UNITED NATIONS POPULATION INFORMATION NETWORK (POPIN)
UN Population Division, Department of Economic and Social Affairs,
with support from the UN Population Fund (UNFPA)

95-12: International Dateline, December 1995

**************************************************************************

This newsletter is being made available by the Population Information 

Network (POPIN) of the United Nations Population Division (DESIPA), in 

collaboration with Population Communication International.  For further 

information please contact Patrice_Newman@together.org

**************************************************************************





                 INTERNATIONAL DATELINE

A Population and Development News and Information Service



DECEMBER WORLD POPULATION UPDATE:

                    5,738,200,000  (Population

                    Reference Bureau)



                         DECEMBER 1995





     THE UNITED NATIONS HAS RELEASED TWO 1994 UPDATES OF

POPULATION PROJECTIONS--one focusing on world population trends and

the other charting patterns of urbanization around the world.  World

Population Prospects 1994 contains the latest revisions of population

estimates and projections for the world, more- and less-developed

regions, least developed countries, major areas and individual

countries.   What the U.N. calls "the projection horizon" was

extended to the year 2050 in the research, so for the first time an

entire century of demographic history and projections are available--

from 1950 to 2050.  World Urbanization Prospects: The 1994 Revision--

at 178 pages a much smaller tome than the 885-page world population

report--presents estimates and projections on the size and growth of

both urban and rural populations in all countries of the world.  The

report ranks the world's top 15 cities and the mega-cities with 8

million or more inhabitants; analyzes the phenomenon of counter-

urbanization; describes the distribution of cities and populations;

and presents current levels of urbanization and future trends for

urban and rural populations of the world, the less- and more-

developed regions and individual countries.



     THE CURRENT WORLD POPULATION GROWTH RATE IS THE LOWEST

RECORDED SINCE THE SECOND WORLD WAR, according to World Population

Prospects.  At mid-1994, world population stood at 5.6 billion,

having grown by about 86 million in the year before that--an average

of 236,000 people per day, or 1.57 percent per year.  Of the world's

5.6 billion people, an estimated 4.5 billion--or 79 percent of the

total world population--live in our planet's less developed regions.

Despite the current slower population growth rates, the U.N. says in

its medium-range population projection that world population could

grow to 7.5 billion by 2015 and 9.8 billion by 2050.  According to

the revisions, the 1994 top ten countries in population size are:

China with 1.2 billion people; India with 919 million; the United

States with 261 million; Indonesia with 195 million; Brazil with 159

million; the Russian Federation with 147 million; Pakistan with 137

million; Japan with 125 million; Bangladesh with 118 million, and

Nigeria with 108 million.  These top ten countries are also the only

ones in the world whose populations exceed 100 million.



     JUST 23 OF THE WORLD'S 228 COUNTRIES ARE HOME TO 75 PERCENT

OF THE WORLD'S CITIZENS.  Besides the top ten countries with

populations of 100 million or more, thirteen countries have a

population size between 50 million and 100 million, accounting for

15 percent of the world's total humanity.  In this group, there are

five countries in Asia (Vietnam, the Philippines, Iran, Turkey and

Thailand), five in Europe (Germany, the United Kingdom, France, Italy

and Ukraine), two in Africa (Egypt and Ethiopia) and one in Latin

America and the Caribbean (Mexico).  China and India alone account

for 38 percent of the entire world population.



     BY THE YEAR 2050, THE RANKING OF COUNTRIES BY POPULATION SIZE

WILL BE SUBSTANTIALLY CHANGED, according to U.N. projections, mostly

due to wide differences in national population growth rates.  India

is projected to surpass China by 2050, becoming the largest country

in the world with a population of 1.64 billion.  But China will be

only slightly behind with a projected population size of 1.6 billion.

Pakistan will probably be the world's third-largest country by 2050,

with a population of 381 million--over two and a half times its

current size.  The United States is projected to rank fourth in that

year--with a population of 349 million.  And Nigeria will most likely

step into the fifth position by 2050 with a population of around 339

million--more than trebling its current size of 108 million.



