were
discussed and Forest Policty Declaration was adopted
at a Workshop organized by FAO/TCP Project and HAYANTAR. Four
development priorities were identified: (i) The
integration of Armenian Forests into the national economy, (ii)
Afforestation, reforestation, regeneration and rural
forestry, (iii) Improvement of the effectiveness of the management
of the forests, and (iv) Conservation and projection of
the environment.
Based on the TCP Project outputs (including the Strategy for
the Development of the Armenian Forest Sector, adopted
by the Government of Armenia), UNDP and GEF in cooperation and
consultation with FAO and all other actors involved
are initiating the developmoent of a large scale comprehensive
sector investment programme for Armenia. The main
components of the programme are Capacity Building, Forest
Inventory, Forest Education and Research, Farmforestry,
Reforestation and Wildland Management.
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues:
3. Major Groups:
4. Finance:
5. Regional/International Cooperation:
| Latest 1993 | ||||
| Forest Area (Km2) | 2,850 | 2,920 | 3,350 | |
| Protected forest area | 900 | 900 | 900 | |
| Roundwood production (solid volume of roundwood without bark in mill m3) | 0,06 | 0,01 | 0,01 | |
| Deforestation rate (Km2/annum) | - | - | 100 | |
| Reforestation rate (Km2/annum) | 30 | 30 | 20 | |
| ||||
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 12: MANAGING FRAGILE
ECOSYSTEMS: COMBATING DESERTIFICATION AND
DROUGHT
International Convention to Combat Desertification in Countries
Experiencing Drought and/or Desertification
Particularly in Africa
Convention : No information
The latest report to the Secretariat of the Convention was
prepared in 19--.
Additional comments relevant to this chapter
The problem of desertification and the organization of
measures to combat it are extremely urgent in Armenia, which
is located in an arid area. One half of the territory of the
Republic is subject to mudslides, which aggravate the processes
of desertification. The processes of defluction and landslides
are also developed. The anthropogenic impact on the
landscape causes intensified soil erosion and salination. While
the Republic has a limited amount of land, a solid outflow
from rivers outside its frontiers removes more than 4 million tons
of fine soil
and solutes. As a result of all this, every year thousands of
hectares of arable land become unusable and forest and
grazing areas are reduced. The energy crisis of the past four
years has aggravated the situation, provoking intensive
unregulated clearance of forests which served to protect the soil
and other functions, since Armenia's forests are
concentrated mainly on steep slopes. The energy crisis also had an
adverse effect on the high mountain freshwater Lake
Sevan, from which large volumes of water have been withdrawn for
power needs. The water level in Lake Sevan has
fallen catastrophically and, unless urgent measures are taken, the
unique nature of the landscape, which plays such a
significant climate forcing role in the region and which supplies
the many springs located in a very dry part of the
Republic, may be destroyed.
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT:
1. Decision-making structure:
- Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources
- The environmental protection legislation of the Republic of Armenia
2. Capacity-building/technology issues: The Republic has sufficient scientific potential to establish a national programme of action and to implement urgent and long-term plans and programmes to prevent desertification.
3. Major groups: No information
4. Finance: The economic situation of the Republic does not allow the Government to allocate resources for the implementation of measures to combat desertification. A number of projects have been proposed to international organizations to attract resources to combat desertification.
5. Regional/international cooperation: Cooperation with neighbouring countries is essential in order to devise joint complex approaches to the solution of problems of desertification on a regional scale.
|
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 13: MANAGING FRAGILE
ECOSYSTEMS: SUSTAINABLE MOUNTAIN DEVELOPMENT
| NATIONAL PRIORITY: | |
| STATUS REPORT:
Armenia is a typical mountain country with the characteristics of an arid mountain ecosystem. Over 90 per cent of Armenia's territory is over 1000 metres above sea level. Because of their diverse geological structure, mountain systems are very jagged and present a diverse landscape. Extreme environmental landscape indicators and an intensive anthropogenic impact have led to the serious degradation of the natural biodiversity of mountain systems. In certain regions, changes which have taken place are irreversible. On account of the dominant geo-ecological significance of the Republic's mountain systems in the region for the conservation of their landscapes and biodiversity, the participation of the countries of the Kur-Araks basin of the Caucasus region is required. Consequently, complex mechanisms must be developed to protect the Caucasus region and establish new transboundary protected regions. The priority areas for action must be the following:
1. The study, forecasting and implementation of measures to
provide protection against exogenous geological processes
(landslides, mudslides, avalanches and other natural
disasters);
|
1. Decision-Making Structure: The Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources of the Republic of Armenia, the Ministry of Agriculture.
