2017 Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT)

Submissions by NGOs

• A/CONF.229/2017/NGO/WP.49
  Recommendations to Improve Aspects of the July 3 Draft Text July 5, 2017. Submitted by Arms Control Association
• A/CONF.229/2017/NGO/WP.48
  Projet de Traité d’interdiction des armes nucléaires. Document de travail d’ACDN
  Draft Ban Treaty. Submitted by ACDN


• A/CONF.229/2017/NGO/WP.47
  Commenti sulla bozza di testo in vista della seconda Sessione di Negoziati alle Nazioni Unite. Presenta Dal Gruppo ICAN (Campagna Senzatomica and Rete Italiana per il Disarmo)
  Comments and notes on the Treaty draft text in view of the second Session of Negotiations at United Nations. Submitted by International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN)


• A/CONF.229/2017/NGO/WP.46
  A Path to Universality through Cooperative, Transparent, Verifiable and Irreversible Disarmament. Submitted by Princeton University


• A/CONF.229/2017/NGO/WP.45
  Never Forget the Good. Submitted by Global Security Institute


• A/CONF.229/2017/NGO/WP.44
  Un contributo da Trieste perché la Convenzione per proibire le armi nucleari consideri l’avvio di case studies, per i porti che bisogna denuclearizzare, sul rischio relativo alle armi nucleari a bordo di navi e sommergibili. Submitted by Women's International League for Peace and Freedom (WILPF Italia) in collaboration with Disarmisti Esigenti.


• A/CONF.229/2017/NGO/WP.43
  Youth Perspective on “The draft Convention on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons”. Submitted by Amplify Youth Network – Generation of Change.


• A/CONF.229/2017/NGO/WP.42
  Convention on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons – Peace Boat's proposals on the draft. Submitted by Peace Boat.


• A/CONF.229/2017/NGO/WP.41
  Un contributo perché la Convenzione per proibire le armi nucleari consideri la minaccia climatica dal punto di vista di una base comune rispetto alla minaccia “atomica”: il diritto dell'Umanità alla sopravvivenza. Submitted by Women's International League for Peace and Freedom (WILPF Italia) in collaboration with Disarmisti Esigenti.


• A/CONF.229/2017/NGO/WP.40
  Forbidding financing: a prohibition on the financing of nuclear weapon producers. Submitted by PAX.


• A/CONF.229/2017/NGO/WP.39
  The dangers of nuclear deterrence, and the threat of use of nuclear weapons: important elements to include in a legally binding instrument. Submitted by Nuclear Age Peace Foundation.


• A/CONF.229/2017/NGO/WP.38
  Nuclear-Armed States, Positive Obligations, Institutional Issues, and Final Clauses: Further Comments. Submitted by International Association of Lawyers Against Nuclear Arms.


• A/CONF.229/2017/NGO/WP.37
  Prohibitions and the Preamble: Further Comments. Submitted by International Association of Lawyers Against Nuclear Arms.


• A/CONF.229/2017/NGO/WP.36
  Strengthening the Positive Obligations on Victim Assistance,Environmental Remediation and Norm Promotion in the Draft Convention for the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. Submitted by Pace University


• A/CONF.229/2017/NGO/WP.35
  A proposal of amendments to the ‘Ban Treaty draft transmitted on May 22nd, 2017 by the president of the Conference Elayne Whyte Gómez. Submitted by Abolition des Armes Nucléaires–Maison de Vigilance


• A/CONF.229/2017/NGO/WP.34
  A prohibition on financing in the nuclear weapon ban treaty. Submitted by Article 36. Authored by International Human Rights Clinic, Human Rights Program at Harvard Law School


• A/CONF.229/2017/NGO/WP.33
  Environmental remediation in the nuclear weapon ban treaty: A comprehensive and detailed approach. Submitted by Article 36. Authored with the International Human Rights Clinic, Human Rights Program at Harvard Law School


• A/CONF.229/2017/NGO/WP.32
  Victim assistance in the nuclear weapon ban treaty: a comprehensive and detailed approach. Submitted by Article 36. Authored with the International Human Rights Clinic, HumanRights Program at Harvard Law School


• A/CONF.229/2017/NGO/WP.31
  Предложения by Center for International Security and Policy к проекту Конвенции по запрету ядерного оружия
  Proposals by Center for International Security and Policy to the draft Convention on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons


• A/CONF.229/2017/NGO/WP.30
  Comments on the Draft Convention on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, submitted by International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War (IPPNW)


• A/CONF.229/2017/NGO/WP.29
  All nuclear weapon states maintain and operate facilities capable of prompt, complete national nuclear disarmament, submitted by the Los Alamos Study Group. June 6, 2017


• A/CONF.229/2017/NGO/WP.28
  The Convention Prohibiting Nuclear Weapons Should NotInclude Disarmament, Fissile Material, or Verification Protocols; Other Comments, submitted by the Los Alamos Study Group. June 6, 2017


