Basic facts regarding population and environment issues in the CST "East and Central Africa" sub-region are illustrated in Table 1 with recent data on demographic characteristics and on the availability of natural resources in the countries concerned. 1/
1.1 Population size and growth
The sub-region (13 countries) has about 310 million inhabitants in 1997, i.e. 41 percent of the population of Africa and 52 percent of that of sub-Saharan Africa. Population growth rates during 1990-1995 varied considerably, from 3 percent or more in four countries to negative rates in the two countries that were subject to civil strife during that period. The growth rate for the total population of the sub-region was 2.8 percent, slightly higher than the rate for all of Africa (2.7 percent) and much higher than the rate for all developing countries (1.7 percent). This rate implies a net addition of about 8.7 million yearly.
1.2 Urbanization
The degree of urbanization also varies considerably in the sub-region, but it is never very high. It is very low in the more mountainous countries region as well as in Eritrea. By contrast, it reaches 40 percent and more in Nigeria, Liberia and the Central African Republic. (Nigeria is virtually the only country in the region to have an extensive urban network, while in others the urban population tends to be largely concentrated in the capital.) The overall proportion of urban population is 29 percent, significantly under the averages for Africa (36 percent) or the developing regions (38 percent).
The overall growth of urban population is rapid by world standards: 5.3 percent annually during 1990-1995, despite negative growth rates in two countries affected by civil strife. (During the same period, the corresponding rate was 2.4 for the whole world, 3.4 for developing regions, 4.4 for Africa, 3.2 for Asia and 2.3 for Latin America and the Caribbean.) Despite this rapid growth, however, the urban proportion in the majority of the 13 countries is not expected to reach 50 percent before the year 2030 (United Nations, 1997).
1.3 Natural resources
The amount of cropland per caput for the whole sub-region as of 1993 was 0.27 hectare, which is the average for Africa (the world average is 0.26 hectare, and that for all developing countries is 1.8 hectare).
The amount of forest and woodland per caput for the sub-region was 0.67 hectare, but most countries had much lower values (without Chad and the Central African Republic, the average would fall to 0.40 hectare). By comparison, the African average is 1.16 hectare and the world average is 0.75 hectare.
Table 1. Some demographic characteristics and natural resources availability in East and Central Africa
| . | Population size 1997 (millions) | Population growth rate 1990-95 (percent) | Percentage urban 1996 | Urban pop. growth rate 1990-95 (percent) | Cropland per caput 1993 (ha) | Forest/woodland per caput 1993 (ha) | Renewable water per caput 1997 (m/day) |
| Sierra Leone | 4 428 | 1.0 | 34 | 3.0 | 0.14 | 0.50 | 94 |
| Liberia | 2 467 | -3.9 | 46 | - 2.5 | 0.17 | 0.77 | 231 |
| Ghana | 18 338 | 2.9 | 36 | 4.0 | 0.26 | 0.48 | 8 |
| Nigeria | 118 369 | 3.0 | 40 | 5.4 | 0.31 | 0.11 | 6 |
| Chad | 6 702 | 2.6 | 23 | 3.7 | 0.54 | 5.40 | 80 |
| Central African Rep. | 3 416 | 2.2 | 40 | 3.1 | 0.64 | 14.90 | 109 |
| Uganda | 20 791 | 3.3 | 13 | 5.7 | 0.37 | 0.30 | 9 |
| Rwanda | 5 883 | -5.9 | 6 | - 4.6 | 0.20 | 0.09 | 3 |
| Burundi | 6 398 | 2.0 | 8 | 5.6 | 0.24 | 0.01 | 2 |
| Tanzania | 31 507 | 3.0 | 25 | 6.3 | 0.12 | 1.19 | 6 |
| Kenya | 28 414 | 2.9 | 30 | 6.3 | 0.17 | 0.66 | 1 |
| Ethiopia | 60 148 | 3.2 | 16 | 5.9 | 0.26* | 0.49* | 5* |
| Eritrea | 3 409 | 1.9 | 17 | 3.5 | |||
| All | 310 270 | 2.8 | 29 | 5.3 | 0.27 | 0.67 | 11 |
* Ethiopia PDR (cropland and forest data: 1992).