2. Capacity-building/technology issues: There is no separate Government programme in the Republic of Armenia for the protection of mountain ecosystems. This area, however, forms an integral part of various thematic programmes on the following questions: landscape diversity and biodiversity, climate change, the development of the forestry sector, the organization of agriculture, etc.
3. Major groups: Until recently, the protection and utilization of mountain ecosystems was a State monopoly, but since the privatization of land resources the private sector can also be expected to participate in this area.
4. Finance: There is no financing allocated solely to the protection of mountain ecosystems. There is a small volume of resources allocated to individual programmes, but these resources are quite inadequate to resolve the problem.
5. Regional/international cooperation: No information
The Convention was signed in 1992 and ratified in 1993. No report on the Convention has been submitted. CITES Convention. Armenia is not a party to the Convention.
Additional comments relevant to this chapter
The relatively small territory of the Republic of Armenia (29,965 sq.km.) is characterized by rich biological diversity. Seventy-six species of mammals, 304 species of birds, 44 species of reptiles, 6 species of amphibians and 24 species of fish inhabit Armenia. There is also a rich and distinctive flora replete with species (approximately 3,200), which results from the complexity of the terrain and climate of Armenia and from its location at the juncture of completely diverse provinces of flora. The forestry resources cover 459,900 hectares. The average density of the forests is 0.54. Armenia's Red Book includes 99 species of animals and 387 species of plants, of which approximately 200 are endemic or relicts. The data cited, however, do not reflect the current real picture since Armenia's flora has suffered an irreplaceable loss on account of the severe energy crisis and the massive deforestation, and this has affected the quantity and quality of the fauna. Migration routes and the ecological balance of animal habitats have been destroyed. The protection of animal and plant life in Armenia is in a critical situation. Because of the lack of financial resources, no work is being done on the establishment of an inventory of animal and plant life. The protection of biological resources has become particularly difficult on account of the privatization of land resources in the Republic, the unauthorized harvesting of medicinal and food crops and the relentless extermination of ornamental plant species. In the opinion of botanical experts, approximately 50 species of plants not included in Armenia's Red Book are now on the verge of extinction.
Five State nature reserves in the Republic, as well as a National Park, the Sevan nature reserve complex and 22 reserves for particular species, have the status of specially protected territories. The total area of the nature reserves is 65,000 hectares (2.2 per cent of the territory of the Republic) and the total area of the reserves for particular species is 94,000 hectares (3.1 per cent of the territory of the Republic). |
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 14: PROMOTING SUSTAINABLE
AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT
| NATIONAL PRIORITY: | |
| STATUS REPORT: Armenia's agriculture has
severely suffered from the known events which occurred recently.
Therefore, a sustainable reform program has been developed and is
being implemented in Armenia to cover all due
problems in this sector.
The following are the measures that could promote the
development of the sector:
|
1. Decision-Making Structure: Government of the Republic
of Armenia
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: Agricultural
Reform Support Program, Irrigation Rehabilitation Credit,
Agricultural Wholesale Market Project, Rural Rehabilitation,
Cooperative Agricultural Bank, Individual and Private
Cooperative Farms Property Insurance, Development Cadastral
Program
3. Major Groups: No information
4. Finance: The abovementioned projects are partly
financed by appropriate WB, EBRD, JAPAN, US Government
credits and state budget of the RA
5. Regional/International Cooperation: WB, EBRD, USAID,
TACIS
| Latest 1996 | ||||
| Agricultural land (Km2) | 13,866 | 13.914 | ||
| Agricultural land as % of total land area | 46 | |||
| Agricultural land per capita | 0,004 | 0,007 | ||
| Latest 1996 | ||||
| Consumption of fertilizers per Km2 of agricultural land as of 1990 | 8,300 | 2,500 | 2,900 | |
| Other data
| ||||
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 15: CONSERVATION OF
BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Convention on Biological Diversity
Additional comments relevant to this chapter
The relatively small territory of the Republic of Armenia
(29,965 sq.km.) is characterized by rich biological
diversity. Seventy-six species of mammals, 304 species of birds,
44 species of reptiles, 6 species of amphibians and
24 species of fish inhabit Armenia. There is also a rich and
distinctive flora replete with species (approximately 3,200),
which results from the complexity of the terrain and climate of
Armenia and from its location at the juncture of
completely diverse provinces of flora. The forestry resources
cover 459,900 hectares. The average density of the forests
is 0.54. Armenia's Red Book includes 99 species of animals and 387
species of plants, of which approximately 200 are
endemic or relicts. The data cited, however, do not reflect the
current real picture since Armenia's flora has suffered an
irreplaceable loss on account of the severe energy crisis and the
massive deforestation, and this has affected the quantity
and quality of the fauna. Migration routes and the ecological
balance of animal habitats have been destroyed. The
protection of animal and plant life in Armenia is in a critical
situation. Because of the lack of financial resources, no
work is being done on the establishment of an inventory of animal
and plant life. The protection of biological resources
has become particularly difficult on account of the privatization
of land resources in the Republic, the unauthorized
harvesting of medicinal and food crops and the relentless
extermination of ornamental plant species. In the opinion of
botanical experts, approximately 50 species of plants not included
in Armenia's Red Book are now on the verge of
extinction.
