UNFPA COUNTRY SUPPORT TEAM

Office for the South Pacific

Discussion Paper No. 14

Reproductive Health and Family Planning in the Pacific:

Current Situation and the Way Forward

by Sun-Hee Lee,
Adviser on RH/FP Research and Training,
UNFPA/CST, Suva

The views and opinions contained in this Report
have not been officially cleared and thus do not
necessarily represent the position of the
United Nations Population Fund


Acknowledgements

An earlier version of the paper was circulated mainly within the UNFPA CST, Office for the South Pacific. The author wishes to acknowledge the useful comments of Mr Stephen Chee, UNFPA CST Director and her CST colleagues, Dr Salesi Katoanga, Mr Bill House, Mr Laurie Lewis and Mr Alan Kondo. Comments from Ms M. Rice WHO, Geneva, are also gratefully acknowledged.


Preface

The UNFPA Country Support Team for the South Pacific, based in Suva, Fiji, is one of eight regional technical support teams established by the United Nations Population Fund to provide countries with technical backstopping to meet country needs in the population field. In fulfilling this function, apart from field missions, the Country Support Team aims to provide active and close backstopping to the local pool of national experts to promote a more holistic approach to population programmes.

This Discussion Papers series has been initiated by the CST (Suva) in an attempt to establish a dialogue among national population programme personnel on the integrated and coordinated multidisciplinary approach to population.

The International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD) in 1994 in Cairo provided a forum to discuss a number of key issues related to population and development. Reproductive health and family planning (RH/FP) issues were at the centre of the discussion. First, the ICPD called for a need to address health issues of women at different stages of the life cycle, not to limit women's health issues to pregnancy, pre-natal and post-partum care. Continuity of care should be ensured from birth through childhood, adolescence, reproductive age, and post-reproductive age. Therefore there is an urgent need to consider family planning within the broad framework of reproductive health. Gender concerns featured very prominently in reproductive health and family planning discussions.

Pacific island countries actively participated in the ICPD process to put forward the Pacific views on reproductive health and family planning. Pacific island countries along with many other countries in the world should take credit for making a significant contribution to the ICPD process of achieving a consensus position on key reproductive health issues. Now the challenge in the Pacific is to link the reproductive health and family planning components of the ICPD-POA framework to implementation. Implementing ICPD RH/FP will require a careful overhaul of the current situation to draw budget implications for making necessary changes. To assist this process, this paper provides an overview of the Pacific RH/FP situation and make some specific recommendations on what concrete steps could be taken.

We would welcome receiving any comments from readers.

29 December 1995,
Stephen Chee,
Director

I. INTRODUCTION

The Pacific region is made up of countries that are small, remote and scattered across the Pacific Ocean. The limited natural resources in some countries and unsustainable rate of resource depletion in others have presented serious development challenges to the Pacific. Despite these constraints, health gains have been achieved, as reflected in the average life expectancy of over 60 years. However, while there are overall health gains throughout the Pacific, there are sharp differences in women's reproductive health within as well as between countries. Negative health outcomes such as infant and maternal mortality rates are much higher in some countries than others. Within a country, women living in rural areas and isolated islands have very limited access to reproductive health and family planning (RH/FP) services compared to those living in urban areas.

Many Pacific countries have adopted the primary health care approach, in which reproductive health and family planning is an integrated part. However, the current programmes dealing with reproductive health are still very much within the conventional Maternal and Child Health and Family Planning (MCH/FP) framework. This focuses mainly on pregnancy care and contraception and employs the pregnancy outcome as the main indicator of women's health. MCH/FP services are sometimes confined to married women only. This narrowly focussed approach does not address the special needs of specific age groups such as teenagers and women in their forties and fifties. Furthermore, conventional MCH/FP programmes pay little attention to related areas such as reproductive tract infections, sexually transmitted diseases, abortion and infertility. There are usually separate programmes on sexually transmitted diseases that focus mainly on men and high risk groups (e.g. commercial sex workers).

The 1994 International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD) held in Cairo gave prominence to reproductive rights and reproductive health issues1. The conference reiterated the importance of the right of men and women to decide freely and responsibly the number and spacing of their children and to have the information, education and means to do so. While the discussions on the definition of reproductive health and reproductive rights have been around before the ICPD, this conference helped to formulate a consensus position on key reproductive health issues. These include the need to consider family planning within the broad framework of reproductive health and to incorporate gender concerns into reproductive health services. These gender concerns have broadened the outlook of reproductive health programmes by adding, inter alia, women's reproductive rights as human rights, men's reproductive health problems, and involving men more in family planning.

The ICPD Plan of Action specifically calls for the need to make reproductive health services accessible to all individuals through the primary health care system as soon as possible and no later than the year 2015. This document specifically mentions the following areas of reproductive health care:

Pacific island countries participated actively in the ICPD preparations and in the conference itself. But the implementation of ICPD reproductive health care as outlined above requires country specific action. This will require a careful overhaul of the current services related to the above areas in order to determine what exactly needs to be done and to draw budget implications for making necessary changes. This analysis will assist countries to develop strategies to incorporate the ICPD messages in a cost-effective manner. As the first step, this paper attempts to assess the current RH/FP situation within the above ICPD RH/FP components for the fifteen Pacific islands countries to which UNFPA provides assistance. While assessment of the situation should be a continuing process of improving reproductive health conditions in the Pacific, this initial assessment will help to address whether the existing indicators are adequate to address key issues of RH/FP and to monitor progress, to identify data gaps, and to prioritise reproductive health indicators.


II. CURRENT STATUS OF REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH AND FAMILY PLANNING IN THE PACIFIC

A. Fertility Patterns

The percentage of women of reproductive age (15-49) ranges from 20 to 25 of the total population in the Pacific. The level of urbanization is generally low and the majority of the population reside in rural areas except Marshall Islands, Palau and Cook Islands. The level of fertility in the Pacific is high compared to that of small island nations in other regions. This is especially so in Solomon Islands, Papua New Guinea, Vanuatu, Marshall Islands, and Nauru. The Total Fertility Rate (TFR), which indicates the average number of children a woman will have if current age-specific fertility rates continue, exceeds five per woman in these countries. Changes in fertility take place slowly in the Pacific. A notable exception is Marshall Islands where TFR dropped from 7.2 to a little over 5 only within five years (1989 - 1994). The main determinants of this remarkable decline are yet to be identified, although it is assumed that the increased contraceptive prevalence would be the main factor. This trend, however, needs to be monitored closely, as the birth records for 1994 and preliminary birth statistics for 1995 indicate that the fertility level in Marshall Islands may be on the increase again.

Table 1. Population and Fertility
TotalFertility Rate
Population at last census (1) (15-49)(2) (under 20) (3) 40+(4) % of births to teen mothers (5)
Cook
FSM
Fiji
18,617(1991)
105,712(1994)
715,375(1986)
3.5
4.7
3.2
0.5
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.7
0.2
18(1991)
13(1993)
n.a.
Kiribati
Marshall
Nauru
72,335(1990)
43,380(1988)
9,919(1992)
3.8(a)
5.7(b)
7.5
0.2
0.8
0.5
0.3
0.6
n.a.
6(1990)
21(1994)
n.a.
Niue
Palau
PNG
2,239(1991)
15,122(1990)
3,607,954(1990)
3.5
3.1
5.4
0.2
0.2
0.4
n.a.
0.3
n.a.
9(1994)
9(1994)
n.a.
Solomon
Tokelau
Tonga
285,176(1986)
1,577(1991)
94,649(1986)
5.8
3.6
3.7
0.5
n.a.
0.1
0.6
n.a.
0.4
n.a.
2(1994)
4(1994)
Tuvalu
Vanuatu
W. Samoa
9,043(1991)
142,419(1989)
161,298(1991)
3.3
5.3
4.8
0.1
0.4
n.a.
0.2
0.5
n.a.
4(1993)
7(1993)
5(1994)

Notes:(a) This may be an under-estimation (see Lewis, UNFPA Mission Report No.13, 1993);(b) Estimate provided by the Ministry of Health. The TFR based on the 1988 census was 7.2. However, it is estimated that the TFR would be between 5 and 6, according to the 1994 Household Survey results.