Renewable water resources vary enormously from one country to another. The sub-regional average is 11 cubic meters (m3) per caput per day, to be compared with the world average of 19 m3. Nine countries appear to have a low unit supply of under 10 m3; Kenya, Burundi and Rwanda are particularly affected.
Where apparent water abundance is explained by the existence of a large or relatively large stream, caution must be exercised in interpreting the indices because, depending on population distribution, the portion of the population that is actually able to use the water resources may be quite limited (in general, much of this type of supply is lost to the sea or to the next riparian country). In addition, interpreting data on average water availability necessitates in all cases to take into account:
Water that is not available at the right place and time often is practically useless, and can hardly be considered as a resource in a practical sense.
2. Population and environment seen from Rio
At the occasion of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED, Rio de Janeiro, June 1992) participating countries reviewed the state of their environment in order to present national reports at the Conference. Table 2 summarizes the environmental issues identified by 11 countries of the East and Central Africa sub-region (United Nations, 1992). 2/
2.1 Main environmental issues in the region
Forest degradation, including deforestation, is the most widespread environmental problem in the region--all but one country signal it. The causes usually are fuelwood collection and land requirements of shifting cultivation; overgrazing also has an impact in some countries.
The next most pervasive problem is soil degradation, either on account of pollution or because of overexploitation leading to loss of soil fertility. Soil erosion is almost as widespread. In arid zones, it may lead up to desertification. 3/ The combined damage of erosion and chemical degradation to agricultural resources is serious, considering the difficult balance between food requirements and production in this region (and in Africa in general).
Another common problem for the countries reviewed here is water pollution. The most common sources of pollution seem to be the industrial sector (including mining), then household wastes/urban sewage, then agricultural chemicals.
Finally, urban environment problems (poor housing and unsanitary living conditions due to inadequate waste management) seem to plague most of the countries in the region. These clearly have negative health implications.
| . | EROSION | CHEMICAL DEGRADATION, POLLUTION | OTHERS | SCARCITY | POLLUTION | OTHERS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sierra Leone | Soil erosion and degradation. | Pollution (from mining). | . | . | (From mining and household wastes). | Water-borne diseases. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ghana | Wind and water erosion (due to agricultural activities). | Loss of fertility | Soil compaction, surface crusting, loss of stability. | . | (From manufacturing, agro-chemicals, mining, waste disposal). | Water-borne diseases. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nigeria | Erosion and desertification
catastrophic in five states. 50 million affected. | Pollution (by heavy metals, agro-chemicals, petro-chemicals). | . | . | (Sewage, industrial effluents, silting, pesticides, fertilizers) | .| Chad
| .
| .
| .
| Precarity due to bad climatic
conditions.
| .
| . | Central African Republic
| Soil erosion.
| Loss of soil fertility.
| .
| .
| Water-borne diseases (rivers and
wells often contaminated).
| . | Uganda
| (Quarrying)
| Pollution (agricultural chemical).
| .
| Lack of safe water supply.
| (Mining wastes; agricultural
chemicals) | .
| Rwanda
| .
| (Overexploitation). Collapse of
agriculture.
| Disappearance of pastures
(demographic pressure).
| Lack of safe drinking water.
| .
| . | Burundi
| .
| Overexploitation by agriculture.
| .
| .
| (Water resources are unprotected)
| . | Tanzania
| Desertification (expanding
agriculture; overgrazing).
| .
| .
| .
| (Insufficient treatment of industrial
effluents)
| . | Kenya
| Desertification (aridity +
increased human use).
| (Inappropriate farming practices)
| .
| .
| (Domestic waste, sewage, industrial
effluents)
| . | Ethiopia (PDR)
| Soil erosion.
| Land degradation.
| .
| Lack of safe drinking water
(especially rural areas).
| .
| .
| (*) Main factors are between brackets.
|
.
| AIR
| FOREST
RESOURCES
| BIO-DIVERSITY
| URBAN ENVIRONMENT
| .
| POLLUTION
| DEGRADATION
| ENDANGERED SPECIES
| CONGESTION,
NUISANCES
| POLLUTION
| OTHERS | Sierra Leone
| .
