UNITED NATIONS POPULATION INFORMATION NETWORK (POPIN)
UN Population Division, Department of Economic and Social Affairs,
with support from the UN Population Fund (UNFPA)

96-12: International Dateline, December 1996

********************************************************************

This newsletter is being made available by the Population Information

Network (POPIN) of the United Nations Population Division (DESIPA)

and Population Communication International.  For further information

please contact Patrice_Newman@together.org

*********************************************************************





                       INTERNATIONAL DATELINE

      A Population and Development News and Information Service



DECEMBER WORLD POPULATION UPDATE:

                                   5,822,064,000 (Population

                                   Reference Bureau)



                                   DECEMBER 1996





     POPULATION GROWTH, POVERTY AND THE STATUS OF WOMEN in societies

were three pivotal issues at the second U.N. World Food Summit, which

took place from 13-17 November in Rome.  Population growth because

the burgeoning number of people and their demands are straining the

world's natural resources--including the water, soil and nutrients

required to grow food.  Poverty because at least 800 million people--

70 percent of them women--and many nations do not have sufficient

income to buy the food they need.  And women because in many parts

of the world, besides comprising a majority of the poor, women

produce at least 75 percent of all food--but don't have equal access

to credit, land, water, and many other necessities.  While in Rome,

delegates from 173 countries agreed on a "Declaration on World Food

Security" and a "World Food Summit Plan of Action."  Both documents

outline strategies and ideas to reduce the number of malnourished

people in the world to half their present level by 2015.  In the

declaration--negotiated prior to the actual conference, countries

agree to try to increase food production while: wisely managing

natural resources, eliminating excessive consumption and production

trends, and working towards world population stabilization.  "The

problems of hunger and food insecurity have global dimensions and are

likely to persist, and even increase dramatically in some regions,"

the Rome Declaration says, "unless urgent, determined and concerted

action is taken, given the anticipated increase in the world's

population and the stress on natural resources."



     CLIMATE CHANGE, DISASTER RELIEF, OVERFISHING, TRADE, AND

ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION are some of the other issues explored in

the Rome Declaration and World Food Summit Plan of Action.  The 173

countries attending the summit agreed that food security depends on

the "sustainable management" of fish stocks, forests and wildlife.

They also concurred that an incentive system is essential to motivate

such management.  Noting a "dramatic increase" in the number of civil

conflicts around the world--like the one in Rwanda that instigated

massive refugee movements into Zaire, delegates attending the World

Food Summit agreed that early action is needed both to defuse such

tensions before they erupt and to minimize their impact on innocent

victims.  Regarding sustainable development policies, delegates

agreed that they should promote "full participation and empowerment

of people, especially women; an equitable distribution of income;

access to health care and education, and opportunities for youth."

They also agreed that: "Particular attention should be given to those

who cannot produce or procure enough food for an adequate diet,

including those affected by war, civil strife, natural disaster or

climate-related ecological changes."



     POLITICAL, ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL STABILITY IN MANY COUNTRIES AND

REGIONS COULD BE SERIOUSLY AFFECTED BY ACCELERATED MIGRATION, says

the Rome Plan of Action, noting that "poverty, hunger and

malnutrition are some of the principal causes of accelerated

migration from rural to urban areas in developing countries."  Unless

remedial action is taken to help the people and areas suffering most

from hunger and malnutrition, the Plan says, even world peace could

be compromised.  The Plan goes on to say that reaching sustainable

world food security is "part and parcel of achieving the social,

economic, environmental and human development objectives agreed upon

in recent international conferences," referring to the 1996 Habitat

II

Conference in Istanbul; the 1995 Fourth World Conference on Women;

the 1994 International Conference on Population and Development, and

all the other conferences organized by the United Nations in this

last decade of the twentieth century.



     "POVERTY ERADICATION IS ESSENTIAL TO IMPROVE ACCESS TO FOOD"

asserts the Rome Plan of Action, adding that, "the vast majority of

those who are undernourished either cannot produce or cannot afford

to buy enough food."  Jacques Diouf, Director General of the U.N.

Food and Agriculture Organization, pointed out that nine of the

world's richest countries spend more on dog and cat food in six days

than is allocated to the entire annual budget of the United Nations

food agency.  And, he added, this same agency's annual budget is

equal to less than five percent of what Americans spend on weight-

loss products every year to fight the effects of overeating.



