UNITED NATIONS POPULATION INFORMATION NETWORK (POPIN)
UN Population Division, Department of Economic and Social Affairs,
with support from the UN Population Fund (UNFPA)

Module V: Gender, Pop., Farm. Sys. & Land Ten.: Main Policy Issues

***************************************************************

This document is being made available by the Population Information

Network (POPIN) Gopher of the U.N. Population Division, Dept. for

Economic and Social Information and Policy Analysis, in

collaboration with the Population Programme Service, Food and

Agriculture Organization.  For further information please contact

Mr. Jacques du Guerny at: jacques.duguerny@fao.org

*****************************************************************

From:  Modules on Gender, Population & Rural Development with a

Focus on Land Tenure & Farming Systems.  Rome: FAO, Population

Programme Service, Nov. 1995.





  MODULE V: GENDER, POPULATION, FARMING SYSTEMS & LAND TENURE:

                       MAIN POLICY ISSUES



            (Topouzis/du Guerny, SDWP, November 1995)



A.   Key Policy Issues



Vertical Versus Holistic Approaches to Gender, Population &

Agriculture/Rural Development.



     As seen in modules I-IV, gender, population and

agriculture/rural development issues tend to be perceived along

vertical lines -- conceptually as well as programmatically -- often

in isolation from one another.  This leads either to the neglect of

linkages between these areas or to simplistic generalizations and

deterministic relationships between related variables (as seen in

Module II).



     For example, to argue that population growth is the main cause

of poverty and environmental degradation is to overlook the

linkages between these problems, such as the wider gender and

social inequalities, unequal land tenure patterns, power relations,

etc.  Rural women, in their efforts to satisfy the basic needs of

their families and lacking alternative means of employment or

access to capital, are frequently pushed to overexploit resources.

This is largely due to gender inequality, and, in particular, to

the fact that resource access and land tenure systems tend to

favour men.



     "Tenurial policies are population policies when they allow

uncontrolled land use in frontier areas, thus inviting large-scale

migration," has argued a recent study conducted by the World

Resources Institute on Population Growth, Poverty and Environmental

Stress.  "Economic policies that depress real wages and employment

also have significant demographic consequences.  Similarly, failure

to address rapid population growth should be regarded as a policy

with massive long-run consequences."1/



     However, tenurial, agricultural and economic policies are

rarely inherently population- and/or gender-neutral.  In other

words, a concerted effort is needed to develop a holistic approach

which incorporates population and gender factors into

agricultural/rural development issues, where appropriate.  The

first step in this process is to identify the linkages between

agriculture/rural development, population and gender.  Modules I-IV

have attempted to delineate some of these linkages, focusing on

land tenure and farming systems.  Rudimentary working conceptual

frameworks and/or broad guidelines on how to incorporate population

and gender issues in agriculture and rural development have also

been proposed.



     Acknowledging the linkages between population, gender and

agricultural/rural development issues, however, is not enough.  The

Thailand case study below shows that population variables should

not translate into mere social or demographic information and data,

as is generally the tendency, as this does not result in the

integration of demographic issues in agricultural policies and

programmes.  Population data should be used as an analytical tool

to enhance our understanding of the relationship between

population, gender and rural development over time and to harmonize

population with agricultural policies.



     A holistic approach to gender, population and rural

development by definition needs to encompass a gender dimension, to

address the needs, interests and constraints of both men and women

(see Module I).  The Onchocerciasis Control Programme examined in

Module IV shows that migration deeply transforms the relationship

between people who have relocated and the land, since those

installed in new settlement areas do not own the land they

cultivate.  Under these circumstances, women's socio-cultural and

economic dependence on their husbands, arising from the fact that

men had formerly entrusted part of the land they owned to their

wives, has no longer a raison d'ˆtre.  Module IV argued that if

advantage is deliberately taken of the changed relationship between

migrants vis-…-vis the land and of its socio-cultural and economic

implications, this could facilitate women's access to and control

over land.