Source:(1) SPC Pacific Islands Population Update (May 1995); (2) Household Survey SPC Pacific Islands Population Update (May 1995); Preliminary 1994 Census for FSM (Lewis, 1995(; 1990 Census for Kiribati;(3) SPC Pacific Islands Population Update (August 1995); Preliminary 1994 Census for FSM; 1990 Census for Kiribati;(4) UNICEF, The State of Pacific Children (1995) based on Booth 1993;(5) 1990 Census for Kiribati; 1994 Fertility and Family Planning Survey for Marshall Islands; Preliminary figures as reported to WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific (1995) for the rest of the countries.

While the TFR is a useful aggregate measure, fertility patterns of high reproductive health risk groups need to be monitored separately. One such group is teenagers. Teenage pregnancy is an issue that deserves special attention in the Pacific as it is often associated with interrupted education, lower employment prospects and a high degree of health risk. Another age group which requires a separate monitoring is women aged between 40-492. Available information on fertility patterns of these two groups show sharp contrasts. Fertility levels of both teenagers and women aged between 40-49[2] are relatively high in Marshall Islands, Solomon Islands, Federated States of Micronesia, and Vanuatu, compared to those of other countries. In Cook Islands, only teenage fertility is relatively high but not the fertility of women over age 40, while Tonga shows the opposite pattern, low teenage fertility with relatively high fertility of women aged 40 and over. In addition to these age differentials, there are urban-rural disparities. A close examination of the 1994 Household Survey conducted in Marshall Islands demonstrates that the proportion of teenagers who gave births in 1993 was much higher in rural (30%) than urban areas (14%).

B. Family Planning

Family planning services are integrated with MCH services in most of the Pacific countries. While government health services are the sole source of family planning services in some countries, the private sector, albeit small, is growing in others such as Fiji, Tonga, Solomon Islands and Western Samoa. According to the 1987 Knowledge, Attitude and Practice (KAP) Survey conducted in Fiji, 10 % of contraceptive users visited private doctors for services related to contraceptive information, IUD, and male/female sterilization (Mendoza, 1988). There are also NGOs, church groups, rural cooperatives and social marketing of condoms, operating on a small scale in a handful of Pacific countries. The range of contraceptives available varies from country to country. Fiji, Marshall Islands and Palau provide all ranges of contraceptives, while other countries do not always offer subdermal implants (Norplants), female sterilization or male sterilization.

The best source of contraceptive prevalence and programme coverage would be population-based survey data. Surveys eliminate double counting of people visiting more than one health facility; they include individuals who obtain contraceptives from other than government health facilities; and they identify individuals who use methods not requiring programme contact (see Bertrand et al. 1994). While survey data are available in some of the Pacific countries, most countries use the routine recording and reporting systems of family planning services as the main source of contraceptive use information. Contraceptive use information generated through the recording and reporting system would not provide true contraceptive prevalence rates. A family planning programme tends to record programme-based methods only and exclude natural family planning users. Also not all clients who receive contraceptive supplies from family planning services will actually use the method that they take home from their visit. In addition, there are other sources of contraceptive supply such as the private sector, a community based distribution programme, a commercial and social marketing programme. In the Pacific, the scale of these operations is generally very small.

However, although contraceptive use information through the recording and reporting system has the abovementioned limitations, it has the major advantage over population-based survey data, i.e., the data availability on a regular interval which is crucial for programme monitoring and measuring changes over time. Contraceptive prevalence rates presented in Table 2 are mostly based on information produced through routine recording and reporting systems, unless otherwise stated. The reported prevalence is considerably low in Vanuatu, Solomon Islands, and Tokelau whereas it is relatively high in Cook Islands and Tuvalu. If one considers the relationship between the crude birth rate and contraceptive prevalence rate (Lee and Lucas, 1986), the contraceptive prevalence rates for Fiji, Tonga, Palau, and Western Samoa represent clear under-estimates.

A few countries such as Fiji and Kiribati have annual contraceptive use data over long period of time, produced through routine recording and reporting systems. Data for both Kiribati and Fiji showed little movement over time. The contraceptive prevalence rate of around 26% in 1990 in Kiribati had stagnated since 1970. Likewise, contraceptive acceptance rates in Fiji showed little dynamics between 1982 and 19903. While the level of fertility in Kiribati did not change very much during the corresponding period (e.g. TFR of 4.7 in 1976 and TFR of 4.3 in 1990), in case of Fiji, fertility was reduced by 20% between 1982 and 1990, indicating a under-estimation of CPR.

While the aggregate contraceptive prevalence rate is a useful measure, there is a need to monitor contraceptive prevalence of teenagers separately, because of difficulties that they encounter in accessing RH/FP services. While information on teenage sexual activity is not readily available, it seems to be the trend that young people are becoming sexually active earlier and in greater numbers. While teenagers aged 15-19 are often included in KAP surveys conducted in the Pacific, survey results are not always reported separately by age groups, resulting in a loss of information on teenage contraceptive use (e.g. a 1987 KAP survey conducted in Fiji and reported in Mendoza, 1988). However, information, though limited, is available in some Pacific countries. In Marshall Islands, for example, contraceptive prevalence among teenagers (15-19) was 11%, compared to 45% among women aged between 20 and 49 (Nasiru, 1995; McMurray, 1995).

Table 2: Family Planning
Crude Birth Rate (1)CPR(2)CPR among teenagers(3)Main Methods
Not available(4)
Reliance on one method (% of current users)(5)% using male methods (6)
Cook
FSM
Fiji
27
34
25
47-50
25
36(1994)
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
Nil
Norplant
Nil(b)
Pill (62%)
Ster(F)(37%)
Pill(26%)
0%
6%
17%(d)
Kiribati
Marshall
Nauru
36
49
24
26(1992)
37(1994)
n.a.
n.a.
11%
n.a.
Nil(c)
Nil
n.a.
Injec.(40%)
Ster(F)(41%)
n.a
10%(e)
n.a.
n.a.
Niue
Palau
PNG
16
22
35
24
38
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
Norplant, Ster.(M)
Nil
n.a.
Pill(11%)
Pill(69%)
n.a
n.a.
n.a
n.a
Solomon
Tokelau
Tonga
42
32
23
11-35(a)
9(1994)
39
n.a.
n.a
n.a
Norplant
Norplant, Ster(F&M)
Norplant
Injec.(72%)
Injec.(63%)
Injec.(32%)
n.a.
n.a.
n.a
Tuvalu
Vanuatu
W. Samoa
29
38
31
45
15
31(1993)
n.a
n.a
n.a
Nil
Norplant
Norplant
Injec.(18%)
Pill(57%)
Injec.(47%)
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
Notes:
    CPR - contraceptive prevalence rates; Ster(F) - female sterilization; Ster(M) - male sterilization; Injec. - injectable hormonal contraceptive

    (a) 11%, based on services statistics; 33% (Choiseul Province) - 35% (Honiara) based on family planning KAP surveys.;(b) Norplant will be available in two centres in Fiji (Labase and Suva) on a pilot basis from December 1995.;(c) There are large variations between South Tarawa and outer islands. While all of the main methods are available in South Tarawa, only a few methods (injectable, pills, and IUDs are generally available in outer islands;(d) Condom 16.3% and 0.4% vasectomy;(e) Male sterilixation 7% and condom 3%

Source:

Widening the choice of contraceptives is one of the key elements of quality of care. Apart from a few methods, a wide range of choice is available throughout the Pacific (see Table 2). Of main programme methods, injectable hormonal contraception is by far the most popular method in the Pacific. Over-reliance on a single method, defined here as the percentage of women using one method exceeding 40% of all recorded contraceptive users, should be looked at carefully in Solomon Islands, Palau, Tokelau, Vanuatu, Kiribati and Samoa.4 Overreliance on a few contraceptives is often associated with limited choices, provider bias, family planning programmes promoting the use of some contraceptives and not others, fear of side-effects due to limited information and counselling, and myths surrounding a few contraceptives. We do not have sufficient information to determine the main reasons for this over-reliance, and this area needs to be researched further. What is evident is that widening the choice of methods does not guarantee that women will take advantage of the variety of choices. For example, in Marshall Islands a wide range of main contraceptives are available to the majority of women and men. Because of urban concentration of the population in Marshall Islands, these contraceptives are readily accessible by at least couples living in urban areas where almost 70% of the population reside. Nevertheless, women rely heavily on a few long term methods, female sterilisation, subdermal implants (Norplants), and injectable hormonal contraception.

