Towards
implementing the Mauritius Strategy
UN-OHRLLS SUPPORT
Fulfilling
the Mandate of the UN Office of the High Representative for the
Least Developed Countries, Landlocked Developing Countries and
Small Island Developing States
Introduction
Since
its establishment by the United Nations General Assembly in 2001
and in accordance with its mandate, the UN OHRLLS has played a
role in furthering the implementation of the Barbados Programme
of Action for the SIDS hand in hand with the two other programmes
of Almaty and Brussels relating to the Landlocked Developing and
the Least Developed Countries respectively. In fact, this role
was given prominent recognition with the appointment of the Under-Secretary-General
and High Representative Mr. Anwarul K. Chowdhury, as Secretary-General
of the International Meeting for the ten-year review of the Barbados
Programme of Action held in Mauritius from 10-14 January 2005.
The UN-OHRLLS played a key role in the preparatory process for
the Mauritius International Meeting. It was instrumental in mobilizing
resources for the participation of SIDS delegations to preparatory
meetings and the International Conference itself, as well as for
the participation of representatives of civil society, non-governmental
organizations and the private sector The Office worked closely
with the Host Country, the Republic of Mauritius, and provided
the guidance to United Nations organizations in preparing and
conducting the International Meeting, which upon its conclusion
was hailed a "resounding success" by the President of
the International Meeting, Prime Minister of Mauritius His Excellency
Mr. Paul Raymond Bérenger. Similar views were expressed
by United Nations Secretary-General Mr. Kofi Annan and other dignitaries
and stakeholders present.
The
UN-OHRLLS mandate within the framework of the Mauritius Strategy
and emanating from General Assembly resolution 56/227 gives it
a continuing role for both advocacy and mobilization of resources
for the implementation of internationally agreed development goals
in respect of SIDS. The Office will therefore continue to initiate
steps to advocate and seek support and resources on behalf of
the Small Island Developing States to achieve the objectives set
out in the Mauritius Strategy to further implement the Barbados
Programme of Action. In this context, the Office continues to
seek the full support of the SIDS, the Alliance of Small Island
States (AOSIS), and the SIDS Unit of UN DESA, the UNDP, UNEP,
UNESCO and other UN system organizations. The UN-OHRLLS has also
recognized the important role of the Bretton Woods institutions,
the World Trade Organization, the World Tourism Organization,
the Global Environment Fund, and the regional organizations in
the implementation of the Mauritius Strategy. The role of civil
society, the private sector and communities in the SIDS are vital
to the success of the Mauritius Strategy.
The
UN-OHRLLS has appreciated the cooperation of the stakeholders
concerned and looks ahead to further enhancing such cooperation
in helping the SIDS in their development in the period ahead.
| We
especially thank Under Secretary General Chowdhury and his
office for the exceptional effort on his part to ensure the
fullest possible participation of civil society in this process. |
| |
| Mauritius
Declaration of the Civil Society Forum, January 2005 |
The
United Nations International Meeting for the ten-year review of
the Barbados Programme of Action for the sustainable development
of the Small Island Developing States (SIDS) was a result of over
a year's preparatory work starting with individual SIDS and the
three SIDS regions of the Caribbean, Pacific and AIMS (Atlantic,
Indian Ocean, Mediterranean and South China Sea) and at the Inter-regional
meeting held in the Bahamas in January 2004. These preparations
were followed by a global preparatory process involving the entire
international community in New York at the Preparatory Meeting
convened by the 12th session of the Commission on Sustainable
Development (CSD 12) and the informal meetings convened thereafter
by the facilitator, Ambassador Don MacKay, Permanent Representative
of New Zealand to the United Nations, right up to the informal
consultations on 8 and 9 January 2005, prior to the International
Meeting in Mauritius.
The International Meeting held from 10-14 January 2005 was attended
by 120 states, 15 Heads of State or Government, 9 associate members
of regional commissions, 20 intergovernmental organizations, and
13 specialized agencies and related organizations. In addition
a Civil Society Forum was held from 6-9 January 2005 and members
of civil society reported on their recommendations on the opening
day of the International Meeting and also participated at the
high-level segment on 13 and 14 January 2005.