     WHILE WORLD POPULATION TRENDS ARE PROJECTED TO A YEAR 2050

HORIZON, U.N. URBANIZATION ESTIMATES ONLY EXTEND TO THE YEARS 2015

and 2025.  According to World Urbanization Prospects 1994, the top

fifteen "urban agglomerations" are currently: Tokyo (26.5 million

people); New York (16.3 million); Sao Paulo (16.1 million); Mexico

City (15.5 million); Shanghai (14.7 million); Bombay (14.5 million);

Los Angeles (12.2 million); Beijing (12.0 million); Calcutta (11.5

million); Seoul (11.5 million); Jakarta (11.0 million); Buenos Aires

(10.9 million); Osaka (10.6 million); Tianjin (10.4 million), and Rio

de Janeiro (9.8 million).  By the year 2000, Lagos (Nigeria), Karachi

(Pakistan) and Delhi (India) are expected to join the list, replacing

Rio de Janeiro, Osaka and Buenos Aires. By 2010, Dhaka (Bangladesh)

will replace Seoul as one of the world's fifteen largest urban areas.

And by 2015, metro Manila will have joined the list with a population

of 14.7 million.



     IN 1950, AN URBAN POPULATION OF ONLY 3.3 MILLION GOT YOU ONTO

THE TOP FIFTEEN CITIES LIST.  BUT BY 1994, 9.8 MILLION PEOPLE WERE

REQUIRED to compete in the city big leagues.  And by 2015, the U.N.

Population Division says, 14.7 million people will be the threshold

for being one of the world's largest fifteen cities.  There is also

a significant shift in the representation of more- and less-developed

regions on the big cities list.  In 1950, all but three of the top

fifteen cities were located in more-developed regions.  By 2015, only

two--Tokyo and New York--will remain.  Asian cities will dominate the

list with eleven out of the fifteen spots.  The remaining positions

will be taken by two cities in Latin America and the Caribbean (Sao

Paulo and Mexico City) and one African city: Lagos is projected to

be ranked third by 2015 and New York will likely be down in the 11th

spot.



     THE NUMBER OF MEGA-CITIES--DEFINED BY THE U.N. AS HAVING 8

MILLION OR MORE PEOPLE--IS INCREASING RAPIDLY, particularly in less-

developed regions.  In 1950, only two cities fell into the "mega"

category--London and New York.  By mid-1994, 22 cities around the

world had populations of at least 8 million, and 16 of those are

located in less-developed regions.  Asia has 12 mega-cities (Tokyo,

Shanghai, Bombay, Beijing, Calcutta, Seoul, Osaka, Tianjin, Jakarta,

Delhi, Metro Manila, and Karachi); Latin America and the Caribbean

hold four (Sao Paulo, Mexico City, Buenos Aires and Rio de Janeiro),

and Africa hosts two (Lagos and Cairo). By 2015, 33 mega-cities are

expected to exist around the world, with 27 of those--almost 82

percent--in the less developed regions.  Two cities will be new to

the mega-cities list in 2015: Lima, Peru and Kinshasha, Zaire.  And

from now to 2015, Paris and Moscow will remain the only mega-cities

in Europe.



     WORLD POPULATION PROSPECTS 1994 ALSO ASSESSES THREE NEW

DEMOGRAPHIC SITUATIONS IN THE WORLD: recent fertility declines in

Africa and Asia; demographics in countries with economies in

transition, and the demographic impact of H.I.V and AIDS.  The report

says that fertility in Africa currently averages 5.8 children per

woman--0.2 child below the figure projected two years ago.  And in

a number of African and Asian countries where fertility levels have

been high and constant for decades, the U.N. says, new demographic

surveys or censuses disclosed recent fertility declines.  The U.N.

says that sub-Saharan Africa "no longer presents a picture of

monolithically high and unchanging fertility levels."  The report

also notes that new data indicate that Bangladesh and Iran are

undergoing a rapid fertility transition.  Regarding the demography

of the 27 European countries undertaking a transition from a

centrally planned to a market economy, the U.N. says the changes have

been striking.  Many of the countries are showing net losses of

population--due to low fertility levels, out-migration of residents,

and a stagnating or rising incidence of mortality.  Within Eastern

Europe, population has declined since 1990 in Belarus, Bulgaria, the

Czech Republic, Hungary, Romania, the Russian Federation and Ukraine.

