| United Nations |
|
E/CN.17/1998/13 |

Economic and Social Council
Distr. GENERAL
20 March 1998
ORIGINAL: ENGLISH
Economic and Social Council
Commission on Sustainable Development
Sixth session
20 April-1 May 1998
Report of the Inter-sessional Ad Hoc Working Group on
Strategic Approaches to Freshwater Management
(New York, 23-27 February 1998)
Contents
Paragraphs Page
I. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-3 2
II. Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-9 2
III. Key issues and challenges . . . . . . . . . . . 10-15 3
IV. Actions and means of implementation . . . . . . 16-45 3
A. Information for decision-making. . . . . . . 19-23 4
B. Institutions, capacity-building and
participation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24-28 4
C. Technology transfer and research cooperation 29-35 5
D. Financial resources and mechanisms . . . . . 36-45 5
V. Follow-up and assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . 46-52 7
VI. Organizational matters . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53-62 8
A. Opening and duration of the session. . . . . 53-54 8
B. Attendance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 8
C. Election of officers . . . . . . . . . . . . 56-57 8
D. Agenda and organization of work. . . . . . . 58-59 8
E. Documentation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 8
F. Adoption of the report of the Working Group 61-62 9
Annex. List of participants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
I. Introduction
1. The Inter-Sessional Ad Hoc Working Group on
Strategic Approaches to Freshwater Management met (New
York, 23-27 February 1998) in preparation for
consideration of the issue of freshwater management by the
Commission on Sustainable Development at its sixth session
(New York, 20 April - 1 May 1998). The discussions were
based on the recommendations and proposals for action
contained in two reports of the Secretary-General
(E/CN.17/1998/2 and Add. 1 and E/CN.17/1998/3) and in
the report of the Expert Group Meeting on Strategic
Approaches to Freshwater Management (Harare, Zimbabwe,
27-30 January 1998) (E/CN.17/1998/11). The discussions
also benefited from national presentations by the
Netherlands and the Russian Federation, describing their
efforts in achieving integrated freshwater development and
management.
2. The participants noted the forthcoming Ministerial
Meeting on Water Resources and Sustainable Development
(Paris, France, 19-21 March 1998) which is expected to
provide additional opportunity for further consideration of
various aspects of strategic approaches to freshwater
management in preparation for the sixth session of the
Commission, in particular the need for improving
knowledge of water resources and water users; promoting
human resources and institutional capacity-building; and
identifying appropriate financial resources. Similarly, a
contribution to the sixth session of the Commission is
expected from an international forum, Global Water
Politics: Cooperation for Transboundary Water
Management (Bonn, Germany, 3-5 March 1998).
3. The outcome of the Working Group meeting is not a
negotiated text, although its contents were thoroughly
discussed. In accordance with the expert nature of the
Working Group and the functions assigned to it, the report
focuses on key issues and conclusions and suggests elements
and policy options for further consideration and negotiation
during the sixth session of the Commission on Sustainable
Development.
II. Background
4. Water resources are essential for satisfying basic
human needs, health and food production, the restoration
and maintenance of ecosystems, and for social and
economic development in general. Agriculture accounts for
the major part of global freshwater use. It is imperative that
water resources development, management and protection
should be planned in an integrated manner, taking into
account both short- and long-term needs.
5. The priority to be accorded to the social dimension
of freshwater management is of fundamental importance.
This should be reflected in an integrated approach to
freshwater in order to be coherent with the objective of
achieving sustainable development that is truly people-centred.
6. The objectives of sustainable development and the
links among its three components -- economic development,
social development and environmental protection -- were
clearly articulated in Agenda 21 and the Rio Declaration.
The specific decisions and policy recommendations
concerning freshwater development, management and use
in chapter 18 of Agenda 21 and the identification of the
seven key programme areas contained in that chapter
continue to be a basis for action.
7. There is evidence of progress in improving some
aspects of freshwater resource management since 1992.
Marked improvements in water quality have occurred in a
number of river basins and groundwater aquifers where
pressures for action have been strong. However, while many
lessons have been learned, overall progress has been neither
sufficient nor comprehensive enough to reduce general
trends of increasing water shortages, deteriorating water
quality and growing stress on freshwater ecosystems. Water
need not become a limiting factor for sustainable
development and human welfare. A series of potential crises
can be averted if vigorous action is taken now towards an
integrated approach to freshwater resource development,
management and use.
8. Competition for limited freshwater increasingly occurs
between agricultural, urban, industrial and environmental
uses. In adopting the Programme for the Further
Implementation of Agenda 21, 1/ in particular its paragraph
34, the General Assembly articulated the multiple dilemmas
and challenges associated with the management of
freshwater. They recognized, inter alia, the urgent need to
formulate and implement national policies of integrated
watershed management in a fully participatory manner
aimed at achieving and integrating economic, social and
environmental objectives of sustainable development. In
addition to agreeing to those strategic principles, the
General Assembly also recognized an urgent need to
strengthen international cooperation to support local and
national action, in particular in the fields of environment
and development, safe water supply and sanitation, food
security and agricultural production, and flood and drought
control, through efforts in areas such as information
exchange, capacity-building, technology transfer and
financing.