One of the most pertinent observations of the ten-year review
of the 1994 Barbados Programme of Action for the sustainable development
of the Small Island Developing States was the inadequate international
cooperation, external resources and technology in implementing
the Programme during the past decade 1994-2004. SIDS on their
part had taken on the major burden of implementing the Programme
but their activities were seriously hampered due to a lack of
financial and other resources including technology, and capacity
constraints to undertake what needed to be done. There was also
a serious problem with coordination amongst the different stakeholders
beginning with regional bodies, the various UN system and other
multilateral organizations that had the capacity and the mandates
to get involved in implementing the different facets of the Programme.
Another glaring factor that emerged from the 10-year review was
the absence of sufficient international awareness of the specific
social, economic and environmental vulnerabilities of the SIDS.
The need to continuously sustain international interest in the
Programme of Action for the SIDS was expressed as a strong concern.
A consistent campaign on their behalf needed to be maintained
in order to keep SIDS issues high on the international agenda.
Hence, the role of advocacy was strongly emphasized by various
speakers at the International Meeting in Mauritius. Secretary-General
Kofi Annan put the problems of implementing the Barbados Programme
of Action in a succinct form:
"United
Nations conferences from Rio to Johannesburg and Monterrey, and
above all 10 years ago in Barbados, has sought to rally the world
behind the cause of Small Island Developing States. There has
been progress. Some small islands have carved out new market niches,
in particular in services such as finance, tourism and information
technologies. The latter in particular have helped to ease their
isolation.
But
major economic challenges remain. On the whole, implementation
of what was agreed and promised at Barbados remains disappointing
at best. And in the meantime, new challenges have emerged. The
AIDS epidemic has made deep inroads, especially in the Caribbean,
which now ranks second to sub-Saharan Africa in the proportion
of its adult population infected.
So
what was, a decade ago, an already pressing small islands agenda,
has become even more urgent and daunting. Good progress is possible
here in Mauritius. Partnerships with regional organizations and
civil society will be crucial. The private sector's involvement
is essential. The United Nations system will continue to do its
part, including through advocacy aimed at keeping the issues of
concern to small islands prominent on the international agenda."
The
state of the implementation of the Barbados Programme of Action
at the end of the decade was clearly highlighted in the abovementioned
statement made by UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan. Hence, from
the Mauritius meeting onwards, Small Island Developing States
and the United Nations system must ensure that a new path, a new
direction, is adopted towards realizing the aspirations of the
small and vulnerable islands in the next few years. Since sustenance
of international interest and resources proved to be the most
serious of handicaps during the past decade 1994-2004 for implementing
the Programme of Action, this was a key point emphasized by the
Mauritius Strategy.
HIGH
REPRESENTATIVE LAUNCHES ADVOCACY FOR SIDS
UN-OHRLLS
SUPPORT ROADMAP
High Representative Anwarul K. Chowdhury began taking the steps
essential in fulfilling the mandate of UN-OHRLLS to promote the
implementation of the Mauritius Strategy. In this regard, a Roadmap
to guide the work of the UN-OHRLLS has been issued and is posted
on its website (www.un.org/ohrlls). This document will act as
a guideline that would be dynamic and would undergo change and
revision in keeping with how the implementation process moves
and how other stakeholders react to the process.
2nd
World Conference on International Strategy for Disaster Reduction,
Kobe, Japan
(18-22 January 2005)
The
Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015: Building the Resilience
of Nations and Communities to Disasters
This
conference was the first major international event relevant towards
implementing aspects of the Mauritius Strategy. As in the case
of the Mauritius International Meeting, this Kobe conference also
acquired higher significance in view of the Asian tsunami disaster
of 28 December 2004.
Mr.
Anwarul K. Chowdhury participated at the conference both in his
capacity as the Secretary-General of the International Meeting
and.the High Representative.
In
keeping with the mandate of his Office the High Representative
made the following points towards advocating the cause of the
SIDS and the further implementation of the Mauritius Strategy:
*
He reminded the conference that the Barbados Programme ranked
the need to address natural and environment disasters as one of
its 14 priorities. The Programme had explicitly called on the
1994 Yokohama World Conference on Natural Disasters to give special
recognition to SIDS so that their unique characteristics are taken
into account in developing natural disaster reduction management
programmes. The Yokohama document had called for giving "priority
attention to the Small Island Developing States and Least Developed
Countries in the activities of the International Decade for Disaster
Reduction."
