unblue.gif (1885 bytes)

BlueballMain

BlueballSub Progamme Review Meetings and Annual Regional Review

Blueball Media Workshop

BlueballTurner Foundation

BlueballTechnical Assistance

BlueballIntegrating Population Factors into Development Planning

BlueballImproving Quality of Care in Reproductive Health: A Pacific Perspective

BlueballUsing Energising Games for Participatory Advocacy

BlueballNi Sa Moce, Nasiru

BlueballNiue: Halting Population Decline

BlueballIn Brief

BlueballInterview: Population Problems are Multi-Dimensional

BlueballReturn to Main Menu

Vol. 7 No. 2

Southpac News

UNFPA Country Support Team for the South Pacific

Dec 1999

IMPROVING QUALITY OF CARE IN REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH: A PACIFIC PERSPECTIVE

Introduction

Improving the quality of reproductive health care services clearly offers many benefits from the perspective of the client and the programme manager. The major components of quality of care are well established. However, in practice, quality of care is a complex matter; it is not easy to measure or to define because it involves a wide range of issues. Since the International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD) in Cairo in 1994 and other international conferences such as the 4th World Conference on Women in Beijing, 1995, and Safe Motherhood in Sri Lanka in 1997, countries throughout the world, including the small Pacific Island countries, have further affirmed their commitment to strengthen their efforts to improve the quality of their respective reproductive health programmes and services. As such, several countries have reported a positive shift towards the provision of quality and user friendly reproductive health services to meet the clients’ expectations as well as encouraging them to use such services. In the Pacific Island countries (PICs), the progress of this shift varies from country to country. It is more visible and very progressive in some, while it is rather slow and not as visible in others. Nevertheless, every island country is committed to the vision of ‘continuous quality’ improvement. Therefore, "to improve or not to improve the quality of reproductive health care services is not the question; the question is what, why, when, where and how?"

Salesi Presentation (45120 bytes)
The Adviser during a recent presentation

WHAT is Quality Reproductive Health Care?

This writer defines quality reproductive health care as: "Accessing and availing of gender sensitive, safe and affordable integrated RH services of acceptable standards and environment, that satisfy the clients’ needs to be provided by appropriately trained and caring service providers and efficient managers." The writer based this definition on working experience and it aims to encompass most of the issues that contribute to quality of care.

WHY Quality Reproductive Health Care?

In terms of reproductive health it means helping couples and individuals meet their health needs safely and effectively. Additionally, it is the right thing to do.

WHEN is Quality Of Care to be Implemented?

In the PICs, the concept of quality of care is already being implemented but progress is still very slow. In regard to Reproductive Health Care, every effort is being made to improve quality. This is reflected in the Pacific Island governments’ placing high priority on promoting 'user friendly services' through training of appropriate staff, provision of equipment and supplies, upgrading of facilities, implementing of the RH community outreach awareness and activities along with regular review and assessment of existing programmes and services. This is an ongoing process.

WHERE Do We Start and Where Do We Go From Here in Terms of Quality of RH Care?

The need to improve quality does not have to start from a special place. The effort could commence from any of the areas that need strengthening, improving or even establishing or re-establishing. It is an on-going process. Limited resources are sometimes blamed for the uncertainty of where to start. Indeed, resources are important, but we do not have to wait, we can always start with whatever expertise is available and utilise the available materials. This leads our discussion to the consideration of the "HOW" aspect of quality of care.

HOW Could the Quality of Health Care Be Improved?

Most PICs are promoting the concept of 'integrated RH services' as one of the approaches to improving quality of RH care services. The PIC's overwhelming support of the concept of integration as an approach to improving RH quality of care is based on several favourable factors. Prominent among these factors are the following:

  • Every PIC has a sound and operational health care system that is well supported by a functional PHC programme and services;
  • Several components of RH care services, such as family planning, maternal health care (safe motherhood), child health care, human sexuality and sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including HIV/AIDS, are already integrated and they all have similar target groups. In fact, one of the most successful integrated programmes before the ICPD was the integration of maternal/child health (MCH) care and family planning programmes;
  • The concept of integration has several other anticipated favourable factors and advantages that include the following:
    • enhances the shift of programmes, such as STIs/HIV-AIDS programmes and services, from a specialised clinic-based to a more holistic and cost effective approach, especially at the PHC level. In this respect, integrated programmes can reach more people, especially the most vulnerable, under-served and at risk groups (including women, adolescents, and youth);
    • employment of trained multipurpose RH care providers should be more cost effective than under the vertical programmes;
    • promotes better utilisation of facilities, equipment and supplies;
    • screening programmes for STIs/HIV-AIDS, breast and cervical cancers, as well as infant/health care and safe motherhood, could be provided under one clinic; and
    • additionally, antenatal care and family planning clinics are also ideal places to inform women about the risks of infecting their unborn and newly born infants with STIs and HIV.
  • In association with the integration programme, other supporting activities are being implemented. For example:
    • Training of multipurpose health care providers at the PHC level (first level of referral).
    • Integration at the secondary level of health care (tertiary, if available).
  • Functionally, pregnant mothers are routinely screened in the antenatal care (ANC) and FP clinics for a selected number of STIs, breast and cervical cancers. However, this screening programme depends heavily on the availability of the necessary supplies. Those who are diagnosed positively, for example, STIs, are treated and managed in this integrated clinic rather than being referred to an STD clinic. The husbands/partners of these positive mothers could also be treated at the same ANC or FP clinic if they wish to do so. Similarly, female clients with STIs could have their pap smears taken at the STD clinic rather than being referred to a FP or ANC clinic.

This integrated approach also promotes a closer working relationship among health care workers (functional integration), even though some of the services are located in different areas of the hospital or health care complex.

Samoa RH/FP Workshop (58594 bytes)
Participants at a RH./FP Workshop in Samoa

Conclusion

Although ‘quality’ is an elusive and complex commodity, it is in great demand. Quality applies to everything in life. It offers many benefits even in the arena of health. However, in health, it will need the positive contributions of all the key stakeholders, especially the clients, the service providers and the managers supported by a well structured environment and services. In spite of its complexity, satisfactory results in quality of health can be achieved. With regard to improving the current standard of quality of care in RH, it is possible as every programme can improve, no matter what its budget scale or cultural setting, i.e. if everyone contributes.

By Dr. Salesi F. Katoanga
CST Adviser on Reproductive Health (Programme)

(Extracted from a paper presented at the WHO Regional Workshop on Women's Health, Beijing, China, 18-22 October, 1999)

arrowtop.gif (60 bytes)Top of page