A/54/154-E/1999/94
Distr.:General
15 June 1999
Original: English
General Assembly
Fifty-fourth session
Item 20 (a) of the preliminary list*
Strengthening of the coordination of humanitarian and disaster relief
assistance of the United Nations,
including special economic assistance: strengthening of the coordination
of emergency humanitarian assistance
of the United Nations
Economic and Social Council
Substantive session of 1999
Geneva, 5–30 July 1999
Agenda item 5
Special economic, humanitarian and disaster relief assistance
*A/54/50.
Strengthening
of the coordination of emergency humanitarian assistance of the United Nations
Report
of the Secretary-General
Contents
|
|
|
Paragraphs |
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. Introduction............................................................................................................ |
|
1 |
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
II. Context: challenges of the past year......................................................................... |
|
2–11 |
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
III. Strengthening the coordination of
humanitarian assistance......................................... |
|
12–54 |
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Coordination in complex emergencies........................................................... |
|
12–30 |
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Improving the environment for
humanitarian action............................... |
|
13–21 |
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Enhancing humanitarian response through
effective coordination........... |
|
22–30 |
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Coordination in natural disasters.................................................................... |
|
31–38 |
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Policy coordination through the
Inter-Agency Standing Committee and
the Executive Committee on Humanitarian Affairs............................................... |
|
39–45 |
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Administrative matters.................................................................................. |
|
46–54 |
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IV. International cooperation and
coordination in the response to the humanitarian emergencies, particularly in
the transition from relief to rehabilitation, reconstruction and development....................................................................................................... |
|
55–95 |
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Transitions in natural disasters.......................................................................... |
|
56–66 |
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Transitions in complex emergencies.................................................................. |
|
67–95 |
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Contextual issues.................................................................................. |
|
69–71 |
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Strategic coordination for
peace-building............................................... |
|
72–77 |
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Frameworks and tools.......................................................................... |
|
78–85 |
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Thematic issues: bridging the recurrent
gaps........................................... |
|
86–90 |
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Financial issues..................................................................................... |
|
91–95 |
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. Observations............................................................................................................ |
|
96–100 |
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annex |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Follow-up to agreed conclusions (1998/1) of
the humanitarian affairs segment of the Economic and Social Council |
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
I. Introduction
1. The present report has
been prepared pursuant to General Assembly resolution 46/182 of 19 December
1991, by which the Secretary‑General was required to report annually to
the Assembly and the Economic and Social Council on the coordination of
humanitarian assistance. It is also in response to Economic and Social Council
resolution 1995/56 of 28 July 1995, in which the Council requested the
Secretary-General to submit a comprehensive report on humanitarian assistance,
and further pursuant to Assembly resolution 52/168 of 16 December 1997, in
which the Secretary-General was requested to report to the Assembly through the
Council on the further progress of the Inter-Agency Standing Committee in the
strengthening of the capacity of the United Nations in humanitarian assistance.
The present report1 also documents the implementation of the agreed
conclusions 1998/1 adopted by the Economic and Social Council in its 1998
humanitarian affairs segment.2 It does so in the context of the
ongoing programme of reform of the United Nations endorsed by the General
Assembly in its resolution 52/12 of 12 November 1997, in particular those
measures aimed at strengthening the Office of the Emergency Relief Coordinator.
II. Context:
challenges of the past year
2. The past year has been one
of enormous challenges. A particularly striking phenomenon has been the
extraordinary rise in the number and scale of natural disasters, and of their
human and financial cost. The suffering and devastation caused by natural
disasters has risen steadily, culminating in 1998 when natural calamities
claimed the lives of more than 50,000 people worldwide. Forest fires raged in
Indonesia, Brazil and the Russian far east; El Niño caused historic levels of
flooding in Latin America; unprecedented floods devastated large parts of
Bangladesh and China, and hurricanes Georges and Mitch caused massive
destruction in the Caribbean region and Central America. Floods struck Somalia
and the Sudan, a cyclone killed 10,000 in Gujarat (India) and a tsunami hit
Papua New Guinea. Estimated economic losses exceeded US$ 90 billion,
compared with US$ 30 billion in 1997. Indications are that this increase is
linked to factors such as rapid population growth and urbanization,
environmental degradation, global climatic changes and other causes. In many
cases, man‑made elements exacerbated the impact of disasters,
highlighting the need for intensive disaster-reduction/prevention activities as
part of overall relief and development strategies.
3. Natural disasters
affecting populations already suffering from complex emergencies presented the
international community with particularly formidable challenges. In the space
of one year (1998 and early 1999), Afghanistan was hit by three major
earthquakes. International relief efforts were hampered by the ongoing
conflict, the remoteness of the affected areas and harsh weather conditions. A
costly air operation was required to deliver the assistance provided by the
international community. Similarly challenging situations were created by
drought in southern Sudan and floods in Somalia, both in the context of ongoing
civil wars that posed major access and security challenges.
4. Regarding complex
emergencies, ongoing conflicts in Angola and Sierra Leone intensified, while
those in Afghanistan and the Sudan continued. In a number of regions, internal
wars took on a larger regional dimension as in the Democratic Republic of the
Congo and in West Africa. In 1999, new violence broke out with enormous loss of
life and human suffering in Ethiopia, Eritrea, and in the south Balkans. Direct
attacks on civilian populations, in flagrant violation of international
humanitarian law and human rights law, led to massive forced displacement and
loss of life in several countries. In Angola and Sierra Leone, civilian
populations were deliberately targeted and terrorized. Those events led to
major increases in the number of internally displaced persons and refugees in
several countries. Although numbers of internally displaced persons are often
hard to quantify, it was estimated that in Angola alone, at least 500,000
people had been newly displaced between 1 January and 15 May 1999. The war
between Ethiopia and Eritrea was believed to have led to the internal
displacement of some 750,000 people.
5. A United Nations
Inter-Agency Needs Assessment Mission, led by the Under-Secretary-General for
Humanitarian Affairs, was dispatched to the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia from
16 to 27 May, to provide an initial assessment of the emergency needs of
civilian populations and of the medium-term rehabilitation requirements in the
country, in the light of the approaching winter.3 The Mission
determined that humanitarian needs of the internally displaced and other
civilians remaining in the province of Kosovo were urgent and immense, and that
food and the provision of primary health care were the major priorities. The
Mission reported on the mass forced displacement and deportation of thousands
of civilians, wholesale destruction of property and means of livelihood, wanton
lawlessness and violence, thousands of documented
killings, countless as yet undocumented deaths, and immeasurable human
suffering. Over 850,000 Kosovar Albanians had fled the province, and many
provided consistent accounts of civilians being subjected to systematic and
extreme human rights violations. Many Kosovars had been stripped of their
identity and other documents as they left. Meanwhile, the Mission noted a great
deal of physical destruction and damage caused by the air strikes carried out
by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) in all the areas of Serbia
visited by the Mission. The Yugoslav Red Cross gave figures that 700 civilians
had died and 6,400 civilians were injured, with many having lost their homes in
the attacks. The overall state of the economy, the closure of industries due to
direct war damage or indirect consequences, such as the lack of raw materials,
loss of trade and damage to transportation links, had led to the growing
impoverishment of the Serbian population. Damage to essential services had also
caused tremendous hardship for the civilian population.
6. In several complex
emergency situations, humanitarian agencies were denied access to the affected
areas for long periods of time, further exacerbating the suffering of the
victims. In some cases, access was blocked not only by conditions of
insecurity, but also by deliberate policies of Governments and parties to
conflicts, often in direct violation of obligations under international law. In
particular, hundreds of thousands of children were deprived of their basic
rights to life, food, health care and education as a result of conflict. This
threatens not only their immediate well‑being, but also their long‑term
prospects for development. An estimated 300,000 child soldiers were active in
conflicts around the world. This practice was especially prevalent in Sierra
Leone and Uganda.
7. The dramatic social
changes resulting from conflicts in many parts of the world have profound
effects on social relations, especially for women and girls. The majority of
internally displaced persons and refugees around the world continue to be women
and children. In several conflicts, women continued to suffer
disproportionately from violence and abuse, including many cases of rape in
Kosovo. In other situations, such as Afghanistan, they were the victims of
discrimination in the allocation of goods and access to services. However, the
role of women in post‑conflict peace-building initiatives at community
level was increasingly recognized.
8. Attacks on humanitarian
personnel, already highlighted in last year’s report, continued at a totally
unacceptable level. In 1998, 22 United Nations staff members involved in
complex emergencies lost their lives. The loss of humanitarian personnel in
several direct attacks in Angola and Somalia illustrated the extent of this
growing problem.
9. The pandemic of HIV/AIDS,
especially on the African continent, is increasingly recognized as having major
humanitarian implications. The increased risk of transmission of HIV/AIDS
during emergencies is considerable and will affect the post-conflict and
reconstruction phases long after the crisis is over. Humanitarian organizations
should therefore regard measures to reduce transmission as a top priority even
if HIV/AIDS is not an immediate visible cause of mortality during the crisis.
10. The challenges of
adjustment to global markets resulted in financial crises in a number of
regions of the world, leading to rising levels of dire poverty and political
instability, in some cases triggering a need for humanitarian assistance. These
complex situations require an integrated response from development and
humanitarian actors.
11. Finally, difficulties in
responding to these numerous challenges were exacerbated by uneven levels of
funding to consolidated appeals. While the overall response to the consolidated
appeals for 1999 was approximately 30 per cent by 31 May 1999, as compared to
about 15 per cent in 1998, the response was extremely uneven in geographical
and sectoral distribution (see table 1). Uneven sectoral funding means that
contributions do not ensure a necessary minimum of care. For example, food
contributions in kind cannot be made use of in the absence of cash
contributions to finance transportation and distribution systems. Uneven
geographical funding leaves some countries in a situation of critical
underfunding, such as in Guinea‑Bissau where only 5.5 per cent of
assessed needs were met, while other emergencies attract extremely high levels
of funding, as in the region of the former Yugoslavia. This unbalanced funding
threatens to undermine the basic principle of humanitarian action, that aid is
provided irrespective of political and other considerations.
