New York

1 February 2017

Transcript of the Secretary-General's press encounter

Watch video on webtv.un.org:

Spokesman:  Good morning.  The Secretary-General will make some opening remarks, and then we'll take your questions.  Sir?
 
Secretary-General:  Ladies and gentlemen of the press, it's a pleasure to have you with us today.  I just arrived yesterday from my first serious mission abroad, attending the African Union Summit.  I left New York last Friday, and I came back yesterday.
 
The objective was very clear -- to establish a higher platform of cooperation between the two organisations, both in relation to the sustainable development of the African continent but also in relation to our cooperation in peace and security in so many areas of concern on the African continent.
 
At the same time, as you can imagine, I have lived in my past capacity, very strongly, the South Sudan crisis.  When I became High Commissioner for Refugees, my first act was to go to Uganda to celebrate World Refugee Day with South Sudanese refugees.  And we helped 500,000 South Sudanese go back home when the country was created; a lot of hope was inspiring them. 
 
You can imagine how tragic it is to see now South Sudan in a dramatic situation with the real perspectives of things getting even worse.  You have seen the reports of our Special [Adviser] on [the Prevention of] Genocide and, at the same time, to see how difficult it has been to create the conditions for the South Sudan situation to be put on track for a peaceful resolution.
 
And so, one of my objectives was to try to establish a sound mechanism of cooperation between the sub-regional organisation IGAD (Intergovernmental Authority for Development), the African Union and the UN in order to be able to do everything possible to avoid worst in South Sudan and to bring the South Sudanese situation into a better track for peace.
 
Now, after the mission, I can tell you that I believe we fully met our objectives.  First of all, we established with the African Union an enhanced platform of cooperation.  I was invited for a breakfast meeting with all African Heads of State to discuss the situation in the continent and the global situation.  It was agreed that, in every African Union summit in January, there will be a breakfast meeting between the Secretary-General and all the African Heads of States, translating the strong commitment of Africa to a very close relationship with UN. 
 
At the same time, we have agreed that Agenda 2063, which is the development agenda of the African Union, and Agenda 2030, the sustainable development agenda that was agreed in the summit last year, will be aligned.  And there will be only one line of reporting, which means that there will be a total cooperation between the UN and the African Union in relation to the Sustainable Development Goals and the implementation of the Paris Agreement in the years to come.
 
On the other hand, we managed to have a summit meeting between IGAD, the African Union, and myself.  We came to a total agreement on the way forward.  And that agreement was preceded by a summit of the IGAD, the sub-regional organisation itself.
 
We will be clearly working together with the same voice, in order to make sure that the national dialogue that will be launched in South Sudan is truly inclusive, including all the key elements of the opposition.  Ex-President [Alpha Oumar] Konaré of [Mali], the African Union mediator, was fully empowered to launch a mediating process with total support from the UN, both from our representative, [Nicholas] Haysom, and from the logistical point of view. 
 
This will be done in very close cooperation with IGAD, and President [Festus] Mogae will also be fully supportive for us in his role of monitoring of the peace process.  And all together we will be acting in order to make sure that the dialogue is really inclusive.  And, at the same time, in a meeting with Salva Kiir, it was agreed that we will have better cooperation, both for the UN Mission to operate more freely inside South Sudan and for the Regional Protection Force to be put in place.
 
We have also reached full agreement with Kenya in order for Kenya to participate in the Regional Protection Force.  And I hope I have meetings with President Salva Kiir and with all the key neighbours, beyond the meetings with the IGAD and with the African Union.  I hope that the conditions are now created for these three organisations, all the neighbours to work together with the same objective, to speak with the same voice, and to try to create the conditions, as I said, to avoid what could be a dramatic evolution of the situation on the ground with massacres that anybody can foresee possible and to put on track a peace process aiming at giving a future of hope for the South Sudanese. 
 
We also had important discussions on Mali, the Mali situation that, as you know, is a very complex situation, because you have a peacekeeping operation with limited mandates, together with the counterterrorism operation in the same territory, what creates many difficulties. 
 
I met with the G5 Heads of State -- Mali, Chad, Mauritania, Burkina Faso, and Niger.  And there will be a new meeting in Bamako in the beginning of February.  And we will be seeing how we can work together to improve our capacity, both to move onwards with the political process and to have a more effective approach to dealing with the very complex terrorist situation in the north.
 
