UN Reform Highlights Since 1997-2006

Reforming the United Nations was a priority for former Secretary-General, Kofi Annan. In the ten years of his tenure (1997-2006), understanding that the organization needs to continue improving, the Secretary-General made numerous proposals with significant implications for how the Organization conducts its work, implements its mandates, and manages the funds entrusted to it by its Member States. This has included changes to work programmes, structures and systems, in headquarters locations and in the field.

Much of this agenda has been implemented. However, not all reform proposals were accepted by Member States.

The Secretary-General initiated his reform agenda with a bold vision in 1997 with “A Programme for Reform” - A/51/950 [PDF, 5772K] (and its Addenda 1 [PDF, 15K], 2 [PDF, 22K], 3 [PDF, 14K], 4 [PDF, 15K], 5 [PDF, 16K], 6 [PDF, 22K] and 7 [PDF, 11K]). He followed in 2002 with “An Agenda for Further Change [PDF, 175K]” (and Corrigendum 1 [PDF, 18K]).

At the 2005 World Summit, the Secretary-General opined to Member States that it was time for “bold decisions” and submitted his report “In Larger Freedom”. On management reform in particular, and the World Summit Outcome Document the Secretary-General was requested “to submit proposals for implementing management reforms to the General Assembly for consideration and decision in the first quarter of 2006.” He subsequently did so in his March 2007 reform report “Investing in the United Nations: For a stronger organization worldwide”.

He also presented his report "Mandating and Delivering" in March of 2006, laying out a framework for updating and analyzing mandates in each of the Organizations’ programme priorities. An electronic registry of mandates was produced which compiled all of the approximately 9000 active mandates that guide the work of the UN.

“Reform” is an all-encompassing term for the many changes that the UN Secretariat has undertaken. This document focuses on those reforms related to management systems and structures, field operations, and partnerships. Further details on such related reforms as governance, system-wide coherence, and relations with civil society can be accessed from the http://www.un.org/reform/ home page.

Table of Contents

  1. Management Systems & Structures
    • Restructuring
    • Efficiency
    • Accountability & Oversight
    • Peacekeeping, Peacebuilding, Counter-Terrorism, and the Responsibility to Protect
    • Finance & Budget Reforms
    • Procurement of Goods & Services
    • Human Resources Management
    • Ethics and Internal Justice
    • Enhancing Staff Security
  2. Field Operations
    • UN Country Teams (UNCTs) and UN Coherence
    • Human Rights
  3. Public & Private Partnerships
    • Building alliances with civil society and the private sector

A. Management Systems & Structures

Restructuring

The 1997 reform package included a number of changes to the Secretariat structure, most notably the creation of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs from three existing departments and consolidation of two programmes into the Office on Drugs and Crime. The Centre for Human Rights was also merged into the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. At this time, approximately 1,000 staff posts that had not been filled in 1996 were permanently eliminated.

Three important new structures were introduced to improve UN management. First, the post of Deputy Secretary-General was created in 1997 to strengthen the management of the Organization at the most senior level. Second, the Secretary-General established his own cabinet in the form of the Senior Management Group, which included all the heads of the Secretariat Offices and Departments, as well as the Heads of the UN Funds and Programmes. Finally, four sectoral committees were formed to bring coherence to the work of the UN on peace and security, humanitarian affairs, development and economic and social affairs.

The second major reform package of 2002 contained additional proposals for a major overhaul of the Department of Public Information and the Department of General Assembly Affairs and Conference Management. Since then, a demonstrable improvement in meetings servicing and documents production have occurred. Nine UN Information Centres in Western Europe were closed and consolidated into one modernized hub in Brussels.

So as to improve the quality and speed of executive decisions, the Secretary-General in 2005 established two new committees. The Policy Committee advises him on issues requiring strategic guidance and cross-cutting thematic policy decisions, while the Management Committee considers internal reform and management-related issues requiring strategic direction from the Secretary-General.

Back to page top

Efficiency

Efforts to improve the overall efficiency of the Organization have moved on several fronts. In the 2004/5 budget cycle, nearly 1000 reports and activities were consolidated or discontinued and resources redeployed to higher-priority areas of work. In his 2005 report, the Secretary-General proposes that a more comprehensive review of mandates older than five years be approved by Member States. As of Fall 2006, Member States had not yet taken decisive action on this proposal.

Much more has been invested in information technologies since the late 1990s. One visible benefit is that all the UN’s official reports and publications may now be retrieved free of charge through the Official Documents System available over the internet. The UN website provides extensive materials in multiple languages, making available up-to-date information and images through multimedia sources. A number of internal processes, for example payroll, travel, recruitment and performance management, have been modernized and streamlined, using information technology.