Further to this overreliance issue, there is a crucial need to look at contraceptive use patterns. Anecdotal evidence suggests that in Solomon Islands couples use contraceptives only when they reach or exceed their desired family sizes and only few use contraceptives for family spacing. This is typical of early stages of contraceptive acceptance which leads to proportionately high reductions in fertility in the older age groups.

Male participation in family planning is low worldwide and it is also true in the Pacific. There are a number of social and cultural reasons for this low participation and family planning programmes should identify main reasons for low participation and innovative ways to promote more active male participation. The world over, male methods are limited only to a few methods including condom use and sterilization. The choice, however, is even narrower for men in parts of the Pacific. Male sterilization is not available in Cook Islands and Niue. Furthermore, myths and misinformation about male sterilization (vasectomy) abound in the Pacific. However, it is interesting to note that males who accepted sterilization constituted 7% of total contraceptive acceptors in 1992, although the number of men involved is small. This represents a relatively high percentage, compared to those in other Pacific countries with small population sizes and the worldwide average of 4-5% of couples (Weinberger, 1994). This ready acceptance of vasectomy by men in Kiribati may need to be examined further, as this has important implications for other Pacific countries.

C. Maternal Health

There are a number of common maternal morbidities, occurring at different stages of pregnancy and delivery, antepartum, intrapartum, postpartum and long-term sequelae. To address these issues, two safe motherhood goals were adopted at the World Summit for Children in 1990: (a) reducing maternal mortality rate by half by the year 2000 and (b) increasing access of safe motherhood care (WHO and UNICEF, 1993). Indicators to monitor these goals were subsequently adopted including maternal deaths and maternal mortality rate (ratio), the proportion of women attended at least once during pregnancy by trained personnel, the proportion of attended delivery, and the number of facilities providing essential obstetric care. While these provide a useful guide, the Pacific countries should carefully assess what indicators would apply best for the Region.

Using the maternal mortality rate (ratio) as the main maternal health indicator poses some serious problems, some of which are generic, but others are unique to the Pacific context. First, vital registration systems are not well established in many countries in the Pacific. Deaths in general and maternal deaths in particular are severely under-reported. The extent of under reporting of deaths in Melanesian countries such as Papua New Guinea, Vanuatu and Solomon Islands may be much higher than any other countries in the Pacific. One estimate of under reporting of deaths was as high as 85% in the case of Solomon Islands (O'Brien, et al 1993). Second, although fertility rates are high in the Pacific, the actual number of births occurring in many countries are relatively small, due to the small populations. For example, in Cook Islands, Niue, Palau, Tokelau, Tuvalu, the annual number of live births are less than one thousand. As a result, each maternal death will bring about a substantial change in the maternal mortality rate. This problem could be rectified by taking a three to five year average, but time series data on maternal deaths are often non-existent, and if available, may lack the required quality. Third, lay reporting of causes of death is poor, resulting in misreporting of maternal deaths in many Pacific countries. Fourth, maternal mortality rate is an aggregate measure more useful for international comparisons than programme monitoring within a country, as it is difficult to capture regional disparities and risk groups differentials.

These problems, however, should not detract from the importance of the issue. On the contrary, every effort should be made to improve the understanding of maternal deaths by collecting complete, accurate and timely information. A concerted effort to collect maternal death could become the vehicle for creating a positive environment for civil registration of births and deaths in countries where this is needed. Available maternal mortality data highlight country variations, with Papua New Guinea and Solomon Islands showing exceptionally high rates by world standards. The estimate for Papua New Guinea was 800 per 100,000 live births. A study on maternal mortality conducted in 1993 in Solomon Islands using the sisterhood methods yielded the estimate of 550 (O'Brien et al 1993). These rates however, hide regional variations which are assumed to be substantial in these two countries.

Table 3: Maternal Care
Prenatal
care cov (1)
Attended Delivery(2)MMR(3)Anaemia(4)Overweight/
Obesity(5)
Cook
FSM
Fiji
100
78
100
99
90
98
46
83
68
n.a.
32
52-62*
68
60
33
Kiribati
Marshall
Nauru
n.a.
76
n.a.
59
87
n.a.
127
109
n.a.
18
17
n.a.
50
66
n.a
Niue
Palau
PNG
100
100
64
99
99
n.a.
Nil
267
800
4
16
n.a.
62
n.a.
n.a
Solomon
Tokelau
Tonga
94
52
95
87
100
92
549
n.a
70-80
30

38
n.a.
n.a.
40
Tuvalu
Vanuatu
W. Samoa
100
93
97
100
75
76
Nil
92-138
50
n.a.
10-73
56
23
n.a.
53
Note: * 52 for Fijians and 62 for Indo-Fijians

Source:

Prenatal care coverage ranges from 52% in Tokelau to 100% in Fiji, Cook Islands, Niue, Palau and Tuvalu. Some countries show further provincial differentials, as seen in Solomon Islands where coverage varies in two adjacent areas: 62% in Guadalcanal and 79% in Honiara Town Council. Post-natal care information is available only for a few countries, ranging from 58% in Tonga to 10% in Tuvalu and Fiji (WHO, 1993a). Reported percentages of deliveries attended by health personnel are high in many countries, except Kiribati, Vanuatu and Solomon Islands. However, these reported figures are very likely to be urban-biased and over-estimated. Women living in rural areas who are not receiving any maternal care might have been excluded from the calculation, leading to an overly positive picture of the situation.

Essential obstetric care (EOC) is designed to measure progress toward reduction of maternal mortality. To ensure positive pregnancy outcome, it is recommended that services should be available at the health centre for essential elements.5 As an indicator of this, it has been recommended to use the number of facilities providing essential obstetric care per 500,000 population. This concept would be applicable and relevant to relatively large island countries such as Papua New Guinea and Solomon Islands. Papua New Guinea already has an elaborate inventory of services and supplies available at the district levels. On the other hand, in small Pacific island countries where health facilities are limited to the primary and secondary levels, this measure may have limited applicability.

Other conditions that limit women's choice of contraceptives are diabetes and hypertension which are related to obesity. Health morbidity data demonstrate that the prevalence of these diseases is higher among women than men in Fiji, Tonga, and Western Samoa. Further analysis on Western Samoa provides evidence that incidences of stillbirths and spontaneous abortion are substantially higher among diabetic women than non-diabetic women (World Bank, 1994).