Table 1
1999 United Nations consolidated inter-agency
humanitarian assistance appeals:
Summary of requirements and contributions by affected
country/region as at 31 May 1999
|
Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information
provided by the respective appealing organizations |
||||||||
|
Affected country/ region |
Requirements (US$) |
Funding (US$) |
Carryover funds (US$) |
Total funds available (US$) |
Shortfall (US$) |
% of needs covered (%) |
Target beneficiaries |
Implementation period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Africa |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Angolab |
62 858 852 |
37 330 005 |
0 |
37 330 005a |
35 639 392 |
43.3 |
1 400 000 |
Jan 99–Dec 99 |
|
Burundic |
38 111 327 |
5 159 806 |
0 |
5 159 806 |
32 951 521 |
13.5 |
860 000 |
Jan 99–Dec 99 |
|
Democratic Republic of the Congoc |
17 383 831 |
2 030 862 |
0 |
2 030 862 |
15 352 969 |
11.7 |
394 600 |
Jan 99–Jun 99 |
|
Ugandac |
8 115 868 |
959 879 |
0 |
959 879 |
7 155 989 |
11.8 |
585 000 |
Jan 99–Dec 99 |
|
United Republic of Tanzaniac |
9 504 800 |
424 399 |
0 |
424 399 |
9 080 401 |
4.5 |
322 002 |
Jan 99–Dec 99 |
|
Great Lakes region and Central Africac |
240 675 497 |
83 328 452 |
0 |
83 328 452 |
157 347 045 |
34.6 |
– |
Jan 99–Dec 99 |
|
Guinea-Bissau |
28 655 368 |
1 578 108 |
0 |
1 578 108 |
27 077 260 |
5.5 |
385 000 |
Jan 99–Dec 99 |
|
Sierra Leoneb |
27 924 296 |
6 937 128 |
0 |
6 937 128 |
22 577 914 |
19.1 |
760 000 |
Jan 99–Dec 99 |
|
Somalia |
65 661 916 |
12 866 919 |
0 |
12 866 919 |
52 794 997 |
19.6 |
4 000 000 |
Jan 99–Dec 99 |
|
Sudan |
198 430 939 |
43 125 363 |
0 |
43 125 363 |
155 305 576 |
21.7 |
2 367 200 |
Jan 99–Dec 99 |
|
Total |
697 322 694 |
193 740 921 |
0 |
193 740 921 |
515 283 064 |
26.1 |
11 073 802 |
– |
|
Newly independent States and the Middle East |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Tajikistan |
24 799 910 |
990 465 |
0 |
990 465 |
23 809 445 |
4.0 |
1 300 000 |
Jan 99–Dec 99 |
|
Total |
24 799 910 |
990 465 |
0 |
990 465 |
23 809 445 |
4.0 |
1 300 000 |
– |
|
Asia, Europe and Latin America |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Afghanistan |
|
112 963 742 |
0 |
11 631 427 |
101 332 315 |
10.3 |
Countrywide |
Jan 99–Dec 99 |
|
Democratic People’s Republic of Korea |
|
292 077 588 |
0 |
43 735 496 |
248 342 092 |
15.0 |
8 044 000 |
Jan 99–Dec 99 |
|
Former Yugoslaviad |
|
|
|
316 050 635 |
310 618 580 |
50.5 |
2 950 000 |
Jan 99–Dec 99 |
|
Total |
1 031 038 072 |
340 635 500 |
30 782 058 |
371 417 558 |
660 292 987 |
36.0 |
10 994 000 |
– |
|
Grand total |
1 753 160 676 |
535 366 886 |
30 782 058 |
566 148 944 |
1 199 385 496 |
31.6 |
23 367 802 |
– |
|
Kosovo crisis — Donor Alert and Addenda 1 and 2 (d) |
266 601 656 |
– |
– |
0 |
266 601 656 |
0.0 |
950 000 |
Apr 99–Jun 99 |
a Includes
1998 pledges of US$ 10.6 million to WFP which have been made available in 1999.
WFP indicates that this surplus will be carried forward to the next phase of
the operation.
b As one surplus in one project does
not offset the shortfall of another, the shortfall reflects the actual
remaining needs. Please refer to table 2 for details.
c Please note that the total
requirements for and contributions to UNHCR and WFP for country-specific appeal
in the Great Lakes region are reflected in the regional appeal.
d To rationalize the tracking of
contributions for the overall inter-agency humanitarian programme for the
region including the countries of former Yugoslavia and Albania, the urgent
requirements and the funds received for the Kosovo Crisis — Donor Alert and
Addenda 1 and 2 have been reflected in the tracking of the 1999 United Nations
Consolidated Inter-Agency Appeal issued in December 1998. This appeal will be
revised in the near future.
III. Strengthening
the coordination of humanitarian assistance
A. Coordination
in complex emergencies
12. The challenges confronted
in the past year have placed limits on the ability of humanitarian agencies to
respond effectively to humanitarian emergencies. The Emergency Relief
Coordinator and the Inter-Agency Standing Committee have responded by trying to
improve the environment for humanitarian action and by further work to
strengthen coordination mechanisms.
1. Improving
the environment for humanitarian action
13. There are a number of ways
in which humanitarian agencies have sought to improve the environment for
humanitarian action. These include: negotiation with parties to conflicts over
issues of access and security; reinforcement of the principles of humanitarian
action; strengthening of the legal framework; and advocacy with the Security
Council and other bodies.
14. Effective negotiation,
based on humanitarian principles, is intended to ensure that all parties to
conflicts understand and implement their responsibility for the basic welfare
of the civilian population in the areas they control. Such negotiations are
carried out by humanitarian coordinators, or when required by senior
humanitarian officials dispatched from Headquarters. When appropriate, political
representatives of the Secretary-General may assist the humanitarian
coordinator with the negotiations, but it is essential that the distinction
between humanitarian negotiations for access and security, and negotiations on
a political settlement of the conflict, is strictly maintained.
15. Negotiations can be
facilitated if there is an acceptance among all parties — government, non-State
actors and humanitarian organizations — of a set of principles of engagement
which apply to the humanitarian operation. In some countries agreements about
these principles have taken the form of a code of conduct drawn up by
humanitarian organizations to describe their method of operation, which may
then be formally endorsed by the Government and other parties to the conflict.
The aim is to obtain unimpeded access to those in need on the basis of a
recognition of the neutrality, impartiality and independence of the
humanitarian operation. A recent example of this approach is the development of
“principles of engagement” for humanitarian operations in the Democratic
Republic of the Congo by the United Nations, the European Community
Humanitarian Office and a number of non-governmental organizations, which was
accepted by both the Government in Kinshasa and the opposition, as a
precondition for humanitarian aid. This approach built on earlier experiences
in Afghanistan, Liberia, Sierra Leone and the Sudan. Those efforts reveal the
need for continual dialogue to promote application of the “principles of
engagement”.
16. Effective negotiations with
parties to conflict can result in a number of opportunities to reach affected
populations, including the creation of secure humanitarian corridors and
authorization of relief flights. Negotiations with all parties to a conflict for
a temporary humanitarian ceasefire to permit the immunization of children have
also proved effective in promoting health care objectives.
17. The environment for
humanitarian action can also be improved through increased respect for,
adherence to and application of international laws and norms relating to the
rights of civilians. The guiding principles on internal displacement, presented
to the Commission on Human Rights in 1998 (E/CN.4/1998/53/Add.2), have quickly
begun to gain authority as an international standard. The Representative of the
Secretary-General for Internally Displaced Persons and the United Nations
agencies have been actively disseminating the principles. They have also
organized together with international organizations and non-governmental
organizations, regional meetings to discuss their application in the field. The
Inter-American Commission on Human Rights of the Organization of American
States (OAS) welcomed the principles and has begun applying them in field
missions. The Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) has
disseminated the principles among its member States. The Organization of
African Unity (OAU) is scheduled to discuss the guiding principles at a meeting
of its Commission on Refugees. However, in spite of these positive
developments, some Governments remain reluctant to apply internationally
recognized norms with regard to the internally displaced.
18. Strengthening the
protection of civilians in conflict must be supported by effective advocacy and
a solid legal framework. In this year of the fiftieth anniversary of the Geneva
Conventions, the focus has been on three parallel approaches: promoting respect
for existing international humanitarian law; promoting the establishment of the
International Criminal Court; and engaging the Security Council in efforts to
identify innovative ways in which the Council, acting within its mandate, can
strengthen its capacity to ensure the protection of civilians in conflict.
19. A functioning system of
international justice capable of prosecuting individuals suspected of genocide,
crimes against humanity and war crimes can help to improve the environment for
humanitarian action, both by deterring those considering incitement to genocide
or ethnic cleansing, and by providing redress for the victims. On 31 May
1999, the Inter-Agency Standing Committee endorsed a statement emphasizing the
importance of an effective and independent International Criminal Court and
urging member States to ratify the statute.
20. The International Committee
of the Red Cross (ICRC) is running a major international campaign under the
slogan “Even wars have limits”. This reflects the importance of constant
dissemination work in all parts of the world to promote knowledge of the
principles of international humanitarian law. The United Nations Children’s
Fund (UNICEF), in collaboration with the Office of the United Nations High
Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and ICRC, has initiated a substantial
capacity-building effort for staff and partners in the area of humanitarian law
and principles.