Five State nature reserves in the Republic, as well as a
National Park, the Sevan nature reserve complex and
22 reserves for particular species, have the status of specially
protected territories. The total area of the nature reserves
is 65,000 hectares (2.2 per cent of the territory of the Republic)
and the total area of the reserves for particular species is
94,000 hectares (3.1 per cent of the territory of the Republic).
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT:
The Convention was signed in 1992 and ratified in 1993. No report
on the Convention has been submitted. CITES
Convention. Armenia is not a party to the Convention.
1. Decision-Making Structure: The Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources of the Republic of Armenia.
Questions relating to biological diversity are regulated by the following environmental legislation: 1. Fundamentals of legislation on environmental protection of the Republic of Armenia. 2. Act on particular sites. 3. Forest Code of the Republic of Armenia. Further legislation is being prepared.
2. Capacity-building/technology issues: The Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources has established working groups to develop new environmental legislation. A working group forms part of the national programme on environmental safety. Under the Convention on Biological Diversity, conferences are being held with the participation of various experts.
3. Major groups: No information
4. Finance: In order to implement the biological diversity programmes in Armenia, 10-15 million United States dollars are required. A number of projects have been proposed to international funds to obtain financing.
5. Regional/international cooperation: The Republic is participating in international meetings in the context of the Convention and is cooperating within the Inter-State Environmental Council (CIS).
|
| Protected area as % of total land area - 10% | |
| Number of threatened species: Out of 447 animal species, 99 are rare and endangered, i.e. 20% | |
| Other data: Out of 3,200 plant species, 387 are rare and endangered, i.e. 12% | |
| These data should be reviewed. |
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 16: ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND
MANAGEMENT OF BIOTECHNOLOGY
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT: No information
1. Decision-Making Structure: No information
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: No information
3. Major Groups: No information
4. Finance: No information
5. Regional/International Cooperation: No information
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 17: PROTECTION OF THE
OCEANS, ALL KINDS OF SEAS, INCLUDING ENCLOSED
AND SEMI-ENCLOSED SEAS, AND COASTAL AREAS AND THE PROTECTION,
RATIONAL USE AND DEVELOPMENT OF THEIR LIVING RESOURCES
The UN Convention on the Law of the Sea
No information
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT:
1. Decision-Making Structure: No information
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: No information
3. Major Groups: No information
4. Finance: No information
5. Regional/International Cooperation: No information
| Latest 199- | ||||
| Catches of marine species (metric tons) | ||||
| Population in coastal areas | ||||
| Population served by waste water treatment (% of
country's total population) | ||||
| Discharges of oil into coastal waters (metric tons) | ||||
| Releases of phosphate into coastal waters (metric tons) | ||||
| Releases of nitrate into coastal waters (metric tons) | ||||
| Other data
| ||||
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 18: PROTECTION OF THE
QUALITY AND SUPPLY OF FRESHWATER RESOURCES:
APPLICATION OF INTEGRATED APPROACHES TO THE DEVELOPMENT,
MANAGEMENT AND USE OF WATER RESOURCES
Water supply systems are operated mainly by pumps. Due
to current energy crisis their operation is essentially
inadequate. Individual projects are prepared to turn the systems
into gravitation supply. Urban sewage is basically treated
at biological plants. Due to inadequate power supply a number of
crucial units at the plants became obsolete, i.e.
pumping plants, aeration systems.
