UNITED NATIONS POPULATION INFORMATION NETWORK (POPIN)
UN Population Division, Department of Economic and Social Affairs,
with support from the UN Population Fund (UNFPA)

94-11: Population Today, November 1994

*****************************************************************

The electronic version of this journal is being made available by

the Population Information Network (POPIN) Gopher of the United

Nations Population Division, Department for Economic and Social

Information and Policy Analysis, in collaboration with the

Population Reference Bureau and with funding from the Andrew W.

Mellon Foundation.

*****************************************************************



                        Population Today

                         November 1994 





Please note: The graphics that appeared in the printed copy of

Population Today have not been included here. For a complete copy

of Population Today, send US$2.00 to Population Reference Bureau,

1875 Connecticut Ave., NW, Suite 520, Washington, D.C. 20009.



World Growth Rate Slows, But Numbers Build Up



by Carl Haub



     The early 1990s are turning out to be another demographic

watershed, reports the Population Division of the United Nations

Department for Economic and Social Information and Policy

Analysis. The newest series of UN estimates and projections

reflects the resumption of a trend of declining world population

growth rates that had begun in the mid-1960s but stalled soon

after. 



     UN demographers calculate that, between 1990 and 1994, world

population grew at 1.57 percent per year. This was significantly

below the 1.73 percent per year growth rate of the previous 15

years (1975-1990) and the peak of 2.0 percent in the late 1960s.

The current population growth rate is the lowest recorded since

World War II.



Differences from Previous UN Projections



     These growth rates are dramatically different from those

used by the UN in its last series of projections, just two years

ago. In 1992, the UN estimated the annual world population growth

rate at 1.68 percent for 1990-1995, not 1.57 percent as it does

now. Declining growth rates have been recorded in both developing

and industrialized countries. They are primarily due to faster-

than-anticipated fertility declines in some countries of Africa

and South Central Asia, as well as "baby busts" in Eastern

Europe, particularly the former republics of the USSR.



     Despite the lower growth rate, the number of people added to

world population is likely to increase annually until at least

the end of this century (see figure).  In mid-1994, world

population stood at 5.63 billion, having increased by 86 million

persons the previous year, an average of 236,000 people each day.

Currently 4.47 billion people--79 percent of the total--live in

developing countries and 1.16 billion live in industrialized

countries.



     World population is projected to be 9.8 billion in 2050 in

the medium series, with a possible range of from 7.9 to 11.9 in

the low and high series.



The 100 million-plus club



     Today, just 10 countries have over 100 million people,

according to the UN. They are China (1.2 billion), India (919

million), the United States (261 million), Indonesia (195

million), Brazil (159 million), Russia (147 million), Pakistan

(137 million), Japan (125 million), Bangladesh (118 million), and

Nigeria (108 million). But, by 2050, the UN medium projections

show eight additional countries joining the 100-million-plus

club: Ethiopia, Zaire, Iran, Mexico, Vietnam, the Philippines,

Egypt, and Turkey. At that time, China and India, with more than

1.6 billion people each, will be neck and neck for the number one

position.



Reasons for the slowdown



     The 1994 revision of the official UN world population

estimates and projections reflects the beginning of an apparent

fertility transition in a number of sub-Saharan African, Asian,

and Middle Eastern countries. For decades, the average number of

children per woman had remained very high and constant in these

countries. Recent demographic surveys have uncovered fertility

declines, which the UN has now built into its projections. Also,

the large number of countries with evidence of three

trends--fertility decline, increases in contraceptive use, and

rising age at marriage--argues that the transition to lower

fertility has actually begun in many countries.



     In Madagascar, average fertility has fallen from 6.6

children per woman in 1980-1985 to 6.1 today; in Tanzania, from

6.7 to 5.9; in Namibia, from 5.8 to 5.3; in Mauritania, from 6.1

to 5.4. New data also suggest faster-than-expected fertility

declines in Zambia, Zimbabwe, and Gambia.