21. In January 1999, the
President of the Security Council invited the Emergency Relief Coordinator to
brief the Council on promoting peace and security: humanitarian activities
relevant to the Security Council. In February, the President invited UNICEF,
the Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Children and Armed
Conflict, and ICRC to speak on the protection of civilians in armed conflict.
These events followed a presentation to the Security Council by the United
Nations High Commissioner for Refugees in November 1998 focusing on security
problems impeding the work of UNHCR and other agencies. The ensuing
presidential statement of 12 February 1999 requested the Secretary-General, in
consultation with IASC, to present a report on the protection of civilians to
the Security Council in September 1999.
2. Enhancing
humanitarian response through effective coordination
22. Work on strengthening the
systems for field coordination has been a major priority for IASC during 1998,
as stipulated in the Council’s Agreed Conclusions of 1998. This work includes
effective preparedness and multisectoral planning for emergencies; efforts to
promote follow-up through strategic monitoring and evaluation; and specific
efforts to improve the coordination of responses to internally displaced person
situations.
23. Early warning and preparedness.
The primary purpose of humanitarian early warning is to ensure quick and
effective humanitarian response to new emergencies. There has been increased
focus on pre-emergency contingency planning and other preparedness measures by
the United Nations agencies in recent years, especially in response to the
lessons learned from the 1994 Rwanda emergency. However, those efforts remain
too ad hoc and unsystematic in nature and, in some cases, have been seen as
little more than the creation of a planning document. Several steps are needed
to address this problem. The United Nations humanitarian agencies need to
ensure that such planning and preparedness measures are a regular feature of
their pre-emergency functions, and that they are undertaken as a continuous
process that responds dynamically to changing circumstances. Donor Governments
need to advocate more forcefully for such actions to be undertaken, and to
provide the significant resources that such preparedness measures can entail.
The Governments in countries where such efforts are undertaken need to
recognize more fully their non-political, humanitarian nature and to support
appropriate actions of this type.
24. Strategic planning,
including strengthening of the consolidated appeal process. A number of
initiatives intended to develop strategic approaches to the planning of
humanitarian interventions are described in section IV. Significant progress
has been made in strengthening the consolidated appeal process, particularly by
enhancing the capacity of country teams to manage and implement the process,
through training and workshops. At the request of donor Governments, the
consolidated appeals for 1999 were launched simultaneously in December 1998,
the first ever joint launch.
25. Less progress has been made
on efforts to translate the consolidated appeal processes and their related
common humanitarian action plans into more effective prioritization of
programmes. Part of the difficulty has been with the disjuncture between the
timing of the preparation of the process and agency planning cycles. This is
being addressed during 1999 by an early start to the appeal process planning
cycle. In the context of serious constraints on financial resources, real
prioritization of programmes within agreed common objectives will be a major
focus for the Inter-Agency Standing Committee in 1999.
26. A corollary of effective
strategic planning is the development of systems for strategic monitoring, that
is for monitoring the effectiveness of coordination, the implementation of
common objectives, and the impact of gaps in programmes, including through
shortfalls in funding. A proposal for a strategic monitoring unit in
Afghanistan is now under consideration. A key objective of the Inter-Agency
Standing Committee during 1999 and beyond is to build on improvements in the
consolidated appeal process, including through the development of effective
monitoring systems.
27. Strengthening of the
field presence. Central to the process of strengthening field coordination
is work done to strengthen the capacity of humanitarian coordinators. In many
cases, resident coordinators are asked to assume humanitarian coordinator
functions. The Emergency Relief Coordinator has worked closely with the UNDP
Administrator to ensure that there is early consultation on the selection of
resident coordinators for countries where the two functions are already
combined, as well as for countries where there exists a serious risk of a
humanitarian emergency. The Emergency Relief Coordinator has also encouraged
all operational agencies to nominate candidates with prior humanitarian
experience to participate in the competency assessment exercise for resident
coordinators, and thereby to enrich the roster of candidates. In addition,
United Nations Volunteers continue to support humanitarian agencies and
humanitarian coordination structures in several countries.
28. A joint consultation with
resident and humanitarian coordinators held in Geneva in December 1998 provided
an opportunity for sharing lessons learned and experiences, especially
regarding the need for strategic planning of assistance interventions. Such
consultations will be repeated regularly, in collaboration with IASC members,
in order to strengthen the links between headquarters and field coordination
personnel.
29. Assistance and
protection for internally displaced persons. Effective coordination is of
particular importance in designing the inter-agency response to the needs of
internally displaced persons. Since there is no single international lead
agency responsible for helping Governments to provide assistance and protection
to internally displaced persons, the Secretary-General, as part of his reform
programme, has called for the Emergency Relief Coordinator to ensure that gaps
in assistance and protection are addressed. A number of initiatives have been
launched to facilitate this task and to assist agency personnel in the field to
design effective programmes for internally displaced persons.
30. As a first step, a review
of the division of responsibilities in all internally displaced person
situations is being undertaken. An IASC policy paper on protection of
internally displaced persons, based on joint work by the Representative of the
Secretary-General for Internally Displaced Persons, the Office of the United
Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and the Office for the Coordination
of Humanitarian Affairs is being finalized, setting out the competencies and mandates
of the different agencies, identifying a number of ways to ensure that
protection responsibilities are discharged effectively and putting in place a
system which routinely and rapidly assigns responsibilities in particular
situations. This will be done by structured interaction between resident
coordinators and their country teams with the Emergency Relief Coordinator and
IASC, using a checklist approach, to enable the resident coordinator to make a
clear recommendation to IASC. To facilitate these efforts, a senior adviser to
the Emergency Relief Coordinator has been appointed and IASC members have been
requested to appoint senior focal points for internally displaced persons
within their organizations. A compendium of good field practice has also been
prepared for distribution to humanitarian workers and increased efforts are
under way in the field of information, including the development of a global
internally displaced persons database, placing country profiles on the
Internet, data collection from over 50 countries and the establishment of
procedures for systematic data collection at the field level. An inter-agency
training module on internal displacement for field personnel will be developed
in 1999.
B. Coordination
in natural disasters
31. While the Governments of
countries affected by natural disasters bear the ultimate responsibility for
bringing relief to the distressed population, the response of the humanitarian
system of the international community to such disasters has been gaining in
dimension and importance. According to statistics of the Office for the
Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, contributions made by the international
community for relief assistance to the survivors of natural disasters amounted
to over US$ 1 billion in 1998 — representing an increase of over
300 per cent from 1997. In 1998, the largest emergency relief operation ever
undertaken by the World Food Programme (WFP), that of assisting over 19 million
people, was implemented following the Bangladesh floods. The devastating impact
of the 1998 disasters has also provided sufficient evidence that natural
disasters should be considered on a par with complex emergencies in terms of
their impact on people, environment and their long-lasting economic
consequences.
32. Efforts to coordinate the
response of the United Nations system to natural disasters have included the
launching of three major United Nations inter-agency appeals in the context of
natural disasters (hurricane Mitch and the Bangladesh and China floods). A
total of 17 United Nations disaster assessment and coordination teams were
fielded during the year, situation reports on over 60 natural disasters were
disseminated, 28 international appeals were launched, and over US$ 1 billion in
response aid was recorded. The fact that reports were regularly posted on the
Web site Reliefweb, together with details on financial tracking, added
considerably to the overall information management on natural disasters.
Efforts have also been undertaken with the United Nations Development Programme
(UNDP) to strengthen the responsiveness of in-country coordination systems. To
this end, a joint letter from the UNDP Administrator and the Emergency Relief
Coordinator was sent to resident coordinators, underlining their responsibility
for humanitarian coordination in matters relating to natural disasters.
33. The Office for the
Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs allocates priority status to response
preparedness in its work programme. Relevant activities include international
disaster management workshops, such as the workshop organized jointly with UNDP
and held in Beijing in June 1999, regional workshops and seminars addressing
improved use and coordination of military and civil defence assets, the
development of contingency plans, and the strengthening of United Nations
disaster assessment and coordination team membership in disaster-prone regions.
A new initiative is the establishment of regional disaster response
coordination units in Asia, Latin America and the South Pacific to assist in
awareness-raising, advocacy and coordination of natural disaster preparedness
and response activities. In addition, following the recommendations of an
evaluation study on the response of the United Nations system to the
Afghanistan earthquakes, humanitarian agencies held a disaster response
workshop in Dushanbe.
34. International disaster
response mechanisms have proven their worth in the wake of many of the natural
disasters that have occurred during the past 12 months. However, evaluations
drew attention to aspects of the international response system which need
strengthening. Areas requiring improvement are response preparedness and
capacity-building, access to resources for emergency relief, and more effective
bridging of the gap between emergency relief and early recovery (see sect. IV).
A recently established inter-agency reference group on natural disasters is
working on a set of recommendations on the strengthening of the mechanisms of
response to natural disasters of Inter-Agency Standing Committee members, at
both headquarters and field levels; the recommendations will be presented to
the Inter-Agency Standing Committee Working Group. What emerges from these and
other similar initiatives is the recognition that strengthening the
coordination of international response to natural disasters and environmental
emergencies requires a continuing dialogue between major actors in all
disasters, starting with the Governments of disaster-prone countries
themselves. Harnessing national and international resources in order to deliver
timely and effective assistance to the victims requires a response-preparedness
approach where United Nations resident coordinators, under the authority of the
Emergency Relief Coordinator, play a pivotal role in supporting national
Governments.
35. In order to improve the
collaborative links between the donor community and disaster-prone countries,
the International Emergency Response Consultative Mechanism has been
established. Policy makers, emergency managers, practitioners in the field and
providers of military and civil defence assets come together in this forum to
discuss, among other issues, the timely mobilization of national assets in case
of disasters. The Mechanism also promotes the development of best practices for
response and coordination. A similar initiative is the European Coordination
Programme, which comprises the 44 Partnership for Peace nations, regional
intergovernmental organizations, the United Nations system and the Red Cross
movement, and looks at key policy issues in the context of coordination and
delivery of humanitarian assistance.