The water code of the Republic is approved as the main
law for water use and water protection.
The annual national social and economic development
programme includes a chapter for water resources rational
use and protection.
One of the Armenian priorities concerning freshwater
resources is to cover all activities in society, in particular
land use, agriculture, forestry, industry and energy generation, in
such a manner as to introduce overall sustainable use of
water resources.
Integrated water resources management plans are drawn up
for all the areas where water quality problems or
conflicts between use and protection occur. Given water scarcity
in the country, therefore, water resource use issues are
closely connected to water protection and are solved in a complex
manner.
Industry generated close on 800 min cubic meters of
process and sanitary waste-water in 1994. Almost 50% is
treated biologically but due to improper operation of the plants
waste waters are treated mainly mechanically. 20% of all
the waste water is treated biologically.
In addition, the environmental approaches for the
countryside and for forestry, research projects concerning i.e.
water conservation in agriculture and forestry have an impact on
the quality of water resources. The state of water is
under continuous monitoring so that the effects of water protection
mesasures can be assessed.
One of the urgent problems related to protection of the
quality and supply of freshwater as well as their effective
use is the support of the Biological Balance of Lake Sevan. In
this regard, a Program for Restoring the Biological Balance
of Lake Sevan, funded by the World Bank, has been identified as a
priority issue.
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT: 75% of the population was served
by public waterworks in 1991. The water supply facilities are
not available to the majority of the Armenian population and are
well lower basic level. About 76% of the population
were served by public sewer systems in 1991. The wastewater
treatment in urban areas consists mainly of biological
treatment.
1. Decision-Making Structure: The Ministry of the
Environment and Underground Resources maintains national
monitoring networks which cover all main components of the
hydrological cycle and several chemicals analyses of water
quality. Municipalities take care, by large, of the water supply
and wastewater treatment of communities.
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: Education for the
sustainable use of water resources has been increased as
part of implementing the environmental programme for agriculture
and rural areas. The main areas of environmental
expertise of Armenian industry lie in waste-water treatment and
measuring techniques. Demand for environmental
technology on export markets will increase.
3. Major Groups: No information. (see also 2 and 4)
4. Finance: The municipal wastewater and water supply
investment costs are financed mainly by municipalities
themelves, and operation and maintenance costs including capital
costs covered by the users in compliance with the Water
Code.
5. Regional/International Cooperation: The World Bank is
allocating a grant to prepare Lake Sevan Ecological Action
Plan
| Latest 1996 | ||||
| Fresh water availability (total domestic/external in million m3) | 10,788 | |||
| Annual withdrawal of freshwater as % of available water | 1991-1995 4,649 mil. m3 |
| ||
| Other data
| ||||
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 19: ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND
MANAGEMENT OF TOXIC CHEMICALS,
INCLUDING PREVENTION OF ILLEGAL INTERNATIONAL TRAFFIC IN TOXIC
AND DANGEROUS PRODUCTS
The Ministry, with the participation of a designated
correspondent approved by UNDP and on the basis of the
data bank of the International Register of Potentially Toxic
Chemicals (IRPTC), has devised a project entitled "Provisions
relating to the utilization, import and export, and the
transboundary movement of chemical and toxic chemical
substances". The project has been submitted to the Government of
the Republic of Armenia for approval.
1. Decision-making structure
The Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources of the
Republic of Armenia.
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT: With a view to protecting nature
and human health, there are plans in the Republic to establish
systematic monitoring of the use of chemical substances in industry
and agriculture. The monitoring will be carried out
by a designated national organ of the Ministry of the Environment
and Natural Resources of the Republic of Armenia.
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 20: ENVIRONMENTALLY
SOUND MANAGEMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTES
The Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements
of Hazardous Wastes and their Disposal
Basel Convention: No information
The latest information was provided to the Basel Convention
Secretariat in 19--.
Additional comments relevant to this chapter
Armenia is not yet joined to the Basel Convention, but the
text of the Convention is studied now by our parliamentary
experts for the purpose of its adoption.
In December 1995 the Government of the Republic of Armenia
approved a resolution, adjusting import, export and
transboundary movement of hazardous and other wastes over the
territory of Armenia. The resolution establihsed the
order of the Supervision over transboundary movements.
After adoption of the Basel Convention Armenian party will
regularly inform the Secretariat of Basel Convenion
about issues, essential to parties, concerning generation, disposal
and transportation of hazardous wastes.