Case Study:  Planning for Community Forestry and Population Issues

             -- Thailand.     INT/90/P40 2/



     INT/90/P40, an on-going project funded by UNFPA and executed

by FAO's Community Forestry Unit (FONP), examines in detail the

relevance and significance of population issues in community

forestry planning.  The project has identified key linkages between

community forestry and population, including policy issues and

training needs and opportunities for community forestry training

programmes.  A brief summary of the project findings will help to

illustrate how similar exercises in the areas of gender, population

and land tenure and farming systems can help integrate linkages

into mainstream policies and programmes.



     Although population pressure and deforestation are quite

pronounced in Thailand, existing literature is heavily focused on

deforestation; community forestry and its organization; conflicts

between communities, forestry officials and capitalists; and how

the conflicts are, or should be, solved.  Studies on significant

population variables -- such as geographic distribution, population

composition (e.g. age and sex), family formation, rural-urban

density, migration streams, growth rates, age structure, dependency

ratio and other socio-economic characteristics -- and their impact

on land use, forestry and deforestation are rare.



     Current forest/environmental research considers population

only in terms of population size, growth and density.  Even here,

differences of opinion exist as to what is the actual causal

relationship between population and deforestation.  This

controversy, moreover, limits the ability to incorporate population

variables into forestry policies, plans and programmes.1





---------------------------

1. For a discussion of  Panayotou's and Sungsuwan's econometric

function for defining forest cover and deforestation, see

"Population Issues Relevant to Community Forestry Planning:

Thailand," INT/90/p40, p. 16.





     The causal link between population and environment in Thailand

today is clouded further by a lack of attention to basic population

data.  Though data on some variables have been collected -- such as

age structure, population size, migration, income and occupational

distribution, and community organization -- they are only collected

to give a descriptive profile of the communities or areas under

study and are not used as analytical tools for understanding the

relationships between population, deforestation and environmental

degradation, especially over time.



     In forestry and environmental planning, population variables

should not be looked at as social or demographic profile

information only, though this has been the case for Thailand thus

far.  In fact, this approach largely explains why population

variables are absent from forestry training programmes as well as

policy-making and planning.  Rather, they should be able to

indicate linkages (both direct and indirect) between those

variables and land and forestry use, as well as whether or not they

affect land and forest degradation, to what extent over time, and

how.  In effect, what studies of population and community forestry

need most is a dynamic time series approach to understand the

actual interaction between population variables and community

forestry, and thereby integrate basic population data into forestry

use planning.  This type of approach does not exist at present and

current assessments are as a result limited, as they only look at

a "snapshot" in time and not how that picture has developed over

time.



     For example, changes in community and household demographic

variables (growth, size, age-sex composition) should be studied

over time in relation to land use and deforestation to determine

whether or not population pressure changes are actually influencing

environmental stability at present versus in the past.  Moreover,

it is often assumed that population growth is one major determinant

of environmental degradation, and that reducing population growth

rates by launching more effective development programmes aimed at

rural poverty alleviation is one effective measure against

population growth.  In Thailand's case, however, the population

growth rate has declined significantly over time due to an

effective national family planning programme.  What is now the real

issue is that the number of births added each year (which amounts

to over half a million) is still a problem for national, social and

economic devleopment planning, particularly in terms of preserving

the environment and natural resources.



     Family formation is another important population

consideration.  It includes such aspects as age at marriage, post-

nuptial residence, age at having first and second children, family

planning, inheritance patterns which should be investigated in

relation to land tenure, land fragmentation, migration as well as

land and forest use.  For instance, while large families may have

been the norm in the past, contributing to the population-

environment pressure process, today the family is changing toward

a more nuclear structure.  This may reduce pressure on the

environment, especially under conditions where some, or most,

family members out-migrate at a certain age.



     Migration needs to be examined in terms of the relationship

between migration, land, forestry use, and degradation,

particularly over time and with regard to gender and occupational

alternatives.  Migration can serve both positive and negative

purposes with regard to community forestry conservation and an

accurate understanding of each of its dimensions is crucial.



     Gender roles are also important as they give indications as

to:



     a) who is utilising what environmental resources and for what

purposes;



     b) how these patterns have changed over time; and



     c) who can best serve as community forestry conservationists.





