
|
Speech of UNRWA Commissioner-General
EU Parliament Foreign Affairs and
Development Committees
Brussels, 10 September 2009 |
 |
Distinguished Chairs, your Excellencies:
It is a pleasure to meet and exchange views with a
joint session of the European Parliament’s Foreign Affairs and
Development Committees. This particular occasion has special
significance for me, personally, as at the end of 2009 I shall complete
my tenure as UNRWA’s Commissioner-General, having served the Agency
since August 2000, initially as Deputy Commissioner-General.
In the decades before I joined UNRWA and through my
years at its helm, one fact has stood out - we could not wish for more
generous, more reliable or more engaged allies than the EU, the EC and
the European Parliament. The European Union, its member States and its
institutions are our largest donors. The financial and in-kind support
you furnish remain indispensable to UNRWA’s ability to fulfill its
humanitarian and human development mandate in the interests of 4.6
million Palestine refugees.
The critical roles the EU plays go well beyond
material assistance. You make available technical expertise for
implementing, coordinating and evaluating UNRWA’s programmes. As active
members of UNRWA’s Advisory Commission, you help oversee financial and
programme management, reforms and policy development, thus advancing our
efforts to become more effective. And you offer to Palestinians, and
Palestine refugees, more general support, including on the international
political and diplomatic scene. Without the backing of Europe and its
member states, UNRWA could not be the positive force it is today
throughout the Middle East.
My remarks this morning will share perspectives on
UNRWA’s financial and operational challenges and outline aspects of the
Palestinian condition from the vantage point of UNRWA’s sixty years of
experience in the region. Allow me to begin with a very brief outline of
UNRWA’s mission and operational profile.
In 2008, Palestinians marked the sixtieth year of
their exile. This year, UNRWA commemorates the sixtieth year of its
creation. UNRWA’s mandate is to assist and protect Palestine refugees in
Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, the West Bank and Gaza, until such time as their
plight is justly resolved.
We currently blend humanitarian and human development
functions in five main programme areas. In the field of education, we
employ some 16,000 teachers in 683 elementary and preparatory schools
and run ten vocational and technical training centers. Primary health
care is delivered through 138 clinics handling several million patient
visits a year. UNRWA implements social safety-net activities,
infrastructure and camp improvement projects and microfinance
interventions. We also maintain emergency response capabilities during
and following armed conflict and humanitarian crises. Our food aid
programmes benefit approximately 1.2 million people, the majority of
whom reside in the occupied Palestinian territory.
Unlike most UN agencies, UNRWA offers its services
directly to refugees, while coordinating and harmonizing its functions
with those of host countries and authorities. Our services contribute
not only to human security, but also to stability and calm in refugee
communities.
UNRWA’s uniqueness, however, remains consistent with
its core identity as a UN agency operating under the guidance of the
General Assembly and in harmony with the principles and purposes of the
UN Charter. In particular, we promote, in refugee communities, the
values of neutrality, impartiality, tolerance for diversity,
non-violence and respect for the human rights of all.
Your Excellencies,
I understand that financial and budgetary matters are
very much on your minds as you enter a critical phase of negotiating the
European Commission budget for 2010. I take this opportunity to call to
your attention the parlous state of UNRWA’s finances. And I appeal to
you to come to our aid by raising the already remarkable levels of
support you provide.
UNRWA is experiencing budget deficits in all three of
its budget lines, namely, the General Fund, our Emergency Appeals and
the project budget. At this time, however, projections for the General
Fund give cause for heightened anxiety.
Our financial difficulties are the cumulative result
of a combination of factors, among them unfavourable regional and
economic patterns and high food and fuel costs. The scale and complexity
of refugee needs have grown as the population has expanded. UNRWA’s
expenditures have risen sharply as we struggle to maintain the quality
of its services, to satisfy intensifying stakeholder demands for more
effective programmes and to meet the salary requirements of our 29,000
staff. Although donor contributions have recently increased in absolute
terms, reflecting donor confidence in UNRWA, they have been outstripped
by the pace of upward trends in operational expenditure.