D. Pregnancy Outcomes Including Abortion

Infant mortality rates of some countries in the Pacific are high. The IMRs of Papua New Guinea, Kiribati, Marshall Islands, Federated States of Micronesia, Vanuatu and Tuvalu all exceed 40 per 1,000 live births which is the average IMR for medium human development countries. While a more meaningful indicator of pregnancy outcomes would be perinatal health, information on this is few and far between. The proportions of low birth weight infants are generally low in many countries, but again, these do not include births occurring in rural and isolated islands. Available data in Fiji provide evidence for large ethnic differences, pointing to a need to collect and report information separately for major ethnic groups.

Abortion is a contentious issue, both in developing and developed countries because it often reflects deep-rooted religious, cultural and social norms and mores. The 1994 International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD) provided a forum to voice different views and reached agreement on numerous contentious issues including abortion. The ICPD Programme of Action, which is intended to chart population policy for the next 20 years, clearly states, "in no case should abortion be promoted as a method of family planning. All Governments and relevant intergovernmental and non-governmental organizations are urged to strengthen their commitment to women's health, to deal with the health impact of unsafe abortion as a major public health concern and to reduce the recourse to abortion through expanded and improved family planning services" (ICPD-POA, paragraph 8.25). While it is up to the individual country to take any measures of changes related to abortion within the health system according to the national legislation process, action should be taken on prevention of abortion and the management of the consequences of unsafe abortion.

Table 4: Pregnancy Outcomes
No. of live births
per year (1)
Infant Mortality Rate(2)% Low Birth Weight(3)Estimated number
of induced abortions(4)
(Note B)
Cook
FSM
Fiji
450(1991)
2,593(1993)
19,358(1994)
26(1991)
49(1993)
19(1992)
3
9
4-21(a)
23(1991)
n.a.
n.a.
Kiribati
Marshall
Nauru
1,891(1990)
1,369(1993)
n.a.
65(1992)
63(1988)
26(1992)
6
9
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
Niue
Palau
PNG
35(1994)
374(1994)
132,595
0(1994)
21(1994)
72(1990)
3
8
n.a.
Nil
n.a.
n.a.
Solomon
Tokelau
Tonga
14,000(1995)
51(1994)
2,550(1994)
38(1986)
19(1994)
12(1994)
9
5
n.a.
n.a.
Nil
n.a.
Tuvalu
Vanuatu
W. Samoa
231(1993)
41(1991)
4,928(1991)
41(1991)
45(1989)
25(1992)
2
10-15
5
4(1993)
144(1987)
1(1994)
Note:
    (a) 4 for Fijians and 21 for Indo-Fijians
    (b) These are estimates only. As there is no information on how these estimates are derived, caution should be exercised in interpreting these data.

Source:
    (1) 1990 Census for Kiribati; 1993 Vital and Statistical Abstracts for Marshall Islands; As reported WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific (1995) for the rest of the countries;(2) Ministry of Health Annual Report for Fiji (1993); Ministry of Health and Family Planning for Kiribati; SPC (1995) for Nauru and Solomon Islands; As reported WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific (1995) for the rest of the countries;(3) UNICEF (1995) Draft Strategy Paper;(4) As reported to WHO Regional Office for Western Pacific (1995)

Worldwide, it is estimated that about 30 to 50% of maternal deaths are due to unsafe abortions, and 99 % of these deaths occur in developing countries (WHO, 1993b). What is of particular concern is the youth risking unsafe abortions. This often results in serious health problems including infection, haemorrhage, infertility and even death. WHO estimates that at least one-third of all women seeking hospital care for abortion complications are under age 20.

Every year many women have unwanted pregnancies, some of which are carried to term and others end in induced abortions. According to a recent survey conducted in Marshall Islands, 45% of women reported that they had at least one unwanted pregnancy. Abortion is illegal in most Pacific countries. Whether legal or not, many women in the Pacific resort to abortion, often traditional methods such as using herbs, abdominal massage, or the insertion of foreign objects into the uterus. These traditional methods are often performed by unskilled providers or by themselves, sometimes leading to fatalities. Abortion data are scarce and inevitably unreliable because of legal, ethical and moral constraints which hinder data collection. Estimated numbers of abortion in some Pacific countries provide some insights into the unmet need for family planning services, but unfortunately little information is available on how these estimates are obtained (e.g. whether they are based on the numbers of women treated for consequences of unsafe abortions or they are best guestimates). If these estimated numbers could be translated into abortion rates per 1000 live births, the rates would be alarmingly high, compared to 15 per 1000 for the Asia Region. Recognizing difficulties of obtaining information on abortion in the Pacific, at least the number of women receiving treatment as a consequence of unsafe abortion should be collected.

E. Reproductive Tract Infections(RTIs), Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STDs) and HIV/AIDS

The presence of Reproductive Tract Infections (RTIs) limits a woman's choice of contraception, her fertility and pregnancy outcome. Some aspects of RTIs are preventable and treatable causes of infertility, ectopic pregnancy, cervical cancer, and negative pregnancy outcomes such as fetal wastage, low birth weight, infant blindness (Wasserheit and Holmes, 1992). Although RTIs are broadly defined to include both sexually transmitted and nonsexually transmitted infections, the former form the majority of RTIs (see Brunham et al. 1992).

STD rates in the Pacific are routinely reported. But direct comparison of STD rates between countries should be done with caution, as there are variations in availability of STD testing, case detection, coverage, and completeness and timeliness of STD reporting. While data from 1983 to 1992 for gonorrhea and syphilis fluctuated in some countries, they provide evidence for a downward trend in countries for which data are available (see Sarda and Gallwey, 1995). However, the current rates, as shown in Table 5, are still alarmingly high when compared to a developed country in the Region, such as Australia (16 per 100,000). Gonorrhea incidence rates are exceptionally high in PNG and the rates for Vanuatu, Kiribati, FSM and Fiji are worrying. Syphilis rates are available for a few countries in the Pacific and the rates for Marshall Islands, Papua New Guinea and Fiji are high, compared to Australia (15 per 100,000).


Table 5: Reported Incidence of Gonorrhoea and Syphilis,
HIV infections and AIDS cases
Gonorrhea per
100,00 (year)(1)
Syphilis
(per 100,000)(2)
HIV (cumulative
total number)(3)
AIDS (cumulative
total number)(4)
Cook
FSM
Fiji
42(1992)
160(1991)
152(1992)
0(1992)
0(1991)
75(1992)
0
2
28
0
2
7
Kiribati
Marshall
Nauru
164(1991)
80(1992)
n.a.
n.a.
123(1992)
n.a.
2
8
0
0
2
0
Niue
Palau
PNG
n.a.
n.a.
337(1991)
n.a.
n.a.
99(1991)
0
1
247
0
1
91
Solomon
Tokelau
Tonga
120(1992)
n.a.
39(1991)
62(1988)
n.a.
n.a.
1
0
6
0
0
5
Tuvalu
Vanuatu
W. Samoa
n.a.
182(1992)
69(1992)
13(1989)
1(1988)
0(1989)
0
0
1
0
0
1
Note:
    (a) 4 for Fijians and 21 for Indo-Fijians
    (b) These are estimates only. As there is no information on how these estimates are derived, caution should be exercised in interpreting these data.

In addition to the above reported data, community based survey results are available for some countries. In Marshall Islands, the STD programme undertook community based surveys in 1989 and 1990, through which 86% of the adult population were screened for syphilis. 8% were found positive, and the prevalence was high among young and urban-based adults (ADB,1993). This rate of infection is about the average of the syphilis prevalence in developing countries (Wasserheit and Holmes, 1992). A follow-up survey conducted in 1991 for over 11,500 men and women further revealed 1.2% new cases. However, once well controlled STD rates seem to be on the rise again, according to the preliminary figures for 1994 and 1995.