So, on top of that, I had the opportunity to discuss with key stakeholders situations in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, in Burundi.  I hope that there will be a chance for progress in all these very complex situations. 
 
And what The Gambia episode has demonstrated is that, when the neighbours of a country are together, when the sub-regional African organisation is united and the African Union is united, then it is possible for the Security Council to decide; it is possible for action to be taken, and it is possible for democracy, human rights, and the freedom of peoples to be defended.
 
When there is division in the region, it is much more difficult for the UN to be able to act accordingly.  I think we made an enormous progress in creating the conditions for a much more effective cooperation with the different African entities and the UN in addressing some of the most complex crises that we face. 
 
But I would like to end by saying that our narrative about Africa must not be based on the crises that exists in Africa.  There are crises everywhere.  We have crises in Europe, crises in the Middle East, crises in Asia… there are crises everywhere. 
 
What is important is for us to understand the enormous potential that Africa represents, that Africa is the continent that has grown more economically in the last decade, that has remarkable success stories, that we need to also take profit of the momentum created by these facts in order to make sure that Africa is able to win the battle for sustainable and inclusive developments in the next few years, knowing that that is also the best way to prevent the conflicts that, unfortunately, have created so much suffering in the continent. 
 
I'm at your disposal for questions.  [Cross talk]
 
**Questions and Answers
 
Question:  Mr Secretary-General, on the US travel ban, we heard what your Spokesman said yesterday.  It took four days for you to come up with a response to a policy that has caused so much chaos.  Why did it take you so long?  And are you calling on President [Donald] Trump to lift those restrictions?
 
Secretary-General:  Well, first of all, it didn't take four days.  I made several statements on that when I was in the African Union.  As you can imagine, you can find some pieces in different media, but what was lacking was the capacity to have a comprehensive approach to the problem, because the transcription that was made of several of my interventions in relation to that when I was in Addis was necessarily truncated.  And I thought it was important to come with something that represents the doctrine we have in relation to these issues, both in relation to the ban and also the very dramatic situations that refugees are facing when they have no chance to reach protection.
 
Question:  Are you calling on President Trump to lift the restrictions?
 
Secretary-General:  It is obvious that, in my opinion, this is not the way… and it was very clear in the statement this is not the way to best protect the US or any other country in relation to the serious concerns that exists about possibilities of terrorist infiltration.  But I don't think this is the effective way to do so, and I think that these measures should be removed sooner rather than later.  That was the appeal I made.
 
Spokesman:  Sherwin, South African News.
 
Question:  Secretary-General, thank you.  Welcome back.  I think there's a broader concern regarding the United States' administration, particularly President Donald Trump's articulation of this "America First" policy that, in essence, is placing the US administration at odds with the goals of your office and this multilateral institution that you head with… on, as you mentioned, the resettlement of refugees where the threats to withdraw from the climate change Paris Agreement or the funding of the United Nations.  How are you strategizing to stand up for this organisation in the face of this perceived or otherwise onslaught on the United Nations?
 
Secretary-General:  I think that it's very… all complicated things have an easy answer, and the answer is to be firm in assessing all principles and open in engaging in constructive dialogue.  And that is this combination that I will try to make effective in the way we deal with US Administration or in the way we deal with any other administration in the world. [Cross talk]
 
Question:  Mr… thank you so much.  Mr Secretary-General, I would like to ask you about Syria.  We haven't heard from [Staffan] de Mistura much about the transitional period, the political transitional period, which is at the heart of the Geneva Communiqué.  You keep referring to 2254, but 2254 enshrine the Geneva Communiqué and ask for the full implementation of that communiqué.  Now, the transitional period, the British Ambassador has said it's a must to achieve any progress, stipulate the establishment of a governing body with full powers.  Are you still behind the transitional period?  Or are we talking about governance, a government of national unity with [Bashar al] Assad in charge?  We know you met [de Mistura] this morning or you're meeting him this morning.  Are you going to stress the importance of talking about the transitional period?
 