The major aim of our Government in this field is to develop
and ensure environmentally sound management of
hazardous wastes in Armenia.
INCLUDING PREVENTION
OF ILLEGAL INTERNATIONAL TRAFFIC
IN HAZARDOUS WASTES
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT:
1. Decision-Making Structure: The Government of the
Republic of Armenia, Ministry of Environment and
Underground and the Ministry of Health are the competent
authorities, making state decisions on wastes issues.
Ministry of Environment and Underground adjusts import,
export and transit movement of hazardous wastes,
ensures supervision over these operations, and processing and
disposal as well.
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: Armenian side needs
up-to-date equipment for sound management of
hazardous wastes.
3. Major Groups: No specific information.
4. Finance: Lack of financing.
5. Regional/International Cooperation: Armenia is very
interested in international cooperation and after adoption of
Basel Convention Armenian side will take steps for effective
cooperation.
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 21: ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND
MANAGEMENT OF SOLID WASTES AND SEWAGE-RELATED ISSUES
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT: No information
1. Decision-Making Structure: No information
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: No information
3. Major Groups: No information
4. Finance: No information
5. Regional/International Cooperation: No information
| Latest 199- | ||||
| Generation of industrial and municipal waste (t) | ||||
| Waste disposed(Kg/capita) | ||||
| Expenditure on waste collection and treatment (US$) | ||||
| Waste recycling rates (%) | ||||
| Municipal waste disposal (Kg/capita) | ||||
| Waste reduction rates per unit of GDP (t/year) | ||||
| Other data
| ||||
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 22: SAFE AND
ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE
WASTES
For the adoption of political and administrative decisions by
the Ministry of Energy, projects in this area are
being prepared with the agreement of the Ministry of the
Environment and Natural Resources, the Ministry of Health and
the local administrative authorities.
The Atomic Inspectorate of the Government of the Republic
deals directly with matters relating to radioactive
wastes.
Low-level radioactive wastes are stored at a special site and
high-level radioactive wastes generated at the atomic
power station are removed in accordance with the contract for the
supply of radioactive fuel to Russia.
The Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources and the
Ministry of Health are responsible for the joint
supervision and monitoring of background figures of radiation
pollution and emissions into the air, water and soil.
At the present time, the population is periodically informed
of the results of the monitoring of radioactive
pollution and the background figures.
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT: The Government of Armenia is
responsible for the overall management of radioactive wastes.
1. Decision-making structure: Decisions relating to the
protection of the population and the environment from
radiation are being prepared. The Ministry of the Environment and
Natural Resources and the Ministry of Health, on the
basis of the monitoring of the atmosphere and the health of the
population and with the agreement of the Atomic
Inspectorate and the Ministry of Energy, are proposing such
decisions to the Government.
2. Capacity-building/technology issues: No inormation
3. Major groups: The Atomic Inspectorate, the Ministry of
Industry, the Ministry of Energy and Fuel, scientific
and medical institutions.
4. Finance: The State budget.
5. Regional/international cooperation: Questions relating
to regional radiation safety are a matter of concern to
all the neighbouring States - Turkey, Iran, Georgia and Azerbaijan
and, in that connection, the organizations authorized to
do so enlist the services, as experts, of representatives of IAEA,
Francelectrique, the Scientific Research Institute of
Russia and others.
| Ch. 24: GOAL-DIRECTED GLOBAL ACTION FOR WOMEN TOWARDS
SUSTAINABLE AND EQUITABLE
DEVELOPMENT. Adoption of legislation directed towards ending discrimination against women's rights. Signed in 1989. Ratified in 1993.
24.b. Increase in the proportion of women decision makers. Percentage of women Government % 2(1992) 4.6 (1996) National Assembly % 3.6 (1992) 6.3 (1996) Local self-government organs % 10 (1992) - (1996) 24.e. Assessment, review, revision and implementation of curricula and other educational material to promote gender-relevant knowledge. Already being implemented
24.f and 24.c. Formulation and implementation of policies, strategies, programmes and recommendations for the achievement of equality in all aspects of society, including strategies for the elimination of obstacles to women's full participation in sustainable development by the year 2000. Policies/strategies, etc. are in the process of formulation.