Elsewhere in Europe, negative growth rates are occurring in Bosnia

and Herzegovina, Croatia, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania.



     THE DEMOGRAPHIC IMPACT OF H.I.V. AND AIDS IS ASSESSED BY THE

U.N. FOR 15 COUNTRIES IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA AND THAILAND.  These

sixteen countries are the only ones around the world where more than

1 percent of the adult population--age 15 and over--is infected with

HIV, the virus that causes AIDS.  Below that level, the U.N. says,

the impact of AIDS on national demographic profiles is negligible.

The fifteen sub-Saharan countries are: Benin; Burkina Faso; Burundi;

Central African Republic; Congo; C“te d'Ivoire; Kenya; Malawi;

Mozambique; Rwanda; Uganda; United Republic of Tanzania; Zaire;

Zambia, and Zimbabwe.  Three of the countries--Uganda, Zambia and

Zimbabwe--have levels of HIV infection that topped 8 percent in 1992.

The AIDS epidemic affects population growth in two ways, according

to the U.N.  First, in the number of deaths from AIDS-related causes

and second through the reduced number of births that occur because

fewer women survive into and through their child-bearing years.  In

Uganda, Zambia and Zimbabwe, AIDS has already reduced the total

population (43 million) by two percent (747,000).  And by 2005, there

will be 6.5 percent (4 million) fewer citizens in those three African

countries than were once forecast to live there.  In the 15 sub-

Saharan African countries as a whole, the cumulative impact of deaths

from AIDS is currently about one percent (2 million) and will reach

four percent (12 million) by 2005.  Without the epidemic, the

countries' population size would currently be 223 million, projected

to grow to 304 million by 2005.  Life expectancy has dropped

significantly in some of these countries.  Kenya, Uganda, and Zambia

have lost five or more years on their average life expectancies due

to AIDS while Zimbabwe has lost seven.



     DESPITE THE DEVASTATING TOLL OF THE AIDS EPIDEMIC, THE U.N.

PROJECTS THAT POPULATION GROWTH WILL CONTINUE TO SWELL in Africa,

with high fertility rates the main driver of growth.  For the period

from 1980 to 2005, population in the 15-country aggregate with over

one percent HIV-infection will more than double from 138 million to

292 million.  Even Uganda, Zambia and Zimbabwe--with over eight

percent HIV infection of the adult population--will see their

populations double in the same period.  Individually, ten of the 15

countries will double in population size: Burundi; Congo; C“te

d'Ivoire; Kenya; Malawi; Rwanda; Uganda; Tanzania; Zaire, and Zambia.

Percentage increases are projected to be as high as 140 percent in

C“te d'Ivoire, 127 percent in Kenya and 120 percent in Zaire.



     THE HIGHEST RATES OF HIV INFECTION IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA ARE

AMONG MEN AND WOMEN OF REPRODUCTIVE AGE with women infected as

frequently as men.  Children born of HIV-positive mothers are at

great risk of both contracting the disease and becoming orphans early

in life, and the U.N. report examines this aspect of HIV/AIDS.

Because of Africa's high mortality rates, a large number of children

would be orphans even without the AIDS epidemic, the U.N. points out.

But in 1990, there were almost 12 percent more orphans because of

AIDS.  By 2005, the number of orphans will be almost double that

projected in the absence of AIDS.  Kenya, Uganda, Zambia and Zimbabwe

will be especially hard hit.  In 2005, Zimbabwe will have 217,000

children under age 10 who have lost their mothers to AIDS--an

astounding 271 percent more than projected without the disease.  In

absolute numbers, Uganda will be the hardest hit.  Almost 600,000

orphans are projected in that country by 2005--over half of these

losing their parents to an AIDS-related illness.