     For more information, contact: World Food Summit Secretariat,

FAO Headquarters, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00100 Rome, Italy.

Fax: (396) 5225-5249.  E-mail: <food-summit@fao.org>  FAO Web site:

http://www.fao.org or gopher.fao.org



     (World Food Summit: Rome Declaration on World Food Security and

     World Food Summit Plan of Action, November 1996, Rome, Italy)



                          *   *   *   *   *





IN BRIEF . . .



. . . POLAND's lower house of Parliament passed a bill in November

liberalizing the nation's abortion law.  Under the new law, women are

permitted to end pregnancies up to the 12th week if they face

financial or personal problems, but only after counseling from an

authorized doctor who will not be involved in performing the

procedure, and a three-day waiting period.  The measure does not

specify how financial or personal problems are to be assessed.  The

bill also provides for sex education in schools and reducing the

expense of contraceptives.  Under existing Polish law, abortion is

permitted only if a pregnancy threatens a woman's life or health, or

results from incest or rape, or in cases of severe fetal anomaly.

The Catholic Church mobilized a huge campaign in Poland against the

new bill, which was passed when a majority in the lower house

overturned a previous Senate veto.  As with the previous law, anyone

found to have performed an abortion illegally can be imprisoned for

up to two years.  Before taking effect, the bill must be reviewed by

Poland's constitutional tribunal, which could reject the law

outright.

     (New York Times, 25 October 1996, New York/Warsaw; Reproductive

     Freedom News, 22 November 1996, Center for Reproductive Law and

     Policy, New York)





. . . SOUTH AFRICA passed legislation in early November allowing

abortion on demand during the first 12 weeks of pregnancy--state-

financed if a woman lacks private medical insurance--and under a

broad range of conditions from the 13th through 20th week.  The bill

will displace existing South African law which allows abortion only

in the case of rape, incest or immediate danger to the mother's

mental or physical health.  The bill was opposed in Parliament by

South Africa's three main right-wing parties.  Under the limited

conditions, abortion has been legal in South Africa since 1975.  To

obtain a legal abortion, women had to gain the approval of at least

two doctors, a public notary, and a medical board.  Arguing in

parliament for the new law, Health Minister Nkosazana Zuma said that

South Africa's existing abortion laws forced poor women--mostly

black--to resort to back-street operations.  A 1995 survey by the

national Medical Research Council concluded that between 200,000 to

300,000 illegal abortions were carried out in South Africa annually.

More than 70 percent of those receiving legal abortions were members

of the 10-percent white minority.



     (Christian Science Monitor, 7 November 1996, Boston/

     Johannesburg; New York Times, 6 November 1996, New York/Cape

     Town; Reproductive Freedom News, 22 November 1996, Center for

     Reproductive Law and Policy, New York)



. . . CERVICAL CANCER has been formally connected to the human

papilloma virus (HPV), a sexually-transmitted infection.  Fifty-five

specialists from 17 countries labelled two types of the virus as

"carcinogenic to humans," two others as "probably carcinogenic," and

suggested that other HPV types are "possibly carcinogenic."  The

meeting was jointly organized by the World Health Organization (WHO)

and the European Research Organization on Genital Infection and

Neoplasia (EUROGIN), a non-profit health organization.  Cervical

cancer is the most common cancer in women in developing countries and

the second most common cancer in women worldwide.  Three-quarters of

the 300,000 annual deaths from cervical cancer occur in poor nations,

according to WHO.  The disease is known to be strongly linked with

an early onset of sexual activity and multiple sexual partners.  In

both developed and developing countries, WHO says, more than 90

percent of new cases result from sexually transmitted HPV infection

of the cervix.  (WHO Press, 3 July 1996, World Health Organization,

Geneva)