| Deforestation
| .
| Poor housing and unsanitary
environmental conditions.
| .
| Overexploitation of
fisheries. | Ghana
| (Largely from manufacturing
industries)
| (Overgrazing, burning)
| .
| Inadequate housing; lack of
safe drinking water.
| (Due to industrialization and
urbanization)
| Overfishing. | Nigeria
| .
| Once extensive forests are greatly
reduced.
| Around 500 plant species; 10
primate species; etc.
| Waste disposal is ineffective.
| (Sewage, industrial effluents,
domestic waste, hydrocarbons)
| Overfishing; trend "is
towards total collapse". | Chad
| .
| Deforestation due to over-exploitation of certain zones.
| .
| .
| .
| . | Central African Republic
| Air pollution.
| Deforestation (shifting cultivation;
slash-and-burn).
| Destruction of natural habitats
and wildlife (fires, population
pressure).
| Waste management
inadequate.
| .
| . | Uganda
| .
| Encroachment by human
settlements. Overuse of wood
(energy; construction).
| Plant breeding and seed
multiplication activities have
dwindled.
| Lack of sanitation and sewage
disposal.
| .
| . | Rwanda
| .
| Deforestation (fuelwood;
agricultural needs).
| .
| Proliferation of slums.
| .
| . | Burundi
| .
| Gradual disappearance of forests
(fuelwood).
| .
| .
| .
| . | Tanzania
| .
| .
| .
| Pollution (lack of adequate
sewerage).
| .
| Coastal erosion. Destructive
fishing. | Kenya
| .
| Deforestation.
| Loss of biological diversity.
| Inadequate waste management,
infrastructure, sanitation.
| .
| . | Ethiopia (PDR)
| .
| Deforestation (overgrazing).
| .
| .
| .
| . |
(*) Main factors are between brackets
| | |||||||||||||||||||||
2.2 Population aspects of environmental issues and policies
We shall examine here to what extent the country reports for UNCED (a) identified population dynamics as a factor in environmental problems, and (b) addressed population dimensions in environmental policies.
In practice, although the countries recognized the role of population factors in environmental degradation, few mentioned population policy as a facilitating factor in environmental protection. Let us now see how governments looked at a qualitative aspect of population factors--one of special interest to UNFPA programmes--namely the dimension of women's roles and place in environment and development policies.
Finally, let us look at governments' declared intentions regarding environmental education, since programme-wise the latter can often be a convenient entry point for population themes:
Overall, it could be said that attention to population dimensions is widespread but not deep. Phenomena other than population growth are rarely mentioned, despite e.g. the relevance of population distribution, migration and urbanization for natural resource use and reciprocal impacts of population and the environment.
On the policy side, only four countries see some value in slowing population growth to facilitate population-environment adjustments. Likewise, few countries seem to perceive qualitative dimensions such as the relationship between a key group like women and the environment (to the management of which they largely contribute), or to appreciate the necessity to invest in environmental education in order to start transforming the population's attitude and practices. Certainly some advocacy work is called for in these areas.
3. Land degradation and its factors
This section is based on of a world-wide assessment of soil degradation problems carried out around 1989, the GLASOD project (ISRIC, 1991). Table 3 presents the main results for the countries of the region.
3.1 Levels of degradation
At the global level, GLASOD found 15 percent of the land area to be degraded by human activities.5/ For seven countries in our group the proportion degraded is higher than this average, sometimes (like in Burundi, Rwanda and Nigeria) much higher.
The seriousness of de gradation also must be taken into account. A handy way of doing this is to assign weighting coefficients to the percentages of Table 3: assigning 1 to the percentage of lightly degraded areas, 2 to that of moderately degraded and 3 to that of strongly degraded ones, one sees that:
3.2 Types of degradation
Soil erosion under the action of water (rain, streams and floods) is the main form of land degradation in seven of the eight countries reviewed. Wind erosion is dominant only in Chad.6/
Chemical degradation, which accounts for 12 percent only of soil degradation at the global level, has a much higher impact in some of the countries reviewed here--Liberia, Sierra Leone, Burundi and Rwanda in particular. This class of problems includes: salinization; the loss of soil fertility (nutrients, organic matter), through depletion from cultivating poor or mediocre soils without sufficient fertilization or through erosion; and pollution.