     United Nations publications are sold through bookstores and

distributors throughout the world.  For more information contact:

United Nations, Sales Section, New York, NY 10017 USA.



     (World Population Prospects: The 1994 Revision, 1995, United

Nations, New York; World Urbanization Prospects: The 1994

Revision, 1995, United Nations, New York)



                      *   *   *   *   *



     CERVICAL CANCER IS CAUSED BY A SEXUALLY-TRANSMITTED VIRUS,

says Xavier Bosch, a Spanish epidemiologist carrying out research for

the International Cancer Research Institute, a division of the World

Health Organization.  Cervical cancer is the leading cause of cancer

fatalities among women in the developing world, and the second

leading cause of cancer death in the developed world.  The disease

develops in a still undetermined percentage of women infected by the

papilloma virus after a period of 15-20 years.  Currently, the only

way to detect the disease is through the Pap smear, which can screen

for early detection of precancerous lesions.



     MORE THAN 500,000 NEW CASES OF CERVICAL CANCER ARE REPORTED

YEARLY--EIGHT PERCENT OF THESE IN THE DEVELOPING WORLD, according to

Bosch.  The virus is transmitted through unprotected sexual contact.

Often the infection does not present any symptoms and many women

simply recover.  But in a certain percentage of women, the infection

becomes chronic and develops into cervical cancer.  It is estimated

that between five and ten percent of the population carries the

virus.  To test the relationship between unprotected sex and the

incidence of cervical cancer, a study compared the average number of

sexual partners in Spain and Colombia.  According to Bosch, Colombian

men and women have more than twice the number of sexual partners as

their Spanish counterparts.  The incidence of the disease reflects

the different levels of unprotected sexual activity: in Spain, 4.7%

of the female population is infected with the papilloma virus, while

in Colombia, the percentage is 13.3%.

    (El Pais, international edition, 28 August 1995, Barcelona,

Spain)



                   *   *   *   *   *



     THE ARGENTINE GOVERNMENT--PRUDISH AND APPARENTLY INTIMIDATED

BY THE CATHOLIC CHURCH--is seeing its young people die rather than

permit the word "condom" to be used in its anti-AIDS campaign.  Among

South American nations, only Brazil registers a higher rate of AIDS

than Argentina: 39 cases for every million people against Brazil's

73 persons per million.  Officially, cases since 1982 totaled some

5300, but because of under-reporting, the actual figure is probably

closer to 12,000.  And it is estimated that within five years, the

figure will more than double to 25,000.  Appalled and frustrated by

the statistics and the death of friends and relatives, high school

students have taken matters into their own hands by wielding spray

cans to paint graffiti throughout Buenos Aires reading: "AIDS: For

Love, Use a Condom."  Sixteen-year-old Concepcion Mateo was arrested

while painting the slogan on a building but released, she says,

"after I cried and told them that my brother (who died of AIDS) would

be alive today if he had used a condom."



     THE BUENOS AIRES GOVERNMENT MUST SHARE THE BLAME for the

situation, according to non-governmental organizations (NGOs) working

against the disease.  They charge that the national campaign focuses

on AIDS transmission while censoring out any mention of the

preventive role condoms can play.  Linda Sassoon, coordinator of the

privately-financed Huesped Foundation, which provides AIDS

counseling, says: "the government has surrendered to Argentina's

politically powerful Catholic bishops, who have branded users of

condoms as degenerates."  And Dr. Laura Astarloa, in charge of the

national AIDS program, says candidly: "The government does not want

to lock horns with the Church."  But Rev. Juan Ronconi, the

Argentinian Catholic Church's point man on AIDS, insists that the

Church is a scapegoat for the government's failure to adequately

finance AIDS prevention and care.  Dr. Astarloa admits she has to

fight to persuade the government to increase funding from last year's

US$13 million to the current $20 million--a sum, she says, that will

not go very far.

(New York Times, 19 January 1995, New York)



                        *   *   *   *   *



     THE INFLUENCE OF FAMILY-PLANNING MESSAGES CARRIED THROUGH THE

MASS MEDIA APPARENTLY HAS SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS on reproductive

behavior.  According to analyses from the 1989 Kenya Demographic and

Health Survey, there is a "strong statistical association" between

women who have heard or seen media messages on family planning and

their reproductive preferences and use of contraceptives.  While

cautioning that their findings are based on "anecdotal evidence" and

"some evaluation surveys," the researchers make these observations:



  * Some 15 percent of women who have neither seen nor heard media

messages on family planning use a contraceptive method;



  * The proportion rises to 25 percent among women who have heard

radio messages;



  * The figure is 40 percent among women exposed to both radio and

print messages;



  * And it rises to 50 percent among those exposed to radio, print

and television.



Based on the same observations, the researchers concluded that in

preference expressed for family size:



  * Women exposed to no media messages on the subject reported an

average of 5 children as their ideal.



  * Those exposed to all three media types preferred an average of

4.7 children.



     THOUGH IT FOCUSED ON KENYA, THE STUDY DREW SIMILAR LESSONS

from evaluations taken in Egypt and Iran.  Concluding, the

researchers said: "In the light of anecdotal and other evidence from

Kenya and elsewhere, we believe that the mass media can have an

important effect on reproductive behavior."



    (International Family Planning Perspectives, March 1995, The

Alan Guttmacher Institute, New York)



                    *   *   *   *   *



     A PUBLICATION THAT FOCUSES ON DEVELOPMENT IN SOUTHERN AFRICA

HAS TURNED ITS SPOTLIGHT on the critical shortage of housing that

plagues the Republic of South Africa.  The periodical is published

by the Human Sciences Research Council's Program for Development

Research Council (PRODDER).  In dedicating an entire 56-page issue

to housing, the editor of the council's newsletter, David Barnard,

explains: "This issue focuses on various issues and initiatives

relating to housing in South Africa, as well as to the experiences

of the rest of southern Africa and abroad."  To illustrate the

magnitude of the challenge, he points out that there are as many as

8 million  homeless in South Africa, a shortage of 1.3 million new

houses and a need for another 130,000 new units every year.  In a

program aimed at catching up with the deficit, the Government of

National Unity has committed itself to ensure that 1 million houses

are built over the next five years.



     THE PRODDER PUBLICATION COVERS CHAPTERS ON A VARIETY OF

ORGANIZATIONS dedicated to coping with the region's housing problems.

They include the National Housing Forum, Housing Consumer Protection

Trust and Urban Sector Network--all based in South Africa.  Contents

also deal with such housing-related projects as university courses

and programs, international conferences, current research, trade

fairs and exhibitions, and a dozen pages of new publications and

video tapes on housing.  Copies of PRODDER Newsletter: The Southern

Africa Development Directory, are available from PRODDER, HSRC, P.O.

Box 324l0, Braamfont, 20l7, South Africa.



                      *   *   *   *   *



     AN ACTION PLAN TO COMBAT AND EVENTUALLY ELIMINATE FEMALE

GENITAL MUTILATION is being developed by the World Health

Organization (WHO).  The project results from recommendations made

at an international Geneva meeting of women's health advocates, non-

governmental organizations, researchers, nurses, midwives,

physicians, and United Nations agencies, including the U.N.

Population Fund (UNFPA).  The meeting's purpose was to define and

study all aspects of the traditional practice that mutilates as many

as 115 million girls and women every year.  In the short term,

effects of female genital mutilation include hemorrhage, shock and

infection--all of which may cause death.  Longer-term effects include

urinary-tract infections, chronic pelvic inflammatory diseases,

infertility, psycho-effective and sexual dysfunction, and obstructed

labor--which is a major cause of maternal mortality.

Recommendations--upon which the WHO action plan will be based--

include:



  * Greater advocacy at all levels for eliminating female genital

mutilation.



  * Training programs for health workers, community leaders, women's

groups and researchers.



  * Strengthened partnership between health and human rights

advocates and between researchers, policy-makers, women's health and

rights groups, and those working to eliminate female genital

mutilation.



