UNITED NATIONS POPULATION INFORMATION NETWORK (POPIN)
UN Population Division, Department of Economic and Social Affairs,
with support from the UN Population Fund (UNFPA)

95-10: Population Today, Vol. 23, No. 10, October 1995

************************************************************************

This newsletter is being made available by the Population Information 

Network (POPIN) Gopher/Web site of the United Nations Population Division, 

Department for Economic and Social Information and Policy Analysis, in 

collaboration with the Population Reference Bureau and with funding from 

the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation.

*************************************************************************





                             POPULATION TODAY

             Monthly newsletter of the Population Reference Bureau

                      Vol 23, No. 10, October 1995





Please note: The graphics that appeared in the printed copy

of Population Today have not been included here. For a

complete copy of Population Today, send $2.00 to Population

Reference Bureau,1875 Connecticut Ave., NW, Suite 520,

Washington, D.C. 20009.





In this issue: ** Black Households: How Are They Doing

Economically?  **  How Many Countries Are in the World?  ** 

Spotlight on Germany ** News and Resources





India's Fertility Declines, But It Still Leads World in

Population Growth



By Leela Visaria and Pravin Visaria



	A dramatic decline in birth rates_largely unheralded_is

taking place in India, the world's second most populous

country. Women in India are now averaging below four

children, down from over five children in 1970. The total

fertility rate (TFR, or average lifetime births per woman)

has been falling for two decades, from more than 5.3 children

per woman in 1970 to 3.6 children in 1992, according to

national statistics (see figure, next page). Fertility has

dropped faster than many population experts expected even a

few years ago. For example, in 1992, the UN projected that

Indian women would average 3.85 children for the first half

of the decade. Now, recently released estimates from India's

National Fertility and Health Survey suggest that even deeper

declines_to 3.4 children per woman_may have occurred. 



	These dramatic changes in childbearing are occurring in

a massive developing country with 931 million people, more

than three times as many as the United States. Despite the

fertility decline, India's population has been growing at

more than 2 percent annually for decades, and is currently

expanding at an estimated 1.9 percent per year. Only 3 of the

world's 10 largest countries_Nigeria, Pakistan, and

Bangladesh_are growing faster.



	The engine behind India's fertility change is

modernization: rising levels of literacy, urbanization,

industrialization, modern communication and transportation,

and improvements in the status of women. Modern

contraception, made widely available by the government family

planning program, is also an important factor. 



	In the developing world, as education levels

rise_particularly those of women_family size tends to

decrease. Women with more education tend to marry later

(since they spend more time in school) and are more likely to

want smaller families and to use modern contraception.



	In India, women's literacy levels are on the rise. They

have nearly tripled since 1961, when only 13 percent of women

and girls were literate. Even so, the majority of Indian

women today cannot read or write. 	In 1991, 39 percent of

Indian women and girls age seven and older could read,

compared with 64 percent of Indian men.



	School attendance rates have also soared, but boys are

more likely than girls to go to school, especially beyond the

primary level. In a 1987-1988 survey, 42 percent of rural

girls ages 10 to 14, but 66 percent of boys, attended school;

80 percent of boys and 72 percent of girls in urban areas

went to school. 



	The electrification of rural areas, combined with the

growth of transportation and communications systems, is

changing the lives and aspirations of people in Indian

villages. Television, for example, now reaches almost 90

percent of the population.



	Women's employment, which is associated with smaller

family size, has remained relatively low in India, however.

Less than one-third of all women were in the labor force in

1987-1988, the same proportion as in 1972-1973. Also, most

women work in agriculture, not modern sector jobs.



	The TFR has fallen faster in urban areas, where women

are more likely to want smaller families. The pace of

urbanization is relatively slow. In 1991, 26 percent of

people in India lived in urban areas, just 6 percentage

points more than in 1971. However, nearly two-thirds of urban

dwellers live in cities of 100,000 or more. The number of

cities of more than 1 million jumped from 12 to 23 between

1981 and 1991. According to UN estimates, three Indian

cities_Bombay (15 million), Calcutta (12 million), and Delhi

(10 million)_rank among the world's 30 largest urban areas.



	These social changes have radically changed childbearing

patterns. Indian women are waiting longer to marry and have

children, and are completing their childbearing at younger

ages than in the past. The average age at marriage is

increasing as more girls stay in school through their teens.

The average marriage age in 1961 was 16.1 years, and by 1971

it was 17.2 years. By 1992, the average age at marriage for

women was 20 years_the same as in the United States during

the baby-boom period.



	A slower pace of childbearing among women over age 35

reflects greater control of fertility within marriage through

family planning_generally through sterilization or other

family planning methods. Between 1970 and 1989, the

proportion of women ages 15 to 44 using family planning

increased from 13 percent to 45 percent, according to the

Operations Research Group. The National Family and Health

Survey came in with a slightly lower estimate in 1992-1993_40

percent. The dramatic increase in contraceptive prevalence is

all the more impressive in a country where the family

planning program has been burdened with logistical and

financial constraints since its beginnings in the 1950s and

1960s.



Population prospects



	Improvements in health and mortality have kept India's

population growing despite falling fertility. Life expectancy

at birth, which was 50 years in the early 1970s, has now

risen to about 60 years. A major contributor to these gains

was the decline in infant and child mortality, thanks partly

to the national child  immunization program initiated in the

mid-1970s. The infant mortality rate, estimated at 200-225

infant deaths per 1,000 live births in 1947, and 134 in the

early 1970s, had fallen to 74 per 1,000 by 1993. 



	Because more children are surviving, India has a young

age structure that assures future population growth. Although

Indian couples are likely to have even smaller families as

the country continues to modernize, population momentum will

keep this country growing rapidly for several decades to

come. India is expected to surpass China as the most populous

country in the world before 2050. 



	For more information, see "India's Population in

Transition," by Leela Visaria and Pravin Visaria, Population

Bulletin 50, no. 3, October 1995. Cost: $7.00 each, bulk

discounts available. To order, call: 1-800-877-9881. Leela

Visaria is a professor at the Gujarat Institute of

Development Research, and Pravin Visaria is the director of

the Institute, located in Ahmedabad, India.





*****



Black Households: How Are They Doing Economically?



By Gretchen Witt and Susan Kalish



	Despite some signs of movement toward greater equity,

wide economic disparities still exist between black and white

families in the United States. 



	The median income for black households was $19,500 in

1993, while for white households it was almost $33,000,

Census Bureau figures show. This represents a gap of about

$13,500. Moreover, the income gap has grown over time. In

1969, the median income difference between black and white

households was the equivalent of $12,700 in 1993 dollars.



	Poverty rates for blacks are three times that of whites,

with about 31 percent of black families compared with about 9

percent of whites living below the poverty level in 1993. 



	Household wealth differences are even more striking (see

figure). The percentage of black households with no assets or

in debt was more than twice the percentage of comparable

white households. One-tenth of white households but about

one-fourth of black households had a zero or negative net

worth, according to just-released Census Bureau figures.

Household net worth measures the dollar value of assets (such

as the value of a home plus personal savings and investments)

minus debts ( such as mortgages, bank loans, and credit card

debt). 



	The net worth picture for black households appears to be

changing for the better, however. The proportion of black

households with zero or negative assets has decreased

steadily since 1984, when the proportion was almost 31

percent. In contrast, the proportion of white households

without assets actually increased from 8 to 10 percent in

this same nine-year period.



	Black households also gained at the upper end of the net

worth scale. Since 1984, the proportion of black households

with a net worth greater than $100,000 doubled from 4 to 8

percent. But the gap between white and black households

remains wide. Between 1984 and 1993, the percent of white

households with net worths of $100,000 or more rose from 23

to 32 percent. The proportion of white households that fall

into this upper net worth category is about four times the

proportion of black households.



	Both income and net worth suggest that black households

lag behind whites economically. Several factors contribute to

this situation. Blacks tend to have higher rates of

unemployment than whites. In the first quarter of 1995, the

unemployment rate for blacks was 10 percent, compared with

about 5 percent for whites. 



	Educational attainment is lower for blacks than for

whites. About 13 percent of black men over age 25 have a

bachelor's degree or higher, compared with about 26 percent

of whites. Family structure also plays a role. More than half

(about 54 percent) of black families are single- headed

households_with only one potential wage earner. In

comparison, about one-fifth (18 percent) of white families

are single-parent families. 



	Black householders are also less likely to own a home, a

key component of assets. In 1993, 42 percent of black

households (compared with 68 percent of white households)

were owned by the resident. Home equity made up about 63

percent of total assets of black households in 1991. In

addition, since income level and asset acquisition tend to be

a function of age, some of the differences between income and

net worth measures may be attributable to the younger age

structure of the black population. 



	Black households have made some economic progress over

the past decade. Nevertheless, black households are far from

having a distribution of net worth or income commensurate

with whites. 





*****





How Many Countries Are in the World?



By Carl Haub



	"In less than half_42 percent_of the world's countries,

women hold cabinet-level positions." We often read statements

such as this and, just as often, give little thought to just

how that "statistic" was derived. Of course, this percentage

would be the result of dividing the number of countries that

have women cabinet ministers by the number of countries in

the world. But that number in the denominator_the total

number of countries in the world_can be elusive. Just what is

a country? Different  sources use different definitions, or

no definition at all, and they quite naturally come up with

different totals.



	From time to time, PRB receives an information request

from an already-confused caller asking,  "How many countries

are  there?" It's been many years since we dealt with this

question in this space.



	The simplest approach to finding an "answer" would be to

open up an almanac or yearbook and count how many countries

are listed. However, the number of countries depends on which

countries the publisher chose to include or, more practically

perhaps, had room for. Standard references definitely differ.



How many are there?



	The Demographic Yearbook of the United Nations lists 234

countries or separately designated areas; the Britannica Book

of the Year, 216; the Department of State, 191; and the

National Geographic Society, 250. The reason for the

discrepancy lies in the universe of countries being

described. The Demographic Yearbook lists "countries or

areas" with a population of 50 persons or more who provide

data to the UN, the Britannica does not clearly define which

countries are included, the National Geographic Society

counts 191 independent countries plus 59 "dependencies and

areas of special sovereignty," and the State Department

counts independent states only. Other listings may lead one

to believe that there are as few as 166 or 173 countries.



	You can buy a Coke in 195 countries, according to a

recent SNAPSHOT in USA Today. Does this mean that Coca-Cola

is available in 78 percent_or over 100 percent(!) _ of the

world's countries?



	Before attempting to determine this elusive number, we

should first try to arrive at some agreed upon definition.

Webster's Dictionary offers a variety of definitions: "an

expanse of land of undefined but usually considerable

extent," or a "motherland," or "home region," or "a political

state or nation that is distinct as to name and the

characteristics ...of its people." Not too illuminating. 



	At PRB, we face the issue of country definition when

selecting entities for the annual PRB World Population Data

Sheet. At PRB we use two categories of countries: those that

are printed on the wallchart itself and those that, while not

printed, do figure into all world totals. In effect, this

process fixes which countries or areas will result in the

final total "world population." Some time ago, PRB chose the

term "geopolitical entities" to specify the countries shown.

But how to select them?



	To begin with, all countries that are member states of

the UN as well as all others with a population of 150,000 or

more are included on PRB's printed Data Sheet. Up until the

1981 edition, that cutoff had been 200,000, but requests to

include the newly independent country of Belize (population

151,000) caused us to lower the threshold. Following that

rule, Palau, the newest UN member, appears under Oceania,

even though its population is just 17,000. The small nations

of Liechtenstein, St. Kitts-Nevis, and San Marino had been

moved to the printed Data Sheet  when they became UN members.

Conversely, Switzerland, which is not a UN member, is

included by reason of its 7 million population. 



	Until recently, there was an unstated exception to PRB's

rule about UN membership. When the UN was created, the former

Soviet Union wanted 16 seats in the General Assembly, one

each for its "independent" constituent republics plus one for

the USSR itself. A compromise was reached  allotting three

seats, one for the USSR and one each for the Byelorussian and

Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republics. That situation has

become moot, of course, since the USSR's breakup. Under PRB's

rule, Hong Kong's last appearance will be on the 1997 Data

Sheet, since it will become a part of China on July 1, 1997.

Further into the future, Macau will become an Administrative

Region of China on December 20, 1999 and, hence, will not

appear on the 2000 edition of the Data Sheet. 



PRB's definition



	PRB's method of selecting countries works as follows.

The 185 members of the UN are automatically included and are,

by definition, sovereign states. Additional completely

sovereign states that are not UN members are added to the

list. Of these, Switzerland is over the population threshold,

while Andorra (population 65,000), Monaco (population

31,000), Tonga (population 106,000), and Tuvalu (population

10,000) are below it. Next are the trickier issues of

nonsovereign places and disputed territories, such as Taiwan.



	For dependencies and other similar areas, PRB's method

of choice is, no surprise, basically demographic. That is,

areas are counted as separate countries if their population

is shown separately from the parent country. Furthermore, the

population must be in permanent, not seasonal, residence.



	Currently, the total number of countries satisfying one

of these criteria (150,000 or more population or UN

membership) is 198, and this is the number of countries on

PRB's printed 1995 Data Sheet. In addition, there are 38

other countries or areas (shown in the table at right) that

are considered separate places by PRB.  All 236 geopolitical

entities are included in the spreadsheet used to construct

the Data Sheet.  Their data are used to calculate regional

and world totals and weighted averages (such as birth rates).

The sum of their populations defines the demographic world by

PRB reckoning. There are, then, 236 countries in the world.



Details, details



	A few examples to illustrate PRB's selection process are

in order. The Caribbean islands of Guadeloupe and Martinique,

which are overseas departments of France, appear on the Data

Sheet because their populations are over 150,000 and they are

not included in the total for "metropolitan" France. In

contrast, the population of Corsica (where Napoleon was

born), an island in the Mediterranean and a department of

France, is included in France's 58.1 million population.

Likewise, Easter Island's 2,800 population does not appear in

the spreadsheet used for PRB's World Data Sheet since it is

included in Chile's population as the Provincia Isla de

Pascua.  Similarly, the Spanish enclaves of Cueta and Melilla

in northern Morocco are counted with Spain's population and

not considered separate. But the population of the south

Atlantic island of St. Helena (where Napoleon died), with its

dependencies Ascension and Tristan de Cuhna, is not included

in the United Kingdom's population and thereby raises the

country count by one. Some of the countries on the

spreadsheet can be quite small geographically_witness Central

Park-sized Monaco, for example.



	The world country total is always in flux to some

degree, but there have been an unusual number of additions

and deletions from the list in recent years. Declines in

number have been caused by the merging of North and South

Yemen into a single country, Yemen, and the reunification of

the two Germanies. But additions to the world's countries

have been more numerous. The breakup of the Soviet Union

added 14 to the world count. 



	The dissolution of Yugoslavia added four countries

(Bosnia- Herzegovina, Croatia, Macedonia, and Slovenia). The

remainder of Yugoslavia consists of Montenegro and Serbia,

although many countries have not recognized that combination.

Greece has protested the use of the name "Macedonia," which

is why the country is referred to as "the former Yugoslav

Republic of Macedonia" in UN publications and alphabetized

under "t." Finally, the split of the Czech Republic and

Slovakia, and of Eritrea from Ethiopia, added two more. In

future World Data Sheets, the Gaza Strip and West Bank may be

listed as a single entity, Palestine, if this alliance is

recognized.



	Two countries, French Guiana and the Channel Islands,

both quite close to reaching 150,000 population, are on the

verge of moving from the relative obscurity of the

spreadsheet to being printed as separate entities on the

World Population Data Sheet. There are several dozen other

areas, all islands, that fail to meet the guidelines for PRB

"country status." Taken together, these areas have less than

5,000 people on them at any one time. We exclude areas that

contain only small military populations or scientific

expeditions. One strong contender, Svalbard, does boast a

winter population of about 3,000 Norwegians and Russians, but

it is not year-round and the Norwegians are counted as

residents of Norway. 



	Finally, the smallest country in the world in

population, according to PRB: the Pitcairn Islands, with a

permanent population of 71, descendants of Fletcher Christian

and other crew members of the Bounty. Sometimes, the world's

smallest countries can be the most interesting. 



	The spreadsheet version of PRB's 1995 World Population

Data Sheet, prepared using Microsoft Excel, is available on

disk for $12.50 +postage and handling. It contains data for

all the inhabited countries of the world (as defined by PRB).

PRB's 1995 World Population Data Sheet is available for $3.50

each, with bulk discounts available. To order, call: 1-800-

877-9881.





Small Countries			

		Estimated Population, 1995

Africa	

	Mayotte            	97,000

	St. Helena		7,000

North America	

	Bermuda		62,000

	Greenland		58,000 

	St. Pierre and Miquelon	7,000 

Latin America and the Caribbean

	Anguilla			7,000 

	Aruba				66,000

	British Virgin Islands		13,000 

	Cayman Islands		33,000 

	Falkland Islands		2,000

	French Guiana			147,000 

	Montserrat			13,000

	Turks and Caicos Islands	14,000 

	Virgin Islands			97,000

Europe	

	Andorra			65,000 

	Channel Islands		148,000 

	Faeroe Islands			47,000 

	Gibraltar			32,000 

	Isle of Man			70,000 

	Monaco			31,000 

	Vatican City			1,000

Oceania	

	American Samoa		57,000 

	Christmas Island		1,000 

	Cocos (Keeling) Islands	1,000 

	Cook Islands			19,000

	Johnston Island		1,000 

	Kiribati			79,000 

	Midway Island			1,000 

	Nauru				10,000 

	Niue				2,000 

	Norfolk Island			2,000 

	Northern Mariana Islands	51,000 

	Pitcairn Islands	       * 

	Tokelau			2,000 

	Tonga				106,000 

	Tuvalu				10,000 

	Wallis and Futuna Islands	14,000 

	Wake Island			2,000 



Total				1,375,000



Source: Spreadsheet for PRB's 1995 World Population Data Sheet.

* less than 100.	

		





*****



Germany



Population: 81.7 million

Land area: 134,950 square miles

Births: 10 per 1,000 population

Deaths: 11 per 1,000 population

Infant deaths: 5.8 per 1,000 live births

Natural increase: -0.1 percent per year

Total fertility: 1.3 births per woman

Life expectancy: 73(male)/79(female)

Capital city: Berlin



By Stefanie Durbin



	On October 3, 1990, West and East Germany

reunified_known as die Wende, or `the change'_after the

collapse of communism in eastern Europe and the former Soviet

Union. Reunification has brought great social, economic, and

political change to the people of Germany.



	Germany is about the size of Montana but is home to

almost 82 million people, mostly of German heritage. A

country poor in natural resources, Germany's markets are

export oriented and highly industrial. One-third of all jobs

are directly export related. 



	Emerging from a post-reunification slump, Germany's

economy is projected to grow in 1995. Although its industrial

sector is criticized by some as outmoded, Germany appears to

be making strides toward increased competitiveness, but still

has one of the most expensive labor markets in the world, the

highest tax rate, and costly social programs.



	Recent efforts to curtail government spending on social

programs have met with mixed results, but German companies

and labor unions have joined to change the structure of the

labor market to increase competitiveness and lower costs.



	One social program that is unlikely to be cut is the

parental leave program, which allows up to three years of

leave, with a stipend, and assurance of a comparable job when

the worker returns. This generous program is moored in an

effort to boost the German family in the face of a dwindling

birth rate. Germany's population bulge is at the mid-30 age

mark, with a precipitous decline in the number of people in

their 20s and teens. This, combined with Germany's total

fertility rate (the average number of children a woman will

bear in her lifetime) of only 1.3 births per woman, signals a

further population decline.



	Abortion is a contentious issue, highlighting cultural

differences between the former East and West Germanies.

Formerly, East German women had access to abortion on demand.

West German women, however, could only receive abortions in

case of rape or severe hardship to the mother. A compromise

law, passed this summer, is unpopular in both camps. It makes

abortion illegal but not punishable if it is performed within

the first trimester and preceded by mandatory state-sponsored

counseling. States are prohibited from funding abortions

except for women whose income is less than $1,200 a month.



	Recent changes in Germany's immigration laws have also

been controversial. Until 1993, Germany had one of the most

liberal immigration policies in Europe. However, leaps in

unemployment and racial tensions contributed to the

government's decision to curtail asylum laws in the summer of

1993, legislation that is credited for reducing the number of

asylum seekers by roughly 70 percent. In 1994, refugees from

the former Yugoslavia and Turkey made up the largest group of

asylum seekers. 



	In fact, foreigners make up 8.5 percent of the German

population, compared with less than 3 percent of foreigners

in western Europe as a whole. By some estimates, the foreign

population of Germany_which cannot vote_could surge to close

to 30 percent of the population by 2030. Immigration has been

a lightning rod for Germany's small but conspicuous neo-Nazi

movement, which was officially banned this year. 



	As a symbol of unification, the capital is slowly being

moved from Bonn, the former capital of West Germany, to

Berlin, the former capital of East Germany and the historic

capital city. The Reichstag, which was recently draped in

silver by the artist Christo, will house the new parliament. 