·* He reaffirmed the SIDS as a special case for sustainable
development in view of the vulnerabilities that they face and
the disproportionately high economic, social and environmental
impact of natural disasters on small islands.
·* He emphasized the need to develop and strengthen effective
disaster risk reduction, early warning systems, emergency relief,
and rehabilitation and reconstruction capacities for these countries.
·* Support the efforts of SIDS through technology development,
capacity-building and human resources development to build resilience
in these countries.
·* He also emphasized the need to take into account the
needs of SIDS and those of the Least Developed Countries while
preparing the Kobe Framework for Action 2005-2015 and the continuing
validity of the assertion made in the Yokohama Strategy that "---
the most affected by natural and other disasters are the poor
and specially disadvantaged groups in developing countries as
they are least equipped to cope with them."
The
outcome of the WCDR, Kobe, was highly pertinent for the implementation
of the Mauritius Strategy. The Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015:
Building the Resilience of Nations and Communities to Disasters
contains the following provisions that are relevant to disaster-prone
developing countries:
"
(g) Disaster-prone developing countries, especially least developed
countries and small island developing States, warrant particular
attention in view of their higher vulnerability and risk levels,
which often greatly exceed their capacity to respond to and recover
from disasters;
(h)
There is a need to enhance international and regional cooperation
and assistance in the field of disaster risk reduction through,
inter alia:
*
The transfer of knowledge, technology and expertise to enhance
capacity building for disaster risk reduction
* The sharing of research findings, lessons learned and best practices
* The compilation of information on disaster risk and impact for
all scales of disasters in a way that can inform sustainable development
and disaster risk reduction
* Appropriate support in order to enhance governance for disaster
risk reduction, for awareness-raising initiatives and for capacity-development
measures at all levels, in order to improve the disaster resilience
of developing countries
* The full, speedy and effective implementation of the enhanced
Heavily
Indebted Poor Countries Initiative, taking into account the impact
of disasters on the debt sustainability of countries eligible
for this programme
* Financial assistance to reduce existing risks and to avoid the
generation of new risks"
Again,
under "Priorities for action" the Hyogo Framework provides
for the specific implementation of the Mauritius Strategy:
"(h)
Implement the outcome of the Mauritius Strategy for the further
implementation of the Barbados Programme of Action for the sustainable
development of small island developing States, including by establishing
and strengthening effective early warning systems as well as other
mitigation and response measures."
Fifth
Open Forum for Partnerships
"Facing
disasters in the least developed countries: Need for preparedness
and international support"
(United Nations, New York 28 February 2005)
The
UN OHRLLS organized this Open Forum where Mr. Salvano Briceno,
Director of the International Strategy for Disaster Reduction
Secretariat (ISDR) and Secretary-General of the World Conference
on Disaster Reduction (WCDR) made a presentation. During the course
of the discussions, Mr. Briceno was requested to update the participants
on efforts being made by the UN to establish early warning systems
of relevance to LDCs and the SIDS. In this context, it was noted
that
·*
Individual countries and communities were strengthening their
disaster management capabilities. ISDR was working closely with
the Indian Ocean Commission and others concerned in the region.
* Work had already begun in the Indian Ocean region to establish
early warning systems with connections with the already-established
Pacific early warning system capabilities. Individual countries
of the region like Indonesia, Thailand and India were also setting
up their own systems. In this regard, the meeting was informed
that attempts had been made a few years ago to establish an early
warning system in the Indian Ocean region. However, unfortunately,
at that time the countries in the region felt that since tsunamis
were rare and 100-year occurrences there was no need for such
facilities. However, it was noted that 100-year occurrences could
happen the very next day.
* Educating the public on tsunamis would keep a population that
is vulnerable alert. The example of a school girl who had just
learnt about tsunamis about two weeks ago in a school lesson had
probably saved her life and that of others when she found herself
exposed to this disaster in Phuket, Thailand. If people had known
about tsunamis they would perhaps have fled to higher ground in
greater haste.
* The use of volunteers who were knowledgeable and especially
those that were locally-recruited was emphasized as an important
resource in building national abilities to cope with natural and
other disasters.