     THE GENEVA CONFERENCE ALSO AGREED ON A DEFINITION OF THE

PRACTICE, to more accurately describe and measure the prevalence of

female genital mutilation worldwide.  By agreed definition, female

genital mutilation comprises "all procedures which involve partial

or total removal of the external female genitalia and/or other injury

to the female genital organs, whether for cultural or any other non-

therapeutic reasons."



    (WHO Features, August 1995, World Health Organization,

Geneva, Switzerland)



                     *   *   *   *   *



     IT WASN'T THE FIRST TIME, BUT CHINA'S DECISION TO PROHIBIT

DOGS ON ITS TERRITORY EFFECTIVE JULY 31 OF THIS YEAR sent shudders

down the spines of many a pet owner.  Nevertheless, the government,

citing a burgeoning canine population that is a major environmental

burden, defended the measure.  China's capital, Beijing, has almost

200,000 dogs, and nationwide, there are over 100,000,000--about one

dog for every 11 persons.  The dogs eat up 15 tons of food per year,

enough to feed 40 million Chinese.  While a human being consumes the

equivalent of half a kilo of cereal per day, dogs eat more than

double that.  It is estimated that 7% of the country's grain

production goes "to the dogs."  The government attempted the ban in

1994, but it was difficult to impose the rule in the Year of the Dog.



     THE PROHIBITION DOES ALLOW FOR SOME EXEMPTIONS: any dog

measuring under 36 cm (14 inches) is allowed, as well as all

Pekinese, a species long accorded almost reverential status in China.

Those whose dogs meet the requirements must shell out US$460 a year,

approximately triple the wages of an employee working in a large

city, in exchange for a medallion tag for the pet and an embossed

registration certificate.  For many, the only solution is having the

dog shipped out of the country or killed.  "We are going to be very

strict with this new law," says Cho Wong Pu, head of the Dog

Propaganda Unit in Beijing.  "We have a duty to protect people and

maintain social order and to clean up the environment.  This law is

deeply welcomed by the masses."



       (La Vanguardia, Horacio S enz Guerrero, Barcelona, July 30,

       1995, and BBC World News, report by Humphrey Hawksley,

       August 1995)



                      *   *   *   *   *











NGO SUPPLEMENT                December 1995



              For and About NGOs and their Work





     WHAT ARE POPULARLY CALLED 'MORNING-AFTER PILLS' WERE THE

FOCUS OF AN INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION that drew 24 experts from around

the world to the Rockefeller Center in Bellagio, Italy earlier this

year.  Technically designated "emergency contraception," the

technique comprises a growing array of post-coital methods that

advocates say could spare millions of mostly-young women worldwide

from the anxiety, pain and threat-to-life of unwanted pregnancies.

Drawing on clinical, statistical and anecdotal experiences, the

experts drafted and adopted an agreed statement and recommendations

aimed at spreading knowledge of emergency contraception.  The

conclusion was that emergency contraception is not as widely known

as it deserves to be, partly because of ignorance of its existence

or availability and partly because of active resistance based on

misconceptions about the method.  With support from the Rockefeller

Foundation, the four-day Bellagio meeting was co-sponsored by the

International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF), the South-to-

South Cooperation in Reproductive Health, Family Health

International, the Population Council, and the World Health

Organization (WHO).   Several articles about to emergency

contraception were featured in a recent issue of Planned Parenthood

In Europe under the general heading: "Expanding Access to Emergency

Contraception in Developing Countries."



     IN AN EDITORIAL, IPPF CONSULTANT EVERT KETTING EXPRESSED

SURPRISE at the general ignorance about emergency contraception.