For instance, in community forests in Northern Thailand, the

traditional pattern included a clear-cut division of labour between

men and women.  Women were responsible for child care, obtaining

and preparing foods in and around the village, obtaining water and

firewood and collecting forest products for sale.  Men were

responsible for gathering foods (animals, plants) deep in the

forest, clearing the land, ploughing and harrowing rice fields,

tending cattle and livestock, cutting trees and constructing

houses, basket weaving, as well as selling forest products.  Today,

however, this relatively rigid traditional division of labour

pattern has broken down.  With the advent of a cash economy, men's

and women's roles have become more flexible since more human

resources are needed.  As a result, gender roles have become

diversified in order that all the required tasks be done.  In

relation to the land, for instance, men and women now share work

more equitably, and men are also assisting in child care.



     Finally, ethnicity, especially with regard to gender roles and

division of labour, is another important population variable which

must be studied in connection to land use and conservation.  Two

cases in point are Northern Thailand's largest hilltribe ethnic

groups, the Karen and the Lawa.  These groups are known to conserve

the environment.  Women make the fire breakers when clearing new

land and are involved in maintaining water resources in the

community.  Women also take part in community forestry projects

which are becoming more widespread among the hilltribes.  At the

household level, the women plant vegetables, herbs, and spices in

the rice fields for family consumption.  Although women have not

formed a formal forest conservation group in hilltribe communities

with regard to environmental conservation, they are the ones who

directly use and benefit from natural resources.



     Therefore, traditional population variables associated with

the environment (e.g. geographic distribution, rural-urban density,

growth rates) are not the only relevant or critical variables that

must be considered in assessing problems related to deforestation

and pressure on forestry resources.  Additional factors (such as

ethnicity and family formation mentioned above) are also important

considerations that need to be integrated into training programmes

for forestry officials, in order to promote better landuse planning

and more sustainable management and use of forest and tree

resources.



     To conclude, although some population issues have been

explored in research projects related to community forestry, they

have been primarily used to compile descriptive profiles of

communities for background information purposes.  They have not

been used as analytical tools in community forestry planning.

Thus, in the future, INT/90/P40 3/ recommends that training programmes

improve the capacities of foresters and demographers to facilitate

local people in developing their own forest land management plans,

by integrating some of the following population components:4/





1.   Population Structure.



Main thrusts/objectives:  To provide analytical information on

population size, age and sex composition in relation to land and

forestry use.  Age and sex structure elements are core components

of all demographic processes -- fertility, mortality, migration,

etc. -- and accordingly, have a direct relationship to rates of

natural increase and overall increase or decrease in a community or

other large social grouping.  Age and sex structure also determines

the proportion of men and women in the labour force and the

dependency ratio which is also important for understanding past,

present and future settlement patterns and their population

composition/charcteristics.





2.   Fertility, Mortality, Migration



Main thrusts/objectives:  To provide analytical information on

births, spacing, family size, family planining accessibility,

contraceptive method use, ability to choose when to have and when

to stop childbearing.  To provide analytical information on

mortality, which includes rates, differentials and causes.  To

enhance the understanding of foresters, other government officials,

policy-makers, etc. of the inter-relationships between population

movement and land/forest use.





3.   Family Structure, Formation and Inheritance Patterns



Major thrusts/objectives:  To examine the relationship between

family structure (i.e. types, status and roles, division of labour,

family formation, family developmental cycle and inheritance

patterns), and land/forest use.  Family structure is dynamic and is

shaped by population change due to changes in fertility, mortality

and migration.  Coupled with inheritance rules, these aspects have

had a tremendous impact on land use patterns, land fragmentation

and forest use.



     The case study of project INT/90/P40 shows how `population'

issues are relevant to community forestry planning.  Similar

exercises on Population, Gender and Farming Systems and Population,

Gender and Land Tenure, could help to document and substantiate

some of issues raised in Modules II, III and IV with "hard"

supporting data.  Action-oriented research into these linkages and

concrete programme recommendations will enable the integration of

this holistic approach in FAO regular programme activities and

budgets and in Member States' development plans and programmes.