Encouraging
Civil Society involvement in the implementation of the Mauritius
Strategy
DISCUSSIONS
Held at United Nations Headquarters on 19 April 2005
THE ROLE
OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MAURITIUS STRATEGY
FOR SMALL ISLAND DEVELOPING STATES (SIDS)
The
UN-OHRLLS collaborated with the UN NGO Committee on Sustainable
Development to organize discussions at UN headquarters in New
York on 19 April 2005 with a view to clarifying the role of civil
society in the implementation of the Mauritius Strategy for the
SIDS.
In
his remarks, Mr. Anwarul Chowdhury said that as the Secretary-General
of the Mauritius International Meeting (MIM) it had been his great
pleasure to work closely with civil society. Civil society had
contributed effectively both during the preparatory phase as well
as at the MIM itself. The Civil Society Forum (CSF) which was
held prior to MIM was well attended and it had come up with a
declaration which had outlined a number of priority areas. The
Forum had presented its report to the MIM opening session. In
the two roundtable meetings of Heads of State/Government, civil
society representatives were allocated two seats so that they
could intervene when necessary.
Mr.
Chowdhury stressed the fact that no UN programme of action, let
alone the Mauritius Strategy (MS), would be effectively implemented
without civil society participation. Partnerships with civil society
and NGO participation in intergovernmental meetings were essential
but this approach still remained elusive and we were yet to find
solutions to this matter.
The
Mauritius Strategy recognized the role of civil society and the
private sector. The CARICOM had a charter provision for the participation
of major groups. There should not only be regional charters like
this but also a global charter for the involvement of civil society.
Mr.
Gordon Bispham (Caribbean/Barbados civil society representative)
acknowledged the role during the last few years of UN-OHRLLS in
promoting civil society. The CSF had called for action in three
main areas:
1. Information and communications network for SIDS
2. Public awareness programme for SIDS
3. Assessment of progress being made and indicators for the programme
of action for SIDS
These
could be considered the three minimum core areas of the CSF framework.
Ms
Vanessa Tobin, Chief, Water/Sanitation and Environment of UNICEF
mentioned that there were three issues within the MS where UNICEF
could play a role. These were in the areas of health, education,
and child protection. In this regard UNICEF was supportive of
Civil Society and to partner with them in the areas of water,
sanitation and hygiene.
*
Globally sanitation and hygiene was lacking in terms of the goals
of the MDGs
* Water quality monitoring and joint monitoring for chemicals
and microbiological contamination was essential
* Emergency preparedness and response plans - UNICEF was working
closely with an interagency team of NGOs in the Maldives. There
were also close working relations with the World Bank and Asian
Development Bank.
Ms.
Roma Stibravy, Chairperson, NGO Committee, saw some very positive
trends towards increased funding from major donors and alternative
mechanisms for meeting international development objectives.
Mr. Om Pradhan (UN-OHRLLS) mentioned the following issues:
* Concern over the delay in the endorsement of the MS by the UN
General Assembly - nearly three months had passed since the MIM
and many more months may slip by before this formality is undertaken.
* Concern that the enthusiasm generated during the MIM preparatory
process and the MIM itself was waning in the aftermath of the
MIM.
* Financial support for Civil Society participation in international
meetings was difficult to come by and each event required approaching
donor countries with unsure results.
In
the course of the Q&A session and an interactive exchange
of views the following issues were touched upon:
* Programmes in the SIDS should be demand-driven as opposed to
supply-driven - national governments should decide on where aid
and investments should go.
* Pacific islands were not on track to meet the MDGs on water
and sanitation.
* Water and sanitation data pertaining to schools was not available
- but the fact that much of such data was with UNICEF was mentioned.
* Civil Society had evolved over the years and their functioning
was much more sophisticated comparatively speaking. For example,
when governments wanted certain development-related information
or data, CS has often been a very useful source.
* All said and done financing of CS is the major challenge for
their work and mobility.
* There was some concern over the privatization of national resources
like water and energy programmes.
* National governments should support Civil Society to gain access
to available financial resources.
· UN OHRLLS should help Civil Society to mobilize financial
and other resources.
Ms.
Roma Stibravy said that financial mobilization in the US was an
industry in itself and perhaps some Civil Society persons could
be trained in this regard. However, it was made known that such
training had already been undertaken; rather it was often more
a question of access from the government to the funds already
there.
UN-OHRLLS
and the World Bank
(7 March 2005)
The
World Bank delegation at the Mauritius International Meeting was
led by Vice-President Mr. Ian Goldin. Since then the High Representative
has discussed various ways in which the World Bank could contribute
towards implementating the Mauritius Strategy.
