1. Population and natural resources: the background

Basic facts regarding population and environment issues in the CST "East and Central Africa" sub-region are illustrated in Table 1 with recent data on demographic characteristics and on the availability of natural resources in the countries concerned. 1/

1.1 Population size and growth

The sub-region (13 countries) has about 310 million inhabitants in 1997, i.e. 41 percent of the population of Africa and 52 percent of that of sub-Saharan Africa. Population growth rates during 1990-1995 varied considerably, from 3 percent or more in four countries to negative rates in the two countries that were subject to civil strife during that period. The growth rate for the total population of the sub-region was 2.8 percent, slightly higher than the rate for all of Africa (2.7 percent) and much higher than the rate for all developing countries (1.7 percent). This rate implies a net addition of about 8.7 million yearly.

1.2 Urbanization

The degree of urbanization also varies considerably in the sub-region, but it is never very high. It is very low in the more mountainous countries region as well as in Eritrea. By contrast, it reaches 40 percent and more in Nigeria, Liberia and the Central African Republic. (Nigeria is virtually the only country in the region to have an extensive urban network, while in others the urban population tends to be largely concentrated in the capital.) The overall proportion of urban population is 29 percent, significantly under the averages for Africa (36 percent) or the developing regions (38 percent).

The overall growth of urban population is rapid by world standards: 5.3 percent annually during 1990-1995, despite negative growth rates in two countries affected by civil strife. (During the same period, the corresponding rate was 2.4 for the whole world, 3.4 for developing regions, 4.4 for Africa, 3.2 for Asia and 2.3 for Latin America and the Caribbean.) Despite this rapid growth, however, the urban proportion in the majority of the 13 countries is not expected to reach 50 percent before the year 2030 (United Nations, 1997).

1.3 Natural resources

The amount of cropland per caput for the whole sub-region as of 1993 was 0.27 hectare, which is the average for Africa (the world average is 0.26 hectare, and that for all developing countries is 1.8 hectare).

The amount of forest and woodland per caput for the sub-region was 0.67 hectare, but most countries had much lower values (without Chad and the Central African Republic, the average would fall to 0.40 hectare). By comparison, the African average is 1.16 hectare and the world average is 0.75 hectare.

Table 1. Some demographic characteristics and natural resources availability in East and Central Africa

. Population size 1997 (millions) Population growth rate 1990-95 (percent) Percentage urban 1996 Urban pop. growth rate 1990-95 (percent) Cropland per caput 1993 (ha) Forest/woodland per caput 1993 (ha) Renewable water per caput 1997 (m/day)
Sierra Leone 4 428 1.0 34 3.0 0.14 0.50 94
Liberia 2 467 -3.9 46 - 2.5 0.17 0.77 231
Ghana 18 338 2.9 36 4.0 0.26 0.48 8
Nigeria 118 369 3.0 40 5.4 0.31 0.11 6
Chad 6 702 2.6 23 3.7 0.54 5.40 80
Central African Rep. 3 416 2.2 40 3.1 0.64 14.90 109
Uganda 20 791 3.3 13 5.7 0.37 0.30 9
Rwanda 5 883 -5.9 6 - 4.6 0.20 0.09 3
Burundi 6 398 2.0 8 5.6 0.24 0.01 2
Tanzania 31 507 3.0 25 6.3 0.12 1.19 6
Kenya 28 414 2.9 30 6.3 0.17 0.66 1
Ethiopia 60 148 3.2 16 5.9 0.26* 0.49* 5*
Eritrea 3 409 1.9 17 3.5
All 310 270 2.8 29 5.3 0.27 0.67 11

* Ethiopia PDR (cropland and forest data: 1992).

Renewable water resources vary enormously from one country to another. The sub-regional average is 11 cubic meters (m3) per caput per day, to be compared with the world average of 19 m3. Nine countries appear to have a low unit supply of under 10 m3; Kenya, Burundi and Rwanda are particularly affected.

Where apparent water abundance is explained by the existence of a large or relatively large stream, caution must be exercised in interpreting the indices because, depending on population distribution, the portion of the population that is actually able to use the water resources may be quite limited (in general, much of this type of supply is lost to the sea or to the next riparian country). In addition, interpreting data on average water availability necessitates in all cases to take into account:

[a] the differences between the spatial distribution of the population and that of water resources;

[b] the differences between the distribution of human needs over the year and the seasonal fluctuations of availability.

Water that is not available at the right place and time often is practically useless, and can hardly be considered as a resource in a practical sense.

2. Population and environment seen from Rio

At the occasion of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED, Rio de Janeiro, June 1992) participating countries reviewed the state of their environment in order to present national reports at the Conference. Table 2 summarizes the environmental issues identified by 11 countries of the East and Central Africa sub-region (United Nations, 1992). 2/

2.1 Main environmental issues in the region

Forest degradation, including deforestation, is the most widespread environmental problem in the region--all but one country signal it. The causes usually are fuelwood collection and land requirements of shifting cultivation; overgrazing also has an impact in some countries.