Physical degradation has very little incidence in this sub-region, even under the low global average of 5 percent of degraded areas worldwide. It consists mainly of soil compaction and the waterlogging of irrigated areas.
Table 3. Some characteristics of land degradation in East and Central Africa
| Total | Light | Moderate | Strong | Water erosion | Wind erosion | Chemical degradation | Physical degradation | Defores- tation | Overexp. wood cover | Over- grazing | Agricultural activities | |
| ||||||||||||
| Sierra Leone | 18 | 3 | 4 | - | 5 | - | 95 | - | 47 | - | - | 53 |
| ||||||||||||
| Liberia | 5 | 1 | 3 | - | - | - | 100 | - | 62 | - | - | 38 |
| ||||||||||||
| Ghana | 11 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 88 | - | 12 | - | 34 | 5 | 18 | 42 |
| Nigeria | 29 | 2 | 10 | 17 | 80 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 25 | 23 | 45 |
| Chad | 20 | 13 | 6 | - | 8 | 81 | 3 | 8 | 4 | 30 | 62 | 3 |
| ||||||||||||
| Central African Rep. | 3 | 1 | 1 | - | 85 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 47 | 19 | 26 | 8 |
| ||||||||||||
| Uganda | 21 | 1 | 13 | 7 | 74 | - | 26 | - | 13 | - | 45 | 42 |
| ||||||||||||
| Rwanda | 69 | 5 | 65 | - | 22 | - | 78 | - | 3 | - | - | 97 |
| ||||||||||||
| Burundi | 70 | 3 | 67 | - | 20 | - | 80 | - | 2 | - | - | 98 |
| ||||||||||||
| Tanzania | 12 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 81 | - | 13 | 6 | 23 | - | 38 | 39 |
| Kenya | 15 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 85 | 15 | - | - | 15 | - | 58 | 26 |
| ||||||||||||
| Ethiopia + Eritrea | 25 | 6 | 8 | 11 | 74 | 26 | - | - | 36 | - | 50 | 14 |
N.B. Totals may not tally due to rounding.
- = zero or negligible
3.3 Causes of degradation and population factors
If natural hazards are left aside, the causes of land degradation can be divided into direct and underlying causes. Direct causes are inappropriate land use and unsuitable land management practices, e.g. the cultivation of steep slopes without soil conservation measures. Underlying causes are the reasons why these inappropriate practices take place, e.g. the slopes may be cultivated because the landless poor need food, and conservation measures not taken because farmers lack security of tenure.
The GLASOD assessment addressed the direct causes of land degradation for each map unit, recognizing four causes:
Deforestation is a cause of degradation when the land that is cleared is steeply sloping or has shallow or easily erodible soils, and when clearance is not followed by good management. It is the dominant cause in only two countries here (Liberia and Central African Republic) and usually does not reach the level of its relative incidence world-wide, where it accounts for 36 percent of total degradation. But it affects most countries to a significant extent.
The role of population dynamics vis-à-vis other factors in deforestation is a much debated issue. In much of the sub-region forest clearance appears to have occurred mostly under the pressure of needs for more cropland and pastures; in addition, forest degradation occurs because of excess livestock grazing in wooded areas as well as collection of wood for human use, especially fuel.
Overcutting of vegetation occurs when people cut forests, woodlands and shrublands--to obtain timber, fuelwood and other products--at a pace exceeding the rate of natural regrowth. This is frequent in semi-arid environments, where fuelwood shortages are often severe. The phenomenon is significant in three countries here (Chad, Nigeria and Central African Republic).
Overgrazing is the grazing of natural pastures at stocking intensities above the livestock carrying capacity; the resulting decrease in the vegetation cover is a leading cause of wind and water erosion. It accounts for 35 percent of the total extent of degradation world-wide. Here it affects eight countries, with a very high relative incidence in Chad, Kenya and Ethiopia/ Eritrea (50 percent or more of the degraded area).