Secretary-General:  I think that is clearly one of the tracks that need to be pursued in the Geneva conference that will take place in the 20th.  That is, of course, one of the central issues that this conference needs to discuss.
 
Question:  But it’s still the core?
 
Secretary-General:  Of course, it's part of the central discussion that needs to be made.  But, of course, all the other aspects need to be also on the table.  I think it's important to have an open discussion without preconditions but that aspect you mentioned is, of course, in the core of all concerns.
 
Question:  So it is still the core?
 
Secretary-General:  That's… well, I'm saying that is in the core of all concerns.
 
Spokesman:  Raghida.
 
Question:  Raghida Dergham, Al Hayat.  So about the three guarantors of Syria, Syrian ceasefire and the political process being non-Arab, three of them, Russia, Iran, and Turkey, there is criticism of the UN associating itself strongly with the Astana process that… excluding the Arab countries.  How do you plan to compensate for that?  And is it your opinion… do you share the opinion that calling for the foreign troops… all foreign troops to… all foreign presence… military presence in Syria that they should withdraw, does that apply to the Iranian-backed militias or the ones who are coming from whether it's Afghanistan, Iraq, and… or Lebanon?  Is it your view that this should apply to them, or they should be excluded?  And are you… I hear you're going to Iran.  Are you going to Iran soon?
 
Secretary-General:  Well, first of all, in relation to the question, I think that if the UN would not be in Astana, we would be tremendously criticised to allow for a process to move onwards with the exclusion of the UN.  I think our presence in Astana was an absolute must in order to guarantee that after Astana, we could have Geneva.  And in Geneva, we could discuss the key political aspects that are essential to be on the table.  Of course, in Astana, we are not all the stakeholders, and I believe that a solution will require the full commitment of all stakeholders, and Arab countries are a key component in finding a solution for the Syria crisis.  In relation to the process onwards and the solutions and the need to set a moment for all foreign troops to leave, I think that should apply to everybody without exception.  But this is a long process of negotiation that is starting now and I hope will be concluded positively for the Syrian people.
 
Question:  Are you going to Iran?  Are you planning to visit the region Iran…? [Cross talk]
 
Secretary-General:  I am planning to visit the region in the next few weeks, months, depending… and obviously, my interest is to be able to talk with all key interlocutors in the region without exception.
 
Spokesman:  Edie?
 
Question:  Mr Secretary-General, the US President has been talking about cutting funding to the United Nations.  There hasn't been a formal announcement yet.  I know that you've met the new US Ambassador.  Are you planning to meet President Trump?  And how will you deal with this whole issue of possibly losing a quarter of the UN's funding and more, if that ever happens?  I mean, I'm sure it's a worrying possibility.
 
Secretary-General:  Well, first of all, in relation to a possible visit, in the phone call I had with President Trump, it was clearly agreed that, at the adequate moment, I would have a visit to Washington to also visit him.  That is absolutely normal, and it will naturally happen.  We had a very constructive discussion with the American ambassador on the cooperation between the US and the UN.  And, you know, sometimes we talk too much about things that have not happened.  And when you talk too much about things that have not happened, you trigger the happening of those things.  [Laughter]  So one thing you can be absolutely sure is that I will not be making comments on possibilities to enhance the post possibilities to possibly be a reality. [Laughter]  What I am doing is to do everything I can to prove the added value of the UN, to recognise the UN needs reforms, to be totally committed to those reforms, and to believe that those reforms will be the best way to get the support of all Member States, including the United States of America and its new administration.
 
Question:  And is there any time frame of your planned meeting with President Trump?  Is it going to be the next few weeks?
 
Secretary-General:  No, that is… at the moment, not yet has been decided on that.
 
Spokesman:  New York Times, Somini.  
 
Question:  Thank you, Secretary-General.  In your view, is the country-specific visa bans that the Trump Administration has ordered a violation of the United States' international obligations?  And on the specific indefinite suspension of Syrian refugee resettlement, can you please comment?
 