36. Years after the Chernobyl
disaster, the long-term consequences continue to call for assistance by the
international community. Problems requiring special attention include: health
effects, where there is a confirmed increase in the incidence of thyroid
cancer, in particular, in those who were children at the time of the accident;
environmental problems, such as the reuse of contaminated forests, contaminated
food and water pollution; psychological impact on the population; and social
and economic rehabilitation of the affected areas. The approach taken in the
United Nations appeal for international cooperation on Chernobyl, which the
Council may wish to endorse, is to strengthen the national institutions in
Belarus, the Russian Federation and Ukraine by developing local skills to
address the long-term consequences of the disaster. With regard to the nuclear
disaster in Semipalatinsk, the Government of Japan, in cooperation with the
Government of Kazakhstan and UNDP, will host an international conference in
September 1999 with particular focus on medical aspects.
37. The General Assembly, in
its resolution 38/202 of 20 December 1983 on strengthening of the capacity
of the United Nations system to respond to natural disasters and other disaster
situations, authorized the Secretary-General to permit the former Office of the
United Nations Disaster Relief Coordinator to respond to requests for emergency
disaster assistance up to a total of $600,000 in any one year, with a normal
ceiling of $50,000 per country in the case of any one disaster, within existing
resources as far as possible. In 1998, there were 22 natural disasters, for
which grants between $10,000 and $50,000 were made, totalling $580,000. In
January 1999 alone, grants of $110,000 were made for four natural disasters. In
view of the experience gained over the years and the repeated occurrence of
natural disasters requiring timely emergency response, the Secretary-General
has proposed, in the context of his proposed programme budget for the biennium
2000–2001 (A/54/6 (Sect. 25)), a $300,000 increase, from $1,200,000 to
$1,500,000, for the biennium. The proposed increase of $300,000, the only one
over the course of 15 years, would provide a firm basis for meeting some of the
most pressing needs of populations affected by disasters and would enable the
Secretariat to respond to at least 30 disaster situations per biennium. The
Council may wish to express its support for the proposal.
38. Notwithstanding these
efforts, the immediate availability of cash resources for life-saving and
life-sustaining assistance to survivors continues to be a major concern. The
Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs has established a reserve
fund for immediate cash disbursement under the United Nations Trust Fund for
Disaster Relief Assistance, currently supported by four donors. The donor
community is urged to come forward with additional voluntary contributions to
this reserve, as recommended in the 1998 humanitarian affairs segment of the Economic and Social Council.2
C. Policy
coordination through the Inter‑Agency Standing Committee and the
Executive Committee on Humanitarian Affairs
39. The Inter-Agency Standing
Committee continues to be the principal inter-agency policy coordination,
consultation and decision-making forum for addressing humanitarian issues and
concerns. The admission of the World Bank into the membership of the Committee
in March 1999 further strengthens this forum.
40. In October 1998, the
Standing Committee issued its comprehensive recommendations related to the
Review of the Capacity of the United Nations System for Humanitarian
Assistance.4 These
recommendations are already being used to guide the selection of appropriate
coordination arrangements at the field level. Through its Working Group, the
Committee has broadened the consultative process on policy issues by delegating
to individual members lead responsibility for the work on specific issues in
sub-working or reference groups. It now has sub-working and reference groups
focusing on natural disasters, improving the consolidated appeal process, human
rights/humanitarian action, internally displaced persons, gender and humanitarian
response, training, small arms, assistance to countries of the Commonwealth of
Independent States, post- conflict reintegration and millennium initiatives. At
each of the meetings of the Working Group, the Inter-Agency Standing Committee
now routinely reviews a specific country operation. The analysis of a country
situation in the presence of the resident/humanitarian coordinator helps to
build a common understanding between agency headquarters and country teams.
41. Humanitarian organizations
need to understand clearly the complex environment in which they work. This
challenge is reflected in the diversity of the policy issues faced by the
Committee. Three issues warrant particular attention in 1999, namely, those
related to human rights, gender and issues affecting children.
42. Human rights.
Recognizing that systematic abuses of human rights are often the cause of
humanitarian crises, the Standing Committee has initiated work to define more
clearly the interrelationships between human rights and humanitarian action.
This work has two parts: enhancing the awareness among humanitarian workers of
the human rights environment in which they work and of the ways in which their
work can help to secure basic rights; and increasing the understanding within
the human rights community of the positive contribution which humanitarian
action can play in the promotion and protection of human rights.
43. Gender. Following
the discussion on gender at the 1998 humanitarian affairs segment of the
Economic and Social Council, an Inter-Agency Standing Committee Sub-Working
Group on Gender and Humanitarian Response was established to recommend policy
on how to ensure that humanitarian operations routinely address issues related
to gender. Its work has resulted in the adoption of a policy statement by the
Standing Committee, which the Council may wish to endorse. The lack of existing
tools for gender analysis and impact assessment in emergencies was recognized
as an important constraint to the implementation of that policy. The
Sub-Working Group on Gender and Humanitarian Response has therefore initiated
the development of guidelines for integrating gender analysis into emergency
programming. As a first step, an inter-agency “Gender Needs Assessment and
Impact Assessment Methodology” is in the process of being developed.
44. Children. Despite
the attention given in recent years to children in situations of armed
conflict, manifested in the Machel report on the impact of armed conflict on
children (A/51/306) and the appointment of a Special Representative of the
Secretary-General for Children and Armed Conflict, there is still a lack of
inter-agency consultation and coordination in this regard, both at the country
and headquarters levels, needs to be strengthened. Violations of children’s
rights, as defined in the Convention on the Rights of the Child, require
consistent monitoring and a well-coordinated response. A main objective of
humanitarian assistance must be to create conditions which prevent children and
youth from falling below a minimum standard for all aspects of their
development. A challenge on the eve of the tenth anniversary of the Convention
on the Rights of the Child is to strengthen existing inter-agency mechanisms
and partnerships within the international community in terms of action on
behalf of children affected by armed conflict. Efforts to end the practice of
recruiting and using children as soldiers have continued. This issue requires a
three-pronged approach: raising the legal age limit for recruitment; mobilizing
an international political campaign of pressure on the warring parties on the
ground; and addressing in a comprehensive manner the underlying socio-economic
and political factors facilitating recruitment.
45. The Executive Committee on
Humanitarian Affairs continues to provide, at the level of the principals, an
opportunity to enhance interaction and complementarity on issues that have
strong security, peacekeeping and political implications for humanitarian
assistance. Recent country issues on the Executive Committee’s agenda include
the determination of appropriate United Nations arrangements in Angola after
the departure of the United Nations Observer Mission in Angola and relations
with regional peacekeeping forces in West Africa.
D. Administrative
matters
46. The budget of the Office
for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs for the biennium 1998–1999
covering core activities and projects, field coordination units, and other
requirements, is projected at US$ 161.2 million, of which $17.6 million are
allocated from the regular budget and $143.6 million from extrabudgetary
resources. In the context of the proposed programme budget for the biennium
2000–2001, the Secretary-General gave priority to the Office and recommended a
growth of 9.6 per cent, with a view to improving the balance between its
regular budget and extrabudgetary resources. Thus, in the coming biennium, the
regular budget share of the Office’s overall resources would increase to 12.5
per cent, while its extrabudgetary resources will constitute 87.5 per cent, as
compared to 10.9 per cent and 89.1 per cent, respectively, in the biennium
1998–1999.
47. Donor support will still be
critical for the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs,
particularly in addressing the requirements of field coordination units which
have been consistently underfunded; efforts should continue to secure a viable
and sustainable financial base for the Office, which is working closely with
interested Member States to find ways of providing its staff at Headquarters
and in the field with contracts of at least one year’s duration, including the
possibility of establishing a general reserve fund.
48. The General Assembly, in
its resolution 46/182, decided that special emergency rules and procedures
should be developed by the United Nations to enable all organizations to
disburse quickly emergency funds and to procure emergency supplies and
equipment as well as to recruit emergency staff. The need for these special
administrative procedures was reaffirmed by the Assembly and by the Economic
and Social Council in its humanitarian affairs segment, held in July 1988.
49. In order to facilitate
rapid responses to emergencies, the Emergency Relief Coordinator has been
delegated authority by the Controller to accept contributions, subject to the
use of a standard funding agreement and to authorize expenditures in respect of
trust funds of the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs used for
the funding of emergencies.
50. Discussions continue with
the Office for Human Resources Management to grant the Office for the
Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs a delegation of authority to recruit
emergency field staff under the 200 and 300 series of the Staff Rules and
Regulations of the United Nations, to ensure rapid recruitment and deployment
of field staff in emergency situations.
51. As regards procurement,
agreement has been reached for the Emergency Relief Coordinator to utilize UNDP
field capacity for local procurement to meet rapid response requirements. For
items and services which cannot be procured or secured by UNDP locally, or
where use of existing agency expertise, capacity and resources are not an
option, the Emergency Relief Coordinator will work towards expediting emergency
procurement from the Central Administrative Services of the United Nations
Office at Geneva, under an agreed mechanism providing for prompt backstopping
of procurement activities during emergencies.
Central Emergency Revolving Fund
52. In recent years, requests
for utilization of the Central Emergency Revolving Fund have declined. In 1998,
only five advances were requested, amounting to US$ 6.3 million; in
the first five months of 1999, five advances were granted, representing US$ 2.5
million. Certain factors have contributed to the decline in the use of the
Fund. Individual organizations have increased their own internal emergency
reserves and have resorted to its use only when the needs exceed their own
emergency funds. Some agencies are reluctant to borrow from the Fund for fear
of not being able to repay the balance. As provided for in resolution 46/182,
utilization of the Fund has been limited to the initial phase of an emergency.