The next most pervasive problem is soil degradation, either on account of pollution or because of overexploitation leading to loss of soil fertility. Soil erosion is almost as widespread. In arid zones, it may lead up to desertification. 3/ The combined damage of erosion and chemical degradation to agricultural resources is serious, considering the difficult balance between food requirements and production in this region (and in Africa in general).

Another common problem for the countries reviewed here is water pollution. The most common sources of pollution seem to be the industrial sector (including mining), then household wastes/urban sewage, then agricultural chemicals.

Finally, urban environment problems (poor housing and unsanitary living conditions due to inadequate waste management) seem to plague most of the countries in the region. These clearly have negative health implications.

Table 2. Environmental issues and their main direct factors in East and Central Africa (*)

SOIL RESOURCES
WATER RESOURCES
. EROSION CHEMICAL DEGRADATION, POLLUTION OTHERS SCARCITY POLLUTION OTHERS
Sierra Leone Soil erosion and degradation. Pollution (from mining). .. (From mining and household wastes). Water-borne diseases.
Ghana Wind and water erosion (due to agricultural activities). Loss of fertility Soil compaction, surface crusting, loss of stability. . (From manufacturing, agro-chemicals, mining, waste disposal). Water-borne diseases.
Nigeria Erosion and desertification catastrophic in five states.
50 million affected.
Pollution (by heavy metals, agro-chemicals, petro-chemicals). . . (Sewage, industrial effluents, silting, pesticides, fertilizers) .
Chad . . . Precarity due to bad climatic conditions. . .
Central African Republic Soil erosion. Loss of soil fertility. . . Water-borne diseases (rivers and wells often contaminated). .
Uganda (Quarrying) Pollution (agricultural chemical). . Lack of safe water supply. (Mining wastes; agricultural chemicals).
Rwanda . (Overexploitation). Collapse of agriculture. Disappearance of pastures (demographic pressure). Lack of safe drinking water. . .
Burundi . Overexploitation by agriculture. . . (Water resources are unprotected) .
Tanzania Desertification (expanding agriculture; overgrazing). . . . (Insufficient treatment of industrial effluents) .
Kenya Desertification (aridity + increased human use). (Inappropriate farming practices) . . (Domestic waste, sewage, industrial effluents) .
Ethiopia (PDR) Soil erosion. Land degradation. . Lack of safe drinking water (especially rural areas). . .
(*) Main factors are between brackets.

Table 2. Environmental issues and their main direct factors in East and Central Africa (cont'd)

. AIR FOREST RESOURCES BIO-DIVERSITY URBAN ENVIRONMENT
MARINE RESOURCES
. POLLUTION DEGRADATION ENDANGERED SPECIES CONGESTION, NUISANCES POLLUTION OTHERS
Sierra Leone . Deforestation . Poor housing and unsanitary environmental conditions. . Overexploitation of fisheries.
Ghana (Largely from manufacturing industries) (Overgrazing, burning) . Inadequate housing; lack of safe drinking water. (Due to industrialization and urbanization) Overfishing.
Nigeria . Once extensive forests are greatly reduced. Around 500 plant species; 10 primate species; etc. Waste disposal is ineffective. (Sewage, industrial effluents, domestic waste, hydrocarbons) Overfishing; trend "is towards total collapse".
Chad . Deforestation due to over-exploitation of certain zones. . . . .
Central African Republic Air pollution. Deforestation (shifting cultivation; slash-and-burn). Destruction of natural habitats and wildlife (fires, population pressure). Waste management inadequate. . .
Uganda . Encroachment by human settlements. Overuse of wood (energy; construction). Plant breeding and seed multiplication activities have dwindled. Lack of sanitation and sewage disposal. . .
Rwanda . Deforestation (fuelwood; agricultural needs). . Proliferation of slums. . .
Burundi . Gradual disappearance of forests (fuelwood). . . . .
Tanzania . . . Pollution (lack of adequate sewerage). . Coastal erosion. Destructive fishing.
Kenya . Deforestation. Loss of biological diversity. Inadequate waste management, infrastructure, sanitation. . .
Ethiopia (PDR) . Deforestation (overgrazing). . . . .

(*) Main factors are between brackets

2.2 Population aspects of environmental issues and policies

We shall examine here to what extent the country reports for UNCED (a) identified population dynamics as a factor in environmental problems, and (b) addressed population dimensions in environmental policies.

  • Sierra Leone included in its "problem areas" the population growth rate (2.8 percent per annum), the unbalanced rural-urban population distribution and the young age structure. Its account of policy measures addressing or contributing to address environmental problems included:

    • a reference to the National Population Policy, with an emphasis on regulating population size;

    • the draft sectoral plans, including agriculture and the environment but also maternal and child health and family planning;

    • the management of demographic change (by guaranteeing access to MCH/FP services for all);

    • the creation of a population and environment data bank.

