President
William J. Clinton
Millennium
Summit
September 6,
2000
Mr.
President,
Mr.
Secretary General,
My
fellow leaders:
It is an
honor to host in the United States this unprecedented gathering of world
leaders. We meet at a remarkable moment -- when more of the world's people
enjoy prosperity, freedom, and democracy than ever before. We are unlocking the
human genome, exploring new frontiers of science, drawing nearer together
through the most extraordinary technology. Yet the Secretary General, in his
Millennium Report, reminds us that our greatest challenges are all unmet: to
free humanity from poverty, disease, and war; to reverse environmental
destruction; and to make this United Nations a more effective instrument in
pursuing all these aims. Today, I would like to address part of that challenge,
but one intertwined with the others: the making and keeping of peace.
Fifty-five years ago, the
UN was formed "to save succeeding generations from the scourge of
war." We are that succeeding generation. There are assembled here more
people with the power to create peace than have ever gathered together in one
place in the history of the world. Can we seize this moment?
Today, there are fewer
wars between nations, but more wars within nations. Internal wars often driven
by ethnic and religious differences - took five million lives in the 1990s, the
vast majority innocent victims. This trend presents us with a stark, collective
challenge. We must respect sovereignty and territorial integrity. But whether
it is diplomacy, sanctions, or collective force, we must find ways to protect people
as well as borders. How shall we do that?
One essential lesson of
the last century is this: There are times when the international community must
take a side - not merely stand between the sides. For when good and evil
collide, even-handedness can be an ally of evil.
We faced such a test and
met it when Slobodan Milosevic, tried to close the century with a final chapter
of ethnic slaughter. We have faced such a test for 10 years in Iraq. The UN has
approved a fair blueprint spelling out what Iraq must do. It must be enforced for
the credibility of the UN is at stake. We face a clear moral test today in
Burma, where a popular leader who has struggled peacefully for dialogue has
once again been confined, with hey supporters imprisoned and her country in
distress, all in defiance of repeated UN Resolutions. On each of these matters,
we must not be silent.
But most conflicts and
disputes are not so clear-cut. Legitimate grievances are piled high on all
sides. It is wrenching to put aside the instinct to avenge old grievances. But
those who hope through peace to redress all their grievances are not seeking
peace. They are still waging war.
Right now, from Burundi to
the Middle East to the Congo to South Asia, leaders are facing a choice between
confrontation and compromise. Among them Chairman Arafat and Prime Minister
Barak are with us today. To those who have supported the right of Israel to
live in security and peace to those who have championed the Palestinian cause
these many years - let me say, the time to help both sides take risks for peace
is now. It will not be easy. But there is not a moment to lose.
When leaders do seize the
passing chance for peace history stops ... and then starts again in a new
direction. That's when outside support, including from the UN, is most
important. The UN increasingly is being called into situations of great
uncertainty - where courageous leaders seek reconciliation, but where enemies
of peace seek to undermine it, and where social and economic institutions must
be built to keep alive the hope for peace.
In East Timor, had the UN
not engaged the people would have lost the chance to control their future. Yet,
the UN did not have the tools to prevent abuses that followed the vote for
independence. In Sierra Leone, had the UN had not engaged, countless children
now living would be dead at the hands of thugs. And yet this year, the UN did
not have the tools to deter
challenges by those same groups
One answer to this problem would be to
say: we should not ask the UN to do what it is not equipped to do. Our
answer should be: let us equip the UN to do what we ask.
We need better machinery
to ensure UN peacekeepers can be rapidly deployed, with the right training and
equipment, the ability to project credible force, and missions well-defined by
a well functioning headquarters. To meet this challenge, we must also more
effectively deploy civilian police to UN missions.
We must also work with
just as much passion and persistence to prevent conflict, recognizing
the iron link between deprivation and war. In too many places, it is easier for
children to find guns than textbooks So we must build on our initiative to
provide free meals for 9 million children around the world, encouraging
families to send their sons and their
daughters to school. Too many countries
are crippled by debt, so we must further our efforts with the G-7 and other
creditors to reduce the debts of developing countries that invest the savings
in basic needs. Too many nations face a tidal wave of infectious diseases like
malaria, tuberculosis and AIDS, which cause one quarter of all deaths in the
world. So we must intensify our work together to promote prevention and to
stimulate the development of drugs and vaccines.
We must also work to stop
the flow of money that finances brutal conflict, whether curbing the trade, in
conflict diamonds in Africa or the trade of drugs in Colombia. And we must keep
promoting democracy not only the best system of government, but the best system
of conflict prevention ever devised.
These efforts come with a
price tag, all nations, including my own, must meet our obligations to the UN.
And those with the capacity to increase their support must do so. Reform of the
UN's financial structure must be made if the organization is to meet the demands
we make of it. Those who believe we can either do without the UN, or impose our
will upon it, have not learned from history and do not understand the future.
My friends: The bloodiest wars in human
history belong now to another century. We have a chance for a fresh start. Can
we seize this chance for peace? The answer is not waiting to be revealed; it is
waiting to be created by the force of our actions. For history, to us, is what
we react. But history, to our children, is what we do. Let them read one day
that we came together in a moment of choice ... and chose to change the world.
God bless you and thank you.