Available information on STD prevalence among antenatal women, albeit sketchy, depicts a worrying picture. In Papua New Guinea, 4.5% of pregnant women were found to be reactive for syphilis in 1989. By early 1990, syphilis rates had dropped among pregnant women, but they were expected to rise in 1993. In Cook Islands, the syphilis prevalence rate among antenatal women was 0.6% in 1993. The syphilis prevalence rates in other developing countries range from 0.01% to 33%, but the median value was around 8%. The prevalence of gonorrhea among antenatal women in Papua New Guinea in the 1980s was very high, ranging from a low of 10% and to a high of 20%. The gonorrhea rate among antenatal women in Cook Islands was about 1.3%. The median prevalence rate in other developing countries was 6%. Information is also available on chlamydia. In Fiji, chlamydia rates among pregnant women were 20%, while they were 12% in Cook Islands and 33% in Marshall Islands. These rates were much higher than the developing country median prevalence rate of 8%.6 As they are based on small samples among clinic attendees, these rates cannot be translated into actual population prevalence and extreme caution should be exercised in interpreting these. However, what these available data suggest is the urgent need to pay attention to STD among women.

F. Infertility

The most common and potentially devastating complication of RTIs/STDs in women is infertility7. It is estimated that the proportion of infertility due to RTIs in Asia ranges from 15 - 40% while the proportion in the African Region ranges from 50 to 80%. By contrast, the proportion is only between 10 and 35% in developed countries (Wasserheit and Holmes, 1992). Little is known about the magnitude and distribution of infertility in the Pacific. But there are indications of infertility problems in the Pacific. One example is the cultural tradition that men prefer to marry women who have proven their fertility. Some Pacific countries such as Marshall Islands include infertility counselling as part of the MCH/FP services, which may imply the government's recognition of the magnitude of the problem. Taking account of relatively high and rising STDs in the region, couples suffering from infertility may be high.

III. MAIN BARRIERS TO EFFECTIVE REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH AND FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES AND MONITORING

The effectiveness of RH/FP services should be measured against the programme goals. Specific goals related to reproductive health and family planning services vary from country to country in the Pacific, but one of the common goals is to improve access to health services. While the overhaul of the adequacy of health infrastructure, services provided, personnel and budget allocations in relation to the programme goals is outside the purview of this paper, this section discusses a few direct barriers to effective programme monitoring and to women's access to services and information that may in turn interfere with their ability to make informed choices on contraceptive use.

A. RH/FP Data Gaps and Deficiencies

Several issues arise regarding data deficiencies, leading to poor quality of data.

Under-reporting: While communities in Pacific are well aware of births and deaths occurring in their localities, registration of deaths is regarded as the exception rather than the rule in countries such as Solomon Islands, Papua New Guinea and Vanuatu. As noted, it is estimated that deaths are under-reported by as much as 80 to 85% in Solomon Islands (O'Brien et al. 1993). Of reported deaths, causes of death are not often recorded and recorded information lacks accuracy, completeness and timeliness. In this context, it is not surprising to find that information on maternal deaths, which are relatively rare events, is very scanty. With regard to births, one estimation of the extent of under-estimation was over 30% in Marshall Islands, according to the 1994 Fertility and Family Planning Survey. Contraceptive prevalence data from routine recording and reporting systems also often lack the desired quality due to a variety of reasons. As contraceptive prevalence is one of the key indicators of RH/FP, improving quality of data should be addressed on an urgent basis.

Information gaps: Key information is often lacking, especially the extent of RTIs, female STD prevalence, the extent of infertility, the incidence of abortion and the rate of hospitalisation for abortion complications. One of the most serious problems is the lack of gender-dissaggregated information on what is routinely recorded and reported (e.g. STDs).

Low data utilisation and poor data management: Although data quality is a commonly stated problem, there are numerous surveys and other sources of data which could throw light on key aspects of RH/FP. In Marshall Islands, at least seven surveys, conducted between 1985 and 1994, can provide useful information on some aspects of reproductive health. In Solomon Islands, there are five surveys on similar subjects. Hospital records are another source of information which is not well tapped into for RH/FP information. While extensive hospital recording systems exist in many Pacific countries, only a fraction of the collected information is analysed and utilised for programme planning and monitoring. Two significant issues arise here. First, the level of data utilisation of the existing survey results is very low. Second, the data management system often does not exist, if it does, it is very poor. This leads to under utilisation of existing data and duplication of data collection activities for a need of the same information.

Data Inconsistencies: Country data on key indicators sometimes show incongruent figures that cannot be easily explained by methodological or time differences. Poor documentation of methodologies and sources of data aggravates the situation. This is one of the major impeding factors in assessing the current reproductive health situation properly for better planning.

B. Girls' Education and Women's Literacy

Education generally have a negative impact on fertility, although the strength of the association varies depending on the level of economic development. A recent analysis of the Demographic and Health Surveys in 26 countries reaffirmed the association and documented that the impact of individual schooling upon fertility is stronger in communities where the education level is relatively higher (Martin, 1995). Although there are a few KAP type surveys which collected information on education and contraceptive use, unfortunately little attempts have been made to examine the linkages between the two. Setting aside the methodological problems of measuring literacy, available data on female literacy show generally high rates for the Pacific, with most of the countries exceeding 80%. Exceptions are Solomon Islands (17%) and Papua New Guinea (38%), Vanuatu (60%) and Federated States of Micronesia (79%). Girls school primary school enrollment rates per 100 boys are over 90 in most countries, except in PNG (77) and Palau (89).

Girls' education and women's literacy have direct relevance to their health status and RH/FP service utilisation. Illiteracy or low level of education may interfere with a woman's ability to understand fully the side-effects, indications and contraindications of contraceptives. This, in turn, may limit her ability to make an informed choice. Also it is not unreasonable to assume that low education and illiteracy may make women more vulnerable to rumours and false beliefs than their educated counterparts, as the former group may have a limited means to verify rumours and false beliefs. In Vanuatu, many women stopped using injectable hormonal contraception due to unfounded rumours of side-effects in the mid 1980s (Vanuatu country report for ICPD). There is an urgent need to raise women's knowledge on personal hygiene, symptoms and signs of STDs, RTIs, sex-negotiating skills especially for young women. While there are effective means of reaching illiterate and less educated women for RH/FP messages (e.g. dramas and songs), information, education and counselling efforts will have only a limited impact, if the literacy and education level is low.

C. Shortage of Female Health Workers

The majority of the Pacific population reside in rural areas, where health services related to reproductive health and family planning are provided as part of primary health care. As Pacific island countries are made of dispersed and scattered islands occupying tracts of ocean, many small and remote outer islands have often one health clinic staffed with a health worker, who is the first contact point for women for their reproductive health and family planning care. A high proportion of health workers in general and health workers at the primary care level in particular are males in many countries in the Pacific. This is one of the factors hindering women from seeking timely health care. To reflect these cultural sensitivities, a few countries have taken positive steps. Marshall Islands, for example, began to recruit more female health assistants. In Solomon Islands, NGO family planning clinics (Solomon Islands Planned Parenthood Association) have a plan to staff with two nurses, one male and one female to be more effective in responding to community family planning needs. However, still there is a large gender imbalance in the health workforce particularly at the primary care level.

D. Consent Form Required to Use contraceptives

Although family planning programmes are mainly targeted toward women, women often lack the autonomy to make decisions about contraceptive use. Data on couples' decision making processes are rare. But if there are systems or customs which could potentially deter women from exercising their desires and preferences in family planning, they should be addressed as part of the reproductive health programmes. One such example is the use of a consent form. In Marshall Islands, the Majuro hospital requires a consent form to be signed by husbands of female clients for female sterilization. This procedure was promulgated by the hospital after an incidence in which the husband of a woman who underwent female sterilization accused the hospital for carrying out the procedure without a proof of couple consultation. The consent form requirement was practised also in Papua New Guinea up until recently. In 1993, however, the Government of PNG did away with the consent form! .