  • Ghana only mentioned urbanization as a problem, because of its impact on marine and coastal degradation. On the policy side, consequently, only the need to manage the urban environment was mentioned.

  • Nigeria expressed concern over the projected continued population growth at 2.8-3 percent per annum and a resulting 300 million population size in 2022. In effect, when listing key priority areas for environment and development, the report placed "managing demographic change and population pressures" 4/ at the second rank. Those pressures were seen mainly in the urban context as the report emphasizes the enormity and complexity of the housing problem.

  • The Central African Republic expressed concern in respect of:

    • the unequal distribution of the population over the national territory;

    • the rapid rate of population growth compared to that of economic growth (2.5 percent to 1.5 percent);

    • the unorganized migration and spread of human settlements, and the pressure it exerts on the forests, natural habitats and wildlife.

  • For Uganda, a problem area was the high and increasing rate of population growth (2.5 percent) and the high proportion of dependent population (about 54 percent).

  • Rwanda mentioned among problem areas the high population density--leading to progressive disappearance of farmland and depletion of natural reserves--and the high rate of population growth (3.7 percent). Consequently, "curbing population growth" appeared among the priorities on environment and development (the target of bringing the population growth rate down to 3.1 percent by 2000 was mentioned).

  • The Burundi report cited the problem of population growth at about 3.1 percent, "which exerts pressure on meagre land resources". It also mentioned the difficulty "to protect nature reserves effectively and at the same time cater for the development of adjacent populations".

  • Tanzania noted that the "population growth is high, and pressures on resources are likely to increase".

  • The rate of population growth was also a concern for Kenya (at 3.4 percent), mainly cited as an exacerbating factor in the housing situation: urban growth "stands at 5-6 percent a year ... rapid urbanization is quickly followed by slums".

  • Ethiopia also considered is population growth rate (just under 3 percent a year) as a problem area. At the response level, the report was the only one in the region that envisaged population distribution as a policy instrument: "To cope with the present population growth and environmental degradation, both permanent and seasonal migration should be promoted ... from densely populated areas to those with under-utilized land and labour deficits".

    In practice, although the countries recognized the role of population factors in environmental degradation, few mentioned population policy as a facilitating factor in environmental protection. Let us now see how governments looked at a qualitative aspect of population factors--one of special interest to UNFPA programmes--namely the dimension of women's roles and place in environment and development policies.

  • Sierra Leone posed as a principle the value of recognizing the role of women in improving the environment and population planning;

  • Chad intended among other measures to 'sensitize' women and encourage them "to get involved in environmental and development activities".

  • Rwanda listed a series of needed programmes for women, ranging from literacy and educational actions to specific actions in the environmental sector like "sensitizing women to rational management of freshwater and energy resources, hygienics and sanitation".

    Finally, let us look at governments' declared intentions regarding environmental education, since programme-wise the latter can often be a convenient entry point for population themes:

    * Sierra Leone cited among intervention areas the promotion of environmental education.

    * Chad indicated its intention to promote environmental education, essentially through the school system.

    * Central African Republic had plans to "educate, train and inform the people, especially women", integrating environmental considerations in school programmes; promoting actions oriented towards women in the area of environmental hygiene; etc.

    * Burundi's strategy included the promotion of public awareness and education through the mass media, schools and literacy programmes, with a broadening of the role of NGOs in training and education.

    * Tanzania aimed at the promotion of environmental education, awareness and knowledge, targeting policy makers, villagers, townspeople, school children and even tourists.

    Overall, it could be said that attention to population dimensions is widespread but not deep. Phenomena other than population growth are rarely mentioned, despite e.g. the relevance of population distribution, migration and urbanization for natural resource use and reciprocal impacts of population and the environment.

    On the policy side, only four countries see some value in slowing population growth to facilitate population-environment adjustments. Likewise, few countries seem to perceive qualitative dimensions such as the relationship between a key group like women and the environment (to the management of which they largely contribute), or to appreciate the necessity to invest in environmental education in order to start transforming the population's attitude and practices. Certainly some advocacy work is called for in these areas.

    3. Land degradation and its factors

    This section is based on of a world-wide assessment of soil degradation problems carried out around 1989, the GLASOD project (ISRIC, 1991). Table 3 presents the main results for the countries of the region.

    3.1 Levels of degradation

    At the global level, GLASOD found 15 percent of the land area to be degraded by human activities.5/ For seven countries in our group the proportion degraded is higher than this average, sometimes (like in Burundi, Rwanda and Nigeria) much higher.