With a view to further streamlining Secretariat documentation, the Secretary-General issued the “United Nations Secretariat First Consolidated Report 2005”, covering both financial and programme information for that year. This Consolidated Report strives for a better balance between quality and quantity of reporting on programmatic and operational matters. The intention is to provide Member States and the public at large with clear, transparent descriptions of what the UN does and how much it costs.

In 2006, another round of ICT modernization was proposed with a view to achieving greater accuracy and usefulness of financial and human resource information. The General Assembly agreed to create a Chief Information Technology Officer, and approved the development of an Enterprise Resource Planning system for the Organization.

Back to page top

Accountability & Oversight

Department heads are responsible for achieving predetermined programme performance objectives, as well as key human resource management targets. So as to be able to hold them more effectively accountable, a Management Performance Board, chaired by the Deputy Secretary-General, was established in 2005 and is tasked with ensuring that managers comply with the performance targets conduct standards and manage their staff effectively.

In the realm of the independent oversight, the Secretary-General recommended an improvement in the capacities of the Office of Internal Oversight Services (OIOS) audit and investigations, given the growing number of operations and the complexity of the cases under its purview. Member States subsequently approved an additional 39 investigation positions in 2006.

In 2005, Member States had also requested that the Secretary-General “submit an independent external evaluation of the auditing and oversight system of the United Nations, including the specialized agencies, including the roles and responsibilities of management”. The resulting “Steering Committee for the Comprehensive Review of Governance and Oversight [PDF, 35K]” submitted its report to the Secretary-General in 2006, with a number of recommendations on how oversight and accountability could be further strengthened. In particular, it made proposals concerning the establishment of an Independent Audit Advisory Committee to advise Member States on the adequacy of oversight. Further, the report contains important provisions on how to make OIOS operationally and budgetary independent.

Back to page top

Peacekeeping, Peacebuilding, Counter-Terrorism, and the Responsibility to Protect

A High-Level Panel, chaired by Lakhdar Brahimi conducted a comprehensive review of the UN’s peace operations in 2000, in what was to be later called the “Brahimi Report”. This has also resulted in a major strengthening of the Organization’s planning and staffing capacity, its rapid deployment capability and its ability to draw on the lessons learned from the large number of field missions deployed over the last 15 years. Concrete improvements include the ability to draw on pre-positioned “strategic deployment stocks” and the development of a capacity for training and deploying civilian police to the missions. The UN’s operations in East Timor and Sierra Leone – commonly regarded as successful missions – have benefited from clearer mandates and better management systems and capacities.

The 2005 World Summit Outcome Document, emphasizing the need for a “coordinated, coherent and integrated approach to post-conflict peacebuilding and reconciliation”, and recognizing the vital role of the United Nations in that regard, decided to establish a Peacebuilding Commission as an intergovernmental advisory body. This Commission was to be supported by a Peacebuilding Support Office, which was duly created by the Secretary-General in May 2006. The Peacebuilding Support Fund, with a target of $250 million and designed to support the activities of the Peacebuilding Commission, had US$140 million pledged at the time of launching in October 2006.

In support of international efforts to combat terrorism, the Secretary-General presented his report “Uniting Against Terrorism” in May 2006. This report presented elements for a counter-terrorism strategy that builds on the so-called “five Ds” of the strategy presented by the Secretary-General in Madrid in March 2005. The five-Ds are:

  1. dissuading people from resorting to terrorism or supporting it;
  2. denying terrorists the means to carry out an attack;
  3. deterring States from supporting terrorism;
  4. developing State capacity to defeat terrorism; and
  5. defending human rights.

The “United Nations Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy” was subsequently adopted by Member States on 8 September 2006. The strategy – in the form of a Resolution and an annexed Plan of Action – is a unique global instrument that will enhance national, regional and international efforts to counter terrorism.

The World Summit leaders also endorsed the concept of a responsibility to protect populations against genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, as described by the Secretary-General in his 28 November 2005 report “Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict [PDF, 94K].” In April 2006, the Security Council unanimously adopted Resolution 1674 on the Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict [PDF, 41K], containing the historic first official Security Council reference to the responsibility to protect: it reaffirms “the responsibility to protect populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity.”

Back to page top

Finance & Budget Reforms

The UN’s system of budgeting was transformed from focusing on a detailed description of inputs and resources to one that identified intended outcomes and measurable indicators of achievement. In 2003, the budget documents themselves were shortened and made more strategic. The long-range planning cycle was reduced from four years to two, and a duplicative intergovernmental review eliminated. In addition, the UN’s financial rules and regulations were updated and consolidated. In his latest reform report, the Secretary General recognizes the need for a more comprehensive overhaul of the existing budget rules and processes.