*****



News and Resources



Immigration down in OECD countries



	In many developed countries, 1993 and 1994 marked a

turning point in migration movements, according to a recent

report from the Organization for Economic Co-operation and

Development (OECD). In general, migrant flows are leveling

off, and host countries are showing a preference for

temporary migration and a wish to increase selectivity of

immigration based on labor market needs, says the report.

However, in almost all OECD countries, immigration continues

to contribute to population growth. [Trends in International

Migration: Continuous Reporting System on Migration: Annual

Report 1994. Organization for Economic Co-operation and

Development. Contact: OECD, 2 rue Andre-Pascal, 75775 PARIS

CEDEX 16, France.]



Great Britain's marriage decline



	Marriage hit a 50-year low in England and Wales in 1993.

Cohabitation rates, on the other hand, are rising_an option

that is often a precursor to marriage, and is popular

primarily among young adults. In the early 1990s, 7 of 10

first marriages were preceded by cohabitation, compared with

a 1970 rate of 1 in 10. [Population Trends, U.K.'s Office of

Population, Censuses, and Surveys, Summer 1995.]



March 1996 data conferences



	The U.S. Census Bureau will hold its 1996 Annual

Research Conference and CASIC Technologies Interchange March

17-21. Contact: Maxine Anderson- Brown, Conference

Coordinator, Office of the Director, Bureau of the Census,

Washington, DC 20233, 301-457-2308.



	On the next day, March 22, the Federal Committee on

Statistical Methodology, the Bureau of Labor Statistics

(BLS), the Joint Program in Survey Methodology, and the

Washington Statistical Society will hold a one-day workshop

on editing survey data at BLS. Deadline for proposals:

January 31, 1996. Send proposals to David Pierce, Federal

Reserve Board, Stop 401, Washington, DC 20551, 202-452-3895,

e-mail <midapoo@frb.gov>. Questions to Mark Pierzchala, 703-

235-5218, e-mail <mpierzchala@ag.gov>.



Fellowships



	University of MichiganUSAID. The Population Fellows

Program, administered by the University of Michigan and

funded by USAID, offers two-year, post-degree fellowships in

population- related areas, placing fellows in developing

countries. Contact the program at the University of Michigan,

School of Public Health, 109 S. Observatory, Ann Arbor, MI

48109-2029.



	Boston University-NIA. Boston University is offering

pre- and postdoctoral traineeships funded by the National

Institute on Aging (NIA). The deadline for 1996-1997

applications is January 15, 1996. Contact the program at the

Boston University Gerontology Center, 53 Bay State Road,

Boston, MA 02215, 617-353- 5045; fax: 617-353-5047.



	Social Science Research Council-Ford Foundation. The

Social Science Research Council  announces a new two-year

dissertation and postdoctoral fellowship program for social

and behavior research on sexuality. Deadline for application:

December 1, 1995. Contact the council at 605 Third Avenue,

New York, NY 10158, 212-661-0280; fax: 212-370-7896.



New books



	Population in Asia. Warren C. Sanderson and Jee-Peng

Tan. Washington, DC: The World Bank, 1995. 243 pages. $15.95

paper. ISBN: 0-231-10123-6. 

Reconstructing Gender in the Middle East: Tradition,

Identity, and Power. Fatma Muge Gocek and Shiva Balaghi, eds.

New York: Columbia University Press, 1994. 233 pages. $16.50

paper. ISBN: 0-231-10123-6.



	The Best Intentions: Unintended Pregnancy and the Well-

Being of Children and Families. Sarah S. Brown and Leon

Eisenberg, eds. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1995.

380 pages. $29.95 paper. ISBN: 0-309-05230-0.



	The Economic Sociology of Immigration: Essays on

Networks, Ethnicity, and Entrepreneurship. Alejandro Portes,

ed. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1995. 310 pages.

$29.95 cloth. ISBN: 0-87154-682-5.



	Women in a Changing Global Economy: 1994 World Survey on

the Role of Women in Development. United Nations Department

for Policy Coordination and Sustainable Development. New

York: United Nations, 1995. 105 papers. $9.95 paper. ISBN:

92-1-130163-7.






For further information, please contact: popin@undp.org
POPIN Gopher site: gopher://gopher.undp.org/11/ungophers/popin
POPIN WWW site:http://www.undp.org/popin