Despite the crisis in the Balkans, only one agency has requested an advance
from the Fund to address that situation.
53. At the same time, there is
a growing demand to address a number of critical humanitarian requirements
which have consistently been underfunded, as well as to support new field
coordination structures and field security arrangements. There has also been an
increase in requests for assistance to support protracted emergencies. The
magnitude and duration of natural disasters in 1998 and their devastating
impact, particularly on developing countries, have underscored the necessity of
an appropriate funding mechanism to ensure a rapid response to the most
pressing needs of disaster-affected populations. While the Fund was designed as
a cash-flow mechanism to ensure a rapid response to requests for assistance in
complex emergencies, there is no explicit provision in its operational
guidelines on its utilization for natural disasters.
54. In the light of the above,
the Secretary-General is undertaking a review of the Revolving Fund mechanism,
with a view to rendering it more appropriate for use by the United Nations
humanitarian family. To that end, detailed proposals for changes to the
functioning of the Fund will be presented to the General Assembly at its
fifty-fourth session as an addendum to the present report.
IV. International
cooperation and coordination in the response to the humanitarian emergencies,
particularly in the transition from relief to rehabilitation, reconstruction
and development
55. International aid agencies,
including both relief and development actors, increasingly recognize the need
for a comprehensive approach to crises, as called for by the General Assembly
in its resolution 53/192 of 15 December 1998. In exploring the development of
comprehensive approaches, a number of common themes emerge, irrespective of
whether the context is conflict or disaster. They include the need for early
joint planning and prioritization, including between United Nations and
non-United Nations agencies, the central role of capacity-building, the
importance of a clearly agreed division of labour in relief efforts through
inter-agency collaboration and the inflexible and discretionary nature of
existing financing systems for transitional programming. In addition,
humanitarian agencies are beginning to recognize that it is part of their
responsibility to ensure that the relief programmes which they implement pave
the way for sustainable development and do not create situations of dependency
on external aid which will make recovery more difficult.
A. Transitions
in natural disasters
56. The scope of disasters such
as the floods in Bangladesh and in China, which affected one fourth and one
fifth of their respective total populations, and hurricane Mitch in Central
America, revealed multiple underlying causes and once again pointed to the need
for comprehensive disaster-reduction strategies. At the same time, the
large-scale relief operations staged to cope with these calamities vividly
demonstrated the imperativeness of setting up effective response mechanisms to
address disaster situations which are beyond the population’s coping capacity.
Finally, the aftermath of hurricane Mitch highlighted the challenges in
financing and implementing timely and comprehensive recovery programmes and
thereby avoiding the need for extended relief assistance.
57. The transition phase in the
aftermath of a natural disaster can be identified as the period during which
external relief support to save and sustain lives begins to be phased out,
while local coping capacities, coupled with recovery programmes of
reconstruction and rehabilitation, begins to create the conditions leading to
sustainable recovery. Where recovery efforts are delayed, a gap in assistance
to affected communities may result. In such situations, agencies are often
obliged to continue to provide humanitarian assistance for an extended period
to populations not yet able to sustain themselves.
58. In this context, the
aftermath of hurricane Mitch provided opportunities for innovative attempts to
establish links between the various phases of international assistance. An
inter-agency working group convened the United Nations resident coordinators
and the disaster management teams of the affected countries to prepare a United
Nations inter-agency transitional appeal for relief and immediate
rehabilitation to cover needs during the period from December 1998 to May 1999.
The transitional appeal attempted to bridge the gap between the delivery of
immediate relief assistance and the disbursement of funds for reconstruction.
It was regularly updated and posted on the Internet and a mid-term meeting with
donors was held to assess response and identify new priorities. An innovative
approach, the transitional appeal did not receive the financial support
required.
59. To assess the strengths and
weaknesses of these efforts, a joint OCHA-UNDP-UNICEF and World Health
Organization/Pan American Health Organization (WHO/PAHO) Disaster Response and
Recovery Mission was undertaken in all countries affected by hurricane Mitch.
The Mission assessed United Nations system coordination, made recommendations
for improved preparedness and response capacities and presented proposals for
ensuring the integration of disaster reduction components into the recovery
process and future development planning.
60. The exercise highlighted
several reasons why the transitional phase after some natural disasters can be
excessively long and characterized by a number of gaps. Relief agencies’
planning is often too focused on immediate needs, and does not take into
account the needs of the transition phase. Funding for longer-term programmes
may sometimes be available, provided that adequate proposals are submitted to
donors early enough. Equally, under certain conditions, funds for emergency can
be used for developmental activities. However, donor funding mechanisms are far
from optimal for responding to the needs of the transition phase. The resources
component of the gap seems to be owing in great part to the fact that there are
completely separate mechanisms (including budget lines and ministries
responsible for their management) for the funding of relief versus
rehabilitation activities. The release of funds for rehabilitation is usually
too late and subject to serious political, procedural and administrative
constraints. In affected countries, capacities for immediate relief often exist
within the public administration at the central and local levels and in civil
society. As the needs shift from emergency to longer term, the lack of local
capacities is felt dramatically and contributes to widening the gap.
61. In countries where
large-scale disasters are infrequent, civil society and national authorities
generally lack the experience, capacity and resources to move rapidly into
implementing comprehensive recovery efforts. In addition, at the national
level, responsibility for relief and recovery action is often found in
different authorities and institutions. Assessment data and programme
priorities, as well as human and financial resource capacities, may differ
significantly between relief and development actors and mechanisms to
facilitate collaborative efforts may not be well established. Finally, the
scope and range of needs for international assistance and national efforts to
restore services and productive capacity are significantly greater than those
necessary to support immediate life-saving efforts. They also require a much
larger and longer-term financial and political commitment.
62. More effective transitions
from relief to recovery require an understanding of the above-mentioned issues
and will necessarily include addressing the challenges set out below.
63. Planning. In the
aftermath of a disaster, Governments and assistance agencies should remember
that it is important to plan early for reconstruction. The actual
reconstruction inevitably takes time, but early planning is essential in a
number of respects and could help to partly overcome the delay in funding from
donors and lending institutions. The positive experience of the agencies that
are present before, during and after the transition phase (i.e. those with a
dual, development and relief mandate, such as UNICEF and WFP) should be
capitalized upon. It is increasingly recognized that essential developmental
activities, such as primary school education and reproductive health measures,
need to be continued, if at all feasible, throughout the crisis. The aim should
be to rebuild people’s livelihoods in the shortest possible time; this should,
for instance, include early access to microcredit schemes.
64. Local involvement and
capacity-building. Within the framework of disaster preparedness
programmes, it is important to give attention to the building of local
capacities for dealing with the transition and rehabilitation phases. Agencies
should assist in the design and implementation of rehabilitation programmes in
response to the needs and priorities as perceived by the local communities at
the district and municipality levels.
65. Financing. It is
essential that the process of developing a comprehensive “package” on the part
of the lending institutions (the World Bank, the regional development banks and
the largest donors) is revitalized. It is widely accepted that many of the
problems experienced during the transition phase are due to the lack of such a
comprehensive strategy. Donor countries should make every effort to harmonize
the procedures for the release of both emergency and reconstruction funds.
Funds for reconstruction should be made available (or at least pledged)
substantially sooner and with significantly less onerous procedures than is
currently the case. Donor countries should also explore possibilities of
establishing funding mechanisms (such as trust funds) specifically tailored to
rehabilitation needs.
66. In all of these efforts,
the United Nations has a potentially important role to play in fostering the
creation of a common platform, including affected countries, lending
institutions, donor Governments and relief and development agencies. The
experience of the transitional appeal following hurricane Mitch is a step in
the right direction, but it will be essential to build on that example. The
Council may wish to endorse the use of this approach in other situations and to
encourage donor support.
B. Transitions
in complex emergencies
67. The issue of the transition
from relief to development in complex crises has been a long-standing policy challenge
for humanitarian agencies. In particular, as acknowledged in the
Secretary-General’s report to the Council of 1998 (A/53/139–E/1998/67),
humanitarian organizations attempted for some years to implement the concept of
the relief-to-development continuum, without significant breakthroughs.
68. Two years into the process
of reform of the United Nations system, there are new structures and tools
available which, if applied in a collaborative spirit, can lead to improved
performance on transition issues. The central challenge for the United Nations
is to make effective use of those structures and tools and to develop strong
and flexible linkages between them. To that end, a number of initiatives have
been undertaken to build bridges between the United Nations core missions
(peace and security, humanitarian, development and human rights). The status of
work in this area is outlined below, in five sections that consider (a)
contextual issues; (b) strategic coordination for peace-building; (c) frameworks
and tools; (d) thematic issues relating to the gap between relief and
development; and (e) financial issues.
1. Contextual
issues
69. Although the question of
the transition from relief to development is normally associated with the
post-conflict phase of crises, there are at least four types of settings,
broadly conceived, in which the United Nations must address the linkages
between relief activities and development:
(a) Contexts in which a comprehensive peace
agreement has been reached, bringing to an end war between competing factions,
although conditions may still be unstable;
(b) Contexts in which war has ended as a
result of victory by one party over another;
(c) Long-running wars, in which conflict in
certain regions coexists with relative stability in other parts of the country;
(d) Countries that are largely in normal
development mode, but are experiencing pockets of instability or conflict.