                          *   *   *   *   *



"    IN THE NEXT DECADE, POPULATION GROWTH, RISING AVERAGE RESOURCE

CONSUMPTION AND PERSISTENT INEQUALITIES IN ACCESS TO RESOURCES ensure

that scarcities will affect many environmentally sensitive regions

with a severity, speed and scale unprecedented in history."  So

writes Thomas Homer-Dixon of the University of Toronto in the

briefing book, Environmental Scarcity and Violent Conflict. With co-

author Valerie Percival, Homer-Dixon says that poverty-driven

migrations, ethnic tensions and weak government--often interpreted

as the causes of conflict--are in fact often the result of

environmental scarcity.  Under the auspices of the University of

Toronto's Peace and Conflict Studies Program, an international team

of analysts conducted a five-year investigation into the link between

scarcities and civil strife, focusing on the dynamics of scarcity and

conflict in 12 developing countries.  Their findings reinforce the

notion that social policy is ineffective unless formulated within the

unique social context of regions and nations.  With the exception of

oil and certain strategic minerals, the study says, the political

significance of nonrenewable resources is declining.  It also found

that the substitution and the wide geographical distribution of non-

renewable resources ensure that they rarely provoke international

conflict.  Market forces, the study team found, have reduced demand

and stimulated substitution and technical innovation.  But the

Toronto group found substantial evidence that scarcities of renewable

resources such as croplands, fresh water, fuelwood, fish, etc.

threaten the internal stability of many developing countries.

Resulting humanitarian disasters and large migrations, Homer-Dixon

says, can in turn threaten international security.  According to the

University of Toronto study: "Conflicts generated in part by

environmental scarcity can have significant indirect effects on the

international community."



     THE CAUSES OF SCARCITY--DEGRADATION, DEPLETION, INCREASED

CONSUMPTION AND INEQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION of renewable resources--

often interact and reinforce one another, the University of Toronto

study says.  In Gaza, for example, the degradation and depletion of

aquifers led to a water shortage, while population growth increased

the demand for water, and inequitable distribution resulted in less

water for Palestinians than for Israelis.  And because developing

countries are particularly dependent on natural resources for

economic production and employment, Homer-Dixon says, they are

especially vulnerable to migrations when scarcities occur.  He adds

that the worldwide tendency for elite sectors of societies to capture

scarce resources and for marginalized people to migrate to

ecologically fragile areas aggravates instability and scarcity.  In

the Mexican state of Chiapas, Homer-Dixon writes, land scarcity

forced peasants to the hills of the Lacandon rainforest,

precipitating chronic poverty when the land could not sustain their

growing population.  In Rwanda, he says, people continue to move into

delicate upland areas in search of arable soil.  And while the

Toronto study found that conflict over renewable resources rarely

leads to interstate wars, civil strife within states can cause

refugee flows and humanitarian disasters that not only destabilize

neighboring states but often lead to international involvement.



     COMPETITION FOR RESOURCES AGGRAVATES GROUP TENSIONS ALONG

ETHNIC, CLASS OR RELIGIOUS LINES, Homer-Dixon says, adding that

sharpened distinctions among groups increase the likelihood of

violent collective action.  In the Indian states of Assam and

Tripura, violence followed the appearance of millions of Bengalis,

who had left Bangladesh partly because of land scarcity.  And the

likelihood of violence increases as the balance of power shifts

against the state and in favor of challenger groups.  As Homer-Dixon

writes: "Scarcity leaves the state vulnerable to violent challenges

by groups whose power or identities have been enhanced by the very

same scarcity."   The study found that scarcity increases the power

of narrow coalitions to use their access to scarce resources for

excessive profits.  As these coalitions become wealthier and more

powerful, Homer-Dixon says, they can reduce tax payments on their

wealth and influence state action in their favor.  For instance, in

Pakistan, the government's inability to provide basic service to

migrants in urban areas led to the creation of informal systems of

illegal occupation and subdivision of state land, managed by corrupt

elites and government officials.



     THE STUDY SAYS THAT SOCIETIES CAN ESCAPE TURMOIL BY ADAPTING TO

SCARCITIES--using renewable resources more sustainably, producing and

trading goods and services that don't rely on them, or finding

substitutes.  Social institutions, including research centers,

efficient markets, competent government bureaucracies and incorrupt

legal mechanisms, are essential for societies to deal with scarcity,

Homer-Dixon says.  Yet he adds that a state's ability to create and

maintain these key institutions may actually be diminished by

scarcity-related stress.  "The capacity to adapt depends on the level

of social and technical ingenuity available in the society," writes

Homer-Dixon.  "However, many countries are unable to decouple from

dependence on scarce resources because of economic, political and

social constraints."



     THE TORONTO STUDY IDENTIFIES SCARCITIES OF AGRICULTURAL LAND,

FORESTS, WATER, AND FISH as the environmental problems that

contribute most to violence.  However, it says, whether or not a

scarcity will result in violence depends on its interaction with a

variety of complex factors, including the character of a country's

economic system, average levels of education, ethnic cleavages, class

divisions, technological and infrastructural capacity, and the

legitimacy of political regimes.  In turn, the foreign policy and

national security of developed countries are affected, as

interactions among scarcity, poverty, rapid population growth and

refugee flows: 1) affect states with large populations and extensive

resources, such as China, India, Indonesia, Brazil and Mexico; 2)

affect states in key regions, such as the Middle East, North Africa,

South Asia, Central America and the Caribbean, and 3) result in

complex humanitarian emergencies that warrant international

assistance or action, as in Somalia and Rwanda.



     For more information, contact:  Brian D. Smith, Project

Coordinator, Population and Sustainable Development Project, American

Association for the Advancement of Science, 1200 New York Ave., NW,

Washington, DC  20005 USA.  Telephone: 202-326-6652; Fax: 202-371-

0970; Internet: BSMITH@AAAS.ORG

     (Environmental Scarcity and Violent Conflict, 1996, University

     of Toronto, Canada)



                          *   *   *   *   *



     ON A SMALL BUT SIGNIFICANT SCALE, URBAN GARDENING IS STRIKING

BACK at the inroads that commercial agriculture is making on the

world's arable land.  It is estimated that 15 percent of the world's

food supply now is produced by 800 million urban farmers worldwide.

According to Jan Smit, an agricultural consultant, the produce is

harvested from vacant-lot market gardens, indoor plots, rooftop

hydroponic (liquid-nourished) plantings, and other imaginative

sources.  In the early 1980s, Jan Smit, then working in Tanzania,

discovered that families in Dar es Salaam were not only growing

vegetables but raising farm animals virtually in the backyards of the

nation's capital.  From that beginning, Smit and his Urban

Agriculture Network team visited 100 cities in 30 countries to

collect information on the topic.  The result was a book cataloguing

the variety of urban farming happening around the world, entitled:

Urban Agriculture: Food, Jobs and Sustainable Cities, published by

the

United Nations Development Program.



     ACCORDING TO SMIT, URBAN AGRICULTURE IS MULTI-BENEFICIAL, with

its nutritional value only the most obvious advantage, particularly

for poor families that may spend as much as 90 percent of their

income on food.  The grass-roots technology also creates jobs, Smit

says.  In Calcutta, 20,000 people work as farmers on the richly

composted land of an old dump.  In Singapore, 90 percent of the

city's human waste--8,000 tons a day--is collected by the Bureau of

Environmental Sanitation, treated and sold as fertilizer for

metropolitan farming.  Smit notes that the risks connected with urban

farming include contamination by lead and other heavy metals from

automobile emissions.  But he maintains that researchers and city

planners can reduce or even eliminate many of the pollutants before

they find their way into the food chain.



     Urban Agriculture: Food, Jobs and Sustainable Cities is

available

in English for the price of shipping and handling by contacting the

Urban Agriculture Network, 1711 Lamont Street, NW, Washington DC

20010 USA.  Telephone (202) 483-8130; fax: (202) 986-6732; E-mail:

72144.3446@compuserve.com

     (Choices, Volume 5, Number 1, U.N. Development Program, New

     York)



                         *   *   *   *   *



     AUSTRALIA'S EXPERIENCE WITH VANISHING FRUIT AND VEGETABLE

SPECIES IS PART OF A WORLDWIDE TREND IN EXTINCTION: the loss of

domesticated varieties of fruit, vegetables and livestock.  In the

late 19th century, Australian consumers and horticulturalists could

choose among 450 varieties of pears.  Today, no more than five are

commonly available.  And that extinction rate carries through much

of the vegetable kingdom.  Since the 1920s, at least 95 percent of

cabbage, broccoli and cauliflower varieties have disappeared along

with 99 percent of celery, carrots, parsley and turnip varieties.

In some cases, extinction has been total.  The Carmen potato, an

Australian staple from the 1920s to the '50s, has completely

disappeared.  So, apparently, have at least 75 common bean cultivars,

all familiar culinary items early in this century.  Similar losses

have been recorded among fruit and livestock.  The main cause of the

phenomenon is consumer-driven commercial competition, which favors

the most profitable varieties to the exclusion of other species.

Unfortunately, these lost species frequently carry genes necessary

to ward off disease, pest, drought and temperature damage.  Food

insecurity is the principal result of the loss of genetic diversity.

That means that if, for example, a favored type of wheat is wiped out

by blight, there may be few if any alternatives varieties to turn to.

Bill Hankin of Australia's Heritage Seed Curators Association laments

that "there are no police to preserve our horticultural

biodiversity."  He points out that Australia has signed two

international treaties pledging biodiversity protection, but he adds:

"We have failed to honor our obligations under them."

     (Weekend Australian, 19 May 1996, Australia)



                       *   *   *   *   *



     THE UNITED NATIONS POPULATION FUND (UNFPA) NEEDS MORE SUPPORT

FROM DONOR COUNTRIES, ESPECIALLY THE UNITED STATES, says Population

Action International (PAI), a Washington-based NGO.  In its new

report, Taking the Lead: The United Nations and Population

Assistance,

PAI also recommends that UNFPA call on the resources of the private

sector, including non-governmental organizations (NGOs), to join

like-minded U.N. member governments in carrying out the goals of the

International Conference on Population and Development, convened in

1994 in Cairo, Egypt.  UNFPA has already proved that it is a vigorous

advocate of women's empowerment, PAI says, especially in the context

of family planning and other reproductive health services.  According

to PAI, UNFPA has the greatest potential in the donor community to

take the lead in the reproductive health and development activities.

But the report acknowledges that limited resources preclude large-

scale support for women's programs, adding that U.S. congressional

resistance to funding U. N. activities is fueled not only by

financial constraints but by political considerations resulting from

misunderstandings.  Chief among the misconceptions, the study

contends, is that the U.N. is ineffective and poorly managed across

the board.  PAI President Hugo Hoogenboom says it is a mistake for

critics to lump all segments of the United Nations together.



     MUCH OF THE U.S. OPPOSITION TO UNFPA STEMS FROM DELIBERATE

MISINFORMATION HANDED OUT BY ANTI-ABORTION RIGHTS GROUPS, according

to the PAI study.  The administrations of U.S. Presidents Ronald

Reagan and George Bush, the report says, were persuaded by the

campaigning of "right-to-lifers" to justify withholding funds from

the U.N. for seven years.  The critics charged that UNFPA was using

U.S. financial contributions to promote coercive abortion, including

infanticide in China.  But in withholding the voluntary U.S.

contributions to the Fund, the PAI study says, both presidents

ignored their own agency findings that UNFPA "neither funds abortion

nor supports coercive family planning practices."  Nevertheless, the

freeze hampers UNFPA's population assistance programs, carried out

in 167 countries during the past 27 years at a total cost of US$3.4

billion.  Normally, PAI says, the United States contribution accounts

for 30 percent of UNFPA's budget.  But because of congressionally

mandated cuts and other spending restrictions, U.S. funding dropped

from $35 million in 1995 to less than $5 million in fiscal 1996.  And

this at a time when the role of UNFPA as advocate and policy adviser

is crucial, says Shanti R. Conly, author of the PAI study.



     IN 1995, NINE COUNTRIES CONTRIBUTED OVER 90 PERCENT OF UNFPA'S

BUDGET.  In descending order of contributions, they are: Japan, The

Netherlands, Denmark, the United States, Germany, Norway, Sweden, the

United Kingdom and Finland.  In contrast, France, Italy and Spain

gave a total of less than $3 million, a mere 1 percent of the Fund's

budget.  To buttress against further inroads into UNFPA's worldwide

activities, PAI recommends:



     * Expanding its advocacy for increased funding for population

and reproductive health programs.



     * Assuming the role of chief population adviser to governments

seeking aid; and working more closely with the World Bank, which has

access to political leaders and therefore can influence policymaking.



     * Applying its limited resources more strategically.

     Taking the Lead: The United Nations and Population Assistance

and

its companion volume, Profiles of U.N. Organizations Working in

Population, are available for purchase from: Population Action

International, 1120 19th Street, NW, Washington D.C. 20036 USA.

Telephone: (202) 659-1833.



     (Press Release, United Nations Key to Population Efforts

     Worldwide, 29 September 1996, Population Action International,

     Washington, DC)



                         *   *   *   *   *



     THOUGH BOMBAY IS THE FIFTH MOST POLLUTED CITY IN THE WORLD, and

one of India's most overcrowded, a new "greening" project is

attempting to bring some fresh air to the city's approximately 12

million residents.  London has seven acres of green space per 1,000

inhabitants and Delhi has four, but Bombay boasts a minuscule 0.03

acres of greenery for every thousand residents.  In light of one of

India's most innovative clean-up projects, this may improve.  Less

than 15 years ago, Mahim Nature Park was a garbage dump surrounded

by slums and a polluted creek.  But after a conversion conceived by

the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF), the wasteland is now a 37-acre

park that supports over 60 species of birds.  Trails lead through a

range of ecosystems modeled after habitats in the neighboring state

of Maharashtra, and at the center of the park, a WWF botanist has

created a sanctuary for 105 plants, and visitors are encouraged to

buy seedlings and dried herbs for medicinal use.  The park's popular

Education Centre teaches children and adults about ecology, personal

responsibility in improving the urban environment, and nature's role

in Indian culture.  Between its opening in April 1994 and September

1995, over 9,000 people visited the Centre.



     A "CLEAN AIR ISLAND" PROJECT IS UNDERWAY IN DOWNTOWN BOMBAY,

converting five square kilometers of congested streets into a green

urban lung.  The area houses 200,000 people and over 25,000

businesses that attract an extra million commuting workers daily.

In an intensive effort to plant trees, recycle garbage and reduce

vehicle emissions, the Bombay Port Trust has turned 11 acres of

wasteland into a public park, and the Navy has set up tree and plant

nurseries, providing free plants for homes and offices.  Individuals

are encouraged to contribute to "greening" the city by keeping potted

plants on window sills and balconies, and both households and

businesses are urged to separate their waste for recycling and home

composting.  The most ambitious goal of Clean Air Island's organizing

committee is to replace Bombay's pollution-spewing cars and trucks--

60 percent of which are government-owned--with electrically-charged

vehicles.  Lacking financial support, the plan has nevertheless been

approved by Bombay authorities, and the central government is

considering similar strategies for other cities in India.

     (People & The Planet, Volume 5 Number 2 1996, Planet 21, London)



                               *   *   *   *   *







NGO SUPPLEMENTDECEMBER 1996



                  For and About NGOs and their Work





     NGOs ATTENDING THE ROME FOOD SUMMIT WERE UPSET AT THE WEAKNESS

OF ONE OF THE MAJOR COMMITMENTS agreed on by government delegations:

that governments will try to reduce "the number of undernourished

people to half their present level no later than 2015."  According

to Mary Theresa Plante, Chair of the NGO Committee on Sustainable

Development [see related story, p. 1 of International Dateline], the

goal is woefully inadequate.  She added that she found the entire

Rome Declaration and Plan of Action "extremely weak."  Because of the

summit format, Plante noted, no negotiations actually took place in

Rome.  She said this frustrated a number of NGOs who made the trip

to Rome, but were unable to attend the regional preparatory meetings

at which the language of the documents was hammered out.  But Plante

said that NGO participants' consciousness was raised in Rome on a

number of emerging issues.  Specifically, she named international

agribusiness and genetic engineering vs. the rights of individuals,

and biodiversity.  Plante said that NGOs recognized that they need

to start "beating the drum" on these and other world trade issues.

Plante also expressed dismay at the security barriers she said were

imposed between NGOs and government delegations attending the Rome

Food Summit.  The Food Summit's parallel NGO Forum took place in Rome

from November 11-17.



     MORE THAN 200 NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS (NGOs) ISSUED A

STATEMENT TO THE WORLD FOOD SUMMIT, outlining their ideas in response

to the official documents of the United Nations conference: the Rome

Declaration and the World Food Summit Plan of Action.  Presented to

the pre-summit Food Security Council Meeting convened by the U.N.

Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) September 19-21, 1996, the

five-page NGO statement contains 31 points aimed at "achieving

universal food security."  First off, the NGO statement recognizes

the need for consonance with other international declarations,

agreements and conventions; and asserts that as most of these have

been approved by an overwhelming majority of the world's governments,

"the governments are obliged to abide by them."  These international

agreements include all the plans/programs of action produced at this

decade's series of international conferences; universal declarations

on human rights, and the eradication of hunger and malnutrition;

conventions on the rights of the child, biodiversity, and

desertification; and covenants on economic, social, cultural, civil,

and political rights.



     THE NGO STATEMENT TAKES ISSUE WITH "THE PRESENT DEVELOPMENT

PARADIGM" that, the document says, ignores: farmers and their

workers--especially on a small scale; women; youth and children;

marginalized rural and urban groups, and even whole regions and

continents.  NGOs agreed that the current growth model "generates

exclusion and poverty, and is not conducive to attaining equitable

and sustainable development, social justice, and gender equality."

They further said that the World Food Summit should focus on

"development, support and propagation of current locally practiced

alternative models and further explorations in other new paradigms

promoting people's participation and empowerment."



     AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES, INDIGENOUS KNOWLEDGE, STRUCTURAL

ADJUSTMENT PROGRAMS, poverty, food security policy issues, health

care--including reproductive health care and family planning,

breastfeeding, water resources, genetic resources, international

trade, transnational corporations and international agribusiness, and

human rights are some of the other issues taken up by the NGO

statement to the World Food Summit.  The NGOs recommend that

governments adopt policies that promote national food self-

sufficiency, noting that "developing countries are often forced to

import food from overseas, so their food security is subject to the

vagaries of the international market."  To eradicate poverty, the NGO

statement says, governments must "guarantee rural and urban poor

people's access to productive resources, such as land, credit,

technology, infrastructure, basic services--including health care--

and jobs."  The NGOs note that food security is a human right "which

must take precedence over macroeconomic and trade concerns,

militarism, and the dictates of the marketplace."  They add that

achieving food security is an integrated endeavor requiring

sustainable human development--including equitable access to

"economic opportunities, policies and programs to assist vulnerable

groups in meeting their basic needs, protection of the environment

and the sustainable management of natural resources, peace, and

transparent, accountable and democratic government."

     (Dateline reporting, December 1996, New York; NGO Statement to

     Food Security Council Meeting, 19-21 September 1996, Rome)



                           *   *   *   *   *



     A NEPALESE NGO HAS RECOMMENDED THAT ABORTION BE DECRIMINALIZED

in the Himalayan kingdom.  The resolution was adopted at a symposium

organized by the Family Planning Association of Nepal (FPAN), in

conjunction with the Population and Social Committee of the national

parliament and the Nepal Medical Association.  The stated purpose of

the symposium was "to secure women's reproductive rights."  Speakers

said Nepal's maternal mortality rate is unacceptably high.  They

blamed illiteracy, the lack of health services, and the kingdom's

"Fundamental Law"--which equates abortion with murder.  One speaker

said that 75 percent of women who choose to abort a pregnancy have

unwanted pregnancies or come from very poor circumstances.  Fifty

percent of abortions, the speaker said, are carried out by

traditional birth attendants, most of the time resulting in a fatal

infection to the mother.  Dr. Bhola Rizal said it is a sad plight

that unsafe abortions continue to escalate Nepal's high maternal

mortality rate.  While asserting that "unrestricted abortion is

neither desirable or right," the symposium's resolution added:

"Abortion of first-trimester pregnancies should be made legal if

performed by registered and trained medical practitioners."  Beyond

that period, the resolution recommended, abortions should be

legalized if they result from rape, incest or contraceptive failure,

or if a pregnancy is certified by a physician as dangerous to the

physical or mental health of the women or is "likely to lead to the

birth of a deformed infant."

     (FRAN Newsletter, January/February 1996, Kathmandu, Nepal)





                       *   *   *   *   *




For further information, please contact: popin@undp.org
POPIN Gopher site: gopher://gopher.undp.org/11/ungophers/popin
POPIN WWW site:http://www.undp.org/popin