Agricultural activities that can cause land degradation include shifting cultivation without adequate fallow periods, absence of soil conservation measures, cultivation of fragile or marginal lands, unbalanced fertilizer use, and faulty planning or management of irrigation--in other words, land mismanagement in general. At the global level they account for 28 percent of the total land degradation. In this sub-region they are a prominent factor in almost all countries (the exceptions being Chad, the Central African Republic and Ethiopia/Eritrea) and by far the major factor in Rwanda and Burundi.
The role of population factors in land degradation processes obviously occurs in the context of the underlying causes. Population pressure operates through giving rise to land shortages, and through other mechanisms as well. Improper agricultural practices, for instance, occur only under constraints such as the saturation of good lands under population pressure which leads settlers to cultivate too shallow or too steep soils, plough fallow land before it has recovered its fertility, or attempt to obtain multiple crops by irrigating unsuitable soils.
4. A close-up on water resource issues
Because of the water scarcity problem, population growth "is at the heart of the problem of semi-arid development [...] The fundamental importance of water both for habitability and for rural access to biomass for food, fodder, fuelwood and timber makes water scarcity a crucial problem in the struggle for a higher quality of life of poor rural populations"; where habitability is reduced by water shortages, emigration is a habitual consequence (Falkenmark, 1990).
Water issues in Africa are serious, generally due to the irregularity and unreliability of supply over time and space. Average (per caput) supply at the country level is often low, and continued population growth constantly reduces that supply as resources are fixed. In effect, situations in 2025 have been projected based on recent population projections and renewable water supply estimates (Engelman and LeRoy, 1993) using the classical scale of levels of competition for water. 7/
Those calculations show that:
Let us now consider the respective roles of agriculture, industry and domestic uses of water, as reported in Table 4.
The region is characterized by:
The implication of these patterns is that there still is quite some potential for increases in water demand, as economies diversify and living standards rise. Unless large gains are made in efficient use of irrigation water and conservation or rehabilitation of damaged irrigated areas, the crunch is likely to severely damage economic competitivity in addition to health and the quality of life.
Table 4. Percent distribution by sector of annual water withdrawals in the "East and Central Africa" sub-region
| Domestic | Industry | Agriculture | |
| Sierra Leone | 7 | 4 | 89 |
| Liberia | 27 | 13 | 60 |
| Ghana | 35 | 13 | 52 |
| Nigeria | 31 | 15 | 54 |
| Chad | 16 | 2 | 82 |
| Central African Rep. | 21 | 5 | 74 |
| Uganda | 32 | 8 | 60 |
| Rwanda | 5 | 2 | 94 |
| Burundi | 36 | - | 64 |
| Tanzania | 9 | 2 | 89 |
| Kenya | 20 | 4 | 76 |
| Ethiopia | 11 | 3 | 86 |
| Eritrea | .. | .. | .. |
| AFRICA | 7 | 5 | 88 |
| Source: World Resources Institute (1996). |
5. Population-environment linkages and population programmes
In this final section we shall try to identify possible activities in the population/environment area for this sub-region. For this purpose we shall first of all refer to the priorities set by the Agenda 21--the main basis for international organizations' environmental mandates--in the area of demographic dynamics and sustainability (Chapter 5). The focus is on the first programme area, namely "Developing and disseminating knowledge concerning the links between demographic trends and factors and sustainable development", where the following activities are proposed (United Nations, 1993):
Since the countries of this sub-region are widely affected by environmental problems, many of which ascribable at least in part to population factors, there is ample scope for activities along these lines.
A first line of activities, aiming at improving the understanding of processes at work, would consist in retrospective studies, such as:
Next comes a group of activities more practically oriented towards policy formulation. Some (4-6) are geared to establish necessary information bases and current diagnoses; others (7) are more of the "policy study" type in the strict sense, i.e. geared to assess the implications of alternative courses of action or alternative scenarios regarding exogenous variables.