In each of these types of cases, a different mix of reconstruction and
rehabilitation activities will be possible at different times. Humanitarian
organizations have learned that, even in the midst of active conflict, except
in its most acute phases, it is possible and desirable to commence some limited
rehabilitation and reconstruction activities and perform some developmental
tasks, including primary education and immunization. Taking on such tasks, even
in the midst of conflict, can substantially reduce both long and short-term
vulnerability.
70. Policy on
relief-development linkages must be based on a realistic assessment of the
linkages between assistance policy, stabilization and progress towards
sustained peace. The early launch of reconstruction and development activities
in a post-conflict environment can complement and underpin political
stabilization and the implementation of peace agreements. In situations of
long-running, low-intensity conflict, early introduction of rehabilitation and
community development activities can help to create conditions conducive to
peace settlements — a concept recognized by WFP when introducing a new
programme category, entitled “protracted relief and recovery operations”.
However, political settlements between warring parties will rarely stand or
fall on assistance issues alone, nor will an effective relief-development
transition by itself bring stability to a political conflict. Political and
economic factors such as the popular support given to a peace agreement, the
economic structure of the conflict environment, and the political sympathies of
the leaders of neighbouring countries, can often exert a more critical
influence over the success or failure of a particular peace process. Thus, for
example, prolonged and extensive efforts to move from emergency relief to
reconstruction in Angola could not avert the collapse of the peace process that
occurred in that country in 1998.
71. Effective transitions from
relief to development both contribute to and are ultimately dependent on the
transition from war to peace. As a result, the transition process is generally
fragile, complex, and fraught with obstacles. Reversals are common, as is a
certain degree of disjointedness, as progress made in one sector may not be
matched by progress in another. This must be anticipated by undertaking
contingency planning for sudden reversals and unexpected opportunities.
2. Strategic
coordination for peace-building
72. With all types of cases,
the essential element of coherent relief-development transitions is the use of
a common framework for the elaboration of strategy for peace-building,
including common goals and objectives, articulation of priorities and a clear
division of labour. Assistance strategy should be closely aligned with
strategies for peacemaking, peace-building and the promotion of human rights,
to ensure that all activities are mutually reinforcing. In contexts where peace
negotiations are under way, the early introduction of humanitarian concerns and
reconstruction plans into the peace process — including issues relating to
particularly vulnerable groups such as children, internally displaced persons,
and women — can help to increase the likelihood of effective transition. Where
a multidisciplinary peacekeeping operation has been deployed, the capacity to
ensure such coordination has been reinforced by the Secretary-General’s
directive that the Special Representative of the Secretary-General should have
clear authority over all United Nations entities in the field.
73. The United Nations already
has substantial experience in providing assistance in post-conflict situations
characterized by comprehensive peace agreements, as well as in post-conflict
situations characterized by one party coming to power. One of the central
lessons learned from these cases is that relief-development transitions cannot
wait until peace has arrived; planning has to begin while conflict is still
ongoing. Early planning reduces the lead time before mainstream development
institutions can come on line, and reduces the risk of missing the brief
opportunity in which recovery efforts must take hold. Collaborative efforts for
peace-building have been undertaken in a number of countries with a mixed
record of results. In 1998, some United Nations country teams developed
strategic plans for transition, inter alia, in Burundi, Afghanistan and
Georgia.
74. The United Nations country
team in Burundi, under the leadership of the Resident Coordinator, developed a
strategic plan for the United Nations programme. Based on an analysis that the
peace process in Burundi was starting to develop positive momentum, the team
began to lay the foundations for a transition to reconstruction and development
in the medium term. First, two key objectives were identified: reducing
dependence on humanitarian assistance; and enhancing the rule of law. With
these two objectives in view, the team laid out a programme of engagement in
community development activities in those regions and sectors where there was a
sufficient degree of stability. Acting collectively, United Nations assistance
agencies and their political and human rights partners can contribute to
stabilization and increase the likelihood of a sustainable peace. In Burundi
the fact that the Resident Coordinator was also the Humanitarian Coordinator,
was an advantage and facilitated planning that placed humanitarian programmes
in their wider context.
75. In Georgia, the country
team, under the overall authority of the Special Representative of the
Secretary-General, put in place an innovative programme with two important
transitional dimensions. First is the Working Group on Enhancing Capacities for
Self-Sufficiency, which is focused on moving people out of emergency aid
programmes into those promoting self-sufficiency. Second is a UNDP-led
programme on conflict resolution and rehabilitation in South Ossetia, an
integrated response strategy which capitalizes on the potential for the
assistance programme to serve as a focus for confidence-building, and assists
the sides in disengaging from conflictual stances by focusing efforts on
solving technical problems through face-to-face interaction.
76. In Afghanistan, the United
Nations continued to undertake a notable innovation in the realm of strategic
coordination for peace-building — the Afghanistan Strategic Framework. A number
of innovative coordination mechanisms have been put in place, including the
Afghanistan Programming Body, which brings together United Nations agencies,
the United Nations Special Mission in Afghanistan, the World Bank, other
international organizations, non-governmental organizations (both local and
international) and the members of the Afghanistan Support Group (the major
donors). The Body makes programming recommendations to the country team within
the context of agreed priorities. A concerted — and at times controversial —
effort has been made in Afghanistan to ensure that agency programmes are indeed
aligned with agreed priorities. These priorities are set out in a strategic
plan developed in consultation with those responsible for the peace process.
This effort, referred to by the Deputy Secretary-General in the Administrative
Committee on Coordination as a disciplined and demanding form of coordination,
has resulted in unified and coherent action by United Nations agencies.
Although it has been difficult to bring the process to fruition, the
Afghanistan Strategic Framework has been widely recognized as a significant
step forward for the United Nations and its partners.
77. In developing Generic
Guidelines for Strategic Frameworks within the Administrative Committee on
Coordination, it was agreed that strategic frameworks should be implemented
only in a few cases meeting specific conditions. Nevertheless, the basic ideas
behind the Afghanistan Strategic Framework, namely, that the United Nations
efforts and those of the wider international community must take place under a
common policy framework, that the peacemaking, assistance, and human rights
aspects of the United Nations work should be closely aligned, and that
assistance programmes can make a contribution to peace-building, have received
wide acceptance. In April 1999, the Deputy Secretary-General announced that the
strategic framework approach, which would be field-based, would be applied in
Sierra Leone, under the leadership of the Department of Political Affairs. The
Council may wish to encourage all stakeholders to cooperate with this
initiative, in order to make it a success. Equally important for successful
strategic coordination is that the United Nations and other significant actors
join together in common coordination systems. Whereas, during acute crises the
United Nations agencies and their non-governmental organization partners are
often the dominant international players, the same is not true in post‑conflict
cases, when the World Bank, the European Commission, bilateral donors and the
International Monetary Fund, all play major roles. Coordination with this
diverse set of actors remains a major challenge for the United Nations.
3. Frameworks
and tools
78. The United Nations has at
its disposal a number of tools for the management of relief operations and
development programming. In emergencies, the consolidated appeal process (see
also paras. 24–26) serves as the common tool for strategic planning. That process
not only provides a coordinating framework for emergency operations, but also
now routinely incorporates rehabilitation activities. On the development side,
the round-table process, though primarily a fund-raising tool, has also been
used as a planning process in post‑conflict circumstances, for example in
Rwanda. An important innovation is the United Nations Development Assistance
Framework, currently being introduced as part of the United Nations reform
effort. The Framework is grounded on a common country assessment, a tool that
generates inter‑agency assessment, in collaboration with Government, of a
wide range of sectors that comprise normal development planning. Two new
developments, which will have implications for the management of strategic coordination,
are the decision by the Department of Political Affairs to make wider use of
peace-building support offices (currently in use in Liberia and proposed for
Guinea‑Bissau) and the introduction by the World Bank of the
Comprehensive Development Framework.
79. The United Nations agencies
and programmes have worked hard to determine how each can promote durable
solutions for crisis-affected countries. UNICEF’s recently adopted rights‑based
programming provides a framework within which relief, recovery, rehabilitation
and development are programmatically linked. WFP has demonstrated its ability
to move effectively from relief assistance to recovery through its “Protracted
relief and recovery operations”. The Food and Agriculture Organization of the
United Nations (FAO), using its Emergency Prevention System, addresses animal
health needs at local and transboundary levels; and WHO has created a new
Emergency Operations division focused on enhancing the capacities of health
authorities to provide care, even during crises. UNHCR, working with its
collaborating partners to ensure the long‑term security of returning
refugees and those who might otherwise be forced to seek asylum, and to provide
an initial basis for sustainable reintegration, uses quick-impact projects to
inject resources into areas where large numbers of returning refugees may
arrive. UNDP’s Emergency Response Division and target for resource assignment
from the core (TRAC) 1.1.3 financing stream exist to facilitate the inter‑agency
planning process, through the resident coordinator system, in post‑crisis
and post‑conflict countries.
80. In spite of the
availability of these tools, it is widely recognized that (a) they are not yet
being used consistently and to maximum effect and (b) there are few consistent
linkages between them. The cost of this can be considerable. Among the
consequences are inadequate planning, disjointed needs assessment and erratic
resource mobilization.
81. Forging effective and early
links between the regular planning frameworks is a particularly important task.
A major review of policy for recovery by WFP led to the conclusion that it is
critical that recovery and development objectives be initially integrated into
the design of relief operations at a very early stage, so that the relief phase
does not prejudice longer‑term recovery and development or create
dependencies. Emergency rehabilitation efforts have all too often created
infrastructure or programmes that are not sustainable. The dangers of this
happening can be reduced by the early introduction of indicative reconstruction
plans.