While requiring a consent form may have ensured consultations between couples on female sterilization, consultations between couples should be ensured for all contraceptive methods, not only on a particular method. The practice of the consent form has a potential to limit woman's reproductive rights. Moreover, the reciprocal procedure, a consent form for vasectomy is not enforced. The informed choice of contraceptives based on couples' joint decisions would be better achieved through the provision of adequate information, education, and counselling on contraceptives than introducing procedures such as a consent form.

IV. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

A. Summary of Reproductive and Family Planning Situation

Although data are of poor quality, analysis of the existing information on the main areas of reproductive health and family planning shows some salient features in the Pacific. Table 6 summarises the status of each country in the main areas of reproductive health and family planning.

Fertility and Infertility
  • The level of fertility in the Pacific is high compared to that of small island nations in other regions. This is especially so in Solomon Islands, Papua New Guinea, Vanuatu, Marshall Islands, and Nauru. The Total Fertility Rate (TFR) in these countries exceeds five per woman.
  • Two specific groups, teenagers and women aged between 40 and 49, are particularly vulnerable to reproductive health problems. Fertility levels of these two groups show sharp contrasts among Pacific island countries. Four countries show relatively high fertility levels on both of these groups, FSM, Marshall Islands, Solomon Islands and Vanuatu. Fertility of high reproductive health risk groups should be monitored separately.
  • Little information is available on infertility.
. Family Planning
  • The level of contraceptive use is low throughout the Pacific, although prevalence may be higher than reported in some countries. Countries where trend data are available such as Fiji and Kiribati show little changes over time. There is a dearth of information on contraceptive use patterns of two vulnerable groups, teenagers and women aged between 40 and 49.
  • Apart from a few methods, a wide range of choice is available throughout the Pacific. Injectable hormonal contraception is by far the most popular method in the Pacific, followed by oral pills and female sterilization.
  • Despite the wide range of methods available, the level of reliance on a single method is an issue that deserves urgent attention. This over-reliance on one method is very pronounced in many countries including Solomon Islands, Vanuatu, Palau, Cook Islands, Palau and Tokelau.
  • Male participation in family planning is very low throughout the Pacific. It is interesting to note that the acceptance of male sterilization is relatively high in Kiribati.
Table 6. Summary of RH/FP Situation in the Fifteen Pacific Island Countries
(See Relevant Sections for Details)
FERTILITY
FAMILY PLANNING
MATERNAL CARE
PREGNANCY
OUTCOME
STD Among Women
High teen
fer-
tility
High
fer-
tility
women 40-49
Low contra
ceptive use
Little change in
contra
ceptive use
Available method limited Over reliance on single method Low male parti
cipation
Low prenatal coverage Low attended delivery High MMR Anaemia High IMR(40+) Low Birth Weight High abortion Chlymedia Gonorrhea Syphilis
Cook
FSM
Fiji
*
*

*

*


*


*

*
*

*





*
*

*


*
*



*




Kiribati
Marshall
Nauru

*
*

*
*

*



*
*

*
*

*
*





*
*

*



*




Niue
Palau
PNG


*


*

*


*


*
*
*
*
*


*


*

*




*






*


*


*
Solomon
Tokelau
Tonga
*

*

*
*
*



*
*
*
*

*


*

*

*














Tuvalu
Vanuatu
W.Samoa

*

*

*





*
*
*
*
*



*
*



*
*
*
*

*

*






Maternal Care, Pregnancy Outcomes, and Abortion

  • Two countries, Papua New Guinea and Solomon Islands, Report staggeringly high levels of maternal mortality. While maternal care situation seems favourable in the Pacific compared to other regions in terms of antenatal care coverage and attended delivery, these coverage data may be over-estimated. One of the pregnancy outcome measures, infant mortality rates are still relatively high in the Pacific, at least in six countries. If estimated numbers of abortion are representative of the Pacific situation, this issue should be given a top priority.
STDs/HIV/AIDS
  • While women appear to experience the impact of STDs more harshly than men, are more susceptible to acquiring infection, and more likely to experience complications arising from the primary infection, STDs data in the Pacific, which are routinely reported, are not gender-disaggregated. Available evidence suggests that chlamydia, syphilis and gonorrhea infection rates among antenatal women are high, compared to other developing countries.
B. Incorporation of STDs into Family Planning programmes

The linkages between the current MCH/FP and STD programmes in the Pacific are very tenuous. Family planning programmes mainly focus on women and pay little attention to STDs. On the other hand, STD programmes deal primarily with men and ignore other services such as family planning. In discussing incorporating STDs into MCH/FP, a number of reservations have been expressed in other regions. These include: comprehensive RH services including STDs would have a large financial implications and would be too costly to consider in a resource-poor environment; family planning services are already overburdened and cannot accommodate expanded service obligations; Family planning clients will not appreciate being asked or screened for diseases such as STDs. Also there is the widely held misperception that STDs occur primarily among limited numbers of sexually promiscuous adults.

It is important to review the above concerns in the Pacific context in order to make informed decisions and improve programme effectiveness. There are compelling reasons for the existing MCH/FP programmes to take into account STDs in the Pacific. First, the presence of STDs limits women's contraceptive choice. Most cases of pelvic inflammatory disease in the developing world are caused by gonorrhea or chlamydia, conditions that could limit women's choices of contraceptive methods such as IUD (Wasserheit and Holms, 1992). Without addressing STD issues in RH/FP, efforts to improve quality of care, especially widening a choice aspect, would have only limited effectiveness.

Secondly, there are approaches available which can detect STDs with relatively low cost and minimal training of family planning staff. A syndromic approach, for example, relies on signs and symptoms of diagnosing and treating such conditions as urethral and vaginal discharge, without using laboratories to determine the organism causing the condition (De Lay, 1994). The drawbacks of this approach, however, are that this has a low level of predictability and does not detect asymptomatic patients especially among women with gonorrhea and chlamydia infection. For men, this approach has proven to be accurate and cost-effective. For women, this method is less effective. The level of STDs in women with no symptoms or poorly recognised symptoms in the Pacific is not known. However, for Pacific countries where a large proportion of women live in remote and isolated islands and general health services are inadequate, this approach may present an affordable alternative that will service more women for STD education, counselling, referrals and treatment. This approach is already being practised in some countries in the Pacific.

C. Key Indicators of RH/FP : Selection Criteria

In order to identify the priority areas of reproductive health that need strengthening, it is essential to decide on the basic key indicators which need to be collected routinely for programme monitoring and planning. While many Pacific island countries collect information on some aspects of RH/FP, there are no clearly defined RH/FP indicators. In selecting indicators, there are a few factors to consider. First, one has to be parsimonious. While RH/FP issues should be the forefront of the health and development agenda, there are other important areas which require a long list of indicators for routine monitoring. Making the utilisation aspect of selected indicators clear at the outset would help to limit the number of indicators.

Second, indicators that could be collected through a routine recording and reporting system should be given a high priority. There are three main sources of data for key RH/FP indicators, routine health recording and reporting systems, civil registration systems for vital statistics, and surveys. For births and deaths, including maternal deaths, civil registration systems should be the best source but they are currently poorly established in many Pacific countries. While population based surveys are the best source for contraceptive prevalence and many KAP type of information, repeat surveys for trend analysis often depend on funding availability. As a very large proportion of surveys in the Pacific are funded externally, future availability of survey data is often uncertain. The recording and reporting system provides the best prospect for producing data for key indicators on a regular basis. Many countries already have established recording and reporting systems. However, efforts should be made to improve the quality of data from the ! curr ent recording and reporting systems in terms of reliability, validity, specificity and sensitivity (see Section III A for detailed discussions).