    The seriousness of de gradation also must be taken into account. A handy way of doing this is to assign weighting coefficients to the percentages of Table 3: assigning 1 to the percentage of lightly degraded areas, 2 to that of moderately degraded and 3 to that of strongly degraded ones, one sees that:

    3.2 Types of degradation

    Soil erosion under the action of water (rain, streams and floods) is the main form of land degradation in seven of the eight countries reviewed. Wind erosion is dominant only in Chad.6/

    Chemical degradation, which accounts for 12 percent only of soil degradation at the global level, has a much higher impact in some of the countries reviewed here--Liberia, Sierra Leone, Burundi and Rwanda in particular. This class of problems includes: salinization; the loss of soil fertility (nutrients, organic matter), through depletion from cultivating poor or mediocre soils without sufficient fertilization or through erosion; and pollution.

    Physical degradation has very little incidence in this sub-region, even under the low global average of 5 percent of degraded areas worldwide. It consists mainly of soil compaction and the waterlogging of irrigated areas.

    Table 3. Some characteristics of land degradation in East and Central Africa

    Level of degradation (%)
    Types of degradation (%)
    Causes of degradation (%)
    Total Light Moderate Strong Water erosion Wind erosion Chemical degradation Physical degradation Defores- tation Overexp. wood cover Over- grazing Agricultural activities

    Sierra Leone

    18

    3

    4

    -

    5

    -

    95

    -

    47

    -

    -

    53

    Liberia

    5

    1

    3

    -

    -

    -

    100

    -

    62

    -

    -

    38

    Ghana

    11

    2

    5

    4

    88

    -

    12

    -

    34

    5

    18

    42

    Nigeria

    29

    2

    10

    17

    80

    4

    8

    8

    7

    25

    23

    45

    Chad

    20

    13

    6

    -

    8

    81

    3

    8

    4

    30

    62

    3

    Central African Rep.

    3

    1

    1

    -

    85

    1

    9

    4

    47

    19

    26

    8

    Uganda

    21

    1

    13

    7

    74

    -

    26

    -

    13

    -

    45

    42

    Rwanda

    69

    5

    65

    -

    22

    -

    78

    -

    3

    -

    -

    97

    Burundi

    70

    3

    67

    -

    20

    -

    80

    -

    2

    -

    -

    98

    Tanzania

    12

    5

    5

    2

    81

    -

    13

    6

    23

    -

    38

    39

    Kenya

    15

    5

    5

    5

    85

    15

    -

    -

    15

    -

    58

    26

    Ethiopia + Eritrea

    25

    6

    8

    11

    74

    26

    -

    -

    36

    -

    50

    14

    N.B. Totals may not tally due to rounding.
    - = zero or negligible

    3.3 Causes of degradation and population factors

    If natural hazards are left aside, the causes of land degradation can be divided into direct and underlying causes. Direct causes are inappropriate land use and unsuitable land management practices, e.g. the cultivation of steep slopes without soil conservation measures. Underlying causes are the reasons why these inappropriate practices take place, e.g. the slopes may be cultivated because the landless poor need food, and conservation measures not taken because farmers lack security of tenure.

    The GLASOD assessment addressed the direct causes of land degradation for each map unit, recognizing four causes:

    • deforestation and removal of natural vegetation;

    • over-exploitation of wood cover for domestic use;

    • overgrazing;

    • agricultural activities.

    Deforestation is a cause of degradation when the land that is cleared is steeply sloping or has shallow or easily erodible soils, and when clearance is not followed by good management. It is the dominant cause in only two countries here (Liberia and Central African Republic) and usually does not reach the level of its relative incidence world-wide, where it accounts for 36 percent of total degradation. But it affects most countries to a significant extent.

    The role of population dynamics vis-à-vis other factors in deforestation is a much debated issue. In much of the sub-region forest clearance appears to have occurred mostly under the pressure of needs for more cropland and pastures; in addition, forest degradation occurs because of excess livestock grazing in wooded areas as well as collection of wood for human use, especially fuel.

    Overcutting of vegetation occurs when people cut forests, woodlands and shrublands--to obtain timber, fuelwood and other products--at a pace exceeding the rate of natural regrowth. This is frequent in semi-arid environments, where fuelwood shortages are often severe. The phenomenon is significant in three countries here (Chad, Nigeria and Central African Republic).

    Overgrazing is the grazing of natural pastures at stocking intensities above the livestock carrying capacity; the resulting decrease in the vegetation cover is a leading cause of wind and water erosion. It accounts for 35 percent of the total extent of degradation world-wide. Here it affects eight countries, with a very high relative incidence in Chad, Kenya and Ethiopia/ Eritrea (50 percent or more of the degraded area).

    Agricultural activities that can cause land degradation include shifting cultivation without adequate fallow periods, absence of soil conservation measures, cultivation of fragile or marginal lands, unbalanced fertilizer use, and faulty planning or management of irrigation--in other words, land mismanagement in general. At the global level they account for 28 percent of the total land degradation. In this sub-region they are a prominent factor in almost all countries (the exceptions being Chad, the Central African Republic and Ethiopia/Eritrea) and by far the major factor in Rwanda and Burundi.