The resulting shortfall threatens UNRWA’s ability to
sustain existing service levels and renders impossible efforts to
improve services. The estimated gap for 2009 is $84 million, of which
$16.3 million represents direct operational costs.
In light of this serious vulnerability, I appeal to
you to respond to UNRWA’s call for extraordinary assistance. I call on
you to help us avoid the dire funding scenario we will otherwise face in
the coming years. By so doing, you will strengthen UNRWA’s – and the
international community’s - hand in taking forward our mission of
helping refugees lead dignified lives while serving as a calming
presence across the region.
Distinguished members,
I shall now briefly outline the situation in each of
UNRWA’s fields of operation. In Jordan and Syria, the refugees are
fortunate to enjoy a secure and stable environment. Even in these
countries, economic opportunities remain out of reach of many refugees,
not least because UNRWA lacks the resources to assist them towards
self-reliance.
In Lebanon, the difficult circumstances Palestine
refugees have long faced confer particular value on the stabilizing
impact of UNRWA’s work. Besides freedom of movement, access to
employment and decent living conditions in the camps, the most pressing
concern is the reconstruction of Nahr El Bared camp which was destroyed
in the summer of 2007, and the care of 30,000 refugees who were
displaced as a consequence. Given the direct relevance to refugees’
rights and to the stability of northern Lebanon, it is critical that the
international community fully responds to our appeal for $277 million to
re-build Nahr El Bared, $67.3 million of which has been pledged so far.
In the West Bank and Gaza, Palestine refugees, who
comprise nearly half the population, confront grave threats to their
lives, liberty and livelihoods. These threats, which have intensified
over the course of the past three years, emanate from both Israeli and
internal Palestinian sources. On the one side is Israel’s occupation of
Gaza and the West Bank since 1967, its overall policies towards
Palestinians, the recurrent cycles of armed conflict and the closure
regimes currently in place. On the other side is the insecurity and
uncertain future stemming from hostility between Fatah and Hamas. The
result is a situation in which Palestinians and Palestine refugees exist
in an abnormal, precarious state.
Gaza’s borders remain closed to the free flow of
people and commercial, humanitarian and construction supplies. The
closure’s stifling consequences are very much in evidence in the
moribund economy, minimal public services, unemployment and human
insecurity.
The blockade frustrates the reconstruction and
recovery effort for which some $5 billion was pledged at Sharm El Sheik
last March and renders almost entirely aid-dependent the 1.1 million
Gazans now receiving food assistance.
In the interests of Palestinians and of regional and
international security, it is imperative that these artificial
conditions of exclusion and imposed poverty be reversed. An open access
regime and greater freedoms for Palestinians are essential for creating
an atmosphere in which the forces of compromise, moderation and
tolerance are encouraged and strengthened.
In the West Bank, the separation barrier and its
associated obstacles and administrative restrictions continue to starve
the economy, placing normal life out of the reach of many Palestinians.
House demolitions and confiscations, notably in East Jerusalem, frequent
arrest and detention campaigns and violent attacks by settlers are
regular features of Palestinian life. In East Jerusalem and elsewhere,
Israeli settlements are but one part of an intricate web of measures
that whittle away the living space and resources available to
Palestinians.
After more than forty years of Israeli occupation,
and notwithstanding recent reports of improvements in economic and
security indicators, the West Bank remains splintered to a point where
its integrity as a viable economic and social unit is deeply
compromised. This has obvious repercussions for the quality of a
prospective negotiated settlement. The immediate question is whether
these fraught, fragmented conditions will allow the West Bank, with
Gaza, to serve as the foundation for a viable Palestinian State.
Your Excellencies,
The situation of Palestinians and Palestine refugees
flies in the face of all the lofty principles of humanity we espouse as
members of the United Nations and of the European Union. In full view of
the international community, Palestinians endure forms of oppression
that violate every precept of human rights and fundamental freedoms.
Nevertheless, the fact that this conflict has defied resolution for over
sixty years must not diminish our resolve to address it, or distract us
from the rich potential for positive change.