24.2.d. Establishment by 1995 of mechanisms to promote the implementation and assess the impact of development and environment policies and programmes on women. Mechanisms are being established The equality of rights of men and women is genuinely established by law in Armenia. It has been still further strengthened by the ratification of international agreements. No specialized institutions have been established with a view to the development and protection of women. A wide range of questions relating to women and maternity are dealt with by the Ministries of Health and Social Security. Within the latter Ministry, there is a department dealing with family problems.
Brief comments on this chapter (maximum 100 words) (please, do not exceed this page):
| |
| |
| Ch. 27: STRENGTHENING THE ROLE OF
NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS (NGOs): PARTNERS
IN SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT.
27.5 Development of mechanisms to allow NGOs to play their partnership role more responsibly and effectively.
27.6 Description of Government measures and mechanisms for the involvement of NGOs in decision-making and implementation. Before being submitted to the National Assembly, draft decisions are submitted to NGOs for consideration.
27.7 Establishment of a mutually productive dialogue between the Government and NGOs by 1995. A dialogue is being promoted between philanthropic organizations and women's organization.
27.8 Granting of permission for and promotion of the participation of NGOs in the consideration, formulation and evaluation of major questions relating to the establishment of State mechanisms under Agenda 21. It is understood that NGOs will be involved
Brief comments on this chapter (maximum 100 words) (please, do not exceed this page):
| |
| Ch. 29: STRENGTHENING THE ROLE OF WORKERS AND
THEIR TRADE UNIONS.
29.2 The full participation of workers in the implementation and evaluation of Agenda 21. The trade unions are involved in established governmental and non-governmental commissions with a view to the preparation of national reports.
29.3 By the year 2000: (a) the promotion of the ratification of conventions of the International Labour Organisation (ILO); (b) the establishment of bipartite and tripartite mechanisms on social security, health and sustainable development; (c) an increase in the number of collective agreements; (d) a reduction in the number of occupational accidents and injuries; (e) the promotion of efforts to provide workers' education and training.
ILO Conventions will be ratified by the year 2000. Workers participate to some extent in the discussion/implementation of the national Agenda 21.
Six ILO Conventions have already been ratified. Others are being reviewed. The main difficulties result from the problem of financing translations. Since 1993, bipartite mechanisms have been in operation. Work is being done with a view to involving a third party, representing labour.
In accordance with its legislation, the Republic of Armenia is required to sign collective agreements. Legislation and regulations are being prepared to reduce occupational accidents and injuries. Work is continuing on the Labour Code.
Brief comments on this chapter (maximum 100 words) (please, do not exceed this page):
| |
| 30: STRENGTHENING THE ROLE OF BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY.
30.6 increasing the efficiency of resource use, including reuse, recycling, and reduction of waste per unit of economic output. There are governmental policies encouraging the above objective
30.18.a encouraging the concept of stewardship in management and use of natural resources by entrepreneurs.
List any actions taken in this area:
30.18.b increasing number of enterprises that subscribe to and implement sustainable development policies. Several big enterprises have adopted sustainable development policies. Several Small and Medium sized enterprises have adopted sustainable development policies.
Brief comments on this chapter (maximum 100 words) (please, do not exceed this page):
| |
| Ch. 31: SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL
COMMUNITY.
31.3.b improving exchange of knowledge and concerns between s&t community and the general public. Sientific community has already established ways in which to address the general public and deal with sustainable development.
31.9 developing, improving and promoting international acceptance of codes of practice and guidelines related to science and technology and its role in reconciling environment and development.
Brief comments on this chapter not already described in chapter 35 (maximum 100 words) (please, do not exceed this page):
Establishment of foundations, grant-giving agencies, organization of international forums dedicated to the formulation of priority directions for the development of science. Allocation of funds for supporting research on reconciling and ameliorating environment, public health, welfare and development of the society. Decisions for research programs launching are made from the viewpoint of their expediency for the relevant spheres.
| |
| Ch. 32: STRENGTHENING THE ROLE OF
FARMERS.
32.5.c promoting and encouraging sustainable farming practices and technologies. The Government supports and promotes sustainable farming practices and technology.
32.5.e developing a policy framework that provides incentives and motivation among farmers for sustainable and efficient farming practices. The basic policy for the present stage is to support programs that yield profit.
32.5.f enhancing participation of organizations of farmers in design and implementation of sustainable development policies.