All these activities are meant to produce utilizable results in the policy making context (i.e. the second programme area of the Agenda 21, namely the formulation of integrated environment and development policies taking into account demographic trends and factors). In most if not all cases, their promotion at government level and successful pursuit will require two types of activities:
Finally, it is worth noting that population-environment linkages are, in many settings, an interesting addition to traditional population education themes:
UNFPA support could be considered for some of these activities. UNFPA first stated its interest for studying selected aspects of the population-environment nexus several years ago already, in its Handbook of Policy Guidelines. Following the ICPD, UNFPA undertook to revise its programmatic guidelines. In the population and environment area this task was effectively tackled only in 1997; the outcome is a well-articulated Guidance Note on Population and the Environment, the substance of which is the following.
Consistent with the Agenda 21 framework and the ICPD Programme of Action (United Nations, 1995) UNFPA can support, within its three thematic areas, the following types of population and environment projects:
Population and development policies and plans should take environmental links and concerns into account. UNFPA can help this process through "studies for incorporating demographic features into policies and plans as well as programmes designed to integrate the direct and induced effects of demographic changes on environment and development programmes".
Policy-oriented research and analysis should bear on "the interaction between demographic trends and factors and sustainable development [and help] identify priority areas for action and develop strategies and programmes to mitigate the adverse impact of environmental change on human populations, and vice versa". Examples of important issues are:
Since the integration of population and environmental factors cannot be pursued without appropriately trained personnel--particularly in the public sector--capacity building is crucial. UNFPA should "support relevant training in population and the environment for persons from appropriate agencies in the public sector" and "from accredited national, regional and international NGOs".
The need for advocacy is also recognized, for "sustained support for viewing environmental issues in a population context will depend on [the] creation of awareness and the dissemination of understanding of the links between population and environment are important steps in the sustainable development process. UNFPA should "support activities to inform, educate, and communicate on the nature of the issues involved [as well as] actively support community efforts and the production and dissemination of relevant information material".
In view "of the multi-disciplinary nature of many of the issues involved in population and environment linkages"--and of limited resources--international assistance should involve all relevant UN agencies and NGOs. In this context UNFPA will concentrate on the population side of the population-environment linkage, and priority will be given to projects that can be used as immediate inputs into policy making in countries and geographical areas experiencing the most acute population and environmental problems.
Country needs for these various kinds of inputs to country policies should be systematically assessed in the context of programming at the country level. In addition, there would be great value in undertaking country activities, such as those suggested above, in a coordinated manner in groups of countries that share the same issues and therefore can benefit both from one another's experience, both in data collection/analysis and in applying thematic knowledge to policy making.
Regional patterns of land degradation
The extent of the degradation problem and its patterns vary notably among regions:
Table 5 below quantifies the area not affected by degradation or wasteland,
as a proportion of total land area,
by region:
North America......
1/ The data sources for Table 1 are the following. Population size and growth rate: United
Nations
(1996); urban population percentage and growth rate: United Nations (1997); cropland and
forest:
FAO (1995) or AGROSTAT data base; water resources: derived from Engelman and LeRoy
(1993),
assuming no change in country resources. Per caput indices of natural resources
availability have been
corrected to take into account the sometimes drastic changes in retrospective population estimates
that
occurred between the United Nations' 1994 and 1996 revisions.
2/ Such reports were presented by all countries covered by the CST except Liberia. "Ethiopia"
is the
then People's Democratic Republic (PDR), including now independent Eritrea.
3/ The United Nations Conference on Desertification, which popularized this word, defined
it as "the reduction or destruction of the land's potential, finally resulting in the appearance of
desert conditions" (United Nations, 1977). Although one should use the concept only in
reference to processes which have resulted in desert conditions or will shortly and inevitably do
so, it is often used in a broader sense. The term "desertification" has other annoying aspects.
It gives no information on the nature of the degradation, hence on possible corrective actions.
It misstates the problems: "the concept of expanding deserts and advancing sand dunes has
become the dominant image in the public's eye rather than [...] less visible and much more
serious problems" (Liamine, 1993), in particular "more subtle, more complex, pulsating
deteriorations [...] radiating out from centers of excessive population pressure (Nelson, 1990).