Secretary-General:  As you know, resettlement of refugees is, in many situations, the only possible solution.  If you are a victim of torture, women and children have lost members of their families and are deeply traumatised, people with complex health situations.  Resettlement has proven and when I was in UNHCR, we were resettling about 100,000 people around the world.  And you can't imagine what it is to go one day to a city in the United States or in Canada or in Australia or in Sweden and talk to a family that came a few years before in the most desperate conditions that had no chance staying in a refugee camp or in the slums of a city in the developing world, even if their countries would be very generous, and to see that, all of a sudden, their children are here or in Canada or in another country and they are in a university that they were able to have a small company that they are operating, giving jobs sometimes to other refugees and to locals, I mean, resettlement is a must from the point of view of refugee protection.  And the United States has been always in the forefront of resettlement, and Syrians are those refugees that, at the present moment, have the most dramatic needs in the world.  So I strongly hope that the US will be able to re-establish its very solid refugee protection in resettlement, and I hope that the Syrians will not be excluded in that process. In relation to the measures that were taken, I already expressed my clear opinion about those measures.  I think that those measures indeed violate our basic principles, and I think that they are not effective if the objective is to really avoid terrorists to enter the United States.  We are dealing with very sophisticated global terrorist organisations.  If a global terrorist organisation will try to attack any country like the United States, they will probably not come with people with passports from those countries that are hotspots of conflict today.  They might come with passports from the most, I'll say, developed and credible countries in the world, or they might use people that [have] been for decades sometimes inside the countries.  And that is why it is so important not to have measures that spread anxiety and anger, because when we adopt measures that spread anxiety and anger, we help trigger the kind of recruitment mechanisms that these organisations are now doing everywhere in the world.  And that is why we have been so strongly pushing for the capacity to have very strong measures in relation to management of borders but, at the same time, not to base them on any discrimination linked to nationality, religion or ethnicity.
 
Spokesman:  Al Jazeera, Raed.
 
Question:  Thank you, Stéphane.  Back to Syria, the HNC (High Negotiations Commission) strongly criticised Mr Staffan de Mistura's statement yesterday on using his right or authority to launch the opposition delegation to Geneva talks.  Do you agree on this statement?  Do you support Mr de Mistura's statement on that?  And do you think that it's a good thing to do under the current circumstances?
 
Secretary-General:  I think that he has said nothing else but what is written in the resolution of the Security Council.  So it is clear that that's what the resolution forecasts, and it is clear this is a possibility that might be used.  What we want is the success of the Geneva conference, and the success of the Geneva conference implies that there is a meaningful representation of the Syrian opposition in Geneva, and we will do everything to make sure that that happens.  But this is not the moment to enter into discussions on secondary issues.  What we need is to conjugate all our efforts in line with Security Council resolution and Geneva Communiqué to make Geneva a success.  And that's, I think, the interest of all of us.
 
Spokesman:  Olga?
 
Question:  Mr Secretary-General, just to follow up with what you just said, if it's needed to make a success in Geneva, what can you do for… what can you do that another round that's supposed to start in 20 February is not just another round when parties meet and talk without any result?
 
Secretary-General:  I think that what is important is to have this time substantive discussions on the central issues, and I hope that this will be possible.
 
Spokesman:  Last question, Turkish...
 
Question:  Thank you, Mr Secretary-General.  Does the UN support the safe zone plans in Syria raised by the Trump Administration and previously by Turkey?  Thank you.
 
Secretary-General:  Well, I don't know exactly what is meant by that concept.  That concept has been used with different meanings in different situations.  I would say three basic things:  First, we have nothing against the creation of areas where people can live in safety.  Second, that can never undermine the right to seek asylum.  So, when people, for instance, decide to create safe zones to not allow people to leave those zones, this is something that is not acceptable.  And, third, we have in history different examples of safe zones.  And some of them were tragic.  Srebrenica was a safe zone.  So, again, it's difficult to comment on something we don't know what it is.  Let's see what it is, and then we will make the adequate comments.
 
Spokesman:  Great.  Thank you very much.  [Cross talk]
 
Secretary-General:  Thank you very much.
 
Question:  [Off mic] Louise Arbour, are you going to make Louise Arbour as migration adviser, Louise Arbour?
 
Secretary-General:  [Off mic] Before I can announce the name, there is a procedure.  That procedure is to submit to ACABQ (Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions) for the post to be created.  And the worst thing I can do is to announce someone before the post is created, because that will be against the rules.  And so you will wait a little bit more.