Gender Bias and Stereotypes



     Modules I-IV have shown how gender bias and stereotyping are

major stumbling blocks to the adoption of more equitable and

holistic policies.  Gender bias and stereotyping permeate

development terminology and are at the core of widely held

assumptions, including the following:



     *    that economic development, including agricultural and

          population policies, are gender neutral;



     *    that farmers are "male" while their wives are mere

          assistants to their husbands.  It is usually taken for

          granted that the male farmer is the head of household,

          the decision-maker, and thus the target group of

          agricultural policies, programmes and services;



     *    that the farm household consists of husband, wife and

          children sharing common interests and working towards

          common goals and that within households, the burdens and

          benefits of poverty and wealth are distributed equally

          regardless of gender;



     *    that most migrants are men and that female migration is

          associational rather than economic in motive; etc.





Part of the reason for gender stereotyping is the lack of data and

empirical evidence on the differential roles, contributions and

constraints of men and women farmers.  Any further work, therefore,

on the linkages between gender, population, farming systems and

land tenure should include gender-dissagregated data collection and

analysis to provide policy-makers with evidence that will help

break down these stereotypes and redress gender bias.





Population, Gender and Land Tenure Issues



     Module II on Gender, Fertility/Mortality and Land Tenure

showed how differing household demographic conditions demand

differing land and tenure arrangements, and, similarly, how certain

land and tenure arrangements are better suited to certain types of

household demographic situations.  While emphasizing the

specificity of each context, the module proposed a more holistic

approach to the relationship between fertility/mortality and land

tenure.  It was seen how the capacity of a household to make an

appropriate land or tenure response depends on three conditions:

land access, security and sustainability.  Men's and women's

constraints to these three conditions and the likely impact of

these constraints on household demographic characteristics and

strategies were examined.  The module raised the issue of the need

to develop broad guidelines in order to help policy-makers design

optimal tenure arrangements for different types of households.  The

need to review the traditional gender focus on land ownership,

given the fact that security of tenure emerged as a far more

important issue for women (and men) than ownership, was also

underscored.



     Module IV on Gender, Migration, Farming Systems and Land

Tenure, used the Onchocerciasis Control Programme as a case study

to illustrate the linkages between rural-to-rural migration, gender

and land settlement.  The case study clearly delineated how a

population component -- in this case, rural-to-rural migration --

can be a critical factor to the success and sustainability of a

`non-population programme.'  It also showed that the gender

dimension of a population variable (rural-to-rural migration) can

be used to enhance land tenure conditions.





Population, Gender and Farming Systems Issues



     Module III showed how growing population pressure on

increasingly degraded land, male out-migration, and socio-economic

changes are transforming the traditional pattern of intra-household

rights and obligations and the very role of women in agriculture.

At the same time, levels of time and human energy inputs required

in women's farm- and home-based productive and reproductive chores

are increasing.  In this context, having a large number of children

continues to be a major asset and source of immediate and long-term

economic and social security for rural women.  In developing

regions, this is reflected in the high value placed on child labour

and in the absence of labour-saving home and farm technologies and

of social safety nets.



     The module further indicated that a critical area which needs

to be addressed is the limited appreciation of the gender and other

relationships within and between rural households, of the access to

resources that different members have at their disposal, of the

constraints under which different household members operate, and of

the complexity of the farming systems that they practice.  This

calls for the need for gender-dissagregated data and gender-

responsive methodologies in farming systems research, including

data linking agriculture and population.  The increasing incidence

of female-headed households (either through male out-migration or

through polygyny) also needs to be addressed in farming systems

research and in the design and introduction of new technologies.