• A/CONF.229/2017/NGO/WP.27
  To Be Effective, Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons Must Include Nuclear Threats, Extended Deterrence, and Military Alliances with Nuclear States (Part II); Nuclear States Must Remain Outside the Treaty, submitted by the Los Alamos Study Group. June 6, 2017


• A/CONF.229/2017/NGO/WP.26
  To Be Effective, Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons Must Include Nuclear Threats, Extended Deterrence, and Military Alliances with Nuclear States (Part I), submitted by the Los Alamos Study Group. June 6, 2017


• A/CONF.229/2017/NGO/WP.25
  Comments and Proposals for the Draft Convention on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, submitted by Soka Gakkai International (SGI)


• A/CONF.229/2017/NGO/WP.24
  The disproportionate impact of nuclear weapons detonations on indigenous communities, submitted by Mines Action Canada


• A/CONF.229/2017/NGO/WP.23
  A contribution to the drafting of an International Nuclear Weapon Ban Treaty, submitted by Abolition des Armes Nucléaires—Maison de Vigilance


• A/CONF.229/2017/NGO/WP.22
  Humanitarian positive obligations for a Nuclear Weapons Ban Treaty, submitted by Pace University


• A/CONF.229/2017/NGO/WP.21
  Additional comments after the first conference session from a planetary health perspective, Submitted by International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War (IPPNW)


• A/CONF.229/2017/NGO/WP.20
  Don’t Take Offence and Be Late for the Party, Submitted by DIYNGO


• A/CONF.229/2017/NGO/WP.19
  Developing a Robust Nuclear Weapons Ban Treaty, Submitted by Peace Boat


• A/CONF.229/2017/NGO/WP.18
  Topic 2: Core Prohibitions, Submitted by Arms Control Association


• A/CONF.229/2017/NGO/WP.17
  Youth and Multilateral Nuclear Disarmament Negotiations: A Voice to be Heard, Submitted by Nuclear Age Peace Foundation


• A/CONF.229/2017/NGO/WP.16
  The Turtle, The Horse and Nuclear Weapons, Submitted by Global Security Institute


• A/CONF.229/2017/NGO/WP.15
  Recommendations of the Secretary General of Mayors for Peace for the successful outcome of the ban treaty negotiations, Submitted by Mayors for Peace


• A/CONF.229/2017/NGO/WP.14
  Victim Rights and Victim Assistance in a Treaty Prohibiting Nuclear Weapons: A Humanitarian Imperative, Submitted by International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN)


• A/CONF.229/2017/NGO/WP.13
  Withdrawal Clauses in Arms Control Treaties: Some Reflections about a Future Treaty Prohibiting Nuclear Weapons, Submitted by International Association of Lawyers Against Nuclear Arms (IALANA)


• A/CONF.229/2017/NGO/WP.12
  Selected Elements of a Treaty Prohibiting Nuclear Weapons, Submitted by International Association of Lawyers Against Nuclear Arms


• A/CONF.229/2017/NGO/WP.11
  The health and humanitarian case for banning and eliminating nuclear weapons, Submitted by International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War, World Medical Association, World Federation of Public Health Associations, International Council of Nurses


• A/CONF.229/2017/NGO/WP.10
  Positive Obligations in a Treaty Prohibiting Nuclear Weapons: Stockpile Destruction, Environmental Remediation, and Victim Assistance, Submitted by Article 36


• A/CONF.229/2017/NGO/WP.9
  Statement on the Convening of the U.N. Negotiation Conference on Banning Nuclear Weapons: Now is the Time to Agree on a Treaty Prohibiting Nuclear Weapons, Submitted by Japan Council against A and H Bombs


• A/CONF.229/2017/NGO/WP.8
  On the Objectives and Significance of Prohibiting Nuclear Weapons, Submitted by Soka Gakkai International (SGI)


• A/CONF.229/2017/NGO/WP.7
  Proposal of a Framework Agreement on Nuclear Disarmament Containing a Protocol to Prohibit Nuclear Weapons, Submitted by Peace Depot Inc., Japan


• A/CONF.229/2017/NGO/WP.6
  Prohibiting the financing of nuclear weapons production, Submitted by Basel Peace Office, Parliamentarians for Nuclear Non-proliferation and Disarmament and UNFOLD ZERO


• A/CONF.229/2017/NGO/WP.5
  Banning investment: An explicit prohibition on the financing of nuclear weapons producers, Submitted by PAX


• A/CONF.229/2017/NGO/WP.4
  Open Letter from Mayors for Peace, Submitted by Mayors for Peace


• A/CONF.229/2017/NGO/WP.3
  Banning nuclear weapons: positive obligations and other elements of a legally binding instrument, Submitted by the Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom


• A/CONF.229/2017/NGO/WP.2
  Banning nuclear weapons: prohibitions of a legally binding instrument, Submitted by the Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom


• A/CONF.229/2017/NGO/WP.1
  Banning nuclear weapons: principles and objectives of a legally binding instrument, Submitted by the Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom