POLAND
Statement by
H.E.
Dr. Wlodzimierz Cimoszewicz
Minister for Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Poland
at the Fifty-Seventh Session of the General Assembly of the United Nations
New York, 15 September 2002
Mr. President,
Please accept my congratulations on your election to the presidency of this
distinguished body.
May I also reaffirm the assurances of my highest appreciation and support to
the Secretary-General of the United Nations, Mr. Kofi Annan.
It is with satisfaction that Poland welcomes in our midst the new Member of
the United Nations - Switzerland and is looking forward to welcome soon the
Republic of East Timor.
Mr. President,
Distinguished Delegates,
Wislawa SZYMBORSKA, a Polish poetess and Nobel Prize winner, wrote the following
words dedicated to the victims of September 11:
"They plunged down from heights ablaze (...) For them I can do but two
things - depict their f fight and have the last sentence unfinished... "
I believe that every one of us traveling to this brave city shared similar thoughts.
We all must have asked ourselves a question - what is being expected of us,
where are we today, what obligations are we to fulfill to make sure that such
horror will never happen again?
No doubt, September 11 was a wake-up call for all of us. It may have not changed
the world but certainly it has fundamentally changed the way we perceive it.
Yet again the history has placed with us the responsibility to face the challenge
and deliver to the future generations a better and safer world. But than - after
all - isn't that really what we are here for?!
Many of my distinguished colleagues have touched upon this issue in recent days.
The messages delivered here, just four days ago, by Secretary General Kofi Annan
and President George W. Bush are especially significant. In that regard we also
share the opinion expressed by a number of other speakers, in particular Prime
Minister of Denmark, Mr. Anders F. Rasmussen, speaking in his capacity of the
President of the European Union.
Today, United Nations stands at the crossroads, facing a choice that needs to
be made. Either we will find internal strength to stand up to the challenge
and prove to be more than a mere discussion forum or forever loose the credibility.
Once again, as was the case at the onset over half a century ago, we must take
the issues of security seriously especially that terrorism has given it a new
dimension.
Poland as the founding member of the United Nations will continue to support
all efforts aimed at preserving its unique position. We fully agree with what
the UN Secretary General said, that we "can only succeed, if we make full
use of multinational institutions". We share the position of President
Bush, that the United Nations must be effective and successful and that UN resolutions
must be enforced. We are convinced that the Security Council must find enough
strength in the nearest future to set the course for the decision-making process
of the United Nations aimed at concrete actions. This time we are left with
very little margin. This is the test that international community has to pass
- failure would undermine both the United Nation's integrity and the security
of the whole world.
Mr. President,
I think the most appropriate motto for my further reflections on the future
of the United Nations is contained in the Secretary-General's Millennium Report.
He wrote: "If the international community were to create a new United
Nations tomorrow, its makeup would be surely different from the one we have
".
It would be highly unfortunate if the Millennium Report, and especially its
conclusions relating to the role of the United Nations and the reform of the
Organization faded into oblivion. Only the United Nations, given its exceptional
legitimacy stemming from the universal character of both its membership and
mandate can - and, indeed, ought to - rise to the challenges posed to the international
community. But for this to happen, its prerogatives, its rules and the instruments
would have to be geared to the needs of today and the threats of tomorrow. This
must be done by member states themselves, because, after all, the UN is - and
will remain - an intergovernmental organization.
Mr. President,
We should consider elaboration of a document, which would be neither a draft
revision of the Charter, nor its supplement, nor its enlarged version. What
I would like to suggest is that we make an attempt to acknowledge the new reality
and try a new road. By no means am I original or precedent-setting: the Atlantic
Charter and the New Atlantic Charter, the 1975 Helsinki Final Act and the 1990
Paris Charter of New Europe have all been there before. In other words, adapting
an organization's mandate to make it relevant to the new needs, without actually
revising its foundation act, have already been tested.
There is a widespread awareness of some provisions of the United Nations Charter
actually becoming a dead letter. That applies to both their substance and the
procedural solutions they offer. Some of the Charter's provisions and organs
have completed the tasks assigned to them. The de-colonization process made
the Trusteeship Council redundant. But the Organization does need new mechanisms
to run peacekeeping operations. It is impossible to comprehend why we still
keep in place the "clauses on enemy states" while the UN has no regulations
to properly address the problems related to its humanitarian interventions.
There is a general acceptance of the need for clear lines to be drawn to mark
new areas of responsibility for a number of important UN organs.
Mr. President,
The values, purposes and principles of the United Nations, enshrined in the
Preamble and Articles 1 and 2 of the Charter have not lost their relevance.
They have stood the test of time. A document that could be considered as "New
Act of the United Nations at the Dawn of the 21st Century" could give
a fresh impetus to the principles, organs and mechanisms of the United Nations
and make them more responsive to the needs and challenges that have dominated
the life of the international community today.
Let me point out four groups of problems that should be tackled - starting with
new threats to security:
- The Charter makes reference to threats traditionally raised by states; the
Charter's provisions concerning the Security Council, its composition, instruments
and the remaining chapters dealing with security are now insufficient - the
fact exposed by numerous developments of the recent years, including the September
11th attack and its consequences;
- Then comes acute poverty, evident in many parts of the world, chronic underdevelopment,
pandemic diseases, lack of education and medical care, the deepening differences
in living conditions and developmental standards - all these being unacceptable
and untenable politically and morally;
- Human rights, the rule of law, democracy, good governance and civil society
are the third group of problems I have been thinking about;
- The fourth group is made up of sustainable development related themes focusing
on the protection of both the human habitat, indispensable for the survival
of the human race, and of the common heritage of mankind.
On top of that, the existing UN principles must be expanded or new ones developed
for the Organization to pursue its actions in the following three dimensions,
namely:
1. manifestations of multilateralism in UN work (reconciling broad representation
and necessary collectivism with effectiveness);
2. subsidiarity in UN work to better utilize the means and resources available
to UN member states (relation: UN - regional arrangements);
3. getting non-governmental entities (including private capital) involved in
UN work in a way which will not detract from the democratic nature of the Organization,
will not erode its governmental character or its efficiency while increasing
its resources and effectiveness.
I dare to say, that no country, group of countries or regional agencies meeting
the Organization's criteria would be capable of taking within its range the
totality of problems such an undertaking would have to address.
Subject to appropriate consultations
involving the UN membership and the Secretary General we might wish to establish
a Group of Sages made up of outstanding personalities. The Group would draft
an appropriate document, which would then be assessed and approved by member
states. That document should have a politically binding nature, which would
combine with its legal anchorage in the Charter to provide a platform for the
UN actions over the coming decades.
Mr. President,
Distinguished Delegates,
We should think about the future, and work on its foundations without losing
sight of present-day achievements.
The enactment of the statute of the International Criminal Court is one such
achievement. It turns a new page in both international relations and international
law. It is Poland's desire for the treaty establishing the Court to become one
of the most universal documents of its kind. We trust that the existing divergences
between respective stands and views can be resolved through dialogue and compromise,
according to international law. We have to act so as not to disappoint the hopes
and expectations, which the international community places in the Court.
Mr. President,
A year ago the whole world has joined together in an unprecedented example of
solidarity. Today we are more aware of the source and the character of the threat.
We are indeed more capable of dealing with it through providing for the implementation
of relevant international instruments, taking steps to control the flow of finances
and persons, state borders and the arms trade. Poland has joined the ongoing
antiterrorist operation. Our soldiers are now deployed in Afghanistan, alongside
their colleagues from other countries, and are doing their utmost to strengthen
security there and help raise the country from rubble and ruin inflicted upon
it by two decades of war and internal strife.
For us it is a natural obligation that stems from the symbolic signature, which
we have placed on the Charter bringing this institution to life. But we cannot
avoid asking ourselves a question - are we any closer today to fulfilling the
ideals that we have set sail for half a century ago....?
We now have another chance to revitalize solidarity, work together for values
that are priceless both to us, and generations to come. Let us all create the
axis of good that will bring back the proper meaning to the term we are so proud
of - The United Nations.
Thank you, Mr. President.