     In Kenya and Botswana, fertility declines had been

documented in earlier UN projections. In these countries, more

couples are using contraception.  Contraceptive use rose in Kenya

from 7 to 33 percent of married couples since the late 1970s and

from 28 to 33 percent in Botswana during the same period. In most

other countries of Africa, contraceptive use remains low, but

evidence exists that women are marrying at older ages. In

Tanzania, current use of contraception is low (10 percent in

1991-1992), but average female age at marriage rose from 19 years

in 1978 to 21 years in 1988. Several large countries, however,

show no evidence of these trends, including Nigeria, Zaire, and

Ethiopia.



     Fertility is also dropping in South Asia and the Middle

East. Surprising new information suggests a rapid fertility

transition in Iran, where average births per woman dropped from

6.8 children per woman in the early 1980s to 5.0 today. Past

fertility declines continue in Bangladesh (from 6.2 children per

woman in the early 1980s to 4.4 today), India (from 4.5 to 3.7),

and Nepal (from 6.3 to 5.4). Populous Pakistan shows no fertility

decline as yet.



     The new UN projections show that, on the one hand, changes

and surprises in current trends are always to be expected. But,

on the other hand, future world population remains very much an

unknown. Consider this: if world birth rates remained just where

they are today (i.e., a "constant fertility" assumption), world

population would rise to 16 billion by 2050, triple today's

total, and would pass 500 billion after 2100. Such is the quiet

power of seemingly small, yet compounding growth rates. Food for

thought. 



For further information on World Population Prospects: The 1994

Revision, write: UN Population Division, DC-2, Room 1950, United

Nations, New York, NY 10017. The Population Division publishes

its projections series every two years, with separate volumes on

age-sex distributions for each country and projections of urban

and rural populations.



*****



Fewer and Fewer "Traditional " Households



by Susan Kalish



Household arrangements are continuing to diverge from what many

Americans still regard as traditional or typical, says the Census

Bureau. Trends such as delayed marriage, unmarried partners

living together, unmarried childbearing, and divorce are all

challenging the cultural expectation of lifelong marriage and

children growing up in the household of their biological parents.



     A new analysis of Current Population Survey data tracks

household patterns since 1970. The report shows that steady or,

in some cases, intensifying pressure of several trends is driving

these continuing social changes.  *     Later marriage, no

marriage. Since 1975, the average age for first marriage has

risen by three years: from 23.5 to 26.5 years for men and from

21.1 to 24.5 years for women. The proportion of men and women age

30 to 34 who have never married has tripled between 1970 and

1993. For women, the proportion grew from 6.2 percent to 19.3

percent; for men, from 9 percent to 30 percent. * Unmarried

couples. In 1993, there were 6 unmarried couples for every 100

married couples, compared with only 1 for every 100 in 1970.

There are 3.5 million unmarried-couple households today, up from

523,000 in 1970. The relationship category, "unmarried partner of

opposite sex," was added to the 1990 Census questionnaire to help

identify this type of living arrangement. *  People living alone.

About 1 in 8 adults (age 15 and older) lived alone in 1993. Most

(6 in 10) were women, but the proportion of men living alone grew

faster than that for women. Still, many more women than men in

older age groups live alone: of adults age 75 and older, 52

percent of women and 20 percent of men live alone. *   Divorced

people. Between 1970 and 1993, the number of individuals who

report their marital status as divorced nearly quadrupled, from

4.3 million to 16.7 million, representing 9 percent of all adults

(age 18 or older). *     Single parents. In 1993, 26.7 percent of

children under 18 were currently living with one parent, up from

11.9 percent in 1970. This single-point-in-time "snapshot" does

not capture the likelihood that today's children have a 50-50

chance of spending some part of their childhood in a

single-parent family. Single parents are now more likely to be

fathers: 12.8 percent of children in a one-parent situation lived

with their father, up from 9.1 percent in 1970.  *     

Never-married parents. In 1993, a child in a single-parent home

was almost as likely to be living with a never-married parent as

with a divorced parent (see figure). These changes affect all

U.S. racial and ethnic groups and all educational levels, but are

more intensified for some. In 1993, 64 percent of white adults

were currently married (down from 73 percent in 1970). The

proportion of married African-American adults plunged from 64

percent in 1970 to 43 percent. The married proportion of

Hispanics fell from 72 percent to 60 percent during the same

period. Or, from a different perspective, the proportion of

never-married adults age 18 and older has risen to 20 percent of

whites, 38 percent of blacks, and 28 percent of Hispanics. 



For more information, see: Marital Status and Living

Arrangements: March 1993, by Arlene F. Saluter. U.S. Bureau of

the Census, Current Population Reports, Population

Characteristics P20- 478.



*****



At ICPD: Religious Groups Focus on POpulation Ethics



By Susan Kalish



Theologians and religious-based social activists, encouraged by

their participation in September's International Conference on

Population and Development (ICPD), are likely to add a diversity

of voices to ethical and policy debates concerning population

issues. 



     The emergent religious and ethical agenda will be broader

than the moral issue that dominated media coverage of ICPD: the

opposition of the Vatican to abortion. The population agenda for

mainline Protestants, the Jewish community, and many other

religious groups will likely focus on questions closer to the

heart of the conference: the empowerment of women; issues of

access to contraception and reproductive health care; the

responsibility of developed countries to aid less developed ones;

the moral implications of the consumption patterns of more

developed countries; and whether it is ethically acceptable to

push for worldwide goals such as women's empowerment or

population stabilization, since countries have different moral,

ethical, religious, and cultural values.  Environment and

population



     Not very long ago, much of religious discourse was viewed as

a hindrance to progress on environmental and population issues,

according to David Anderson, coauthor of Religious Communities

and Population Concerns, a PRB report. Historian Lynn White

summed up this criticism in a 1969 article in Science, finding 

an "anti-nature" bias in Western science and technology going

back to the Genesis story of Eden--in which God gave human beings

domination over creation. Also in 1969, in response to such

emerging criticism, the National Council of Churches established

an Environmental Stewardship Action team and 75 religious

thinkers formed the Faith-Man-Nature Group to explore the

theology of ecology. New theological approaches began to stress

the immanence of the divine in the natural order--for example,

the "creation spirituality," "deep ecology," and "Gaia"

movements, as expressed by writers such as Thomas Berry, Matthew

Fox, Vincent Rossi, Bill DeVall, George Sessions, and Rosemary

Radford Ruether. The concept of "stewardship" began to outgrow

its traditional meaning of church fundraising and took on a sense

of "earth stewardship," the responsibility to care for the entire

natural world as a sacramental trust. 



     Church environmentalism in the 1970s and 1980s, says

Anderson, "proceeded by fits and starts, expressed among

grassroots and local congregations in a concern about such issues

as energy efficiency or recycling and on the theological level

with a renewed attention to the doctrine of creation and an

expanded view of the concept of stewardship." 



     This period also saw a deepening of discussions between

religious leaders and environmental scientists. In 1990, 34

internationally known scientists issued an "Open Letter to the

Religious Community." This appeal stated that "Efforts to

safeguard and cherish the environment need to be infused with a

vision of the sacred." Two years later, several hundred religious

leaders from all major faiths and from all around the world

signed a joint statement reading, "...a consensus now

exists...across a significant spectrum of religious traditions,

that the cause of environmental integrity and justice must occupy

a position of utmost priority for people of faith."



Religious voices at ICPD



     These messages of earth stewardship were heard at ICPD--but

they were by no means the strongest religious voices there. At

the official UN conference, held in Cairo's new International

Conference Center, the Vatican's opposition to aspects of the

ICPD Program of Action dominated the agenda and international

press coverage for days. In the end, however, in a conciliatory

gesture that surprised seasoned observers, the Vatican joined the

consensus although with reservations on several issues. This was

the first time the Holy See had signed the official report of a

UN population conference.



     At ICPD's NGO Forum, held in a nearby huge snail-shell of a

modified sports stadium, the strongest religious voices were

those of Muslims--a group with relatively small U.S. numbers, but

a major religion worldwide. The participation of Muslims in the

ICPD dialog was particularly important since, all around the

world, Muslims tend to have larger families than other groups in

the same locale or at similar income levels. Particularly active

at ICPD were faculty and religious leaders from Al-Azhar

University, which held a 1991 International Conference on

Bioethics in Human Reproduction Research in the Muslim world, and

published a 1994 commentary on ICPD's draft plan of action. 



     Spokespeople from Al-Azhar University appeared in workshops

and forums almost daily. Discussions tended to be intense, but

without the vociferousness of militant Egyptian Muslim preachers

who, according to news reports, denounced the conference as

immoral. Cairo's Grand Mufti, Mohammed Said Tantawy, the

highest-ranking spiritual leader of the Muslim community in

Cairo, made a surprise personal appearance to a packed hall on

the last day of the NGO forum, dispelling rumors that he

personally disapproved of the conference.



     In general, Al-Azhar spokes-people made strong, moralistic

calls for protecting marriage and the family, condemning

cohabitation and any adolescent or premarital or extramarital

sexual behavior. They accepted a maternal and child health

rationale for the use of contraception, especially for birth

spacing. However, they opposed sterilization and abortion (except

for serious health considerations) and argued that, although

birth spacing is acceptable, the ultimate number of children in a

family should be left to God. In regard to ICPD's central theme

of improving women's status, it was often repeated that the Koran

gives women equal rights. However, the male role of dominating

and providing for the family was also affirmed.



     One woman dissident, Rifat Hussan, a Pakistan-born Muslim

expert on women in Islam who teaches religious studies at the

University of Louisville in Kentucky, strongly criticized this

line of thinking at an early Al-Azhar presentation. "The Koran

has largely been interpreted by men to deny women the rights

given them by God," she said. "The Prophet said, `Learn half of

the faith from me and half from my wife Ayesha.' Where is

Ayesha's representative?"  Religious-based, right-to-life groups,

primarily from the United States and South America, worked to

keep the focus on the abortion issue, raising this concern in

question-and-answer sessions and forums--sometimes to the point

of discouraging discussion on other issues. 



     Perhaps the most striking aspect of much of the religious

discourse at ICPD was the extent to which it embraced the goals

of the conference. In a speech from the ICPD plenary floor,

Daniel Maguire, a Catholic theologian from Marquette University,

praised the "remarkably broad consensus" inherent in the ICPD

Program of Action: 1)    "Population problems will not be solved

until women are educated and empowered." 2)  "Parents must have

hope that their children will live." 3) Economic development must

be "geared to the elimination of poverty and not left

to...trickle- down economics." 4)  Richer nations must curtail

their "rapacious consumption patterns." 5)   "We must control our

power to destroy the earth." Although Maguire admitted that there

is "dissension" on a sixth point, "that contraception and safe

abortion should be available to those who need them," he

characterized the Program of Action as "indebted to the justice

theories that define holiness of Judaism, Christianity, and

Islam" and as deeply moral at base.



     In a press conference of representatives from world

religious traditions, Marilia Schuller, a Brazilian lay

theologian with the World Council of Churches, praised the ICPD

Program of Action for "making recommendations concerning human

rights, environmental sustainability, overconsumption by the

wealthy, gender equity, and woman's empowerment." She said that

"recognition that these factors are interrelated opens a critical

door toward the creation a more just, egalitarian, and humane

society."



     The Reverend Gordon Sommers, president of the National

Council of Churches of Christ, USA, appealed for "better

stewardship of the earth." He called on the "Global North" (the

more developed countries) to "acknowledge and curb excessive

consumption of the earth's resources." He said that most

environmental degradation "is perpetuated by the affluent few and

not by the numerous poor."



     The 1992 Earth Summit (UN Conference on Environment and

Development, or UNCED) gave U.S. religious groups that

participated an opportunity to deeply consider issues of earth

stewardship, especially in the context of the ecological impact

of consumption patterns of developed countries. Two years later,

ICPD has provided a new perspective on issues such as the

empowerment of women, the role of women in development, and

responsibility of developed countries toward the poor countries

of the world. More than that, the Cairo conference was a crucible

in which church-based social activists could infuse these issues

with a tradition of social justice that has historically been a

potent force in social movements. The Social Summit coming up in

March and the Women's Conference  in September 1995 will likely

keep these issues in the public eye and on the agenda of

religious groups as well.



Religious Communities and Population Concerns, by Benedicta

Musembi and David E. Anderson, is available free of charge from

PRB. To request a copy, write or call: Population Reference

Bureau, 1875 Connecticut Ave., NW, Suite 520, Washington, D.C.

20009. Phone: 202-483- 1100.



*****



North Korea





Population: 23.1 million Land area: 46,490 square miles Births:

24 per 1,000 Deaths: 6 per 1,000 Infant deaths: 30 per 1,000 live

births Natural increase: 1.9 percent Total fertility: 2.4 births

per woman Life expectancy: 66(male)/73(female) Capital city:

Pyongyang



By Alex de Sherbinin



Occupying roughly half of the Korean peninsula, the Democratic

People's Republic of Korea shares borders with China's Manchuria

in the north and the Republic of Korea in the south. The country

enjoys a temperate climate and moderate rainfall, with a

landscape of pine-covered hills and mountains in the east and

north and cultivated lowlands in the southeast. North Korea has

half the population size and density of South Korea. Following

World War II, the peninsula was partitioned at the 38th parallel

by the occupying forces of the former-USSR and the United States.

Backed by the Soviet Union, Kim Il Sung assumed power in 1946 and

remained the country's absolute ruler until his death earlier

this year. He is succeeded by his son, Kim Jong Il. Some

political observers question, however, whether the younger Kim

will be able to dominate the country's power structure as his

father had. The situation is precarious at a time when U.S.

negotiators are seeking international inspections of North Korean

nuclear facilities.



     North Korean society has been greatly affected by war and

perceived military threats. Soon after World War II, mounting

tensions between North and South Korea culminated in the Korean

War. In June 1950, North Korean military forces invaded South

Korea, and within days occupied Seoul. The Seoul government

called upon the United States, which together with the UN mounted

a collective defense action in support of South Korea. After

three years of fighting, a cease-fire line was established near

the 38th parallel. The war resulted in 3 million military and

civilian casualties for North and South Korea combined.



     Following the war, North Korea turned its attention toward

building its industrial infrastructure. In the late 1950s the

country enjoyed rapid economic growth due to the government's

ability to muster underutilized resources and constrain

consumption. Agriculture was collectivized, and mining and other

heavy industries were developed quickly. However, since 1989, the

govern-ment's rigid adherence to centralized planning and

disruptions in trade relations with the former-USSR have resulted

in declining output.



     From the early 1960s through the mid-1980s, the North Korean

government kept secret most socioeconomic and demographic

statistics. In 1989, the government issued population statistics

to the UN Population Fund for the first time. The data revealed

sufficient information for demographers to discern the outlines

of the country's demographic history.  Wartime casualties made

Korea a labor-scarce country. Labor scarcities, combined with the

view that socialism could expand productivity sufficiently to

care for the needs of a rapidly growing population, led North

Korea to pursue an explicitly pronatalist policy during the 1950s

and 1960s. By 1970, the rate of population growth had reached 3.5

percent and was undermining the government's ability to provide

services. The government quietly began to implement a family

planning program, following a plan for improving maternal health

and enhancing economic opportunities for women. By the late

1980s, fertility had declined to just over replacement level.

North Korean women now bear an average of 2.4 children. 



     Because of the 1960s "baby boom," North Korea is

experiencing rapid growth in the labor force and in the

population of childbearing age. North Korea has near-universal

education and literacy, and a highly skilled work force. In

addition, it has made notable progress in the area of health

care--infant mortality has dropped, from an estimated 115 deaths

per 1,000 births in 1950 to 30 per 1,000 in 1990, and life

expectancy levels are approaching those of the developed world.



     North Korea is highly militarized, with one-sixth of its

work force, or 1.25 million men, employed by the armed forces.

This military force, equal to that of India, is thought to be the

largest per capita in the world. 



*****

News and Resources



Gerontological Society of America Meeting



     GSA's 47th Annual Scientific Meeting will be held November

18-22 in Atlanta. A special lecture by Nobel laureate Robert W.