At the meeting between the High Representative and Mr. Jim Adams,
Vice President of the World Bank in Washington D.C. on 7 March
2005 they also discussed the implications for SIDS of the just-concluded
IDA-14 agreement.
Following are the main outcome of the discussions for follow-up:
*
A five-year review was being undertaken for the Small States Forum.
The Bank was evaluating the relevance of the Forum and examining
whether the Forum should continue to be a global level forum or
should it be taken to the regional levels.
*
The next meeting of the Forum would examine the recommendations
of this review and take a decision. The Caribbean region would
have the chairmanship of the Forum in 2005 and it is expected
that Prime Minister Owen Arthur of Barbados will be invited to
chair the event.
*
The Mauritius Strategy would be put on the agenda of the Forum.
·*
The World Bank was supportive of the regional approach with regard
to the follow-up of the Mauritius Strategy and felt that as the
regional bodies like CARICOM and the Pacific Islands Forum had
emerged as key players, such an approach would get the World Bank's
support.
*
IDA-14 had some positive elements for SIDS, namely higher ceiling
for SIDS to be eligible for IDA loans, and there were exceptions
agreed upon for SIDS. The Bank would have increased resources
for SIDS but the performance level of the SIDS needed to be better
to obtain increased resources from the Bank. It was felt that
the Caribbean countries were doing better than the Pacific Islands
in this regard.
*
If there were any new ideas that UN-OHRLLS had on the follow-up
of the Mauritius Strategy, the Bank would welcome them and would
work together with the office.
Open
Forum for Partnerships to discuss the issue of protecting the
environment in Least Developed Countries and Small Island Developing
States, with Global Environment Facility (GEF), 24 March 2005
Mr. Anwarul K. Chowdhury called for a renewed commitment by the
international community to prevent environmental degradation in
Least Developed Countries as stated in the Brussels Programme
of Action. "The Least Developed Countries and Small Island
Developing States are contributing the least to the emission of
greenhouse gases, while they are the most vulnerable and have
the least capacity to adapt to the adverse effects of climate
change," he said at the United Nations today.
Chairman
of the Global Environment Facility (GEF), Mr. Leonard Good said
that there was a growing link between environment and development.
He said that the Global Environment Facility had 431 projects
with an investment of $1.1 billion in 49 Least Developed Countries
and 260 projects with a financial undertaking of $425 million
in 41 Small Island Developing States. "While GEF has an Island
Biodiversity work programme focused on SIDS, mitigation of greenhouse
gases has been a priority in Least Developed Countries,"
he added.
The
LDC Fund had been set up and the Least Developed Countries should
push for more funding. "GEF is now focusing on several different
environmental issues, for example issues relating to water. The
Small Island Developing States have the perfect opportunity to
get involved," Mr. Good said.
13th
session of the Commission on Sustainable Development
(11-14 April 2005)
On
11 April 2005 Mr. Anwarul K. Chowdhury made a statement at the
opening session of the Commission. This statement was critical
in drawing the attention of CSD 13 to the programmes of action
for the three most vulnerable groups of countries, and especially
the SIDS in the context of the Mauritius Strategy. On the opening
day itself, he pointed out that the documents presented to the
Commission should have reflected very prominently the issues concerning
these vulnerable countries, particularly the LDCs and SIDS as
the Brussels Programme and the Mauritius Strategy devote special
attention to water, sanitation and human settlements. He said
that it would have been appropriate to incorporate worthwhile
references to their concerns for consideration of the Commission.
He also mentioned that it was also disappointing to find that
the matrix of the IPM summary made by the Chairman did not include
the special profile that the Chairman had accorded to the needs
of these most disadvantaged countries.
Specifically, in respect of the SIDS, Mr. Chowdhury informed the
Commission that earlier this year in January at the UN-convened
Mauritius International Meeting to conduct the 10- year-review
of the Barbados Programme of Action for the sustainable development
of Small Island Developing States, the water, sanitation and human
settlements issues in SIDS received special attention of the international
community. The Mauritius Strategy clearly emphasized that the
"access to safe drinking water, the provision of sanitation
and the promotion of hygiene are the foundations of human dignity,
public health and economic and social development." The SIDS
continued to face water management and access challenges.