Brief comments on this chapter (maximum 100 words) (please, do not exceed this page):
There is a current active process of participation of farmers in design and implementation of development policies. A tendency is displayed by local donors to invest in scientific research on a long-term basis with a perspective of multiple effect. The Presidential Decree of 1996 has set up a profit tax holiday for organizations which have payed debts for 1996 and invested in science.
| |
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 33: FINANCIAL RESOURCES
AND MECHANISMS
| NATIONAL PRIORITY: Socio-economic reforms and the stabilization of the situation | |
| STATUS REPORT:
The reforms carried out recently have led mainly to the macroeconomic stabilization of the Republic. Over the past year the gross national product increased 6 per cent over that for the same period the previous year.
REFORM AIMED AT STABILIZING DEVELOPMENT IN THE NATIONAL BUDGET:
In 1996 reforms continued in the energy sector. As a result, progress has now been made not only in the supply of electricity but also in improving the regularity of payments for electricity. Budget planning takes social considerations into account.
NEW ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES:
The introduction of a State treasury system had led to improved budget discipline in the Republic and to greater expediency and effectiveness in the use of State budget resources.
ACTIVITIES AT THE LOCAL AND NATIONAL LEVELS WHICH WILL PROMOTE THE DEVELOPMENT OF INDUSTRY AND ENHANCE ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY. THESE MAY INCLUDE:
The training of personnel, the adoption of preferential financial agreements, the dissemination of information and structural legal changes.
PROGRAMMES FOR THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE COUNTRY ARE AIMED AT:
The acquisition of new markets for production, enhanced efficiency in the activities of industrial enterprises, the resolution of the investment crisis, increased exports, finding substitutes for imported raw materials, and so on.
|
| NATIONAL PRIORITY: | |
| STATUS REPORT ON LINKS BETWEEN NATIONAL, REGIONAL
AND INTERNATIONAL INFORMATION
NETWORKS/SYSTEMS: No information
MEANS OF IMPLEMENTATION: No information
|
| Describe any work being undertaken at the national or
local level regarding efforts to promote clean production
processes and/or the concepts of eco-efficiency. These processes
may include training, preferential financial
arrangements, information dissemination and changes in legal or
regulatory frameworks.
No information
Provide information on the adoption of environmental management systems. National reaction to environmental management system standards such as the ISO 14000 Series and others. Please note efforts made at the national level to promote their adoption and the creation of certification infrastructure in order to facilitate access to these standards to local industry.
No information
List and describe programs or work under way to facilitate the transfer of ESTs to small and medium sized enterprises. Please note efforts to facilitate access to financial resources and other transfer strategies.
No information
|
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 35: SCIENCE FOR
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
A number of ecological and environmental research projects are
being carried out, including projects relating to
specific aspects of sustainable development. These research
projects are being carried out with the participation of
leading scientific centres of the National Academy of Sciences of
the Republic of Armenia, higher educational
establishments, specialized administrative scientific organizations
and scientific-production enterprises. Among the
priorities for scientific research in the area of sustainable
development and environmental protection, mention should be
made of the restoration and conservation of the sustainability of
the ecosystem of Lake Sevan, the improvement of the
legal basis for the utilization and administration of natural
resources, the development of economic mechanisms for the
utilization of natural resources, the introduction of a system of
continuing environmental education, and so on.
STEPS TAKEN TO ENHANCE SCIENTIFIC UNDERSTANDING, IMPROVE
LONG-TERM SCIENTIFIC
ASSESSMENT, BUILDING OF CAPACITY AND CAPABILITY:
Ecological research relating to environmental protection and
sustainable development must be carried out in
accordance with priorities and in stages which will ensure the
establishment of mechanisms for sustainable development.
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT ON NATIONAL SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE,
RESEARCH NEEDS AND PRIORITIES:
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 36: PROMOTING EDUCATION,
PUBLIC AWARENESS AND TRAINING
(a) Reorienting education towards sustainable
development
The educational system and the legislative and normative basis
for the provision of access to education are being
reformed. A Government decree is being prepared on the
introduction of a system of continuing environmental education
in the Republic of Armenia. In 10 State higher educational
establishments and 40 higher educational establishments in the
private sector, new programmes on questions relating to development
and environmental protection are being developed
and organized. Education is being reoriented with the inclusion
of the principles of the concept of sustainable
development. An experimental textbook has been published for
senior secondary school classes entitled "Principles
governing the utilization of nature and environmental protection",
which is fully oriented towards Agenda 21 and the
principles of sustainable development. In several faculties at
Erevan State University (ESU), courses are being taught on
the global programme for sustainable development. Through the
efforts of UNDP, ESU and the Association for the
sustainable development of human society, a textbook has been
published for higher educational establishments entitled
"The Concept of Sustainable Development: Theory and Practice".