Third, indicators reflecting ICPD issues should be included in the key RH/FP indicator list. There are three dimensions that are particularly relevant to the Pacific context. They are quality of care (widening the choice of contraceptives aspect), gender perspectives (women's reproductive rights, men's reproductive health needs and men's participation in family planning) and special geographic and age groups (teenagers, women aged between 40 and 49, and rural women).

Quality of Care: Quality of care is the key to more effective family planning programmes, increasing contraceptive prevalence, and continuity of use. It has been suggested that having a small number of acceptors per year and ensuring their continuation rates by meeting the client's needs would increase contraceptive prevalence (Jain 1989). But if the programme focuses mainly on recruiting a large number of acceptors and fails to meet the client needs, then this strategy will have only a short-term impact on contraceptive prevalence that cannot be sustained. While quality of care methodology is still evolving, widening the choice indicators can effectively be monitored within the existing data collection systems. From the analysis of the Pacific situation, it is clear that broadening the variety of methods available by itself does not guarantee the widening choice. It should be accompanied by other activities such as counselling, education, and information to assist women to maximise the benefits of availability of different contraceptives. Long-acting contraceptive methods such as IUDs, subdermal implants (Norplant) and female sterilization are among the most effective methods available for preventing unwanted pregnancy. From the user's point of view, they require little effort on the part of the user after initial service delivery. However, women may have less control over use than with other contraceptives, as these methods must be delivered, removed or reversed by providers.

Widening the choice of contraceptives applies also to men. Men's choice of contraceptives is very limited. While the exact level of effectiveness of coitus interruptus (withdrawal) as contraception needs to be established through more research (see Rogow and Horowitz, 1995), Pacific countries may wish to review this method for promotion as part of the family planning programme in the Pacific. This method lacks side effects, user controlled, and requires no supply. Especially couples living in isolated islands where supplies of contraceptives may be irregular, this method might pose as an alternative, or a backup method to their choice of other contraceptives. The contraceptive use pattern suggests that the proportion of couples using male methods, such as condoms and withdrawal are higher in developed countries than that in developing countries. An indicator of male participation in family planning needs to be included in the RH/FP indicator list and monitored.

RH/FP Needs of Teenagers: Those who are younger than 15 make up about one third of the Pacific population, and they will soon need contraception. Teenage pregnancy and unsafe teenage abortions are the major consequences of not meeting the needs of adolescents. Infants born to teenage women are twice as likely to die than those born to older women, as shown in data in Marshall Islands (Lee and Katoanga, 1995). Teenage pregnancy often poses a higher risk than that for women in older age groups, because of their late service seeking, limited knowledge and information on antenatal care, limited resources, and social and cultural barriers. Yet their contraceptive use is low mainly due to social constraints and lack of knowledge.

RH/FP Needs of women over 40: While family planning needs diminish with age, reproductive health problems increase with age. One of the common reproductive morbidities is cervical cancer. While pap smear tests are routinely carried out in some of the Pacific countries, the results are not routinely reported.

Rural-Urban Disparities: Analysis of the current situation in the Pacific shows that the patterns of contraceptive use, maternal health care, pregnancy outcomes differ considerably between rural and urban areas.

Men's Reproductive Health Needs and Involving Men in Family Planning: Little is known about men's reproductive health and family planning needs in the Pacific. To involve men more in RH/FP, it is essential to understand men's concerns regarding contraception, reproductive health needs and reproductive responsibility. Until recently, research in the family planning field seldom included men. Informing and educating men about contraception may be particularly crucial in cultures where women have little control over contraceptive decision-making, as observed in some countries of the Pacific.

D. Importance of RH/FP Policy Indicators

Policy indicators are important in determining whether national authorities give formal endorsement to certain policies and strategies. RH/FP issues should be monitored closely, not only by health officials but by planners as well. Reproductive health and family planning (RH/FP) is a priority issue in the Pacific as it is inextricably linked with women's status enhancement and family well-being in a society. Many countries in the Pacific espouse RH/FP as one of the population and development priorities, and include the subject matter in their population and development policies, as seen in Marshall Islands. This priority, however, is not well braced judging from the financial resource allocations. The health expenditure spent on the MCH/FP programme is relatively small, for example, 7% in Marshall Islands and 10% in Kiribati. The proportion of donors' funding on MCH/FP programmes is also small compared to that for hospital and hospital base services.

The new reproductive health approach calls for a need to include services related to prevention aspects of STDs, abortion, and infertility to which the conventional MCH/FP programme has not paid much attention. This may require some adjustments in the current health service delivery, and may have budget implications for further training and retraining, operational research and supplies and equipment. Without appropriate budget and personnel support, the RH/FP programme would have only limited effectiveness. In view of likely reduction in donor funding in the Pacific including programmes concerning MCH/FP, STD/HIV/AIDS, it would be unrealistic to expect a substantial increase in RH/FP related programmes. However, the level of RH/FP resources needs to be closely monitored.

Table 7: Overall Health Expenditure, Expenditure on MCH/FP
Analysis of Total Health Expenditure
Analysis of Donor Expenditure
Public expenditure
in Health (% of GNP)(1)
Curative Health
Care (% of
Public Health Expenditure)(2)
% of
Health
Expenditure
on MCH/FP (3)
As % of Health
Expenditure(4)
% Spent on MCH/FP(5) % Spent on Hospital/Hospital based services(6)
Fiji
2
87
n.a.
3
0.7
66
Kiribati
6
81
9.8
19
0.6
92
Marshall
10
n.a.
7.2
15
28.3
0
Solomon
n.a.
80
n.a.
26
0
39
Tonga
4
81
n.a.
25
0
6
Vanuatu
3
89
n.a.
42
0
3.7
W.Samoa
n.a.
83
n.a.
50
1
62
Source:
    (1) UNDP Pacific Human Development Report (1994);(2) UNDP Pacific Human Development Report (1994);(3) to (6) World Bank (1994:9,130,177)

Another area requiring policy indicators is the progress toward removing barriers to effective RH/FP, as noted in Section III. Women and men living in rural areas deserve special attention as they are one of the most disadvantaged groups receiving least adequate health services. Health workers at the community level are the first contact point for these groups. A high proportion of health workers at the primary care level is males in many countries in the Pacific. This is one of the factors hindering women from seeking reproductive health services. To reflect cultural sensitivities there is a need for a larger representation of female health workers to be trained as primary level health. It has been proven that the most effective way of meeting community's health care needs is to have a team of a male and a female health workers. Some countries, such as Marshall Islands, have already taken a step to address this gender imbalance in the health workforce. But as the workforce is dynamic by nature, this needs to be monitored on a continuing basis.

E. Conclusion

It is envisaged that the demand for reproductive health and family planning services will increase in the near future in the Pacific. The large and growing young population (aged 0-14) will reach their reproductive age soon. While the level of political commitment to health and population has been lukewarm in some countries in the Pacific, improvements in education especially girls' education and increased awareness of reproductive choices and population issues will further generate the demand for family planning services. Through global and regional developments such as the ICPD, however, there seems to be a renewed interest in health and population issues. It is an opportune time for Pacific island countries to develop country-specific RH/FP strategies specifying realistic and clear objectives and input requirements, to maintain the momentum gained through the global RH/FP developments. Identifying key indicators to monitor the progress toward objectives is a concrete step towards this. The list of the key RH/FP indicators presented in Table 8 is the reflection of the analysis of the Pacific situation and the principles of the recent developments in RH/FP. Indicators listed in Table 8 are the ones which could be collected through routine recording and reporting systems, with a few minor changes. However, it is important to have periodic population-based surveys to supplement and verify the information collected through the routine recording and reporting system.