And it seems to designate an absolute evil, while the salinization of an irrigated area, although
reversible, may be a greater loss than the washing away of the last inch of topsoil in a marginal
area. For FAO (1986) desertification "is only one extreme aspect of the widespread deterioration
of ecosystems under the combined pressure of adverse climate and agricultural exploitation".
4/All the quotes in this section are from United Nations (1992).
5/ For a comparison of land degradation patterns among regions of the world, see the Annex,
p.18.
6/ Globally 83 percent of land degradation is in the form of erosion: 70 percent mere loss of
topsoil and 13
percent more severe terrain deformation.
7/ Population pressures under 600 persons per flow unit (P/FU; 1 FU = 1 million cubic meters)
are not
considered a serious issue, although water quality problems and dry season supply problems may
occur.
Between 600 and 1000 P/FU, chances of more recurrent quantitative or/and qualitative supply
problems
increase notably: this is called the "water stress" stage. Between 1000 and 2000
P/FU such problems are
common and affect human and economic development; this is the "scarcity" stage.
2000 P/FU is seen as the
maximum population pressure that can be handled in the present state of technology and
management
capabilities; it has been labeled "water barrier". This scale was developed from the
observation of areas
where both per caput supplies and resource use problems were well
documented.
8/Scarcity-related concepts are indicative, in view of the different adaptive capacities of
countries. In
particular, the water barrier concept should not be taken literally; even if water shortage is
indeed a medium-term barrier to development, there is a priori no indication that
solutions for the long term cannot be found.
Rather than impending absolute physical limits, the indicator points to steeply increasing
costs of supply on
account of increased investment and recurrent expenditure for water supply, treatment and/or
re-use; in turn,
the cost issue points to likely social problems for cost recovery. On the other hand,
"in arid conditions, the
problem is more complex because of considerable seasonal variations in rainfall. The largest
need for
irrigation water is during the dry season when the water accessible to people can be as low as
10 percent of
the annual flow. Even countries with an average competition level of only 50 [P/FU]
have considerable
allocation problems during the dry season"; in addition, "national figures do not reflect the stress
on water
resources quality in local areas exerted by rapid urbanization and industrialization" (Falkenmark
and
Widstrand, 1992).
Engelman, E. and P. LeRoy (1993): Sustaining water. Population and the future of
renewable water
supplies. Washington, Population Action International.
Falkenmark, M. (1990): "Rapid population growth and water scarcity: the predicament of
tomorrow's
Africa", in: Resources, environment and population (K. Davis and M.S. Bernstam,
eds.), pp. 81-94.
Supplement to Population and Development Review, vol. 16.
Falkenmark, M. and Widstrand, C. (1992): Population and water resources: a delicate
balance.
Population Bulletin (Population Reference Bureau, Washington), vol. 47 no. 3.
FAO (1986): African agriculture: the next 25 years. Rome.
FAO (1995): Country tables. Basic data on the agricultural sector. Rome.
ISRIC (1991): World map of the status of human-induced soil degradation (by L.R.
Oldeman, R.T.A.
Hakkeling and W.G. Sombroek). Global Assessment of Soil Degradation (GLASOD). Nairobi,
UNEP.
Liamine, N. (1993): "Desertification - The issues and challenges",
Ecoforum, vol. 17 no. 1/2 (April)
pp. 11-21.
Nelson, R. (1990): Dryland management - The "desertification" problem. World
Bank Technical Paper
No 116. Washington.
United Nations (1977): Round-up, Plan of action and resolutions of UNCOD. New
York.
United Nations (1992): Nations of the Earth report. UNCED national reports
summaries. New York.
United Nations (1993): Agenda 21: Programme of action for sustainable
development. New York.
United Nations (1995): Programme of action adopted at the International Conference on
population
and Development, Cairo, 5-13 September 1994. New York.
United Nations (1996): World population prospects: the 1996 revision. New
York.
United Nations (1997): World urbanization prospects: the 1996 revision. New
York.
World Resources Institute (1996): World resources 1996-97. New York,
Oxford University Press.
91 percent WORLD.............. 74 percent
South America...... 85 percent Asia.............. 71
percent
Australasia........ 78 percent Central America....... 62
percent
Europe............. 77 percent Africa................ 59
percent