9. In accordance with the Programme for the Further
Implementation of Agenda 21, Governments called for a
dialogue under the aegis of the Commission on Sustainable
Development, beginning at its sixth session, aimed at
building a consensus on the necessary action and, in
particular, the means of implementation and tangible results,
in order to consider initiating a strategic approach for the
implementation of all aspects of the sustainable use of
freshwater for social and economic purposes, including,
inter alia, safe drinking water and sanitation, water for
irrigation, recycling, and wastewater management, and the
important role freshwater plays in natural ecosystems. That
intergovernmental process will be fully fruitful only if there
is a proven commitment by the international community to
the provision of new and additional financial resources for
the goals of the initiative.
III. Key issues and challenges
10. The process called for in the Programme for the
Further Implementation of Agenda 21 should focus on
fostering and supporting national and international action
in those areas where goals and objectives have been
defined; identification of existing gaps and emerging issues;
building global consensus where further understanding is
required; and promoting greater coordination in approaches
by the United Nations and relevant international institutions,
particularly in support of national implementation policy
and development.
11. Numerous gaps can be identified in the path towards
integrated water management which need to be addressed
by Governments with support from the international
community. Areas that require further attention include,
among others: awareness of the scope and function of
surface and groundwater resources; the need for human
resource development and participatory approaches, notably
including women; the role of ecosystems in the provision
of goods and services; balancing structural and non-structural
approaches; explicit linkages with socio-economic development,
including sound economic policies, for equitable and
efficient freshwater allocation and use; improved sanitation
and waste-water treatment; conserving the biological
diversity of freshwater ecosystems; understanding hydrology
and the capacity to assess the availability and variability
of water resources; and the mobilization of domestic and
international financial resources. Strategic and integrated
actions are still needed in order to adapt to ever changing
social and environmental circumstances and to address fundamental
concerns for combating poverty, ensuring adequate provision of
public health, food security and energy, and better to protect the
environment.
12. International cooperation and action needs to address
effectively the above issues, building on existing consensus
for the successful implementation of integrated water
resource development and management.
13. The implementation of integrated water development
and management strategies requires action at all levels.
However, most decisions and actions related to integrated
water management need to take place at the local and
national levels. Those actions should be closely related to
other areas of natural resource management, including land,
forestry and mountain development. Effective integrated
water resource management should incorporate approaches
dealing with river basins, catchments, watersheds and
ecosystems.
14. There is need to ensure that local and national
management plans are in a position to bring about
productive and sustainable interactions between human
activities and the ecological functioning of freshwater
systems. There is also need to minimize impacts from
human activities on coastal areas, estuarine and marine
environments, and in mountainous areas, and to reduce
potential losses from droughts and floods, erosion,
desertification and natural disasters. Furthermore, pollution
prevention, sanitation and the treatment of waste water need
to be addressed.
15. Riparian States are encouraged to cooperate on
matters related to international watercourses. This important
issue requires further consideration by the Commission and
in other relevant forums.
IV. Actions and means of implementation
16. Governments are invited to intensify efforts to develop
local and national integrated water resource development
and management programmes and policies, as recommended
in Agenda 21. Governments at the appropriate level should
set and publish target dates for the adoption or updating of
local or national action programmes for implementing such
programmes. The implementation of local or national
programmes should form an important part of the local
Agenda 21 approach.
17. In formulating and implementing integrated water
resource management policies and programmes, there is
need to take into account actions to implement relevant
conventions in force, in particular conventions on biological
diversity, desertification, climate change, and wetlands and
the Convention on International Trade in Endangered
Species of Flora and Fauna (CITES). In addition,
consideration should be given, as appropriate, to relevant
recommendations and/or programmes of action emanating
from a number of major international conferences and
events, including the Global Programme of Action for the
Sustainable Development of Small Island Developing
States, 2/ the Global Programme of Action for the Protection
of the Marine Environment from Land-based Activities, 3/ the
Mar del Plata Action Plan, 4/ the International Drinking
Water Supply and Sanitation Decade, 5/ the International
Conference on Water and the Environment: Development
Issues for the 21st Century (Dublin, 1992); 6/ the World
Summit for Social Development; 7/ the Fourth World
Conference on Women; 8/ the United Nations Conference on
Human Settlements (Habitat II); 9/ and the World Food
Summit. 10/ Furthermore, in formulating such policies,
Governments are called upon to address the need for
achieving universal access to water supply and sanitation,
with poverty eradication being one of the means, taking into
account, in particular, chapter 18 of Agenda 21, the Global
Consultation on Safe Water and Sanitation for the 1990s
(New Delhi, 1990) 11/ and the recommendations of the 1994
Noordwijk Action Programme on Drinking Water and
Environmental Sanitation. 12/
18. The holding of the Expert Group Meeting on Strategic
Approaches to Freshwater Management and its report are
noted with appreciation. In formulating and implementing
policies and programmes, Governments are invited to
consider the key recommendations of the report.