82. Different planning
frameworks will be relevant in different contexts. The consolidated appeal
process, in addition to life‑saving activities, is best suited to
covering those rehabilitation activities that can easily be undertaken even
during conflict, especially in the health and social services sector. When the
process has been used as the primary planning and fund-raising tool for
transitional situations, such as in Burundi, Guinea‑Bissau and
Tajikistan, it has met with mixed results. Strategic frameworks are designed
primarily for use in post‑conflict cases where the capacity of the State
to engage in strategic planning has been severely weakened. As the United
Nations Development Assistance Framework comes on line, links between it and
the consolidated appeal process may serve to address reconstruction and early
development needs in some transitional cases. Efforts to enhance linkages were
endorsed by a joint meeting of the Executive Committee on Humanitarian Affairs,
the United Nations Development Group and the Executive Committee on Peace and
Security in late 1998. Subsequently, links have been further developed between
the Inter-Agency Standing Committee and United Nations Development Group,
including through exchanges between the consolidated appeal process and
Development Assistance Framework working groups, and the incorporation in the
revised Framework guidelines of risk assessment and links to the consolidated
appeal process.
83. Ensuring effective
strategic coordination also requires effective linkages between in‑country
coordinators. Strong ties between the resident coordinator system managed by
UNDP and the humanitarian coordinator system managed by the Office for the
Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs have helped in the creation of joint
structures, for example in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, where a joint office has been set up. Also
essential is a clear understanding of the relationship between humanitarian
coordinators and special representatives of the Secretary‑General. In
April 1999, the Executive Committee on Humanitarian Affairs endorsed a draft
note of guidance defining this relationship. This guidance reflects the need
for special representatives of the Secretary-General to have overall authority
over in‑country programmes, in order to ensure effective coordination for
peace-building. The note also describes the responsibility of humanitarian
coordinators, under the authority of the Special Representative of the
Secretary-General for assessment and coordination of humanitarian response,
including the negotiation of access and principles.
84. Different tools will be
relevant in different stages and types of conflict. In Bosnia, an early study
of baseline data proved to be of great value for agencies planning transitional
programmes. Equally, the experience of the War‑Torn Societies Project in
Eritrea, Guatemala, Mozambique and
Somalia provides useful lessons about the need to involve stakeholders
in a participatory process of prioritization for rehabilitation and
reconstruction. In addition, while the common country assessment is primarily
an assessment tool for normal development situations, some elements of it may
be valuable in transitional settings, as certain regions or sectors stabilize.
In cases where a common country assessment was conducted prior to the outbreak
of an emergency, it would contain important baseline data that could guide the
recovery process.
85. The real challenge,
however, is to ensure that common objectives and priorities in fact guide the
development of agency programmes in the field. Only in one case has the hard
nut of prioritization been cracked to any significant extent — in the
Afghanistan Strategic Framework. In that case, the Resident
Coordinator/Humanitarian Coordinator resorted to highlighting within the
consolidated appeal process those programmes that conformed to agreed
priorities, a decision that generated a strong reaction from some agencies, but
which was supported by key donors. The Council may wish to encourage agencies
to take steps to ensure that their programmes are systematically tailored, and
if necessary curtailed, to fit priorities agreed by the country team in the
field. As yet, there is no generally accepted forum for carrying out this
process, nor is there any commitment by major donors to base their funding
decisions on such prioritization work.
4. Thematic
issues: bridging the recurrent gaps
86. One of the most important
recurrent gaps occurs in the context of the post‑conflict reintegration of
returnees. What is sometimes characterized as a “handover” problem, that is,
the absence of development partners with sufficient capacity to take over from
relief agencies, can also be thought of as an absence of sufficiently early
joint planning for what are the inherently linked tasks of repatriation,
resettlement and reintegration. The United Nations High Commissioner for
Refugees and the President of the World Bank have focused valuable new
attention on the financial and institutional aspects of this problem in their
recent initiative taken in conjunction with the Brookings Institute. The Joint
Reintegration Programming Unit in Rwanda and the joint early planning efforts
of the Government/World Bank/UNDP/UNHCR in Azerbaijan provide examples of how the
activities of relief and development agencies working on reintegration can be
integrated. Early planning of this kind, however, has often had to overcome
innumerable financial and administrative obstacles, with resulting considerable
delays between the return of refugees and the implementation of joint plans.
87. A second important gap
often occurs with demobilization, unless it is linked to the reintegration
process, demobilized soldiers do not re‑enter society and are easily re‑recruited
into armed groups, leading to higher risks of instability and reversals in the
conflict resolution process. On the other hand, a demobilization programme
effectively linked to reintegration programmes can contribute to stability.
Demobilization and reintegration can also be linked to rehabilitation and
reconstruction, for example, by the employment of demobilized soldiers in small‑scale
community reconstruction projects.
88. The demobilization of child
soldiers requires not only early planning, but early action. Even during active
conflict, provision must be made for demobilizing child soldiers and for the
provision of both relief and assistance for reintegration. Given the rights of
children, the laws against recruitment of children into armies and the
enormously high long‑term costs of the phenomenon of child soldiers,
demobilization in this instance cannot wait for the end of war.
89. Relief‑development
transitions also must encompass comprehensive mine action programmes that are
undertaken for humanitarian and socio‑economic purposes. The existence of
mines of course hampers the process of return and resettlement, and also
affects agricultural rehabilitation and sectors such as transport and commerce.
As with demobilization, demining programmes must be undertaken in conjunction
with wider projects of social and economic rehabilitation and reconstruction.
In this context, humanitarian agencies continue to advocate for the universal
ratification and implementation of the Ottawa Convention on landmines.
90. All of these programme
areas must be addressed in the context of a coherent, system‑wide
approach to what is arguably the central question of transitions: the role of
government. The appropriate relationship between government and humanitarian
agencies varies by context. The difficulty is that while humanitarian agencies
recognize the responsibility and right of government to set priorities in the
recovery process, internal wars are, by definition, contexts in which the
capacity of government to choose between competing priorities is severely
diminished. Nevertheless, the role of government cannot be sidestepped, nor
should it be. Indeed, this is arguably the most critical — and probably the
most difficult — challenge of post‑conflict reconstruction: to structure
the provision of assistance in a manner that helps to rebuild the capacity of
government and its civil society partners to regulate effectively the competing
claims of different sectors of society. While all elements of post‑conflict
reconstruction are important, failures in this area produce a high risk of
return to conflict.
5. Financial
issues
91. Integrated programming in
protracted crises is hampered by rigidities in the funding systems of a number
of donor Governments that restrict the use of funding windows for transitional
and developmental activities in war contexts, as well as by differences in the
programming cycles of agencies. In recent years, a number of donors, notably
the Netherlands, Sweden and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern
Ireland, introduced flexibility into their financing schemes such that
developmental activities can be undertaken even in periods of instability. The
Council may wish to encourage more donors to adjust their funding systems to
facilitate integrated responses to crises.
92. Even more problematic are
the existing funding systems for post‑conflict reconstruction. Donors are
understandably reluctant to provide funds for rehabilitation, reconstruction and
development in situations where instability means that there is a high risk of
a loss of investment. Indeed, in many such situations, donors are almost
equally reluctant to commit funds for humanitarian programmes. The cost of this
reluctance is very high. Stabilization after war cannot occur without at least
a certain level of investment in public safety and public services.
Unwillingness to provide funds at this key moment produces a high risk of a
return to conflict and a further period of acute human suffering.
93. Political difficulties
associated with transitional financing are amplified by the fact that donors
have created a wide variety of mechanisms for post‑conflict financing,
including trust funds, specialized post‑conflict units, and separate
finance windows for relief and development. There is no common mechanism of
providing funds to which a common mechanism for raising funds, such as the
extended consolidated appeal process, can connect. Fiduciary, administrative
and political restrictions placed on some of these funds limit the ability of
some donors to fund key activities, such as demobilization. The result is that
those sectors most crucial to stabilization in transitional circumstances, such
as demobilization, reintegration and governance, are precisely those sectors
for which it is often most difficult to generate adequate, predictable funds.
94. In recent years, the
extended consolidated appeal process has been used more frequently to cover
post‑conflict activities. This builds on the positive experience of
covering under the process the rehabilitation activities that normally
accompany relief operations. However, funding of the consolidated appeal
processes in post‑conflict countries has continued to decline,
culminating in a response of only 5.5 per cent to the 1999 appeals for Guinea‑Bissau,
13.5 per cent for Burundi, and 4 per cent for Tajikistan as at 31 May 1999.
United Nations country teams in transitional settings such as these are not
currently able to tap into the full range of existing funding mechanisms,
including dedicated funds for post‑conflict recovery held by the World
Bank, the Government of Canada, the United States Office for Transitional
Initiatives, and others, although the amounts available in these specialized
facilities remain modest.
95. There is an urgent need for
the United Nations, in consultation with donors, to develop flexible approaches
that allow country programmes to tap into a range of funding streams. Inclusive
consultations will be required to generate system‑wide agreement on the
best way to achieve this. In 1999 and beyond, the United Nations and its
partners must ensure that strategic coordination for peace-building is
adequately backed up by effective funding. Only in this way can there be
comprehensive approaches to the transition from relief to rehabilitation,
reconstruction and development.
V. Observations
96. As the present report was
being finalized, the world experienced two unfolding humanitarian tragedies,
one, in the Balkans under the glare of television cameras and the other, in
Angola, largely ignored outside southern Africa. In the Balkans, over 1,200,000
people were uprooted from their homes in Kosovo within two months. In Angola,
over 500,000 people were uprooted with the outbreak of fighting in early 1999,
bringing the total number of internally displaced to 1,600,000.
97. While aid agencies poured human
and financial resources into the Balkans in response to the needs of the
refugees, the airlift of vital food aid in Angola was threatened with
disruption for security reasons and for lack of funds. The focus of
international media attention on Kosovo helped to ensure essential relief for
people fleeing the conflict. However, the response to consolidated appeals for
almost all other humanitarian emergencies, while improving on the figures for
1998, remained substantially below expectations.