World
Food Programme (WFP)
The
WFP informed the UN-OHRLLS vide their letter of 30 March 2005
that at the Kobe WCDR, WFP had launched the Humanitarian Early
Warning System Web (HEWSweb), a global warning hub for early warning
and alerts for UN, other partners, donors, governments and the
humanitarian community at large. (www.hewsweb.org)
Sixty-First
session of the Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the
Pacific (ESCAP), Bangkok, Thailand
(12 to 18 May 2005)
Addressing
the Ministerial segment of ESCAP, Mr. Anwarul K. Chowdhury put
forward the case of the SIDS before the meeting. He said that
the region's 15 small islands as well as the associate members
had been enthusiastic participants at the Mauritius International
Meeting convened by the United Nations that resulted in the adoption
of the Mauritius Strategy for the implementation of the Barbados
Programme. He said that he was happy to note that the Pacific
Islands Summit would take place next year during the ESCAP's 62nd
session in Indonesia. The ESCAP Pacific Operations Center (EPOC)
had a major role in the implementation of the Mauritius Strategy
in the region working closely with the Pacific Islands Forum and
other relevant regional organizations. He also reiterated that
he had been underlining consistently the importance of the role
regional organizations can play in the implementation of the sustainable
development agenda of the small islands. The UN system and international
financial institutions needed to provide the support that these
small islands deserve due to their acute vulnerability and remoteness.
Second
South Summit, Doha, Qatar
(12 - 16 June 2005)
The
HR participated at the Second South Summit of the Group of 77
and China in Doha, Qatar (12-16 June 2005) with a view to highlight
what had been done and what could be done within the framework
of South-South cooperation for the three most vulnerable groups
of countries. In the case of the SIDS, he brought the Mauritius
Strategy to the attention of the Summit stating that this internationally
agreed outcome stated that South-South cooperation was critical
at the bilateral, sub-regional and regional levels in investment,
capacity-building, disaster management, environment, food, agriculture,
oceans, water, energy, health and education. Within this framework,
SIDS-SIDS cooperation had acquired considerable significance.
Based on their real developmental needs, South-South cooperation
should be built as an integral part of the international community's
support to the countries in special needs.
The
HR pointed out that a growing number of institutions with excellent
standards of education and outstanding capacities and expertise
in areas of health, manufacturing, hi-tech industries and ICT,
as well as research and development exist today in the South.
These countries had the means and the resources to further promote
South-South cooperation to support the disadvantaged countries.
In recent years, such cooperation was being promoted actively
in areas ranging from health - more specifically in the fight
against HIV/AIDS, capacity development, trade and agriculture
to economic infrastructure, debt cancellation, population, disaster
mitigation, governance and democratic institutions building and
sharing of technology. Regional cooperation and greater market
opportunities among developing countries in general, and with
the most vulnerable countries in particular, appeared to be key
factors for the expansion of South-South trade. This was also
finding increasing reflection in the cooperation frameworks of
the regional and sub-regional organizations of Africa, Asia-Pacific
and Latin America-Caribbean.
It
is important to recognize the linkage between South-South cooperation
with the realization of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs),
especially with regard to poverty reduction efforts and social
development, including raising the status of women. It was important
to tie South-South agenda with the MDGs through mechanisms for
more effective implementation of policies, agreements and action
plans, with special emphasis on least developed countries, landlocked
developing countries, Small Island developing States and Africa
in general.
The
HR took the opportunity to tell the Summit what specific actions
could be taken to focus on the special needs of the LDCs, LLDCs
and SIDS and the implementation of their respective Programmes
of Action. The developing countries needed to give particular
attention to the following six areas in order to:
1.
Remove all existing tariff and non-tariff barriers to their markets
for the products of LDCs and support LDCs to overcome their supply-side
constraints.
2. Facilitate and improve transit transport by all modes of communications
for LLDCs.
3. Increase foreign direct investment (FDI) flows to LDCs, LLDCs
and SIDS, particularly to build infrastructure and expand export
capacity.
4. Double the present technical assistance as well as training,
research and educational facilities and scholarships provided
to the LDCs, LLDCs and SIDS.
5. Provide greater support to the social sector development in
the LDCs with special attention to health focusing on HIV/AIDS,
education, population issues and women's empowerment.
6. Cooperate in establishing food security for the LDCs