A. Information for decision-making
19. Governments are encouraged to establish and maintain
effective information and monitoring networks and further
promote the exchange and dissemination of information
including related socio-economic and environmental data,
gender differentiated, where appropriate -- needed for policy
formulation, planning and investment decisions and
operational management of freshwater resources, and
encourage the harmonization of data collection at the
basin/aquifer level. Public access to this information should
be facilitated. This includes the need to improve the
understanding of hydrology (surface and groundwater) and
the function of ecosystems and to strengthen relevant
information systems better to foresee and manage resource
uncertainty. Such efforts on the part of developing
countries, particularly the least developed countries, require
support from the international community.
20. Governments are encouraged to implement and
monitor national water-related indicators of progress in
achieving integrated water resource management, including
water quality and quantity objectives, taking into account
ongoing work of the Commission on Sustainable
Development on indicators of sustainable development.
21. In addition, in accordance with their policies,
priorities and resources, Governments may find it useful to
carry out national water quality and quantity inventories for
surface water and groundwater, including the identification
of gaps in regard of available information.
22. Governments are invited to establish or strengthen
mechanisms for consultations on drought and flood
preparedness and early warning systems and mitigation
plans at the local and national levels. Governments are
encouraged to consider the establishment of systems --
which may take the form of emergency funds, where
appropriate -- to ensure that individuals and communities
can be compensated for the damage that they suffer from
such extreme events. At the international level, there is, in
particular, need to maintain support of these activities at the
conclusion of the International Decade on Natural Disaster
Reduction.
23. The international community should support national
efforts in the areas outlined above. The United Nations
system is called upon to play a central role in the
development and coordination of relevant data and
information networks, strengthen regional and global
monitoring systems, carry out periodic global assessments
and analyses, and promote the broadest exchange and
dissemination of relevant information, in particular to
developing countries.
B. Institutions, capacity-building and participation
24. Governments are urged to establish national
coordination mechanisms, as already envisaged in the Mar
del Plata Action Plan, providing for the involvement of all
relevant parts of government and public authorities, in the
formulation and implementation of integrated water
resource development and management plans and policies.
Such mechanisms should also provide for consultation with
major groups. This involves the participation of water users
and the public in planning, implementing, and evaluating
water projects.
25. Governments are invited to take the necessary steps
to establish legislative and regulatory frameworks -- and to
improve such frameworks where they exist -- to facilitate
integrated water resource management and strategies,
including both demand and supply management, taking into
account the need to improve capacity to apply and enforce
such frameworks. Each Government needs to define its
relevant functions and distinguish between those related to
standards, regulation-setting and control, on the one hand,
and the direct management and provision of services, on the
other.
26. In view of the complexity of implementing integrated
water resource development and management strategies,
Governments should strengthen institutional and human
capacities at the national and local levels. At the local level,
this could be done through local Agenda 21 processes,
where they exist. Effective water resource management and
protection requires appropriate tools for educating and
training water management staff and water users at all levels
and for ensuring that women and youth have equal access
to education and training programmes.
27. Governments are encouraged to establish an enabling
environment to facilitate partnerships between public and
private sectors and non-governmental organizations, aiming
towards improved local capacity to protect water resources,
through significant outreach educational programmes and
improved public access to information. The pivotal role of
women should be reflected in institutional arrangements for
the development and management of water resources. There
is a need to strengthen the role of women, who should have
an equal voice with regard to water resource development
and management and the sharing of benefits.
28. In support of national efforts in this field, the
international community, in particular the organizations of
the United Nations system, should strengthen capacity-building
programmes, taking into account the special needs
of developing countries, in particular the least developed
countries and the specific circumstances of small island
developing States, in such areas as training, institutional
development and the participation of women.
C. Technology transfer and research cooperation
29. Governments are encouraged to stimulate and remove
impediments to research and development cooperation,
together with the development of technologies for
sustainable water management and use, and to increase
efficiency, reduce pollution and promote sustainable
agriculture and food production systems. This involves the
adaptation and diffusion of new and innovative techniques
and technologies, both private and public, and the transfer
of technologies to developing countries, inter alia on
concessional terms, as mutually agreed, taking into account
the need to protect intellectual property rights. The use of
local and traditional technology and knowledge should be
promoted, and South/South cooperation should be
encouraged.