Overall, the organization has been able to do “more with less” and live within three consecutive budget cycles of zero or very limited nominal growth in the Organization’s regular budget.

The issue of the Secretary-General’s budgetary discretion has been a matter of some debate. The Secretary-General made another push for greater discretion in his March 2006 reform report “Investing in the UN”, in light of the recent difficulties observed in responding effectively to crises and emerging priorities. The General Assembly decided to approve a modest package of reforms granting the Secretary-General limited budgetary discretion, amounting to a spending authorization of $20m per biennium for the periods 2006-2007 and 2008-2009.

Back to page top
Procurement of Goods & Services

Procurement at the UN has undergone significant transformation since reforms were initiated in 1999. Despite a number of improvements introduced since the late 1990s, including posting annual procurement plans and requirements on the web, in recent years UN procurement has come under great scrutiny. Following a revelation of criminal misconduct concerning a UN procurement official in 2005, the Secretary-General ordered a comprehensive review of internal and financial controls which identified weaknesses in internal control and capacity. In 2006, the Secretary-General presented a package of proposed improvements to Member States, including staffing enhancements and a programme of training and certification. At the same time, throughout 2006, OIOS has been conducting in-depth fact-finding investigations into allegations of procurement fraud and corruption.

On a separate track, the Organization has developed clear policy guidance for the acceptance of pro-bono goods and services. Its purpose is to prevent possible conflicts of interests or unforeseen commitments when the UN accepts such offers. This is becoming particularly pertinent following major disasters when companies or governments offer direct assistance.

Back to page top
Human Resources Management

A host of improvements to the UN’s system of managing its people have been introduced in recent years. First, a new web-based recruitment system for hiring, reassigning and promoting staff to ensure greater transparency in advertising vacancies was put in place in 2002. Programme managers are now empowered to select their own staff, subject to appropriate checks and balances. Second, incentives to encourage staff mobility between duty stations, and functions, were introduced. Training and learning programmes for all staff are now more widely available. Third, a new personnel appraisal system which stressed the importance of core competencies and developmental needs was introduced. Finally, a number of “staff-friendly” benefits were introduced as part of an effort to achieve better “work/life” balance for UN staff. These include the introduction of flexible working hours, telecommuting possibilities and paternity leave entitlements – and have been widely used.

A strengthened and simplified human resources system formed the centerpiece of the Secretary-General’s March 2006 reform report “Investing in the UN”. These reforms aim at adapting the Organization’s human resources management framework to meet evolving requirements and to better serve the mandates of Member States. Fundamental changes are being proposed, including a more proactive, targeted and speedy recruitment system, an integrated approach to mobility, streamlined contractual arrangements and harmonized conditions of service. These are before the Member States for their consideration at the 61st Session in 2006.

Back to page top

Ethics and Internal Justice

At the beginning of 2005, following the findings of an internal staff survey and in response to reported shortcomings in the management of the Oil-for-Food Programme, the Secretary General introduced a series of reforms to improve accountability and improve ethical conduct.

A UN Ombudsman, whose office was established in 2002, was tasked to facilitate the informal resolution of disputes between UN staff and management. The Secretary-General created an Ethics Office in January 2006, responsible largely for managing and overseeing new whistleblower protection and financial disclosure policies. The Office is responsible for developing ethics training programmes for staff and managers throughout the Secretariat and held its first organization-wide ethics brief for senior managers in October 2006.

A revised policy for “Protection against retaliation for reporting misconduct” or “whistleblower protection” was issued by the Secretary-General to help ensure that the organization functions in an open, fair, and transparent manner, with the objective of protecting staff who report alleged wrongdoing. The US Government Accountability Project deemed this policy a “gold standard” for international organizations in December 2005.

The guidelines on financial disclosure and declaration of interests were also revamped and broadened to include more senior managers, procurement officers, and those who invest the assets of the organization. Thresholds for declaring gifts and assets were significantly lowered, and the ability to monitor the accuracy of the disclosure forms improved.

Under the ethics and conduct banner, in response to the sexual exploitation and abuse cases that surfaced in 2005 in peacekeeping, DPKO established “Conduct and Discipline Teams” both at headquarters and in 18 peacekeeping missions. The role of the team at headquarters is to develop strategies and policies on conduct and discipline issues in relation to prevention, enforcement and remedial action, maintain global oversight on the state of discipline, and provide overall guidance, training, and direction to missions. A system-wide policy on “Prevention of workplace harassment, sexual harassment, and abuse of authority” was also introduced.