Since early this year, the President of the United
States has led a refreshing turnaround in the approach to these issues.
His words have inspired belief in the possibilities of peace among all
who are weary of war in the Middle East. And his forthright stance on
the construction of settlements indicates a readiness to address a major
aspect of the Israeli occupation.
While the new posture of the US could not be more
welcome, the complexities of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict demand
that the promises of inspiring words be followed by concrete action. The
wretched conditions Palestinians face must be reversed. Their dignity
must be restored, and a credible negotiation process reinstated. Allow
me to draw on my experience of living and working in Gaza for the past
nine years, to suggest some requirements that are fundamental to
renewing the prospects for tomorrow.
An important consideration is the need for States and
political actors to act in concert, particularly in holding both sides
to their international obligations. The leading role traditionally
played by the US must be complemented by other major actors to ensure
that maximum, unified leverage is brought to bear on both sides. Europe,
with its resources, global clout and historical ties to the region is
well placed to play an even larger role than it does at present.
A primary prerequisite for a credible, effective
negotiation process is its ability to command confidence across the
Palestinian rank and file. For this reason, a further need is for future
processes of dialogue and negotiation to embrace the major
constituencies within the Palestinian body politic. An inclusive
approach will ensure that Palestinians see themselves and their
interests reflected in the process. It will also pay dividends in
enhancing the likelihood of negotiation outcomes being accepted.
Closely related to the requirement of an inclusive
negotiation process is the imperative of investing in efforts to heal
the intra-Palestinian rift. The Fatah-Hamas divide is more entrenched
than ever, a threat to the Palestinian cause and to the durability of
any negotiation process. The old adage, "a house divided against itself
cannot stand" has a chilling resonance to the current hostility within
the Palestinian camp. The perils of this impasse should be acknowledged
more candidly, and the necessary resources and pressure invested to help
the ‘warring’ sides towards an accommodation - if not a reconciliation.
Another requirement relates to the issues to be
addressed in negotiations. The lessons of the past and the realities of
the Palestinian condition suggest that a comprehensive negotiation
agenda may help to advance the process. The current emphasis on halting
Israeli settlements must be complemented by attention to the variety of
outstanding issues – the release of Staff Sergeant Gilad Shalit, the
strictures of closure, blockade and lack of humanitarian access and the
systematic demolition and/or confiscation of Palestinian homes and
structures. Credible efforts to resolve these and other human rights
related questions will go a long way to create an atmosphere that
enhances the prospects of dialogue.
From the standpoint of UNRWA’s mandate, I place
particular emphasis on the need to reflect seriously in any negotiation
process the interests and concerns of Palestine refugees. Issues of
refugee return and settlement are especially complex in the Palestinian
context. Accordingly, the principles of informed choice must serve as
the basis for clarifying refugee expectations and the rights attached to
choices the refugees themselves might make. Ensuring that the refugee
voice is heard and refugee choice ascertained and respected will ensure
that the outcome of any dialogue or negotiated settlement will benefit
from the understanding – if not the full support – of the refugee
constituency, and will thus be accorded the credibility required to
stand the test of time.
Your Excellencies,
I am of the firm conviction that this conflict and
the condition of Palestinians and Palestine refugees can and must be
resolved. The cry for peace, so powerful among millions of ordinary
Palestinians, must not go unheeded for much longer. To respond to that
cry, States and political actors must remain open to the possibilities
that exist amidst the harsh realities, and seize the opportunities that
have been overlooked over the years.
Europe is well placed to be a catalyst and agent of
positive change. In addition to the resources and the international
authority you have at your command, and your unstinting support for
UNRWA, you bring to the Israeli-Palestinian table your own experience of
emerging from decades of armed conflict and deep divisions to become a
united continent in which human rights, prosperity and the rule of law
flourish. It is to such a transformation that Palestinians and Palestine
refugees aspire. For our own sake, as much as theirs, let us work
together to realize their ultimate vision of a viable State of
Palestine, thriving in peace and security with its neighbours. |