30. Governments, industry and international organizations
should promote technology transfer and research
cooperation to foster sustainable agricultural practices
which promote efficient water use and prevent pollution of
surface water and groundwater. These technologies should
include the improvement of crops grown on marginal sites,
erosion control practices, and the adaptation of farming
systems. They should also improve water efficiency in both
irrigated and rain-fed areas and improve the adaptation and
productivity of drought-tolerant crop species. Farmer
participation in farm research, irrigation projects and
watershed management should be encouraged. Research
results and technologies should be available to both small
and large producers.
31. In order to help increase the supplies of freshwater,
research cooperation and technology transfer to developing
countries are desirable in the areas of desalination, brackish
water treatment, waste-water treatment and desert dew
catchment and in the use of remote-sensing techniques and
other relevant modern technologies.
32. Water management provides an opportunity for
technology cooperation projects involving partnerships
between the public and private sectors. Governments are
urged to promote innovative approaches.
33. The Commission on Sustainable Development should
call upon all relevant parties to develop and implement best
practices and appropriate technologies in the area of water
development and management. Codes of conduct, guidelines
and other voluntary agreements can enhance the positive
role that industry and agriculture can play and should cover
the activities of companies operating and investing outside
their home countries.
34. Governments are encouraged to make the best use of
national, regional and international environmentally sound
technology centres.
35. Donor countries and international organizations are
urged to intensify their efforts to facilitate their transfer of
environmentally sound technologies, including publicly
owned technology; to accelerate their technical assistance
programmes to developing countries, aimed at facilitating
the choice and acquisition of appropriate technologies and
their transfer and diffusion; and to promote exchanges of
know-how. The United Nations system has an important role
to play as a clearing house in putting those in need of
assistance in contact with those able to provide it.
D. Financial resources and mechanisms
36. As stated in the Programme for the Further
Implementation of Agenda 21, the intergovernmental
process on freshwater, under the aegis of the Commission,
will be fully fruitful only if there is a proven commitment
by the international community for the provision of new and
additional financial resources for its goals.
37. New and additional financial resources for developing
countries, in particular the least developed countries, will
need to be mobilized for the development and management
of freshwater resources if the broader aims of sustainable
development are to be realized, particularly in relation to
poverty eradication. Existing resources currently allocated
to the freshwater sector should be used effectively, which
should help mobilize additional finance from all sources,
both public and private.
38. Official development assistance should complement
and focus on programmes aimed at meeting basic human
needs, including freshwater development and management,
structural reform, protection of ecosystems, sustainable
management of resources, and promoting participation and
capacity-building. Donors, including multilateral donor
institutions, should be ready to continue, or even reinforce,
the support for programmes and projects in the water sector
which will reduce or eliminate poverty. In addition, donors
should persist in trying to meet international development
targets. Projects supported by donors need to be capable of
becoming financially self-sustaining once the initial
investment is complete. Donors should also consider
support for the freshwater sector in light of cross-sectoral
interests such as desertification and climate change.
39. The private sector represents an important new source
of investment in the water sector. Local and national water
management systems should therefore be designed in ways
that encourage and support public/private partnerships. It
is important to ensure that water management systems are
organized so that they will be robust and, once established,
can support themselves. The introduction of enabling
financial framework conditions will be of paramount
importance, if private sector finance is to be mobilized.
40. Governments are urged to strengthen consultative
mechanisms aimed at improving donor/recipient schemes
for the mobilization of financial resources in a well-targeted
and predictable manner, based on local and national
programmes of action, with a special focus on integrated
water resource management which recognizes the needs of
vulnerable groups and people living in poverty.
41. All costs must be covered, whether by water users or
the public-sector budget, if the provision of water is to be
viable. Cost recovery needs to be gradually phased in by
water utilities or the public sector, taking into account the
specific conditions of each country. Subsidies for specific
groups, particularly people living in poverty, are required
in some countries. Governments could benefit from sharing
experience in this regard.
42. In the light of commitments on resources in relation
to water made at the World Summit for Social Development
and at the Fourth World Conference on Women, initiatives
should be undertaken to help identify and mobilize more
resources -- human, technical (know-how) and financial --
and take into account the 20/20 initiative in accordance with
national policies. Resources should be focused on local and
national programmes that are consistent with the key issues.
A fundamental aim must be to promote the generation of the
resources needed for proper water supply, sanitation and
water management systems and their efficient and effective
deployment. Governments are invited to allocate sufficient
public financial resources for the provision of water supply
and sanitation to meet basic human needs and for waste-water treatment.
43. Governments, when using economic instruments for
guiding the allocation of water, are urged to take into
account considerations of environmental requirements,
efficiency, transparency and equity, taking into particular
account the needs of vulnerable groups and people living
in poverty.
