ADDRESS BY
DR. TH HON. KENNY D. ANTHONY
PRIME MINISTER, MINISTER FOR
FINANCE,
ECONOMIC AFFAIRS AND
INFORMATION
OF SAINT LUCIA
TO THE MILLENNIUM SUMMIT
OF THE UNITED NATIONS
NEW YORK
SEPTEMBER 07, 2000
STATEMENT BY THE HONOURABLE
DR. KENNY ANTHONY
PRIME MINISTER OF SAINT
LUCIA
TO THE MILLENNIUM SUMMIT,
SEPTEMBER 7. 2000
Co - Chairs of this millennium Summit
Excellencies,
We are gathered here
today to reaffirm our faith in this organization - this United Nations.
We are gathered here to reconfirm that the principles and purposes of its
Charter can safely lead us in the new millennium - to give us the ageless
expectation of a world free of poverty, free of hunger, free of war, free of
the dictatorship of the mighty, free for us to enjoy our right to development.
But why should Saint Lucia, an island of 238 square miles with a population of
155,000 persons be interested in the will and conscience of the United Nations?
Has this body demonstrated in any way that it is a sanctuary for small island
developing states? Was it not a promise of its birth to protect the weak,
vulnerable and marginalized? Was this not the hope?
So, Excellencies, I
ask you, where is the hope when the World trade Organization has orchestrated
the destruction of the economies of some small Caribbean countries, through a
ruling that condemns the preferential marketing arrangements for their bananas
in Europe as being anti free trade? How can this be just when these
arrangements are a life force of the economies of these countries? How can this
be defensible when the Caribbean banana trade represents only 2% of world
banana trade? Where is equity, justice, and fairness when other developing
countries participate in this attack on our livelihood?
Where is the promise
when the member countries of the OECD arrogate to themselves, the right to
pronounce on the efficacy of the international financial services industries of
a number of Caribbean countries; when they imperiously seek to determine the
nature of our tax regimes by blacklisting those industries as harmful tax
havens? Harmful to whom Mr. President? In this new age, we are exhorted to be
competitive. Yet, whenever we manage to succeed in this endeavour, our
developed world shouts foul and accuses us of being harmful and discriminatory.
Therefore, I say to
you, Excellencies, that those prophets of the new age of globalization and
trade liberalization, who trumpet hope in their praises of that new age, do so
only because they are the ones who enjoy its benefits. . But for us in small
island states like Saint. Lucia, what we hear is the deafening silence of a new
order that ignores our special needs. What we experience is the insensitivity
and the disinterest of the mighty (is they manipulate the system for their
selfish ends. How can we laud the new order? How can we sing its praises ?
Excellencies
We are gathered here
at a time of supreme paradox in the history of mankind? We meet (it a time when
the peoples of the world can celebrate the unparalled progress that mankind has
made in this last century. Yet, we are gathering at a time when they can also
reflect on the unprecedented horrors and contradictions that human civilisation
has visited upon itself during that epoch. On the one hand,
we
have a world of unlimited possibility, a world of technological wizardry -
all inflated to millennial proportions. On the other hand, there is a digital
divide that more than ever extends the gap between the haves and the have -
nots into "those who know* from *those who don't"
Today, life expectancy
has increased. Educational, nutritional and health standards have improved
qualitatively and quantitatively; but, we have never, ever, been stricken by
the nature and scale of diseases that presently afflict us.
The world's economy
has generated more wealth than at any other time in history and the prospects
for economic prosperity are a lot brighter for a larger percentage of the
world's population than ever before. But Excellencies, how can we explain the
fact that, according to The Conference Report on Eradicating Global Poverty: Parliamentary Action Agenda for the
21st Century ", three billion people
on the planet are living on less than one dollar a day, that One billion subsist on less than three dollars a day? Today, the
combined wealth of the three richest people in the world is greater than the
combined Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of the forty-eight poorest
countries in the world. Of the one hundred largest economies in the world, f
fifty-one are corporations, not countries.
How
can we explain the fact that international assistance from wealthy countries to poorer countries has
reached its lowest point in twenty years? Where is the collective conscience of
human kind, where is our sense of justice, where is the brotherhood that binds
us together. Where is the hope?
Today, there is (in evil stalking our civilization. It is the trafficking and consumption of illicit drugs. Day after day one of our young citizens succumbs to these drugs, and I know that we may have lost another genius. Day after day, we persist in pursuing strategies that are clearly not working king. We must urgently review those strategies. We must consider and commit ourselves to new approaches to eradicating the scourge of drug trafficking and addiction, otherwise we will not only lose our young people but communities, and in time, governments.
Excellencies,
If the United Nations
truly wishes to embrace small states and the developing world and give us the
promise of its birth, it must redefine global governance so as to embody the
key principles of inclusiveness, equality, transparency and participatory
action. Due deference and recognition must be paid to the special conditions of
small developing countries. We must accept the constraints imposed upon them by
geography and population size. We must understand their limited internal
markets and resource endowment. We must appreciate their low levels of economic
diversification. We must realise their high susceptibility to external shocks.
We must sympathise with their vulnerability to natural disasters and the
effects of environmental change. The United Nations System must take the
leading role in the refashioning of multilateral economic governance so as to
establish a new regime that is fully legitimate and effective, so that states
like as a Saint Lucia given their
openness, small size, diseconomies of scale and vulnerability are not further
victimized, marginalized and ostracised.
What is therefore needed is a paradigm shift - a paradigm shift that will place the all
encompassing issue of human security at the heart of the United Nations agenda
as we seek to shape a new vision for the 21st century. If the 21' century is to
be a century of prosperity for all, then people must be placed at the centre of
development. Consequently, the United Nations System cannot continue to operate quasi concert of great powers.
Excellencies
The new millennium presents for us a special historical opportunity, a
chance for new beginnings, a window through which desired moral imperatives can
infuse the international system with new guiding principles for a different,
fairer world order. In the existing plethora of international organizations,
the United Nations System must lie at the legislative and normative centre of
the world order. The United Nations system is the only universal forum capable
of institutionalising development cooperation. Yet rich and powerful members of
this body seek to denature it and strip it of its developmental role and focus.
In the context of the global order, the United Nations must become the eternal
symbol of the world community for equality in rights and unity of action; an
institution where weakness can be ameliorated by justice and fairness. We
cannot build a civilization without a conscience.
Saint Lucia therefore looks forward to the convening
next year of the Conference on Financing for Development when development,
economic and systemic issues will be addressed.
Excellencies
If there is to be hope that United Nations can
fashion a 21" Century free of want
and free of fear, then we must accept. that the
pursuit of genuine global peace and security cannot be attained merely through
peacekeeping, but rather by addressing the root causes of conflict, poverty,
deprivation, and discrimination among the world's peoples and nations.
I thank you.