Corruption
'threat to South Pacific economies'
12.06.2004
By FRAN O'SULLIVAN
Transparency International has blown the whistle on corruption in
some South Pacific nations which threatens the region's economic
future.
A study into
12 small nations found widespread concern about political corruption,
particularly during election campaigns.
Vote buying
and the operation of political slush funds were of particular concern
to South Pacific Islanders.
Not even civil
organisations, usually seen as a brake on Governments, were free
from the taint of corruption.
The report notes
that the private sector has often been viewed as the perpetrator
of corruption, bribing officials to get business.
Now the boot
is on the other foot, and the private sector is complaining that
it is often the victim of "rent seeking" bureaucrats and
politicians.
Churches and
other non-government organisations might sometimes criticise Government
corruption, but may be vulnerable to it themselves, the report says.
Countries surveyed
were the Cook Islands, the Federated States of Micronesia, Kiribati,
the Marshall Islands, Nauru, Niue, Palau, Samoa, the Solomon Islands,
Tonga, Tuvalu and Vanuatu.
Transparency
International said some countries had strengthened their anti-corruption
measures, but none of the 12 was free of the corruption taint.
Among concerns
are widespread abuse of ministerial and official travel, suspicions
that Government ministers favour relatives when dishing out appointments,
contracts and scholarships, distortion of budget processes by pet
projects and what is called in Micronesia "pitch and catch"
- where legislators benefit from expenditure they authorise.
Areas most at
risk of corruption are police and customs, land and titles administration,
forestry and fisheries, ports, health and education, retirement
funds, tendering, trade in passports and stamps, and overseas banking.
The director
of Transparency International's Papua New Guinea chapter, Peter
Aitsi, said there was concern throughout the Pacific at the effect
corruption had on a country's economic performance.
Aitsi said nepotism
was a particular concern, especially when Government cronies were
appointed to state-owned enterprises.
He said the
surveys were independently carried out by local researchers under
the Australian National University's Asia Pacific School of Economics
and Government. Austaid provided funding.
Earlier reports
covered Fiji and Papua New Guinea