44. International financial support will continue to be
important, particularly in helping to find ways of removing
constraints on the development of local and national water
management systems. Existing international financial
support arrangements should be reviewed, to see if they can
be made more effective in this task. Governments, with the
support of the international community, needs to promote
and examine the economic, social and environmental values
provided by ecosystems and the cost of their degradation.
45. The international community could give consideration
to creating a financial mechanism to promote the efforts of
developing countries in the development, management,
distribution and use of water resources. Such a mechanism
could draw upon existing funds and be supported by
existing administrative arrangements. The discussion of this
proposal should include consideration of the following
challenges/issues:
(a) Promoting more effective donor coordination
and more effective and creative use of existing resources;
(b) Generation and allocation of new and additional
financial resources from all sources;
(c) The inclusion of resources in the form of direct
grants and loans in concessional terms;
(d) A quantified resources programme, in
accordance with the needs of developing countries;
(e) Resources contributions by industrialized
countries and international financial institutions, including
regional institutions;
(f) Formulation of financial strategies which include
possible partnerships with non-governmental organizations
and the private sector and the promotion of conditions for
increased private financial flows;
(g) The strengthening of consultative mechanisms
by Governments and the international community aimed at
making freshwater a development priority and at improving
dialogue between industrialized and developing countries
in a well targeted and predictable manner, based on national
actions and plans, with a special focus on integrated water
resource management that recognizes the needs of
vulnerable groups and people living in poverty. This could
include exploring the potential of new financial
arrangements.
V. Follow-up and assessment
46. Governments are invited to report to the Commission
on Sustainable Development in the year 2002 on actions
they have undertaken towards the development and
implementation of national integrated water resource
development management policies. The Secretariat is
invited to continue collecting, analysing and disseminating
national information, promoting exchanges of such
information and developing relevant databases.
47. To facilitate progress at the national level, interested
Governments and organizations are strongly encouraged to
organize, in support of the work of the Commission,
meetings and activities aimed at exchanges of experiences
and best practice on specific issues proposed by
Governments. Such meetings, inter alia, should promote
exchanges of information on local and national action
programmes and community-based efforts to implement the
provisions of Agenda 21 relevant to freshwater, especially
advances in integrated water resource and watershed
management.
48. The Commission should give consideration to possible
specific modalities of an intergovernmental dialogue on
freshwater, to take place after its sixth session. The goal
would be to take stock of progress achieved at all levels and
give further guidance to various activities leading to a more
comprehensive review in the year 2002. Possible options
include:
(a) Addressing the issue of freshwater during one
of the ad hoc inter-sessional groups of the Commission
which will meet in 2000;
(b) Consolidating the work and functions of the
Committee on Natural Resources into the Committee on
Sustainable Development so as to provide the capacity for
continuing intergovernmental dialogue on freshwater issues,
subject to the outcome of ongoing discussions in the context
of follow-up to General Assembly resolution 50/227 on the
reform of the Economic and Social Council's subsidiary
bodies;
(c) Organizing a special inter-sessional meeting in
the year 2000 to be funded through extrabudgetary
resources or sponsored by interested Governments.
49. The United Nations system, in support of the
intergovernmental dialogue in the Commission, acting
through the ACC Subcommittee on Water Resources, and
working in collaboration with international institutions
outside the system, is invited to elaborate, for consideration
by Governments through the Commission, in the year 2000,
an international implementation programme containing
action-oriented recommendations on ways and means to
enhance coordination within the United Nations system to
accelerate the implementation of chapter 18 of Agenda 21
which will outline ways and means to encourage
international support for national actions. Such
recommendations should:
(a) Systematize various objectives identified for the
United Nations system in Agenda 21 and other relevant
international declarations and programmes of action;
(b) Suggest on the basis of analysis of experience
gained in the United Nations system, ways and means to
enhance coordination in order to raise the effectiveness of
support to the implementation of objectives identified in
chapter 18 of Agenda 21;
(c) Suggest practical ways and actions to reach such
objectives through various services offered by international
institutions, in such areas as capacity-building,
infrastructure development, research, policy advice, etc.
This should include the implementation of recommendations
to the United Nations system contained in the present report
(see paras. 23, 28 and 35);
(d) Define effective division of responsibilities and
consider ways of increasing efficiency in programme
delivery, including the avoidance of unnecessary overlap
and duplication, and possibilities for joint programming;
(e) Explore the potential of basin-level
arrangements, where appropriate, drawing upon the
experience gained in existing regional programmes in the
United Nations system;
(f) Identify benchmarks and time-frames for
implementation, and necessary actors, both within and
outside the United Nations system;
(g) Identify all possible sources of finance for
implementation.