(b) Increasing public awareness
The competent departments of the Ministry of the
Environment and Natural Resources, scientific centres, NGOs
and the mass information media are involved in the process of
environmental education. A national report on Armenia,
environmental journals and materials on educational methods are
published. Regional centres of environmental education
have been opened in the districts of Gegarkunik and Armavir.
Erevan State University and the Association for the
sustainable development of human society, with the
cooperation of the Ministry of the Economy of the Republic of
Armenia and UNDP, organized the first National
Conference in the context of Rio + 5, on "The sustainable
development of society and Armenia", in which Government
organs, higher educational establishments, scientific research
institutes and non-governmental organizations participated.
(c) Promoting training
Government departments and scientific and public organizations
are active in promoting the implementation of
continuing environmental education and the establishment of
sustainable development mechanisms. These departments
and organizations include: the Department of Science of the
Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources, Erevan
State University, the Engineering University of Armenia, the
Armenian Division of the International Environmental
Academy, the non-governmental organizations "Byurakn" and
"Sustainable Development", the Association "For the
sustainable development of society", the Botanical Society, the
Green Union and others.
FINANCING AND COST EVALUATION OF LABOUR ACTIVITIES:
Environmental and sustainable development
research are funded by Government organizations, national and
international funds (for example, UNDP financed research
on the transformation of the human development index (HDI) into the
sustainable human development index (SHDI),
research which was carried out by an interdepartmental group of
experts). The evaluation of the cost of labour and the
allocation of activities is being carried out in accordance with
the priorities in that sphere.
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT:
| NATIONAL PRIORITY: | |
| STATUS REPORT ON NATIONAL ENDOGENOUS CAPACITY
BUILDING: No information
|
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 38: INTERNATIONAL
INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS
| Ch. 38: Brief summary of any particular UN System
response affecting this country/state:
No information
|
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 39: INTERNATIONAL LEGAL
INSTRUMENTS AND MECHANISMS
| Ch. 39: International Legal Instruments are covered
under the relevant sectoral chapters. This is a listing of major
agreements/conventions (not already covered) entered into and
relevant to Agenda 21:
No information
|
| 2. | International cooperation and trade | |||||
| 3. | Combating poverty | |||||
| 4. | Changing consumption patterns | |||||
| 5. | Demographic dynamics and sustainability | |||||
| 6. | Human health | |||||
| 7. | Human settlements | |||||
| 8. | Integrating E & D in decision-making | |||||
| 9. | Protection of the atmosphere | |||||
| 10. | Integrated planning and management of land resources | |||||
| 11. | Combating deforestation | |||||
| 12. | Combating desertification and drought | |||||
| 13. | Sustainable mountain development | |||||
| 14. | Sustainable agriculture and rural development | |||||
| 15. | Conservation of biological diversity | |||||
| 16. | Biotechnology | |||||
| 17. | Oceans, seas, coastal areas and their living resources | |||||
| 18. | Freshwater resources | |||||
| 19. | Toxic chemicals | |||||
| 20. | Hazardous wastes | |||||
| 21. | Solid wastes | |||||
| 22. | Radioactive wastes | |||||
| 24. | Women in sustainable development | |||||
| 25. | Children and youth | |||||
| 26. | Indigenous people | |||||
| 27. | Non-governmental organizations | |||||
| 28. | Local authorities | |||||
| 29. | Workers and trade unions | |||||
| 30. | Business and industry | |||||
| 31. | Scientific and technological community | |||||
| 32. | Farmers | |||||
| 33. | Financial resources and mechanisms | |||||
| 34. | Technology, cooperation and capacity-building | |||||
| 35. | Science for sustainable development | |||||
| 36. | Education, public awareness and training | |||||
| 37. | International cooperation for capacity-building | |||||
| 38. | International institutional arrangements | |||||
| 39. | International legal instruments | |||||
| 40. | Information for decision-making | |||||
No information
| Latest 199- | ||||
| Number of telephones in use per 100 inhabitants | ||||
| Other data
| ||||
Copyright © United Nations
Department of Economic and Social Affairs
Comments and suggestions: esa@un.org
1 November 1997