Ketting, deputy director of the Netherlands Institute of Social

Sexological Research, said the methods had been common knowledge in

his country for some 30 years.  Yet in most countries, he said, even

service providers or women who could benefit by them know little or

nothing about the contraceptive methods for use in such emergencies

as condom slippage, for example.  He blamed the situation in part on

false beliefs--including the "inexhaustible idea" that if emergency

contraception were easily obtainable, young people would engage more

irresponsibly in sex.  Ketting cited that canard as an old fallacy

in which people can supposedly be encouraged to act responsibly by

lack of access to essential information and services.  He explained

that the Bellagio conference was prompted by the urgency of

accelerating research for emergency contraceptives more effective

than the two most commonly used methods: a combination of ordinary

birth control pills and the post-coital insertion of an IUD.  Ketting

strongly discouraged the suggestion that "morning-after pills" could

be used routinely instead of conventional contraceptives.  "After

all," he concluded, "an emergency solution is only for emergency

cases."  In a statement on emergency contraception, the IPPF's

International Medical Advisory Panel defined some of the

circumstances that justify resorting to emergency contraception.

Broadly, they said, they should be used by women exposed to

unprotected sexual intercourse, specifically condom breakage, missed

pills or in the case of rape.



     CONTRARY TO ANOTHER MISCONCEPTION, EMERGENCY CONTRACEPTION

IS NOT ABORTION, Ketting emphasized in a separate article.  It is

therefore permissible even in countries where abortion is illegal,

he says.  This point was also stressed at the Bellagio meeting.  At

the conference, WHO provided a comprehensive review of the scientific

literature on emergency contraception, including evidence that the

Yazpe method (two regular contraceptive pills taken within 72 hours

of unprotected intercourse) and the IUD (insertion within 5 days

after unprotected intercourse) are both methods safe and relatively

reliable.  The Bellagio conference agreed that both regimens are

effec ive, safe, convenient to use and easily accessible.

Nevertheless, attenders recommended further research to improve

existing methods and to develop new and better ones.  WHO research

suggests that Mifepristone (RU 486) is potentially a very effective

emergency contraceptive method, with few side effects.



      (Planned Parenthood in Europe, August 1995, International

      Planned Parenthood Federation, London)



                      *   *   *   *   *



      A NEW AND UNORTHODOX INTERNATIONAL PROJECT HAS BEEN LAUNCHED

by six family planning associations (FPAs) in Africa, Asia and the

Caribbean.  Under the umbrella of the International Planned

Parenthood Federation's (IPPF) Sexual Health Project, the undertaking

is designed to improve sexual health at the community level.  Strong

grass-roots input is solicited to sensitize the FPA staff and

volunteers to better understand the needs and concerns of the people

they serve.  Carried out through community discussions, the approach

adds a new dimension to traditional programs, which often slight

community views.  The programs in which the teachers learn from their

pupils is being tested in Burkina Faso, Dominican Republic, Gambia,

Ghana, India and Tanzania.  As IPPF explains: "The Sexual Health

Program is creating the opportunity for people in marginalized

villages and neighborhoods to take independent, community action to

change their lives for the better."



      SEXUAL HEALTH BEGINS WITH THE INDIVIDUAL, but goes on to

spread its benefits to the community, says Hilary Hughes, IPPF

adviser on the new project.  In an article elaborating on the

subject, he explains that the term "sexual health" goes beyond such

physical considerations as pregnancy, childbirth and sexually

transmitted diseases.  It also includes the emotional relationships

"which allow us to develop as full human beings."  Hughes calls

sexual health "a basic human right" which guarantees an individual

the ability to exercise control over his or her sex life.  He

suggests that "preaching" rarely has the impact of the participatory

approach to sexual health because options for improving their own

lives may be entail factors beyond people's control--such as poverty

or lack of power.  He concludes that to move forward, individuals and

communities must be encouraged to express their needs--the approach

taken by the IPPF's new participatory program.



      For further information and copies of the paper Participatory

Operations Research and Sexual Health, write to Sexual Health

Project, International Planned Parenthood Federation, Regent's

College, Inner Circle, Regent's Park, London NW1 4NS, England.



      (Press Release, January 1995, IPPF, London and Health

      Action, September/November 1994, AHRTAG, London)



                      *   *   *   *   *


For further information, please contact: popin@undp.org
POPIN Gopher site: gopher://gopher.undp.org/11/ungophers/popin
POPIN WWW site:http://www.undp.org/popin