50. The United Nations Environment Programme should,
in collaboration with other members of the ACC
Subcommittee on Freshwater, provide an effective
contribution to the work of the Commission on Sustainable
Development and the ACC through the provision of policy,
technical and scientific advice on environmental aspects of
the sustainable development of freshwater resources. The
potential of the Global Environment Monitoring System and
other relevant global monitoring networks should be fully
utilized.
51. At the country level, the United Nations system
through the United Nations Development Assistance
Framework, as appropriate, and the resident coordinator
system must enhance coordinated efforts and programmes
in the area of freshwater. Better coordination is needed
between the work of United Nations agencies and bilateral
donors and international financial institutions. Possibilities
should be identified for joint projects and missions.
52. Finally, the organizations of the United Nations,
through the ACC Subcommittee on Water Resources, are
invited to develop a consolidated guidebook on integrated
water resources management, to replace existing sectoral
guidelines, and to submit the guidelines to the Commission
on Sustainable Development at its session in 2002.
VI. Organizational matters
A. Opening and duration of the session
53. The Inter-Sessional Ad Hoc Working Group on
Strategic Approaches to Freshwater Management of the
Commission on Sustainable Development met in New York
from 23 to 27 February 1998, in accordance with Economic
and Social Council resolution 1997/63 of 25 July 1997. The
Working Group held 9 meetings (1st to 9th meetings).
54. The meeting was opened by the temporary Chairman,
Ms. Marta Ine's Galindo (Colombia), Vice-Chairman of the
Commission on Sustainable Development.
B. Attendance
55. The session was attended by representatives of 39
States members of the Commission on Sustainable
Development. Observers for other States Members of the
United Nations, the European Community and
representatives of organizations of the United Nations
system and observers for intergovernmental and non-governmental
organizations also attended. (A list of participants is
given in the annex below.)
C. Election of officers
56. At the 1st meeting, on 23 February, the Working
Group elected by acclamation, H.E. Mr. Rogatien Biaou
(Benin) and Ms. JoAnne DiSano (Australia) as Co-Chairmen.
57. At the same meeting, the Co-Chairmen made
introductory statements.
D. Agenda and organization of work
58. At the 1st meeting, on 23 February, the Working
Group adopted its provisional agenda, contained in
document E/CN.17/ISWG.I/1998/1, and approved its
organization of work. The agenda read as follows:
1. Election of officers.
2. Adoption of the agenda and other organizational
matters.
3. Strategic approaches to freshwater management.
4. Other matters.
5. Adoption of the report of the Working Group.
59. At the same meeting, the Working Group agreed to
invite the Convention on Wetlands of International
Importance Especially as Waterfowl Habitat (Ramsar
Convention) to attend the session of the Working Group as
an intergovernmental organization, with the status of
observer.
E. Documentation
60. The Working Group had before it the following
documents:
(a) Report of the Secretary-General on strategic
approaches to freshwater management (E/CN.17/1998/2);
(b) Report of the Secretary-General on strategic
approaches to freshwater management, transmitting the
report of the Expert Group Meeting on Strategic
Approaches to Freshwater Management (Harare, 27-30
January 1998) (E/CN.17/1998/2/Add.1);
(c) Report of the Secretary-General on activities of
the organizations of the United Nations system in the field
of freshwater resources (E/CN.17/1998/2);
(d) Letter dated 11 February 1998 from the
Permanent Representative of Zimbabwe to the United
Nations addressed to the Secretary-General transmitting the
report of the Expert Group Meeting on Strategic
Approaches to Freshwater Management, held at Harare,
Zimbabwe, from 27 to 30 January 1998 (E/CN.17/1998/11);
(e) Note by the Secretariat on participation of
intergovernmental organizations in the work of the Inter-Sessional Ad Hoc
Working Group on Strategic Approaches to Freshwater Management
(E/CN.17/ISWG.I/1998/L.1);
(f) Report of the High-level Advisory Board on
Sustainable Development for the 1997 review of the Rio commitments
(E/CN.17/1997/17/Add.1).
F. Adoption of the report of the Working Group
61. At the 9th meeting, on 27 February 1998, the Working
Group had before it the draft report
(E/CN.17/ISWG.I/1998/L.2), as well as an informal paper.
62. At the same meeting, the Working Group took note
of the informal paper and adopted its report.
Notes
1/ Resolution S/19-2.
2/ See Report of the Global Conference on the Sustainable Development of
Small Island Developing States, Bridgetown, Barbados, 25 April-6 May 1994
(United Nations publication, Sales No. E.94.I.18 and Corr.1 and 2), chap. I,
resolution 1, annex II.
3/ See A/51/116, Annex II.
4/ See Report of the United Nations Water Conference, Mar del Plata, 14-25
March 1977 (United Nations publication, Sales No. E.77.II.A.12), chap.I.
5/ See General Assembly resolution 35/18.
6/ See A/CONF.115/PC/112, annex II.