    The role of population factors in land degradation processes obviously occurs in the context of the underlying causes. Population pressure operates through giving rise to land shortages, and through other mechanisms as well. Improper agricultural practices, for instance, occur only under constraints such as the saturation of good lands under population pressure which leads settlers to cultivate too shallow or too steep soils, plough fallow land before it has recovered its fertility, or attempt to obtain multiple crops by irrigating unsuitable soils.

    4. A close-up on water resource issues

    Because of the water scarcity problem, population growth "is at the heart of the problem of semi-arid development [...] The fundamental importance of water both for habitability and for rural access to biomass for food, fodder, fuelwood and timber makes water scarcity a crucial problem in the struggle for a higher quality of life of poor rural populations"; where habitability is reduced by water shortages, emigration is a habitual consequence (Falkenmark, 1990).

    Water issues in Africa are serious, generally due to the irregularity and unreliability of supply over time and space. Average (per caput) supply at the country level is often low, and continued population growth constantly reduces that supply as resources are fixed. In effect, situations in 2025 have been projected based on recent population projections and renewable water supply estimates (Engelman and LeRoy, 1993) using the classical scale of levels of competition for water. 7/

    Those calculations show that:

    - Ghana, Tanzania and Uganda would be among the 15 countries (world-wide) suffering from water stress.

    - The Ethiopia+Eritrea area, based on the figures assessed for the former Ethiopia PDR, would be among the 10 suffering from water scarcity.

    - Burundi, Kenya and Rwanda would be among the 22 countries meeting the water barrier before 2025. 8/

    Let us now consider the respective roles of agriculture, industry and domestic uses of water, as reported in Table 4.

    The region is characterized by:

    (a) a relatively high share of domestic uses in most countries: 7 countries are at or above 20 percent; in 5 cases this is due to a level of agricultural uses substantially lower than the African average;

    (b) a low share of industrial use, in line with African characteristics, except in Liberia, Ghana and Nigeria; and

    (c) a level of agricultural use mostly in line with African standards, except for the 5 countries mentioned above.

    The implication of these patterns is that there still is quite some potential for increases in water demand, as economies diversify and living standards rise. Unless large gains are made in efficient use of irrigation water and conservation or rehabilitation of damaged irrigated areas, the crunch is likely to severely damage economic competitivity in addition to health and the quality of life.

    Table 4. Percent distribution by sector of annual water withdrawals in the "East and Central Africa" sub-region

    Domestic Industry Agriculture
    Sierra Leone 7 4 89
    Liberia 27 13 60
    Ghana 35 13 52
    Nigeria 31 15 54
    Chad 16 2 82
    Central African Rep. 21 5 74
    Uganda 32 8 60
    Rwanda 5 2 94
    Burundi 36 - 64
    Tanzania 9 2 89
    Kenya 20 4 76
    Ethiopia 11 3 86
    Eritrea .. .. ..
    AFRICA 7 5 88
    Source: World Resources Institute (1996).

    5. Population-environment linkages and population programmes

    In this final section we shall try to identify possible activities in the population/environment area for this sub-region. For this purpose we shall first of all refer to the priorities set by the Agenda 21--the main basis for international organizations' environmental mandates--in the area of demographic dynamics and sustainability (Chapter 5). The focus is on the first programme area, namely "Developing and disseminating knowledge concerning the links between demographic trends and factors and sustainable development", where the following activities are proposed (United Nations, 1993):

    (a) "Identifying the interactions between demographic processes, natural resources and life support systems, bearing in mind regional and subregional variations deriving from, inter alia, different levels of development";

    (b) "Integrating demographic trends and factors into the ongoing study of environmental change [...] first, to study the human dimensions of environmental change and, second, to identify vulnerable areas";

    (c) "Identifying priority areas for action and developing strategies and programmes to mitigate the adverse impact of environmental change on human populations, and vice versa".

    Since the countries of this sub-region are widely affected by environmental problems, many of which ascribable at least in part to population factors, there is ample scope for activities along these lines.

    A first line of activities, aiming at improving the understanding of processes at work, would consist in retrospective studies, such as:

    1 - Assess the role of population dynamics and other factors with respect to prevailing trends in water supply issues, land degradation, deforestation.

    2 - Assess the impact of urban expansion on the state of natural resources (cropland, forests, water).

    3 - Assess changes in the quality of urban environment (access to water and sanitation, infrastructure, equipment) and assess their reciprocal causal relationships with the demographic dynamics of the settlements.

    Next comes a group of activities more practically oriented towards policy formulation. Some (4-6) are geared to establish necessary information bases and current diagnoses; others (7) are more of the "policy study" type in the strict sense, i.e. geared to assess the implications of alternative courses of action or alternative scenarios regarding exogenous variables.

    4 - Based on country characteristics, identify specific environmental indicators integrating population dimensions. Look specifically into the feasibility of spatially disaggregated indicators. Set up data collection and processing systems. Where feasible, build retrospective time series for these indicators as a starting point for analysis.

    5 - Assess current dimensions of population pressure on water resources: count population by watershed area, assess broad patterns of use by sector.