Back to page top

Enhancing Staff Security

Facing a sharp escalation in threats against UN personnel, the staff security procedures were reviewed, first in 2000, and more recently in 2003, following the tragic loss of 22 UN staff in Baghdad.

In late 2004, the Secretary-General recommended a major overhaul of the UN’s security system. This included a request for a sizeable increase in resources allocated for protection of staff, and proposals to strengthen and clarify the chain of command. A new Department of Safety and Security was subsequently created, consolidating functions previously performed by separate offices. Its capacity for providing timely, professional advice on security-related matters has been enhanced, including through more thorough threat and risk assessment. The new Department is responsible for the security of some 100,000 UN staff and 300,000 dependents in 150 duty stations throughout the UN system, many of which are in crisis and post-conflict risk situations.

Back to page top

B. Field Operations

UN Country Teams (UNCTs) and UN Coherence

Since the Secretary-General’s inauguration in 1997, measures were introduced to start consolidating the vast network of UN offices “in the field”. He approved a strengthened role for the “UN Resident Coordinator” to ensure that these “UN Country Teams” in over 134 countries maximize cost savings, share resources, and plan and coordinate their activities in a more integrated manner.

There are now consequently over 60 common “UN Houses” in the developing world, and significant cost savings have been a result of these consolidations.

The UN Development Group (UNDG) brings together the operational agencies working on development. It aims to develop common planning policies and tools and strategies for cost containment.

The adoption of the Millennium Development Goals – the time-bound targets for reducing poverty, disease, hunger, illiteracy and gender – has helped the UNDG, in collaboration with Member States achieve a more coherent policy approach to development.

One of the great challenges of any Secretary-General has been the management of the large network of UN entities, with their many mandates and separate governing bodies and means of implementation. In pursuit of increasing efficiencies and reducing the overlap in the work of these entities, the Secretary-General’s High Level Panel on UN System-wide Coherence in the areas of Development, Humanitarian Assistance and the Environment delivered its report “delivering as one” to the General Assembly in November 2006, with proposals for a more unified, coherent UN structure at the country level.

Back to page top

Human Rights

This significant institutional reform builds on the Secretary-General’s first term, a push was made to mainstream human rights, particularly into the peacekeeping and development work of the Organization. The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights established several sub-offices in the field to enhance its response and monitoring capacity. More assistance is now provided to countries to build human rights institutions and to assist them in compliance with treaties. The Secretary-General also appointed a Special Adviser on the Prevention of Genocide, and pressed the Security Council to ensure proper protection of civilians in armed conflict. Member States agreed to the significant strengthening of the High Commissioner’s Office in 2005.

World leaders agreed to the creation of the Human Rights Council, to succeed the Human Rights Commission. By May 2006, the General Assembly elected the first 47 members of the new Human Rights Council.

Back to page top

C. Public & Private Partnerships

Building alliances with civil society and the private sector

The Secretary-General launched the Global Compact in 1997, challenging corporations to meet their responsibilities as global citizens. Nearly 2,000 businesses and leaders of prominent civil society and labor organizations have since joined the Compact. It has improved the dialogue between civil society and private sector, spurred corporate social responsibility initiatives, and promoted new outlooks on the public role of business in developing countries.

In addition, civil society now also has more opportunities to participate in the UN consultative process. For example, the Security Council is able to hear testimony directly from non-governmental organizations. Another instance was in 2000 when UN agencies struck an agreement with leading pharmaceutical companies to make retroviral AIDS drugs more affordable and accessible in epidemic-stricken developing countries. A panel chaired by former Brazilian President Cardoso made a number of proposals to strengthen relations between the UN and civil society. One concrete achievement was the introduction in the General Assembly of informal hearings for civil society. These hearings were held for the first time in June in the lead-up to the Summit.

The Secretary General established UNFIP, a body expressly established for the purpose of strengthening private-public partnerships. UNFIP was given the responsibility of facilitating and reviewing project opportunities between the UN System and the United Nations Foundation, the latter being responsible for administering the US$1 billion contribution in support of UN causes.

Following the third ministerial meeting in April 2005 of the Community of Democracies in Santiago, Chile, attended by 141 nations, the Secretary-General announced the establishment of a UN Democracy Fund in July, 2005. The UN Democracy Fund builds on the UN General Assembly’s commitment to promote and consolidate new and restored democracies, as expressed in a resolution adopted in 2003.

Back to page top
Website development: UN Web Services Section, Department of Public Information, United Nations © 2009