7/ See Report of the World Summit for Social Development, Copenhagen, 6-12
March 1995 (United Nations publication, Sales No. E.96.IV.8).
8/ See Report of the Fourth World Conference on Women, Beijing, 4-15
September 1995 (United Nations publication, Sales No. E.96.IV.13).
9/ See Report of the United Nations Conference on Human Settlements (Habitat
II), Istanbul, 3-14 June 1996.
10/ See Report of the World Food Summit, Rome, 13-17 November 1996 (WFS
96/REP), (Rome, 1997).
11/ See A/C.2/45/3.
12/ Adopted at the International Ministerial Conference on Drinking Water and
Environmental Sanitation, Noordwijk, Netherlands, 22-23 March 1994. See
E/CN.17/1994/12.
Annex
List of participants
Members
Australia: JoAnne DiSano, Ross Walker, Howard Bamsey, Malcolm Forbes, Richard
Bomford, Kerry Smith, Volker Aeuckens, Emma Ferguson, Kylie Oakes-Ati, Peter
Hoey, Amanda Hawkins
Bahamas: Maurice E. Moore, Sharon Brennen-Haylock, Sandra P. Carey, Allison P.
Christie
Bangladesh: Anwarul Karim Chowdhury, F.A. Shamim Ahmed, Muhammad Ali Sorcar
Belgium: Alex Reyn, Jan Verschooten, Marc Gedopt, Remy Merckx, Joseph-Simon
Smitz, Hugo Brauwers, Johan Debar, Jan de Mulder
Benin: Fassaddi Adam Yacoubou, Rogatien Biaou, Samuel Amehou, Charles Borromee
Todjinou, Thomas D'Aquin Okoudjou, Thomas Guedegbe, Paul H. Houansou
Bolivia: Alberto Salamanca, Estela Mendoza, Gustavo Claros
Brazil: Enio Cordeiro, Antonio Fernando Cruz de Mello, Eduardo Carvalho,
Carlos Alberto Michaelsen den Hartog, Julio Thadeu Silva Kettelbut
Bulgaria: Vladimir Sotirov, Zvetolyub Basmajiev
Burundi: Gamaliel Ndaruzaniye, Jean-Baptiste Hajayandi
Canada: Richard Ballhorn, Ken MaCartney, Brigita Gravitis-Beck, Denis
Chouinard, Yvan Jobin, Rene'e Sauve', Guy Rochon, Carol Smith-Wright, Veena
Halliwell, Andrew Kenyon, Kevin Wisener, David Malone, Barry Burciul,
James Riordan, Linda Dunn, Janet Stephenson, Tim Hodges
Central African Republic:
China: Liu Zhiguang, Zhang Yue
Colombia: Julio Londono Paredes, Jairo Montoya Pedroza, Marta Ines Galindo,
Maria Andrea Alban
Djibouti:
Egypt: Nabil Elaraby, Hussein Ehsan El-Atfy, Adel Abdellatif, Mohamed Fattah
Ethiopia: Mohammed Duri, Berhanemeskel Nega, Meheret Getahoun, Bisrat Gidey K.
Mariam
Finland: Taisto Huimasalo, Risto Ranki, Asko Luukkainen, Antero Honkasalo,
Marit Huhta, Jorma Suvanto, Salla Korpela, Jukka Uosukainen, Hanelle Nyroos,
Marjo Nummelin
France:
Gabon:
Germany: Gerhard Henze, Cornelia Quennet-Thielen, Wolfgang Runge, Rainald
Roesch, Knut Beyer, Karsten Sach, Hans-Joachim Kampe, Elfriede Bierbrauer,
Carola Schmidt, Peter Christmann, Jurgen Wenderoth, Claudia Warning, Wolfgang
Grabs, Bernd Schleich, Luiz Ramalho, Frank Schulte
Ghana:
Guyana: S.R. Insanally, G. Talbot, K. Simon
Hungary:
India:
Indonesia: Arizal Effendi, Mochammad Slamet Hidayat, Bagas Hapsoro, Sidharto
Reza Suryo-di-Puro
Iran (Islamic Republic of): Bagher Asadi, Mohammad Reza Hadji Karim Djabbari,
Esmail Tekyeh Sadat
Ireland: Dympna Hayes, Damien Boyle
Japan: Wataru Nishigahiro, Hideki Ito, Yasufumi Enomura, Masahiko Tanoi,
Hidefumi Kurasaka, Hirotsugu Ikeda, Akikazu Adachi, Takemasa Minemoto,
Nobumasa Nakashima, Kiyofumi Kobayashi, Yutaka Yoshino
Mexico: Manuel Tello, Cesar Herrera Toleda, Gerardo Lozano, Roberto Cabral,
Francisco Giner, Ramon Benitez, Veronique Deli, Sandra Pina, Ulises Canchola,
Mirella Areyzaga, Bertha Elena De Buen, Ruben Barocio Ramirez
Mozambique:
Netherlands: Pieter Verbeek, Maarten de Hoog, Ron Lander, Vincent van den
Bergen, Albert van der Beesen, Gerard Broseliske, Daniel Pietermaat, Jeroen
Steeghs, Herman Verheij, Karin Wester, Linda Docter
Niger:
Pakistan:
Panama: Judith M. Cardoze
Papua New Guinea: Utula U. Samana, Jimmy U. Ovia, Adam V. Delaney
Peru: Marcela Lopez Bravo de Ruiz, Italo Acha