    6 - Identify the vulnerable populations with regard to specific environmental issues, e.g. pollution, water supply problems, deforestation. This is an important and sometimes difficult task, since even in the case of a local environmental problem some of the populations affected may be located far from the area where the problem arises.

    7 - Project population impact on various environmental goods (e.g. cropland, building areas, water resources, forests) based on scenarios of population growth, urbanization, consumption patterns. Illustrate potential differences arising from alternative demographic scenarios.

    All these activities are meant to produce utilizable results in the policy making context (i.e. the second programme area of the Agenda 21, namely the formulation of integrated environment and development policies taking into account demographic trends and factors). In most if not all cases, their promotion at government level and successful pursuit will require two types of activities:

    8 - Advocacy, i.e. the use of classical information techniques to raise the awareness of government, relevant public agencies and NGO staff regarding concrete, priority reciprocal linkages of population dynamics and environmental change at the national and sub-national levels (in light of the knowledge gained through the above activities), and achieve a clear recognition of the need to develop policies that take those linkages into account.

    9 - Capacity building, e.g. through interdisciplinary workshops making use of practical exercises in formulating environment and development strategies.

    Finally, it is worth noting that population-environment linkages are, in many settings, an interesting addition to traditional population education themes:

    10 - IEC activities addressing the general public could derive arguments inter alia from those linkages, especially where the impact of environmental degradation on people's health and living conditions is more acutely felt. Field experiences in communication campaigns focused on such themes, built upon assessments of the people's perceptions regarding environmental change, its causes and consequences, can be utilized with profit in new contexts.

    UNFPA support could be considered for some of these activities. UNFPA first stated its interest for studying selected aspects of the population-environment nexus several years ago already, in its Handbook of Policy Guidelines. Following the ICPD, UNFPA undertook to revise its programmatic guidelines. In the population and environment area this task was effectively tackled only in 1997; the outcome is a well-articulated Guidance Note on Population and the Environment, the substance of which is the following.

    Consistent with the Agenda 21 framework and the ICPD Programme of Action (United Nations, 1995) UNFPA can support, within its three thematic areas, the following types of population and environment projects:

    • under reproductive health, "synergistic interventions" (combining health programme elements with assistance to local development and environmental management), for example in areas where environmental degradation, poverty and population pressures are exacerbating one another;

    • under population and development strategies:

    * integration of population and environmental linkages in policies and plans;

    * policy-oriented research and analysis of linkages between population factors and the environment, and capacity building through training; and

    * under advocacy, awareness creation and the dissemination of understanding of the links and synergies between population and the environment.

    Population and development policies and plans should take environmental links and concerns into account. UNFPA can help this process through "studies for incorporating demographic features into policies and plans as well as programmes designed to integrate the direct and induced effects of demographic changes on environment and development programmes".

    Policy-oriented research and analysis should bear on "the interaction between demographic trends and factors and sustainable development [and help] identify priority areas for action and develop strategies and programmes to mitigate the adverse impact of environmental change on human populations, and vice versa". Examples of important issues are:

    (A) Potential population-supporting capacities: this is a useful tool to study "the national, or local, balance between population, resources and the environment, and particularly the pressure implied by the intensification and extension" of agricultural systems in the context of prospects for population stabilization.

    (B) Population pressure, poverty and environmental degradation: these three phenomena coincide in many countries, but their interrelations are not well understood. UNFPA can support policy-relevant research to clarify the relationship.

    (C) Population and food security: "projections of global food production suggest that it is likely to keep pace with global population growth [but] they are subject to numerous uncertainties". UNFPA "can help clarify this important issue by, for example, supporting studies of national food production capability under different population growth and density scenarios", especially in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. It can also support country studies on:

      (i) the population dimensions of the food supply system (that is, how many people and with what characteristics depend on a specific sub-system, for example subsistence agriculture vs. foreign trade), and

      (ii) the population dimensions of food insecurity and vulnerability assessment (i.e. how many would be affected by this or that type of failure in a given sub-system)".

    (D) Population and the growth of cities: "urban areas make a large and growing contribution to economic growth, to reducing population pressure in rural areas, and to creating conditions favourable for demographic transition". But urbanization also creates its own management problems. UNFPA can support research on (e.g.) growing urban populations and their needs, or the past and prospective impact of urban extension on neighboring and more distant natural resources (arable land, woodland, water resources).

    (E) Population and deforestation: deforestation "has many causes, including population pressures, poverty, agricultural clearance, fuelwood harvesting, over-grazing and commercial logging". UNFPA can support research to clarify the role of those causes, particularly population factors.

    (F) Population and desertification: drylands "are the habitat and source of livelihood for about a quarter of the world's population, and they are found on all continents, especially in Africa and Asia. The extent of desertification taking place in these areas is likely to be caused by a multiplicity of factors of which population pressures, density and migration play a role that should be clarified by careful research".