98. The unfolding tragedies in
Angola and Kosovo raised other serious issues for the international
humanitarian community. These included questions of access by humanitarian
agencies to the victims of conflict, the impartiality and independence of
humanitarian aid, the definition of the lead agency and coordination functions
in certain types of complex crises, and the role of the military in support of
humanitarian operations. The two situations highlighted once again the
appalling human cost of lack of progress on the road towards peace. In the end,
however, they illustrated the significance of the humanitarian imperative,
which requires a humanitarian response to human suffering, whatever its cause.
99. In this fiftieth
anniversary year of the Geneva Conventions, violations of international
humanitarian law have received particular attention. While the issue of the
protection of civilians in conflict will be the subject of a special report to
the Security Council in September 1999, the environment for timely humanitarian
action in many countries continues to be compromised by deliberate targeting of
civilians and humanitarian workers, ethnic cleansing, atrocities committed
against children and denial of access to humanitarian assistance. The scale and
number of these abuses demands accelerated efforts to introduce an effective
International Criminal Court, as one instrument for dealing with the cycle of
impunity.
100. Important progress has been
made within the United Nations system in introducing a more integrated and
strategic approach to the planning of assistance programmes in emergency and
transitional situations for both natural disasters and complex emergencies. The
challenge for the United Nations is to work with non‑United Nations
partners to establish ways of ensuring that the integrated and strategic
approach embraces all stakeholders, both national and international, under the
overall leadership, wherever possible, of the national Government. However,
such achievements will be of limited value if Member States are not able to
make corresponding progress in the provision of appropriate political and
financial support to these efforts.
Notes
1 The present report can be read in
conjunction with other reports being presented to the Economic and Social
Council at its fifty-fourth session, including: report of the Second Committee
on the triennial policy review of operational activities for the development of
the United Nations system (A/53/610); and reports of the Secretary-General on
international cooperation to reduce the impact of the El Niño phenomenon
(A/54/135–E/1999/88), collaborative efforts to assist Belize, Costa Rica, El
Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua and Panama and progress made with the
relief, rehabilitation and reconstruction efforts of the affected countries
(A/54/130–E/1999/72) and progress made in the relief, rehabilitation and
reconstruction efforts of Antigua and Barbuda, Cuba, the Dominican Republic,
Haiti and Saint Kitts and Nevis (A/54/129–E/1999/73).
2 Official Records of the
General Assembly, Fifty-third Session, Supplement No. 3 (A/53/3), p. 49.
3 The report of the Inter-Agency
Needs Assessment Mission is contained in the annex to document S/1999/662.
4 The recommendations cover the issues
of coordination, internally displaced persons, local capacities/relief and
development, resource mobilization, monitoring and evaluation, human resources
management and development.
Annex
Follow-up
to agreed conclusions (1998/1) of the humanitarian affairs segment of the
Economic and Social Council a
|
Issue |
Recommendation |
Status |
|
|
|
|
|
Field coordination |
OCHA and the IASC are encouraged to (a)
further clarify the parameters of authority for the resident/humanitarian
coordinator functions, and (b) establish selection criteria and
procedures, and specific training and performance review mechanisms for
humanitarian coordinators. |
(a) ECHA
has endorsed a Note of Guidance clarifying the relationship between HCs and
SRSGs. (b) The
ERC has encouraged agencies to nominate candidates to participate in
competency assessment exercises to enrich the pool of candidates for HC/RC
positions. OCHA/UNDP held workshops with RC/HCs in December 1998 in Geneva to
exchange lessons learned. This will be repeated. |
|
Roster of humanitarian coordinators |
All United Nations funds and programmes are
encouraged to cooperate fully in developing and maintaining a roster of
qualified candidates. |
Ongoing collaboration between ERC and
operational humanitarian organizations who contribute to humanitarian
coordination by seconding staff for HC/RC functions as well as other senior
staff to OCHA. |
|
Humanitarian segment |
The Secretary-General, in consultation with
Governments, is encouraged to recommend ways to further improve the
humanitarian segment of ECOSOC. |
The Secretariat submitted a Note (E/1999/45)
on 23 April, in response to this recommendation. |
|
Mine action |
OCHA is requested to share all relevant
information with the United Nations Mine Action Service, the focal point
within the United Nations system for all mine-related activities, and other
partners on the humanitarian implications of landmines. |
As part of its continuing support to UNMAS,
OCHA participates in joint assessment missions, as well as in meetings of the
Steering Group on Mine Action and the Inter-Agency Standing Group on Mine
Action. OCHA has cooperated with UNMAS in facilitating assessment missions to
Kosovo and providing advice on the humanitarian impact of landmines in
Angola, Guinea-Bissau and Sudan. |
|
Financial basis for OCHA |
The Secretary-General is invited to submit to
the General Assembly at its fifty-third session, for its consideration, his
proposals for putting the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs
on a sound financial basis for the coordination of humanitarian assistance
activities. |
In the context of the proposed programme
budget for 2000–2001, the Secretary-General recommended an increase of 10 per
cent of resources from the regular budget for OCHA. |
|
Improving the CAP |
OCHA is encouraged to improve the format and
structure of the CAP so as to make them effective programming instruments for
the purpose of strategic planning. |
IASC Sub-Working Group on the CAP meets
regularly in Geneva. Latest “products” include: improved technical guidelines
for the CAP including on Common Humanitarian Action Plans, and the
organization of a 1999 mid-term review. Joint Launch of 1999 CAPs in December
1998 was a major innovation. “Marketing” of the Consolidated Appeals also
being addressed. |
|
a See Official
Records of the General Assembly, Fifty-third Session, Supplement No. 3
(A/53/3), p. 49. |
||
|
Strategic monitoring |
IASC should develop a field-based system for strategic monitoring which
will help assess how programme targets and strategic objectives are being
met. |
The improved CAP guidelines recently released focus primarily on
strategic planning and monitoring. OCHA and IASC prepared ToR for pilot
projects for fall of 1999. |
|
Disaster preparedness |
Disaster preparedness and early warning must be further strengthened
at country and regional levels, through better coordination among relevant
United Nations bodies and cooperation with interested Governments, regional
organizations and other relevant sectors. |
OCHA participated in the multi-agency mission to evaluate the
international response to hurricane Mitch, in January 1999. The Mission
produced a set of recommendations, inter alia, on how to strengthen
disaster preparedness measures at the national level. |
|
Local capacities |
Particular efforts should be undertaken to enhance local capacity in
disaster response, as well as to utilize capacities already existing in
developing countries which may be available closer to the site of a disaster
and at lower cost. |
OCHA, in collaboration with the Resident Coordinator and the
Government, has organized an International Workshop on Natural Disaster
Management in Beijing, China in June 1999. OCHA, in collaboration with ECOWAS, OAU and Government of Ivory Coast,
sponsored the High-Level West African Regional Humanitarian Assistance
Seminar in May 1999 for the 16 member States of ECOWAS. The seminar focused
on the use of military and civil defence assets in the region for emergencies
and disasters. OCHA is working with UNDP and the UNDMT in Kenya on improving the
operational preparedness of the Government in case of disaster. In responding to natural disasters, increased emphasis has been placed
on identifying regionally based experts to take part in UNDAC teams (e.g. for
Mitch and tsunami in Papua New Guinea) and on undertaking, as a matter of
principle, local procurement of relief items (e.g., fire-fighting equipment
for forest fires in Indonesia). |
|
El Niño Task Force |
The United Nations Inter-Agency Task Force on El Niño is invited to
make available its experiences on national capacity programmes for disaster
management as an input to the development of the disaster reduction strategy
for the twenty-first century. |
The United Nations Inter-Agency Task Force on El Niño co-organized
together with the Government of Ecuador and the Permanent Commission of the
South Pacific (CPPS) the first Intergovernmental Meeting of Experts on
El Niño, in Guayaquil, Ecuador, from 9–13 November 1998. The work of the Task Force includes, a comprehensive Scientific and
Technical Retrospective of the 1997/98 El Niño phase. This component of the
Inter-Agency Task Force work has been presented to the Thirteenth World
Meteorological Congress, Geneva, Switzerland, 4–26 May 1999. |
|
|
|
Specific El Niño concerns with regard to natural disaster reduction
were discussed at the International IDNDR Early-Warning Conference, Potsdam,
Germany, 7–11 September 1998, at the IDNDR-ESCAP Regional Meeting for Asia,
Bangkok, Thailand, 13–17 February 1999, and at the IDNDR-UNEP Regional
Meeting for Africa, Nairobi, Kenya, 18–21 May 1999. El Niño will figure at
the IDNDR Regional Meeting for the Americas, San Jose, Costa Rica, 1–5 June
1999, and at a thematic session of the IDNDR concluding event, the Programme
Forum, Geneva, 5–9 July 1999. |
|
Gender issues |
The Emergency Relief Coordinator, in cooperation with the Division for
the Advancement of Women of the United Nations Secretariat, should ensure
that a gender perspective is fully integrated into humanitarian activities
and policies. |
The IASC has established a Sub-Working Group on Gender and
Humanitarian Assistance. The group produced a paper on mainstreaming gender
into humanitarian emergencies and prepared a policy statement endorsed by the
IASC on the same issue. Workshops are being organized to develop tools to
integrate the gender perspective into the Consolidated Appeals Process. |
Abbreviations
CAP – consolidated
appeal process
ERC – Emergency
Response Coordinator
IASC – Inter-Agency
Standing Committee
OCHA – Office for the
Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs
RC/HC – resident
coordinator/humanitarian coordinator
UNDMT – United Nations
disaster management team
UNMAS – United Nations Mine
Action Service
![]()