     It was also shown that there is some evidence linking partial

breast-feeding and early weaning with women's increasing

involvement in subsistence activities (just as changes in land

tenure and farming techniques may have a profound impact on women's

farm work and ability to breast-feed).5/  Additional research is

needed into how and to what degree the pressures on women's time at

certain points of the agricultural cycle may lead to curtailment of

breast-feeding and corresponding demographic effects and the likely

impact of different types of agricultural innovation on breast-

feeding.  The module also raised the need to quantify, document and

incorporate the economic contributions of children by gender into

programmes and projects.  Finally, the impact of AIDS-related

mortality on farming systems and rural livelihoods was examined

within a gender perspective, pointing to the need for population

and agricultural programmes alike to design responses that take

into account the linkages between gender, food security and

HIV/AIDS.





B.   Recommendations



1.   CONDUCT FIELD RESEARCH ON THE LINKAGES BETWEEN GENDER,

        POPULATION AND AGRICULTURE/RURAL DEVELOPMENT



     Field projects similar to INT/90/P40: Population Issues

Relevant to Community Forestry Planning, on gender, population and

farming systems/land tenure could help elucidate key policy issues

with supporting data and empirical information.  This would:





     a)   make visible the linkages between gender, population and

          farming systems and land tenure;



     b)   show the relevance of these linkages in a specific

          programme or project; and



     c)   help propose concrete policy recommendations.



2.   MERGE AGRICULTURAL CENSUSES AND DEMOGRAPHIC SURVEYS



     An important step in the process of translating the need for

a more holistic approach into practice would be to merge

agricultural censuses with demographic surveys.  At present, the

Demographic and Health Surveys are usually conducted in isolation

from agricultural censuses.  Agricultural censuses undertaken

jointly with demographic surveys could be initially carried out and

tested on a pilot basis.  This would make both sets of surveys more

effective, while facilitating the articulation of population,

gender, agricultural and other linkages.





3.   REGIONALIZE EXISTING MODULES ON GENDER, POPULATION, FARMING

     SYSTEMS AND LAND TENURE



     Given time and space constraints, modules I-IV on gender,

population and rural development are general and global in scope.

As a result, and given the variety of land tenure and farming

systems, and demographic conditions and priorities of different

regions, oversimplification of the issues at stake has been to some

extent unavoidable.  The next step in identifying policy-relevant

linkages between these variables would be to make them region-

specific and to find ways of incorporating them into regional and

national population and agricultural policies and programmes.



4.   HOLD AN EXPERT CONSULTATION OF GENDER, POPULATION, LAND TENURE

     AND FARMING SYSTEMS SPECIALISTS



     An expert consultation of population, farming systems, land

tenure and gender specialists could:



     a)  set up a policy and action-oriented research programme on

the issues and linkages identified in these modules;



     b)  deliberate on the recommendations proposed in this module

and work out the modalities of operationalizing these

recommendations;



     c)  develop a methodology to help harmonize policies and

programmes in the areas of population, gender and

agricultural/rural development; and



     d)  organize a subsequent meeting of population and

agricultural policy-makers to discuss and disseminate the findings

of the expert group meeting.





                           ENDNOTES





1/  M. C. Cruz, C. A. Meyer, R. Repetto and R. Woodward,

Population Growth, Poverty, and Environmental Stress:

Frontier Migration in the Philippines and Costa Rica, World

Resources Institute, October 1992, p. 12.



2/  The case study is based on the Draft Population Issues

Relevant to Community Forestry Planning:  Country Profile

Thailand, by Bencha Yoddumnern-Attig, George A. Attig,

Tirapong Suntipop, and Kriangsak Rojkureestein, 1995.



3/  Ibid.



4/  For a complete list of project recommendations, see

Draft Population Issues Relevant to Community Forestry

Planning:  Country Profile Thailand, op. cit., 1995,

pp. 19-26.



5/  Christine Oppong, Relationships between Women"s Work

and Demographic Behaviour, 1991 and Ingrid Palmer, Gender

and Population in the Adjustment of African Economies:

Planning for Change, 1991, cited in C. Oppong, "Introduction,"

in C. Oppong and Aderanti Adepoju (eds), Gender, Work and

Population in Sub-Saharan Africa, ILO, London, 1994, p. 14.






For further information, please contact: popin@undp.org
POPIN Gopher site: gopher://gopher.undp.org/11/ungophers/popin
POPIN WWW site:http://www.undp.org/popin