Fogel, "A Theory of Technophysio Evolution Combined with

Implications for Forecasting Population, Health Care and Pension

Costs," will be given on November 20 from 4 to 6 p.m. The

Demography of Aging interest group will meet on November 19, as

will an NIA Symposium on "Research Initiatives of the National

Institute on Aging." For a copy of the preliminary program, write

to GSA, 1275 K Street, NW, #350, Washington, DC 20005-4006, or

call 202-842-1275. 



Population Clock on Internet



     The Census Bureau now has an up-to-the-minute national

population count available on Internet. To access Popclock

through Worldwide Web, go to homepage at http://www.census.gov.

For those who use a gopher system, the address is

gopher.census.gov; at the initial menu, choose "Enter Main Data

Bank," then choose "Population," then choose "Popclock

Projection." This will give you the nation's total population.

For information about the Census Bureau's population clock, send

an e-mail message to gatekeeper@census.gov.



Secrets of Successful Family Planning Programs



     Family planning programs face considerable challenges. To

maintain current levels of contraceptive use, 100 million more

married couples will need to be served by the year 2000 than got

services in 1990. Population Reports reviews what works for

successful family planning programs.



     Successful programs are convenient, suit families' needs,

provide good service, and have good leadership. Contraceptive

prevalence increases with such factors as proximity of

facilities, variety of contraceptives offered, good communication

with clients, and reliance on research findings.



     Support from national leaders and mass media help create

public consensus for family planning. Without subsidization, most

people in developing countries could not afford contraception. 



     Programs generally work with married women, but other groups

need to be reached. With attitudes about sexuality and family

structures changing, more young people are sexually active. It

has been found that men in sub-Saharan Africa often know more

about contraceptives than women and can strongly influence their

wives' contraceptive choices. [Population Reports, Johns Hopkins

School of Public Health, August 1994]



Pronatality Laws Failed to Speed Romanian Population Growth



     Despite laws banning the importation of contraceptives,

prohibiting most abortions, and taxing childless couples, the

birth rate of Romania rose only slightly during the Ceaucescu

regime. Many Romanian women died as a result of illegal abortions

(10,000 deaths over 23 years) and infant mortality rates

increased (29 infant deaths per 1,000 live births in 1987).



     Researchers recently concluded that the pronatality laws

reinforced Romanian society's patriarchal view of the role of

women. They found that sex was a taboo topic in homes, women

often had domineering husbands, unwanted pregnancies were common

and traumatic, and the economic struggle of daily life eroded

partner relations. Even in the early 1990s, after the

legalization of abortion, pronatal and patriarchal attitudes,

along with economic difficulties, persist. Self-induced and

nonprofessional abortions are still common. [Adriana Baban and

Henry P. David, Voices of Romanian Women, Transnational Family

Research Institute, 1994]



Books received The Day Before America: Changing the Nature of a

Continent, by William H. MacLeish. Boston: Houghton Mifflin,

1994. 277 pages. $21.95 hardcover. ISBN 0-395-46882-5. World War

III: Population and the Biosphere at the End of the Millennium,

by Michael Tobias. Santa Fe, NM: Bear & Company, 1994. 608 pages.

$29.95 hardcover. ISBN 1-879181-18-5. Looking for the Last

Percent: The Controversy Over Census Undercounts, by Harvey M.

Choldin. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1994. 264

pages. $17.00 paperback. ISBN 0- 8135-2040-1. The "Second India"

Revisited: Population, Poverty, and Environmental Stress Over Two

Decades, by Robert Repetto. Washington, DC: World Resources

Institute, 1994. 95 pages. $14.95 paperback. ISBN 0-915825- 96-1.

World Population--Turning the Tide: Three Decades of Progress, by

Stanley P. Johnson. London: Graham & Trotman/Martinus Nijhoff,

1994. 387 pages. $32.00 paperback. ISBN 185966-047-9. 






For further information, please contact: popin@undp.org
POPIN Gopher site: gopher://gopher.undp.org/11/ungophers/popin
POPIN WWW site:http://www.undp.org/popin