Table 8: List of RH/FP Basic Minimum Indicators To Be Collected
through Routine Recording and Reporting System
Main Issues Indicators Diffentiating Factors
Family Planning
  • Limited number of methods
  • Over reliance on single method
  • Low male participation
  • Teenage pregnancy
  • Late pregnancy

Maternal Care

  • Low coverage
  • Late visit to the clinic
  • Cervical Cancer

Reproductive Conditions
  • Prevention of Cervical Cancer
  • Family Planning
    • Contraceptive prevalence rate
    • Number of methods available
    • Reliance on a single method
    • % of couples using male method
    • Teenage CPR

    Maternal Care

    • Prenatal Care Coverage
    • % of women visiting clinics in their first trimester
    • Post-partum care coverage
    • Attended delivery
    • % women overweight or obese

    Reproductive Conditions
  • Number of women taking Pap smear tests
    • for teenagers
    • for women over 40
    • by urban/rural







    • for teenagers
    • for women over 40
    • by urban/rural








    • for women over 40
    Pregnancy Outcomes
    • Negative pregnancy outcomes
    Abortion
    • Prevention of abortion and management of unsafe abortion
    • No information

    Pregnancy Outcomes
    • Number of live births
    • Number of perinatal deaths
    • Infant mortality rate
    • Number of Maternal deaths
    Abortion
    • Abortion Rate

    • for teenagers
    • for women over 40
    • by urban/rural




    • for teenagers
    • for women over 40
    • by urban/rural

    RTIs/STDs
    • No female STD data
    • High STD among antenatal women
    RTIs/STDs
    • Female/Male prevalence of syphilis, gonorrhea
    • Prevalence of Chlamydia
    • for teenagers
    • by urban/rural
    Infertility
    • No information
    Infertility
    • Number of couples consulted
    Policy Indicators
    • Low priority given RH/FP
    • Women's low utilization of health services related to few female health workers
    Policy Indicators
    • % of health budget spent on MCH/FP/STD
    • % RH/FP budget from external sources
    • % of female health workers

    ______________________

      [1] Reproductive health is defined as "a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity, in all matters relating to the reproductive system and to its functions and process" (ICPD-POA, paragraph 7.2)
      [2] Caution should be exercised in interpreting fertility rates of these groups, as they are based on small numbers.
      [3] The facility based CPRs were 27% (1982), 26% (1983), 26.8%(1984), 27.5% (1985), 27.2% (1986), 28.7% (1987), 27.5% (1988), 28.4% (1989), and 27.6% (1990). The crude birth rates were 32.2 in 1982 and 25.3 in 1990. Source: Ministry of Health Annual Reports, Fiji (various years).
      [4] Caution should be exercised in reviewing the level of reliance on single method which are based on data from recording and reporting systems.
      [5] These include parenteral oxytocic drugs, parenteral sedatives for eclampsia, manual removal of placenta, manual of retained products, and assisted delivery. At the district hospital, it is recommended that the essential elements include all of the above, plus surgery anaesthesia and blood transfusion (WHO 1993c).
      [6] Source: Papua New Guinea figures are from Mugrditchian and Jenkins (1993); Median prevalence rates in other developing countries are from Wasserheit and Holmes (1992); and Cook Islands figures are from the 1992 Women's Health Survey; and Fiji figures are from Fiji Medium Term Plan for AIDS.
      [7] Data from developed countries indicated that 10-40% of women with untreated chlamydia or gonococcal infection develop symtomatic pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) and that up to one quarter of those with PID will become infertile (Meheus, 1992).

    REFERENCES

    Asian Development Bank (1993) Health Sector Review. Majuro: Republic of Marshall Islands.

    Bertrand, J. Magnani, R. And Knowles, J. (1994) Handbook of Indicators for Family Planning Program Evaluation. The Evaluation Project.

    Brunham R.C. and J.E. Embree (1992) "Sexually Transmitted Diseases: Current and Future Dimensions of the Problem in the Third World," in Germain, A et al. (eds) Reproductive Tract Infections: Global Impact and Priorities for Women's Reproductive Health. New York: Plenum Press.

    Pacific Island Country Reports prepared for the 1994 ICPD held in Cairo. Suva: UNFPA CST

    De Lay, P. (1994) "Adding STD Services Needs Careful Evaluation," Network. May. Pp. 8-10.

    Dixon-Mueller R. (1993) Population Policy and Women's Rights: Transforming Reproductive Choice. Westport : Praeger.

    Gillet, Joy E. (1990) The Health of Women in Papua New Guinea, Papua New Guinea Institute of Medical Research, Papua New Guinea

    Jain, Anrudh K. (Ed.) (1992) Managing Quality of Care in Population Programmes. Kumarine Press.

    Lee, S.H. and Lucas, D., (1986) "Estimating Required Contraceptive Prevalence," Research Note, Department of Demography Research School of Social Sciences, ANU, Canberra, Australia.

    Lee, S.H. and S. Katoanga (1995) "Reproductive Health Including Family Planning and Sexual Health in Marshall Islands." Suva: UNFPA CST. (Draft paper)

    Martin, T.C. (1995) "Women's Education and Fertility: Results from 26 Demographic and Health Surveys," Studies in Family Planning. 26 (4):187-202.

    McMurray, C. (1995) "Report on the Republic of the Marshall Islands Fertility and Family Planning Survey, November - December 1994." (Draft).

    Meheus, A. (1992) "Women's Health: Importance of Reproductive Tract Infections, Pelvic Inflammatory Disease and Cervical Cancer," in Germain, A et al (eds) Reproductive Tract Infections: Global Impact and Priorities for Women's Reproductive Health. New York: Plenum Press.

    Mendoza, O.M. (1988) Technical Report on the Assessment of the Family Planning Programme of the Ministry of Health of Fiji. Manila:WHO.

    Nasiru, I. (1995) "Report on the Fertility and Family Planning Survey, Marshall Islands, 1994" Ministry of Health and, Republic of Marshall Islands.

    O'Brien, J., Thomas W., Knott, S., Pickacha, J., and Graham, W.(1993) Maternal Mortality in the Solomon Islands. Unpublished Paper.

    Rogow, D. and S. Horowitz (1995) "Withdrawal: A Review of the Literature and an Agenda for Research," Studies in Family Planning. 26(3): 140-153.

    Sarda, R.M. and J. Gallwey (1995) "STD Services in the Pacific: Report of a Survey," Pacific Health Dialog. 2(2): 37-44.

    Sarda, R.M. and G. Harrison (1995) "Epidemiology of HIV and AIDS in the Pacific," Pacific Health Dialog. 2(2): 6-13.

    United Nations (1995) Population and Development: Programme of Action Adopted at the International Conference on Population and Development, Cairo, 5-13 September 1994. New York: UN.

    United Nations Development Programme (1994) Pacific Human Development Report, Suva: UNDP.

    United Nations Development Programme (1994) Human Development Report 1994. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Wasserheit J.N. and K.K. Holmes (1992) "Reproductive Tract Infections: Challenges for Inernational Health Policy, Programs and Research," in Germain, A et al (eds) Reproductive Tract Infections: Global Impact and Priorities for Women's Reproductive Health. New York: Plenum Press.

    Weinberger, M.B. (1994), "Recent Trends in Contraceptive Use," Population Bulletin of the United Nations. No. 36. New York: UN.

    World Bank (1994) Health Priorities and Options in the World Bank's Paific Member Countries. Washington DC: World Bank.

    World Health Organisation Regional Office for the Western Pacific (1994) "Western Pacific Region Data Bank on Socioeconomic and Health Indicators" Manila: WPRO.

    World Health Organisation (1993a) Maternal Health and Safe Motherhood Programme, Coverage of Maternity Care - A Tabulation of Available Information, Third Edition, Geneva: WHO.

    World Health Organisation (1993b) Maternal Health and Safe Motherhood Programme, Abortion, Geneva: WHO.

    World Health Organisation (1993c) Indicators to Monitor Maternal Health Goals, Report of a Technical Working Group, Geneva: WHO.