Philippines:
Poland: Wojciech Ponikiewski, Jacek Jaskiewicz
Russian Federation: Nikolai V. Tchoulkov, Georgy Voloviki, Vassili Nebenzie,
Aleksandr Pankin, Dmitry Maksimitchev, Sergei Fedotov
Saudi Arabia: Ali Bahaitham, Ahmed ElDahry
Senegal:
Slovakia:
Spain: Inocencio F. Arias, Arturo Laclaustra, Amparo Rambla, Francisco Rabena,
Marta Betanzos, Manuel Varela
Sudan: Elfatih Erwa, Mubarak Ramtalla, Daffa-Alla
Alhag Ali Osman, Omer Dahab Fadol Mohamed, Tarig Ali Bakhit,
Mohamed Mustafa M. Ahmed
Sweden: Michael Odevall, Hans Lundborg, Per Tegner, Anders Berntell, Mats
Ekenger, Sofie Nordstrom, Per Augustsson, Pia Lovkvist, Ingvar Andersson
Switzerland: Daniel Hartmann, Livia Leu-Agosti
Thailand: Charivat Santaputra, Prasert Tapaneeyangkul, Manop Mekprayoonthong,
Arunrung Phothong
Ukraine: Volodymyr M. Reshetnyak
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland:
Sheila McCabe, Peter Gooderham, Ian Symons, Alan Simcock, Scott Ghagan,
Alistair Wray, Richard Dewdney, Michael Massey, David Dunn, Robert Baldi,
Alasdair Wardhaugh, Peter Dearden, David Townsend, Chris Tompkins
United States of America: Mark G. Hambley, Betty King, Adela Backiel, Donald
Brown, Ann Carey, James Freud, Donald Burgess Laird, Deborah Linde, John
Matuszak, Wendy McConnel, Lynette J. Poulton, Seth Winnick, Kirk Barrett,
William Breed, Ronald Hoffer, Timothy Kasten, Gerry Delli Priscoli, Jane
Siegel, Sandra Smithey, E. Zell Steever, Gail Karlsson, Norine Kennedy, Thomas
Rogers
Venezuela: Oscar de Rojas, Evelyn Horowitz, Lui's Fernando Pe'rez-Segnini,
Judith Musso-Quintero
Zimbabwe: Machivenyika T. Mapuranga, Alfred Mutiwazuka, Sibokile Mtetwa
States Members of the United Nations
represented by observers
Algeria, Argentina, Austria, Botswana, Burkina Faso, Chile, Co^te d'Ivoire,
Denmark, Ecuador, Greece, Guatemala, Haiti, Italy, Jordan, Kenya, Lithuania,
Malawi, Malta, Monaco, Morocco, Namibia, New Zealand, Norway, Paraguay,
Portugal, Republic of Korea, Romania, Slovenia, Syrian Arab Republic, Tunisia,
Turkey, Uruguay, Yemen
Entities represented by observers
European Community
Specialized agencies and related organizations
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, United Nations
Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, World Health Organization,
United Nations Industrial Development Organization
Intergovernmental organizations
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Convention on Wetlands
of International Importance, especially as Waterfowl Habitat (Ramsar
Convention)
Non-governmental organizations
General consultative status with the Economic and Social Council:
Franciscans International, International Chamber of Commerce, International
Confederation of Free Trade Unions, World Wide Fund for Nature International
Roster or accredited to the Commission on Sustainable Development:
Alliance to End Childhood Lead Poisoning, Alliance of Northern Peoples for
Environment and Development, Association of the Bar of the City of New
York, Earth Council, Friends of the Earth, Institute for Agriculture and Trade
Policy, International Institute for Sustainable Development, Netherlands
Committee for IUCN, The Other Economic Summit, United Nations Environment and
Development - UK Committee, Women's Environment and Development Organization,
World Sustainable Agriculture Association, Zero
This document has been posted online by the United Nations
Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA). Reproduction and dissemination of the
document - in electronic and/or printed format - is encouraged, provided acknowledgement
is made of the role of the United Nations in making it available.
Date last posted: 8 December 1999 15:15:30 Comments and suggestions: DESA/DSD
|