    (G) Population and water scarcity: water use is growing rapidly, "and already a number of regions are chronically water-short [...] There are needs for a better understanding of the interaction between population growth, related environmental factors and the demand for water. UNFPA can support research that will provide a solid basis for the design of informed policy options and effective strategies to reach sustainable levels of water use".

    (H) Population and environmental migration: "an issue of growing importance in several countries is [...] the extent to which environmental degradation and problems cause the displacement of people thus leading to internal or even international migration". UNFPA "can support research on the causes and consequences of environmental refugees, particularly in relation to their reproductive health needs".

    (I) Gender, population and environment: "women are major caretakers of the earth. In many societies they produce most of the food and care for the land [... They] are also the major caretakers of health and the main providers of water for domestic uses, which makes it critical to involve them in the decision-making process". UNFPA "can provide support for research [on] the nature and importance of the roles of men and women, and the ways in which those roles [affect] attempts to promote sustainable development".

    Since the integration of population and environmental factors cannot be pursued without appropriately trained personnel--particularly in the public sector--capacity building is crucial. UNFPA should "support relevant training in population and the environment for persons from appropriate agencies in the public sector" and "from accredited national, regional and international NGOs".

    The need for advocacy is also recognized, for "sustained support for viewing environmental issues in a population context will depend on [the] creation of awareness and the dissemination of understanding of the links between population and environment are important steps in the sustainable development process. UNFPA should "support activities to inform, educate, and communicate on the nature of the issues involved [as well as] actively support community efforts and the production and dissemination of relevant information material".

    In view "of the multi-disciplinary nature of many of the issues involved in population and environment linkages"--and of limited resources--international assistance should involve all relevant UN agencies and NGOs. In this context UNFPA will concentrate on the population side of the population-environment linkage, and priority will be given to projects that can be used as immediate inputs into policy making in countries and geographical areas experiencing the most acute population and environmental problems.

    Country needs for these various kinds of inputs to country policies should be systematically assessed in the context of programming at the country level. In addition, there would be great value in undertaking country activities, such as those suggested above, in a coordinated manner in groups of countries that share the same issues and therefore can benefit both from one another's experience, both in data collection/analysis and in applying thematic knowledge to policy making.

    ANNEX

    Regional patterns of land degradation

    The extent of the degradation problem and its patterns vary notably among regions:

    - Africa has 25 percent of wasteland (the highest proportion among regions), 12 percent lightly or moderately degraded and 4 percent strongly or extremely degraded land (also the highest proportion). The main type of degradation by far is the loss of topsoil (76 percent of the degraded area) followed by the loss of soil nutrients (9 percent). Burkina Faso, Burundi, Ethiopia (the then PDR), Lesotho, Madagascar, Morocco and Rwanda are particularly affected.

    - North and Central America has 6 percent wasteland, 6 percent lightly or moderately degraded and 1 percent strongly degraded land. The main types of degradation are the loss of topsoil (75 percent of the degraded area) and terrain deformation from water erosion (16 percent, but 40 percent in Central America). Costa Rica, El Salvador and Panama are the most affected countries.

    - South America has 1 percent wasteland, 11 percent lightly or moderately degraded and 1 percent strongly or extremely degraded land. The main types of degradation are loss of topsoil from water erosion (39 percent of the degraded area), loss of soil nutrients (28 percent) and terrain deformation from water erosion (12 percent). Brazil is particularly affected.

    - Asia has 11 percent wasteland, 15 percent lightly or moderately degraded (the highest proportion among regions) and 3 percent strongly or extremely degraded land. Again the main type is loss of topsoil (71 percent of the degraded area), the next being terrain deformation (16 percent); salinization (7 percent) is significant. China, India, Thailand and Vietnam are the most affected countries.

    - Australasia has 11 percent wasteland, 11 percent lightly or moderately degraded and a negligible proportion of strongly or extremely degraded land. For 95 percent, degradation consists in the loss of topsoil.

    - Europe has a negligible proportion of wasteland, 22 percent lightly or moderately degraded and 1 percent strongly or extremely degraded land. The main types of degradation are loss of topsoil from water erosion (61 percent of the degraded area) and compaction (15 percent).

    Table 5 below quantifies the area not affected by degradation or wasteland, as a proportion of total land area, by region:

    Table 5 - Proportion of total area in stable and other terrain, not degraded by human action (wasteland excluded), by region

    North America......

    91 percent WORLD..............74 percent
    South America...... 85 percentAsia.............. 71 percent
    Australasia........ 78 percentCentral America....... 62 percent
    Europe............. 77 percentAfrica................ 59 percent


    FOOTNOTES

    1/ The data sources for Table 1 are the following. Population size and growth rate: United Nations (1996); urban population percentage and growth rate: United Nations (1997); cropland and forest: FAO (1995) or AGROSTAT data base; water resources: derived from Engelman and LeRoy (1993), assuming no change in country resources. Per caput indices of natural resources availability have been corrected to take into account the sometimes drastic changes in retrospective population estimates that occurred between the United Nations' 1994 and 1996 revisions.

    2/ Such reports were presented by all countries covered by the CST except Liberia. "Ethiopia" is the then People's Democratic Republic (PDR), including now independent Eritrea.

    3/ The United Nations Conference on Desertification, which popularized this word, defined it as "the reduction or destruction of the land's potential, finally resulting in the appearance of desert conditions" (United Nations, 1977). Although one should use the concept only in reference to processes which have resulted in desert conditions or will shortly and inevitably do so, it is often used in a broader sense. The term "desertification" has other annoying aspects. It gives no information on the nature of the degradation, hence on possible corrective actions. It misstates the problems: "the concept of expanding deserts and advancing sand dunes has become the dominant image in the public's eye rather than [...] less visible and much more serious problems" (Liamine, 1993), in particular "more subtle, more complex, pulsating deteriorations [...] radiating out from centers of excessive population pressure (Nelson, 1990). And it seems to designate an absolute evil, while the salinization of an irrigated area, although reversible, may be a greater loss than the washing away of the last inch of topsoil in a marginal area. For FAO (1986) desertification "is only one extreme aspect of the widespread deterioration of ecosystems under the combined pressure of adverse climate and agricultural exploitation".

    4/All the quotes in this section are from United Nations (1992).

    5/ For a comparison of land degradation patterns among regions of the world, see the Annex, p.18.

    6/ Globally 83 percent of land degradation is in the form of erosion: 70 percent mere loss of topsoil and 13 percent more severe terrain deformation.

    7/ Population pressures under 600 persons per flow unit (P/FU; 1 FU = 1 million cubic meters) are not considered a serious issue, although water quality problems and dry season supply problems may occur. Between 600 and 1000 P/FU, chances of more recurrent quantitative or/and qualitative supply problems increase notably: this is called the "water stress" stage. Between 1000 and 2000 P/FU such problems are common and affect human and economic development; this is the "scarcity" stage. 2000 P/FU is seen as the maximum population pressure that can be handled in the present state of technology and management capabilities; it has been labeled "water barrier". This scale was developed from the observation of areas where both per caput supplies and resource use problems were well documented.

    8/Scarcity-related concepts are indicative, in view of the different adaptive capacities of countries. In particular, the water barrier concept should not be taken literally; even if water shortage is indeed a medium-term barrier to development, there is a priori no indication that solutions for the long term cannot be found. Rather than impending absolute physical limits, the indicator points to steeply increasing costs of supply on account of increased investment and recurrent expenditure for water supply, treatment and/or re-use; in turn, the cost issue points to likely social problems for cost recovery. On the other hand, "in arid conditions, the problem is more complex because of considerable seasonal variations in rainfall. The largest need for irrigation water is during the dry season when the water accessible to people can be as low as 10 percent of the annual flow. Even countries with an average competition level of only 50 [P/FU] have considerable allocation problems during the dry season"; in addition, "national figures do not reflect the stress on water resources quality in local areas exerted by rapid urbanization and industrialization" (Falkenmark and Widstrand, 1992).


    REFERENCES

    Engelman, E. and P. LeRoy (1993): Sustaining water. Population and the future of renewable water supplies. Washington, Population Action International.

    Falkenmark, M. (1990): "Rapid population growth and water scarcity: the predicament of tomorrow's Africa", in: Resources, environment and population (K. Davis and M.S. Bernstam, eds.), pp. 81-94. Supplement to Population and Development Review, vol. 16.

    Falkenmark, M. and Widstrand, C. (1992): Population and water resources: a delicate balance. Population Bulletin (Population Reference Bureau, Washington), vol. 47 no. 3.

    FAO (1986): African agriculture: the next 25 years. Rome.

    FAO (1995): Country tables. Basic data on the agricultural sector. Rome.

    ISRIC (1991): World map of the status of human-induced soil degradation (by L.R. Oldeman, R.T.A. Hakkeling and W.G. Sombroek). Global Assessment of Soil Degradation (GLASOD). Nairobi, UNEP.

    Liamine, N. (1993): "Desertification - The issues and challenges", Ecoforum, vol. 17 no. 1/2 (April) pp. 11-21.

    Nelson, R. (1990): Dryland management - The "desertification" problem. World Bank Technical Paper No 116. Washington.

    United Nations (1977): Round-up, Plan of action and resolutions of UNCOD. New York.

    United Nations (1992): Nations of the Earth report. UNCED national reports summaries. New York.

    United Nations (1993): Agenda 21: Programme of action for sustainable development. New York.

    United Nations (1995): Programme of action adopted at the International Conference on population and Development, Cairo, 5-13 September 1994. New York.

    United Nations (1996): World population prospects: the 1996 revision. New York.

    United Nations (1997): World urbanization prospects: the 1996 revision. New York.

    World Resources Institute (1996): World resources 1996-97. New York, Oxford University Press.